refine all the data into a solid, evidence based case against the perps and their supporting debunkers, I also use it to ultimately improve the quality of arguments and evidence I present to newcomers of 9/11 truth.

Whilst I agree that activism is VERY important and is really the only way we can help educate folks that are too busy to find out for themselves, not everyone discovers 9/11 truth that way.

I can only speak for myself, but something inside me after 9/11 knew there was a massive problem with this world and I wanted to find out more.

During my learning, I longed for quality research, like that is now coming out.

So yes, I agree with you somewhat, but just looking at your JFK argument where almost everyone (more than 90%) are aware of the "lone gunman sham", yet it still has not caused the real perps to brought to justice.

I'm really unsure why you're so anti-research, how can what Richard Gage does, be seen as stalling, when he meets with many architects and presents his research. The same goes for many other great researchers, who get up in front of the public to share the truth.

Anyway, I believe it's horses for courses and many do what they can to progress 9/11 truth, of course there are many that just want to supress it too.

The mainstream media is the nut that must be cracked.

Good luck and best wishes

The movement needs three things: analysis, activism, political action.

One thing to remember is what people still believe. The common person, even the informed common person, is still not aware that architects and engineers, who know their stuff and can apply it to the towers' destruction, can now demonstrate demolition. That represents analysis.

This video helps correct that. So it helps the activism. Activism definitely needs clear-headed analysis backing it up.

On to politics: If we get someone, anyone, to initiate investigation, it sure won't hurt to have expertly assembled evidence, as shown here to a great extent, in this video. It doesn't hurt to keep assembling evidence, IMO.

Action is maybe the most urgent now, agreed. But all three of these are required, even now, it seems to me.

Yes, Yes , Yes to all the above.

I wonder how much longer we are going to research this also. And if we will just become another personality cult. You know, some people thrive off of debate for the thrill of being "right". If you spend your whole life debating how the burglar is stealing your jewelry, what kind of knife he's using to kill your wife, what he looks like, what did he get fingerprints on, etc.

You're still left with a crime at the end of the day.