dougr's blog

Who can handle Truth?

When a government lies about something and most people find it easier or more comfortable to believe the government's lies than to accept the truth, what can the minority of people who CAN handle the Truth do about it? They can organize to wake up more and more people. Some waking is more difficult than others. Waking people up to 9/11 is pretty high up on the scale in that regard.

Is it true that 9/11 was an inside job? Yes, the evidence is overwhelming.
Is it true that high tech means were used to explode the towers? Yes, the explosiveness of the events were definitely not low tech. The pulverization was too complete.
Does the 9/11 Truth Movement KNOW what type of explosives were used? Besides thermate, what other types of explosives were used to pulverize the towers so completely?
Does the government/military possess technology of which the public, and indeed most people inside the government itself, are unaware? Yes.
Is there, perhaps, a huge area of Truth as yet unexplored by the 9/11 Truth Movement that might have a bearing on the events of 9/11? Yes.

Administration going toe-to-toe with Truth Movement on 9/11?'s a really weird one. The text following the url below is from a blog titled

Informed Comment Global Affairs: Group blog on Current Events

The blog entry's author is Barnett Rubin.
Barnett Rubin is a CFR member............cue the Twilight Zone music.

From a straight take on what he says it looks like the administration is going to try to drown out the 6th anniversary Truth events.
Maybe more and larger Truth actions and events need to take place on the 9th and 10th.
A big Truth roar on those 2 days will make it look obvious to more people that the
administration is scared of the Truth if/when cheney rolls out the new product on the 11th:
"Today I received a message from a friend who has excellent connections in Washington and whose information has often been prescient. According to this report, as in 2002, the rollout will start after Labor Day, with a big kickoff on September 11. My friend had spoken to someone in one of the leading neo-conservative institutions. He summarized what he was told this way:


BAE Systems has on its board William Schneider Jr. who is also connected with
International Planning Services, Inc.: President
G2 Satellite Solutions: Advisory board
Defense Forecasts International: Member, Board of Directors
Defense Group, Inc.(DGI): Member, Board of Directors

Schneider was a signatory to 7 of the 13 most commonly referenced letters and statements which outline the goals espoused in the Project for a New American Century...the neocon manifesto.

One of these letters, written within 9 days after 9/11 states, in part,
"A serious and victorious war on terrorism will require a large increase in defense spending. Fighting this war may well require the United States to engage a well-armed foe, and will also require that we remain capable of defending our interests elsewhere in the world. We urge that there be no hesitation in requesting whatever funds for defense are needed to allow us to win this war."

Then in Jan 2003,
"To rebuild, transform, and man our military adequately for its many missions and responsibilities, defense spending will need to be increased by an additional $70 to $100 billion."

Truth Kit

No theories, no controversy, no references to opinion, no conspiricizing....just cold, hard science and reason.

....The first shows that, "...the explanations of the collapse that have been given by the 9/11 Commission Report and NIST are not physically possible."
Impossible must be taken in its most literal sense here:

From the rooftop of WTC1, drop one dark blue billiard ball over the edge. As it falls, it accelerates. If it were in a vacuum, it would hit the pavement, 1368 feet below, in 9.22 seconds, shown by the blue curve in the figure 1, below. It will take longer if air resistance is considered, but for simplicity, we'll neglect air resistance. This means that the calculated collapse times are more generous to the official story than they need to be.

Figure 1. Minimum Time for a Billiard Ball dropped from the roof of WTC1 to hit the pavement below, assuming no air resistance:
Notice that the billiard ball begins to drop very slowly, then accelerates with the pull of gravity. If in a vacuum, the blue ball will hit the pavement, 1368 ft. below, 9.22 seconds after it is dropped. That is, unless it is propelled by explosives, it will take at least 9.22 seconds to reach the ground (assuming no air resistance).

Getting good information out there

The amount of hits 911Blogger is getting is very impressive. To see that so many people are interested in the message here is very encouraging.

However, people that come here are already prepared to hear the truth.
There are other people out there who haven't been exposed to the level of information required to bring them to sites such as this one. With that in mind I've started to visit some of the more popular politically oriented blogs armed with information and laying it out.

First I tried Daily Kos. That site, for reasons having to do with "popularity", has a stated policy that no "conspiracy" related entries are allowed. Breaking that policy results in being banned from the site. Although that's a distressing state of affairs I attempted to crash the gate there. I'd been a kos member for a couple years and most of my entries had to do with the sad progress toward a police state we're facing in this country.
Realizing that this attack on our freedoms stems directly from 9/11 I inched closer and closer to breaking that policy.
Yesterday I did. The incredibly bad response I got and my subsequent banning from the site did not deter me.

My next attempt was on Booman Tribune. There I was treated to the opportunity to engage in real, reasoned debate with Booman him(her?)self. The lesson here can work.