To say that communication between civilian Air Traffic Control (ATC) and NORAD was abysmal on the morning of September 11, 2001 would be a massive understatement. As an illustration, it took ATC twenty-three minutes to communicate to NORAD that American Airlines Flight 11 had been hijacked, and in the case of United Airlines Flight 175, ATC informed NORAD of that flight’s odyssey through northeast skies at 09:03, the same minute as Flight 175 impacted Two World Trade Center!

Continued at www.DNotice.org

http://www.rockcreekfreepress.com/CreekV2No9-Web.pdf

BY DEAN M. JACKSON

Testifying before the 9/11 Commission, General Richard Myers, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, told the commission in response to a question on NORAD’s failure to anticipate the 9/11 attacks, “I can’t answer the hypothetical. It’s more — it’s the way that we were directed to posture, looking outward.” As we will see below, NORAD, since its inception in 1958, was tasked with more than merely “looking outward”.

WWW.DNotice.org

IN "THE NORAD PAPERS III" WE LEARN THAT NOT ONLY WAS NORAD ‘INWARD’ LOOKING ON 9/11, BUT, ACCORDING TO THE General Accounting Office, NORAD'S INWARD MISSION HAD BECOME THE NEW FOCAL POINT FOR THE DEFENSE ORGANIZATION ‘POST’ USSR

www.DNotice.org

Remember Remember The Seventh Of July

On July 7, 2005, at 8:50 AM, three bombs were detonated more or less simultaneously at three stations of the London Underground subway system. Approximately one hour later at 9:47 AM another bomb detonated, this time above ground in a double-decker bus, at the intersection of Tavistock Square and Upper Woburn Place.1 Four men, three of Pakistani descent and a Jamaican, were identified by authorities as the bombers. Their names were Mohammad Sidique Khan, 30; Hasib Mir Hussain, 18; and Shehzad Tanweer, 22. The fourth bomber was Germaine Lindsay.2 Within two weeks of the attacks the authorities’ investigation seemed to be closing in on the party that put the four men up to the bombings. Sir Ian Blair, Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police (Met), said he expected to uncover a "clear al-Qaeda link".

http://www.dnotice.org/

One of Our Aircraft Isn’t Missing

At 11:43 am on the morning of 9/11 WCPO radio in Cincinnati posted an AP article titled "Plane Lands in Cleveland; Bomb Feared Aboard" concerning the strange occurrence of a commercial airliner making an emergency landing at Cleveland Hopkins Airport due to a bomb threat. AP reported that Mayor Michael R. White of Cleveland had identified the aircraft as a 767 out of Boston. Mayor White added that the aircraft had been moved to a secure area of the airport and evacuated. Why, one might ask, do I consider it strange that a commercial airliner experiencing a bomb threat would be diverted and landed before it reaches its destination? Strange because the AP article identified the aircraft in question as UAL Flight 93 (a Boeing 757), the very Flight 93 that crashed in Shanksville, Pa at 10:03 AM. In the third paragraph AP reports, "United identified the plane as Flight 93."

http://deanjackson60.googlepages.com/ifyoucan'ttaketheheat,getoutofthekitchen

NIST FORGETS TO RUN THE NUMBERS ON THE WTC TOWERS' HEAT SINKS! I WONDER WHY?

A critical missing element in the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) report on the collapse of the World Trade Center towers1 is the absence of any reference to the three-dimensional thermal conductivity properties of the structural steel network in those buildings, commonly referred to as the heat sink.2 Thermal conductivity "is the intrinsic property of a material which relates its ability to conduct [transfer] heat."3 Considering that each tower was made up of approximately 100,000 tons4 of inter-connective steel, and steel is known to be at least a fair conductor of heat, this neglect by NIST to analyze the towers’ heat sink properties nullifies NIST’s mission to determine why and how the towers collapsed....

http://deanjackson60.googlepages.com/home

When compared to the media circus that surrounded the pretrial investigation and ultimate trial and conviction of Scott Peterson in 2005 for the murder of his wife Laci and unborn child Conner, the just concluded Neil Entwistle murder case doesn’t even register a whisper. This is very curious. The Neil Entwistle case had all the elements necessary for a media circus…a wife shot to death in her home along with her 9-month old daughter, plus an international angle where the suspect husband flees back home to England.......

http://deanjackson60.googlepages.com/notsodeepimpact

What You Always Wanted To Know About The Kinetic Energy Damage To The WTC Towers, But Were Afraid To Ask:

"The buildings have been investigated and found to be safe in an assumed collision with a large jet airliner (Boeing 707 - DC 8) traveling at 600 miles per hour. Analysis indicates that such collision would result only in local damage which would not cause collapse or substantial damage to the building and would not endanger the lives and safety of occupants not in the immediate area of impact." Appendix A, NISTNCSTAR1-2, April 26, 2006 update.

"Our analysis indicated the biggest problem would be the fact that all the fuel (from the airplane) would dump into the building. There would be a horrendous fire. A lot of people would be killed," he said. "The building structure would still be there." John Skilling, Lead Structural Engineer for the WTC, The Seattle Times, February 27, 1993.

Kinetic Energy Calculations of Flight 11 and Flight 175 Impacts..........................

http://deanjackson60.googlepages.com/thenoradpapersii

In The NORAD Papers we learned from documents dating from the 1990s that NORAD had three core missions since its creation in 1958. These are:

a. surveillance and control of the airspace of the United States and Canada;

b. providing the NCAs with tactical warning and attack assessment of an aerospace attack against North America; and

c. providing an appropriate response to any form of an air attack.

The last two missions constitute NORAD’s "outward" search for hostile aircraft approaching the North American continent. NORAD’s first mission, however, tasks the agency to monitor and control all aircraft within the United States’ and Canada’s air space. This is what NORAD calls "air sovereignty". Let’s take a closer look at what constitutes "air sovereignty".

As reported by the Government Accountability Office in 1994 "NORAD defines air sovereignty as providing surveillance and control of the territorial airspace, which includes:

1. intercepting and destroying uncontrollable air objects;