Demolition wave caught on BBC special?
911truther Wed, 11/29/2006 - 2:25am
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5860825099435530591&sourceid=docidfeed&hl=en
Has anyone seen this? I got it from Rick Siegel's website (via whatreallyhappened.com).
If this is truly unedited, it's just another piece of A+ evidence that shows CD.
- 911truther's blog
- Login to post comments
I was going to post about
I was going to post about this, but hadn't gotten it all together yet..
I got a copy of this from one of our users who recorded it on a dvd-recorder from the BBC airing..
here is the hires wmv:
http://www.911podcasts.com/files/video/BBC_Clip_DVD.wmv
and the VOB:
http://www.911podcasts.com/files/video/BBC_Clip_DVD.VOB
the audio track is totally different than the original version of this clip:
http://www.mediumrecords.com/wtc/southtower.weststreet.mpg
I noticed that the collapse of the north towers in this documentary had a very similar sound as well.. it is my guess that the BBC took some 'creative license' and inserted their own sound effects track for both collapse clips they showed.. either that or the original clips had fabricated audio.. obviously one of them is real, and one of them is not.. i haven't ripped the 2nd collapse yet, but it would show the similarity in the audio, and then someone could track down the original.. it is my suggestion that we track this stuff down if at all possible..
The show was '9/11: The Twin Towers', under 'BBC One', and the actual production firm is referenced at the end.. i was going to get their contact info and try to figure out what was going on here.. i can look into it some more tomorrow night..
dz....
Last night I tried to post a blog with another anomoly with the South Tower collapse, but it didn't show up on here. Any idea what happened? It was a still from a zoomed in clip of the collapse that showed possible demolition damage affecting the upper part of the tower many floors above the impact damage. I also noticed this in another clip that was zoomed out.
---From a decon @ my church: "I want to tell you something very serious..very serious, but I don't want you to say 'I told you so'. I want you to forgive me..You were right. I know the truth about 9/11.
That is amazing. I
That is amazing. I downloaded the mpeg too, and with or without audio, the proof is what you see. It does appear the audio was boosted in the google, or maybe sampled badly on the mpeg, but that is immaterial. There is a clear demolition wave ahead of the collapse.
WOW!
More spin to come...
CCC-Media: Read, Watch, Think, Decide!
Everytime I see this
I'm pretty sure this clip has been around for a while, but, yeah, I don't know how anyone can look at that and not see the building exploding. What's David Ray Griffin's line? Something about "negative reasoning"? As in, never before has a building displayed all of the attributes of a controlled demolition and _not_ been a controlled demolition.
Something rumbles in the pit of my stomach when I see this clip. That sound you hear when you watch it is your conscience screaming out for justice.
notice the flare up of flames in the North Tower
As the collapse of South Tower begins. Remember that Willie Rodriguez says that when they heard the South Tower start to go from within the North Tower, they also heard a bang-bang-bang series of explosions from inside there. It is similar to the flare up you can see in other videos as the North Tower begins to collapse.
In addition with the curious near simultaneous timing of the basement explosions with the first impact, this screams to me that the various series of explosions were timed to blend as much as possible in with sounds that had other plausible explanations (plane crash, neighboring tower collapse)
____
Real Truther a.k.a. Verdadero Verdadero
WTCdemolition.com - Harvard Task Force
Have you ever blown on
Have you ever blown on embers in order to rekindle a fire? The collapse of the South Tower is pushing air into the fire in the North Tower.
i think the concussion from
i think the concussion from a massive explosion could move enough air to cause such flare ups. the same is seen when the 2nd plane hits. it's really just speculation either way i suppose.
And what about Willie's testimony?
Also, I have blown on embers and as the air is being blow at the embers they just glow brightly (you're blowing off the accumulation of ash) and after you stop is when the flames pop up.
If the air coming from the south tower was doing something similar, I think it would look different--sounds like a false analogy, i.e. no reason to compare the situation in the towers with a wood fire.
____
Real Truther a.k.a. Verdadero Verdadero
WTCdemolition.com - Harvard Task Force
What makes the embers glow
What makes the embers glow when you blow is the oxygen and not the removal of ash.
Please explain what important differences exist between a wood fire and a building fire that are consequential in terms of how oxygen would interact with flames. Also in what way would it "look different" if the fall of the south tower pushed oxygen into the fire in the North Tower?
The audio track is fake...
The audio track is fake...
poisoning the well
The video shows the wave for sure, but the fact the audio is spliced together from other video's and that BLAST sound sounds completely synthetic (+ noise + linear increase in volume)...
While the video is older, it has been sexed up big time and no where is this being stated on the google video entry...
Another reason to be suspicious is this very video was discussed here before (sorry I am not good at searching through the blog entries) and the same conclusions as above were stated (seemed the audio was edited, and color was added).
And my red flag, Rick Siegel is promoting it...
[the "Oh My God" is a dead give away that it is edited]
This is a classic example of taking important evidence (that was not confiscated by the FEMA, FBI, DoJ, NIST, etc.) and trying hard to insert a reason to doubt its credibility. If two versions of this video exists (this new one did not exist BEFORE the BBC broadcast) then months later doubt will exist as to the credibility of both.
Don't fall for this trick... (I suspect that was the orginal purpose of 911 Eyewitness, to misdirect attention of the helicopters , which may have been the source for the radio signals for the detonators - unobstructed view of the towers and/or visual signaling to ground teams to begin the detonation sequence)
Please keep in mind what brought Dan Rather down...
A carefully forged document was created with all the correct information about George W. Bush and his Air National Guard service. This then found its way into Rather's hands and brought him down and by fallacious reasoning "proved" Bush had completed his Guard service and met his obligations.
Beware of Greeks bearing gifts!
It is interesting to note that Rather is the only MSM commentator who called the CD as he saw it live, perhaps part of the reason he was targeted for removal. I'd love to chat with him for just 5 minutes about 9/11.
Keep up the fight, brothers and sisters. Truth will prevail!
The truth shall set us free. Love is the only way forward.
Be well.
He who giveth can taketh away...
Dan Rather's "fib"
Dan Rather, at the time an unknown newscaster from a small market Texas TV station, viewed the Zapruder film, then described it to America on the CBS network. As this recording of that broadcast shows, Rather lied to all of America in claiming that the head shot pushed John F. Kennedy's head forward. Rather's meteoric rise to network status and stardom soon followed. When the Zapruder film was finally shown publicly, during Jim Garrison's trial of CIA agent Clay Shaw, Rather's lie was revealed for all to see. Sound file provided by www.warrencommission.com.
source: http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/RANCHO/POLITICS/JFK/jfk.html
Peter Jennings also mentioned demolition
not as it happened, but in subsequent commentary. it's clear that it took a while for the word to spread that this was a no no...
____
Real Truther a.k.a. Verdadero Verdadero
WTCdemolition.com - Harvard Task Force
Whoever edited this tape purposely omitted...
evidence that clearly shows a bomb detonating approximately 50-60 floors below the point of where the airplane impacted.
http://terrorize.dk/911/wtc2dem12/demolition.wave.170.jpg
http://terrorize.dk/911/wtc2dem12/burst.3.jpg
Some try to explain this explosion as just "air" being forced out due to the collapse above it, but that would be impossible, due to the distance between that particular explosion and where the building started to collapse.
This video shows that the explosion and the "collapse" both occured at approximately the same time:
http://terrorize.dk/911/wtc2dem12/911.wtc.2.demolition.south.below.mpg
Now compare that video to the edited version:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5860825099435530591&sourceid=do...
It's quite obvious that this video was edited to hide that explosion 50-60 floors below the "collapse"/impact zone..