NFL great Mark Stepnoski talks about 9/11

Mark Stepnoski gained fame as a lineman with the Dallas Cowboys, and was with that team for two superbowl wins. In an interview in today's Erie Times News, Stepnoski gives some reasons for his interest in the 9/11 truth movement:

Q. Anything else you want people to know?

A. Well, you asked. I've got a lot of things I like to do, I read a lot and travel and all that. I don't even know if you want to get into this, since it's a little bit political in tone. But I'm really interested now in the things the 9/11 truth movement is doing. I guess I could spend a lot time talking about that and cover all kinds of policies and statistics, but I don't know how much people want to know.

It interests me because I don't think we're being told truth about what really happened on Sept. 11, 2001. I'm highly skeptical of government accounts of what really happened. It's one of those things that really won't go away. I've been reading about that event and studying about it a great deal. I've read several books and a lot online pretty much since it happened, just because I'm curious about it and just because of other events in our historical past, like the Kennedy assassination for example.

Before anyone wants to try and pigeonhole me as conspiracy theorist, it's like a lot of things. If you're just willing to scratch beneath the surface and do a little research maybe you can find out some things, maybe more people would be more skeptical about our government's involvement with 9/11.

I used to read a lot of things on one Web site called "From the Wilderness." The site no longer exists. It was run by a guy named Mike Ruppert, who wrote one of the best books on the subject called "Crossing the Rubicon." It came out right after the 9/11 Commission report a few years ago, and I read it right after it came out.

We're being lied to. That's what bothers me the most. There's a lot of evidence in almost any area of the entire event, and you can bring up a lot of inconsistencies and unanswered questions just about the event itself. Two of the three steel-frame buildings that day collapsed due to fire, and that's never happened before, never in history. But that day it happened three times, including one building that didn't get hit by a plane. Building Number 7 didn't get hit by a plane and it went straight down in six and a half seconds. In the vast majority of U.S. cities that would have been the tallest building in the city. It had nothing but a couple of small fires on a couple of floors, but it fell down at free-fall speed in six and a half seconds. There are several engineers and architects who have made the argument that it was a controlled demolition because, again, there's never been a steel building collapse due to fire. So how can it happen three times in one day?

There are many, many other things I could talk about, several inconsistencies we could talk about for a long time. If you read some of the authors like Mike Ruppert and Barrie Zwicker, and look at some Web sites, you can get a fuller account. A whole lot of insider trading occurred beforehand, and that's a huge red flag that there was foreknowledge of the event. There were large financial transactions made ahead of time, a lot of trades made to buy stock in United and American airlines beforehand with the expectation that those stocks were going to go down drastically. A lot of the hijackers from the list released by FBI -- a lot of those guys are alive. Many, many guys on the list are the wrong identity. One guy was a pilot for Saudi Airlines, another guy is living in Lebanon and is suing the U.S. government to clear his name.

I'm compelled because as time goes on there is a greater and greater growing voice among people in areas involved with different aspect of that day. You have pilots speaking about what would be involved with trying to fly a plane into the Pentagon that day in the way that it was portrayed. You have architects and engineers speaking out over the actual explanation that jet fuel could melt steel and cause buildings to collapse. You have former people who worked in the Bush administration or the military who have come forward to express doubt about the official story.

Consider the fact that the Bush administration really fought the formation of the 9/11 Commission the whole way. It fought over who was going to head it and who was going to be on it. Initially Henry Kissinger was supposed to be the chairman, but he stepped aside because of conflict of interest issues. The commission didn't come together until a year and a half after the event. ... And you think about how the government spent $15 million on the commission to investigate 9/11, which sounds like a lot. But then you make the comparison that the government spent $40 million to investigate the Monica Lewinsky affair. I certainly share a lot of those views.


We still need to switch on a lot more brains in and outside the US.

This alone will make a lot of people take their first look...

and we know what happens to most of them.

Mark Stepnoski will be on Alex Jones Radio TODAY !!!

in approx 20mins (3rd hour of show)...


Can listen via...


Infowars :

Sure there's others


Best wishes

I hope this guy continues to

I hope this guy continues to speak out like this. If he does, he will get a lot of sports crazed, Joe Sixpack type American males to start checking out the facts for themselves. The official story is floundering more and more every day. It's just going to die a slow peaceful death. In ten years time (if that long) it will be common knowledge that the whole thing was a staged event. Eighty percent will know the truth, just like they now the truth about what happened to Kennedy. We're on our way.

If you want to draw parallels to Kennedy...

...assassination, then the outlook is really bleak -- we will never have justice, never find out how the whole thing actually transpired, who was responsible and therefore, can't prevent it in the future...

What is the result of the 80% of the people knowing the truth about the Kennedy assassination, as you say? Not a god damn thing -- there have been no trials, no new investigation, no legislative action that would prevent something like this from happening in the future, nothing... And I am very afraid that you might be right, that this could be the future for 9/11 truth as well...

Yes, I hear you, but we have

Yes, I hear you, but we have the power of the Internet now, at least for the time being. : ) Patience & persistence, but time is of the essence . . .



I'm so glad this guy brought up credible claims about 9/11. I'm so sick of celebrities "coming out" for the 9/11 truth movement and raving about the Pentagon.

The answer to 1984 is 1776!
(Gold, Oil, and Drugs)


I just updated his wikipedia page to reflect this new line of interest :)

The answer to 1984 is 1776!
(Gold, Oil, and Drugs)

Thanks for speaking out Mark Stepnoski...

It's articles like this that give me faith...

Best wishes

It only

goes to show.......ANYONE who at least looks will know the truth.

Yes, I second that. Thank

Yes, I second that. Thank you for speaking out; for having the interest and the curiosity to seek the truth and ultimately justice. Anyone with a pedigree :) or any degree of so-called celebrity stepping out into the limelight re 9/11 truth is SO beneficial (and courageous for many). Thank you.




And, team, remember Pat Tillman.

he seems to be decently

he seems to be decently informed of the whole affair. However, just like Sheen, many will still find him completely non-credible to raise such questions because he's a sports star, like Sheen is a Hollywood star.
I'm not saying that's all that comes of it, of course. It's just that people fail to realize we're not propping these guys up as if they are experts in the relevant fields of questions regarding 9/11...but simply because they have a name and respect from their fans, that saying such things in such a tight-lipped political climate requires large cajones because they have nothing to gain, and can 'mainstream' the idea a bit better.
I'm not saying his coming out is a bad thing at all. But it's certainly not going to have the effect we all think it is, especially if we feed the cynicism of the people who disregard anybody who isn't a famous, relevant expert.
As though famous people aren't allowed to have an opinion on something that isn't their profession. It's worse for them than it is the average individual. All they're apparently allowed to talk about is their profession as though they are one-dimensional people not capable of thinking about anything else. It's rather pathetic.
Better than keeping quiet though, for sure! The fact he articulates his points and knows a decent amount of information definitely helps in such an uphill battle.
I think when we mention famous people like this to others or try to support them, we need to be clear that we support them because of their courage. Not because people should believe the stars' opinions based on their fame.
Anybody who says "what the hell does he know? he's just a football player"..much like people who say "I'm sick of hearing these actors with their political opinions...why don't they just stick to their job and act?". Tell them that it doesn't matter what their profession is, they have concerns just like anybody else, and that they are courageous for sticking their reputation on the line for what they really believe in.

"The most perfidious way of harming a cause consists of defending it deliberately with faulty arguments."
Friedrich Nietzsche, The Gay Science, section 191
German philosophe

Mark Stepnoski is also a

Mark Stepnoski is also a Marijuana-legalization advocate, and member of NORML.

So he'll be labeled a pot-smoking kook if he decides to speak out more.

///////////////////// - $1 DVDs shipped - email for info

In a word, WOW!

Alex's interview with Mark Stepnoski today is absolutely incredible. Mark Stepnoski is very knowlegable, particularly of history, and quite articulate. This is an interview that everyone should listen to, particularyly NFL fans in a fog.

Find an MP3 of this one. It's a keeper.

Try here later today:

Ther jig is up!

"But truthfully, I don't really know. We've had trouble getting a handle on Building No. 7."
~~ Dr. Shyam Sunder - Acting Dir. of Buiding and Fire Research Laboratory (NIST)
"We are unable to provide a full explanation of the total collapse." (NIST)

I just blogged Jack Blood's interview w/ Stepnoski from Nov. 6th

Just waiting for approval from the PTB ;) Here's the link to the article and interview 'til then:

Former Dallas Cowboy Tells It Like It Is:
"I Suspected 9/11 Was A False
Flag Attack From The Beginning"

By Jack Blood
November 6th, 2007
From Pat Tillman, to 911, to the Oklahoma City Bombings, Ron Paul
and Iraq...This legendary offensive lineman now blocks for the truth

"If I had just paid $20 million for the NIST report, I'd be asking for a refund!... The trouble with the NIST Report is that it isn’t even science because it's not capable of being verified or negated!"
-Dr. Frank Greening