Support 911Blogger


"Fourteen Points" Media Visibility Update 4/21/08

Does anyone else besides me think it would be good to keep the “Fourteen Points” Digg Button at the top of 911Blogger all week? Just the Digg Button (or w/ a short blurb), so every new visitor sees it? Say so in Comments.

Thank god i don’t have a job (full time student, come summer I’ll be looking)

As a result of my flexible schedule, today I was able to:

1) Post the Fourteen Points article on IndyMedia.org:
Boston: http://boston.indymedia.org/newswire/display/204360/index.php
Ontario, CA: http://ontario.indymedia.ca/twiki/bin/view/Ontario/FourteenPointsOfAgreementWTCDestruction
Philly: http://www.phillyimc.org/en/node/66582
DC: http://dc.indymedia.org/mod/comments/update/index.php link's dead?
http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2008/04/21/18494301.php

2) Respond to posts on my OpEdNews.com Diary (thanks to those who posted)
Announcing 9/11 Truth: "14 Points of WTC Destruction" Media Visibility Week
http://www.opednews.com/maxwrite/diarypage.php?did=7091

3) Scour the web for coverage of “Fourteen Points of Agreement with Official Government Reports on the World Trade Center Destruction”. I’ve set up Google and Yahoo comprehensive search alerts to catch new coverage daily; if you haven’t used those, check it out; search News on google or yahoo, and somewhere on the page you’ll see an option for creating an alert for your search term. Don’t rely on it; it’s just handy.

Mathaba.net: 9/11 Revisionist Science Published in Civil Engineering Journal
http://mathaba.net/news/?x=589560

Week of Truth (includes Fourteen Points plug/link, other commentary) - by Carol Brouillet
http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2008/04/21/18494153.php

My “Media Visibility Week” OpEdNews Diary comes up in the Google News search as well.

On the Web searches, I came across some very thoughtful comments from some of you with the link; if you think it’s a good idea, grab and paste both the Digg link and the Direct Journal link at the same time, like this:

DIGG.com: Fourteen Points of Agreement: World Trade Center Destruction
http://digg.com/general_sciences/Fourteen_Points_of_Agreement_World_Trade_Center_Destruction

Fourteen Points of Agreement with Official Government Reports on the World Trade Center Destruction
http://www.bentham-open.org/pages/content.php?TOCIEJ/2008/00000002/00000001/35TOCIEJ.SGM

Also, consider posting a Diary entry over at http://www.OpEdNews.com
Anyone is allowed to post almost anything you want (they welcome or tolerate 9/11 Truth) and get an instant audience of 600,000 visitors a month, plus your posts turn up in web searches. Go ahead and say something dumb in support of the truth; I’ll bet you’ll be surprised at how many of the People you enlighten, and you’ll generate more visibility for the Journal article, Digg link and the issues during this crucial one-week media visibility window.

4) Write this update.

5) See “File Attachments” – this is a version of the Journal article that has been formatted to paste directly into indymedia sites with no changes; I assume it will work just as well on forums, bulletin boards, blogs, etc. The letter is in the Public Domain, and the more places it gets posted in full, the better, I think.

6) Draft and blast a rougher version of the following to my personal email list, listserves and alternative media/bloggers that I thought would/should want to publish about the Fourteen Points:

DIGG LINK!!!
If you're tired of waiting over 6 years for the NIST WTC 7 Report, have questions about the NIST Report on WTC 1 & 2 and want the scientific community to know about and address these 14 points, then please Digg the Journal article here:

Fourteen Points of Agreement: World Trade Center Destruction
http://digg.com/general_sciences/Fourteen_Points_of_Agreement_World_Trade_Center_Destruction

Dear Friends, Family, Bloggers, Journalists, Reporters, Editors, Publishers, Producers, Professors, Universities and Who Else?:

A letter has just been published in a mainstream, peer-reviewed scientific engineering journal; this is significant because the authors are known for hypothesizing that on 9/11 WTC 1, 2 & 7 were destroyed by controlled demolition. In their letter they seek to reach agreement on grounds for “productive discussion” on the destruction of WTC 1, 2 & 7, based on the 14 points outlined in the letter, which are based on assertions of fact already made by NIST and FEMA.

Given that the authors agree with the NIST and FEMA reports on all 14 points listed in the article, what’s the issue? The issue is that the NIST and FEMA reports appear to be grossly inadequate, contradicting both their own conclusions and established facts. Read and see for yourself whether or not you agree; now that this has been published, the scientific community will be debating it.

Can you forward this link to Noam Chomsky? Preceding the actual article, I’ve pasted some of Dr. Jones commentary on the publication, which includes a short Chomsky quote: http://www.911blogger.com/node/15081

"With publication in an established civil engineering journal, the discussion has reached a new level – JREF’ers and others may attack, but unless they can also get published in a peer-reviewed journal, those attacks do not carry nearly the weight of a peer-reviewed paper. It may be that debunkers will try to avoid the fourteen issues we raise in the Letter, by attacking the author(s) or even the journal rather than addressing the science – that would not surprise me.

Professor Chomsky wrote to several, who passed it on to me:
“You, or anyone who agrees with you, has a very simple task. Since the evidence is so obvious and compelling, submit an article about it to Science, or Nature, or even Scientific American, or more technical journals, say those in civil engineering, where your article can refute the conclusions of the professional society of civil engineers… To date, no one has been willing to submit an article -- at least, after probably hundreds of inquiries to Truth Movement advocates, no one has been able to mention one...”

Would someone who has received this note from Prof. Chomsky please send him a copy of the downloaded paper? Perhaps we can build a bridge with him. You might note that the paper is published in a “technical journal [one of those] in civil engineering,” to use his own words, which I took as sort of a challenge. I have published before in Nature (e.g., May 1986 and April 1989) AND Scientific American (July 1987), and this paper in a civil engineering journal I consider to be a very significant step in the history."

A September 6, 2007 Zogby Poll found 67% fault the 9/11 Commission for not investigating the anomalous collapse of World Trade Center 7 http://www.zogby.com/news/ReadNews.dbm?ID=1354

August 1, 2006 Scripps News Poll: "16 percent of Americans speculate that secretly planted explosives, not burning passenger jets, were the real reason the massive twin towers of the World Trade Center collapsed."
http://www.scrippsnews.com/911poll

Fourteen Points of Agreement with Official Government Reports on the World Trade Center Destruction
http://www.bentham-open.org/pages/content.php?TOCIEJ/2008/00000002/00000001/35TOCIEJ.SGM

From: The Open Civil Engineering Journal, 2008, 2, 35-40, published by Bentham.org

AttachmentSize
Fourteen Points Template 2.doc111 KB

and thanks to those who Dugg & Reddit my OpEdNews article, too

A few trolls posted on it, if you feel like giving them a lashing

Announcing 9/11 Truth: "14 Points of WTC Destruction" Media Visibility Week
http://www.opednews.com/maxwrite/diarypage.php?did=7091

The Top 40
http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20041221155307646

Nice work!

What's that cracking sound? ;-)

Jumbo Jets Can Not Demolish Skyscrapers.
http://nasathermalimages.com

Nice site

That's quite an amazing stash you've got there, at http://nasathermalimages.com , jkeogh- and you certainly have the right to remain anonymous. Got Mirrors?

The Top 40
http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20041221155307646

i'm bullsh!tting

i'm only just learning how to blog

What do people here think about the concept of a "mirror union" or something like that; create a mini-dmoz for 9/11 truth and replicate it infinitely all over the web

storage just keeps getting cheaper, like processing power keeps getting faster and cheaper

Anybody read Ray Kurzweil?

The Top 40
http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20041221155307646

Cross-posted at OpEdNews.com

Tom Murphy has promised a point by point rebuttal to be published in a diary or article at OpEdNews.com - see the thread here:
http://www.opednews.com/maxwrite/diarypage.php?did=7091

He wasted his time responding to me, just an idiot with a keyboard and an internet connection, while i spent my day publicizing

Fourteen Points of Agreement with Official Government Reports on the World Trade Center Destruction
http://www.bentham-open.org/pages/content.php?TOCIEJ/2008/00000002/00000...

All over the web. Gotta love those trolls!!!

"Fourteen Points" Media Visibility Update 4/21/08
http://www.opednews.com/maxwrite/diarypage.php?did=7106

The Top 40
http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20041221155307646

forgot, i worked some links about DKos CIA truth & lies

into the OpEdNews intro

-have ya'll heard about that yet; the guy who's trying to take over the Dems from the "establshment" by mobilizing the grassroots to follow his lead on things- interviewed with the CIA for at least 6 mo, before + during the time he was setting up his famous, widely-reported about in the media blog that came out of nowhere in 02?

According to his own worlds Commonwealth Club 6-2-06 - Kos CIA comments 11:54”-16:25”
http://www.commonwealthclub.org/archive/06/06-06zuniga-audio.html

The Indictment of Markos C.A. Moulitsas ZÚÑIGA by Justice and History (Updated with Additional Information and Counts)
http://truth-about-kos.blogspot.com/2007/08/indictment-of-markos-ca-moul...

The Truth About Kos (DailyKos)
http://truth-about-kos.blogspot.com/

The Top 40
http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20041221155307646