A large percentage of all criminal prosecution are under some form of conspiracy theory. RICO is an especially significant conspiracy based law. No, "conspiracy theory" is a phrase created to discredit critical thinkers. Just like "family values", "activist judges", "patriotism", "American values" or whatever other phrase the Neo-scum have conjured up to gain the subverviance of the American public, these phrases are trigger words ment to obfuscate, mis-direct or intimidate. Newt Gingrich once produced a list of "words" that the repukes should use, Im sure "conspiracy" is on that list.

Though the public education system of this country is now abysmal, it most certainly wasnt when I grew up. The general populace is getting wise to these charlentan tricks. The only thing hold back a reformation of the true American spirit, is the vast infection of the government/business sector by the facist/Neo-scum/NWO types. As with any infection, it takes time for the ancetode to take effect, antibodies have been awaken and are mobilizing to defeat this latest intrusion into the "Great American Experiment".

Look at who is lying or profiting about 9/11 and you will find out who is behind 9/11. Follow the $.

that the New York Times, when describing Lyndon LaRouche, called him, at least in their better moments, a "conspiracy theorist." LaRouch, of course, was later jailed, i think it was on credit card fraud or some such thing, and my guess is it was all trumped up. The government really hated Larouch. I do believe he is still alive, and his organization is active.

He had reporters, and they used to confront people the way WeAreChange does today, although WeAreChange appears to be more widespread in its program and better able to distribute the results to the public. I remember some of the confrontations were televised, and I witnessed one first hand, at a press conference at the Waldorf Astoria Hotel in Manhattan. We were all gathered around Henry Kissinger in the hallway, and this shortish woman began railing at him and confronting him about some charges that I could not then figure out, but he actually started to answer them, which surprised me at the time. Anyway, the whole press conference went to pieces. Everybody froze while the confrontation was happening, and there were no other questions asked.

Willhelm Marr used a two word phrase in a book in the late 19th century.Two words that stifle debate,two words that when used is like a hand grenade going off in the room.Those two words are Anti Semite!.Sometimes i feel that the same tactic is being used by using two more words,Conspiracy Theorist.Its the closer of all debate,all rational thought,all logic,all evidence.Conspiracy theorist gets thrown into debate and Bang! game over.NIST never had any intention of explaining how the towers collapsed but point that out to people and they recoil,go into automatic defense mode and throw in the CT bomb.Throw in some more evidence and they recoil some more and throw in lizards and tin foil hats.They think they are as free as a bird but don,t realize they live in a cage.They feel free to say whatever they want as long as they can quote from other people,usually because they have nothing to add to any debate.Questioning your representatives and dissenting is as American as Apple Pie.America was founded by dissenters.It is un American not too question authority because that would be cowardly.

The real reason why there are conspiracy theorists is because there are conspiracies.There have been conspiracies for thousands of years.James Thornwell was awarded $625,000 dollars in compensation from Congress,after proving the American Army conducted mind control experiments on him ,using LSD,without his knowledge.This is my own "Conspiracy Fact" bomb that makes the Free birds recoil up their own backsides.

The truth about the 911 Truth Movement is that it is essentially a citizen's criminal investigation, necessitated by the unwillingness of our elected government to do a legitimate investigation.

The term conspiracy theorist can only stick if investigators are undisciplined and speculate wildly without a basis.

While speculation is a tool, used by all investigators, to develop scenarios which can possibly lead to fruitful avenues of investigation, it needs to be constantly checked by logic and how it actually fits with observation. The important thing is to scrutinize speculations and remove those which do not conform to evidence, logic, and observation. Investigations are evolutionary and speculation is a necessary and valuable tool which also needs to be controlled and used responsibly.

An example I would give, of speculation which should have been and was thrown out somewhat quickly by most investigators of the 911 crimes, was the notion of directed energy weapons being used to destroy the towers. There was simply no basis for it and that which was attempted proved to be explainable by much more coherent and natural means. The proposal that mini-nukes were used in the destruction of the towers is another example, after it was shown that there was no radiation above background in Lower Manhattan.

I very rarely hear those interested in investigating the crimes committed on Sept. 11, 2001 claim that directed energy weapons or mini-nukes were a part of it. The suspicion of the many grounded citizens trying to investigate this crime is that those who irresponsibly continue to push these theories, after they have been shown to have no basis, are possibly trying to poison the well of legitimate investigation.