the fear of not covering the story will be greater than the fear of covering the story.

I have always held that Michael Moore would release a huge 9/11 Truth movie at a time of his choosing and make a godzillion dollars.

It is not fair, but then as my father used to tell me until I screamed, "Life is not fair".

If you have the energy.. mike@michaelmoore.com

and the webmaster.
http://www.michaelmoore.com/email/form.php?sbj=admin

The easiest thing he could create that is toxic and a follow-up to F911 is likely about torture. 9-11 was used to justify everything and all previous limits went out the window in the Iraq war. So I would expect that's what he will focus on.

Speaking of Amy Goodman, an excellent and chilling interview on DemNow the other day was with Adrienne Kinne, a former Army sergeant who worked in military intelligence and who listened in on phone calls all throughout Iraq. She talks about how before the Iraq war their job in intelligence was well defined, but once that started, there were no more limits on what they could and couldn't do -- no one was exempt anymore from being listened to. So they listened to everyone. It's fascinating to hear the actual justifications given to the workers who are objecting . . . questioning. But one phrase she says is key to understanding the 9/11 ops -- "Everything is so compartmentalized that you don’t really know necessarily what the person next to you is doing, let alone in a different room in a different building in a different location." That's how crimes can be committed from within and no one knows.

AMY GOODMAN: I also, Adrienne Kinne, wanted to go back to this point of eavesdropping on international aid organizations, on NGOs. Can you explicitly say what you heard and why you were listening to these conversations?

ADRIENNE KINNE: Definitely. During that one conversation between a British aid worker and the American aid worker that I was talking about previously, the British aid worker basically told the American, “Be careful what you say, because the Americans are listening to us.” And they weren’t talking about anything that would have warranted their concern. There was—it was just kind of mundane office goings-on. And so, the American actually responded and said, “They can’t listen to me. I’m an American citizen. I’m protected by USSID 18.” And USSID 18 is basically a directive which is given out to military intelligence which bars the collection on American citizens, to include allies of other countries who we’ve signed binding agreements with. And when I heard that transmission and that conversation, I—kind of it caused me to raise my eyebrow, because here we were, we were listening to Americans, and we were collecting on them.

And so, I brought that particular intercept to the attention of my officer in charge. And actually, rather than be concerned that we were actually spying on Americans and violating the law and the Constitution, he was actually outraged that an American would reference USSID 18 to a non-American, and as if this American was somehow betraying some classified information that Americans have a right not to be spied upon.

And it was shortly thereafter that we were given a verbal waiver that we could listen to Americans and other ally citizens of allied countries for whatever—from whatever organizations, humanitarian aid organizations, journalists, NGOs, because—and then we were given two reasons that we could listen to Americans and these ally citizens. One was that they were eyes on the ground, and they could stumble upon the location of weapons of mass destruction, and if they should pass the location on over the phone to co-workers or what have you, that we would have to be listening in order to find out where the weapons of mass destruction were located, and we could pass that location on to higher-ups. The other rationale that we were given in order to kind of justify spying on Americans was that the organization or the individual could lose their satellite phone, and a terrorist could pick it up and then start using it. And we would have to monitor all these phones in order to make sure that if that took place, we could be there to listen to the terrorists.

And, you know, when this was going on, I had absolutely no idea what was going on in the rest of the military intelligence, the rest of our government. Everything is so compartmentalized that you don’t really know necessarily what the person next to you is doing, let alone in a different room in a different building in a different location. And so, it really wasn’t until the New York Times piece came out about the NSA’s domestic wiretapping that I really began to think about what we were doing and my mission and that we were collecting on Americans. And we were doing so for the flimsiest of reasons.
http://www.democracynow.org/2008/5/13/fmr_military_intelligence_officer_...

mike@michaelmoore.com

Mike,

I've heard you are making a sequel.

You must be aware that 9/11 was an INSIDE JOB. The evidence is now *overwhelming*. Millions of Americans know it, too.

Please do something to help the other, unknowing Americans realize this. You've helped in so many ways, but this time it could be YOUR MOST IMPORTANT WORK, ever.

Thanks, Mike, for Fahrenheit 9/11. It started me towards 9/11 Truth. But, with your next movie, please lead the others there too. Our beloved USA is at stake.

"Ultimately, silence is betrayal."

Sincerely, and best wishes,
Kevin

....because he irritated the Bush Administration to no end. Michael was loathed at the White House.

In the intervening years, it seems, something has changed? Moore is not nearly as visible or outspoken as he was at one time? The Bush Administration proxies at Faux News even gave Sicko a good review? Hmm. Whatever has happened I don't like it!

...don't believe them!