Visibility 9-11 Welcomes Physicist David Chandler,

Visibility 9-11 welcomes David Chandler, American Association of Physics Teachers and member of Architects and Engineers for 9-11 Truth.

David has a BS from Harvey Mudd College, Claremont, CA (IPS major–independent program of studies with emphasis in physics and engineering); MA in education from Claremont Graduate University; MS in mathematics from Cal Poly, Pomona and has taught Physics/Mathematics/Astronomy at K-12 and Jr. college levels. He is also and author and served formerly on the editorial board of The Physics Teacher, an AAPT journal. David is also an active designer and inventor of educational materials emphasizing quantitative visualization.

David’s recent article, WTC7: NIST Admits Freefall focuses on some of the significant errors and descepancies in the final NIST report on the collapse of tower 7 and includes exerpts from a tehnical briefing held by NIST on August 26, 2008. During this briefing, questions were put to the panel by David Chandler as well as Dr. Steven Jones.

Intermission music by Libra Project.

Ending music by Prymal Rhythm.

Direct download: visibility911_chandler.mp3

We can be sure that

David Chandler, American Association of Physics Teachers and member of Architects and Engineers for 9-11 Truth is of SOUND MENTAL HEALTH

Just like many of us -especially the folks at &

I wonder what LAUREN COX of ABC News Medical Unit will have to say about this.

Pls see:

What's Behind Internet Conspiracy Empires?
As Conspiracy Communities Grow, Mental Health Docs Are Left With Big Questions

-Edit - Speaking of Conspiracy Communities - WHO IS REALLY Insane?

Iraq Report Reveals Pentagon's Massive Fraud And Waste

Iraq Reconstruction Effort A $100 Billion Failure... Pentagon Put Out Inflated Measures Of Progress To Cover Up Failures... Colin Powell: Defense Department "Kept Inventing Numbers Of Iraqi Security Forces - The Number Would Jump 20,000 A Week!"

An unpublished 513-page federal history of the American-led reconstruction of Iraq depicts an effort crippled before the invasion by Pentagon planners who were hostile to the idea of rebuilding a foreign country, and then molded into a $100 billion failure by bureaucratic turf wars, spiraling violence and ignorance of the basic elements of Iraqi society and infrastructure.

The history, the first official account of its kind, is circulating in draft form here and in Washington among a tight circle of technical reviewers, policy experts and senior officials. It also concludes that when the reconstruction began to lag -- particularly in the critical area of rebuilding the Iraqi police and army -- the Pentagon simply put out inflated measures of progress to cover up the failures.

Definiton of conspiracy from :

[kuhn-spir-uh-see] Show IPA Pronunciation
–noun, plural -cies.

1. the act of conspiring.

2. an evil, unlawful, treacherous, or surreptitious plan formulated in secret by two or more persons; plot.

3. a combination of persons for a secret, unlawful, or evil purpose: He joined the conspiracy to overthrow the government.

4. Law. an agreement by two or more persons to commit a crime, fraud, or other wrongful act.

5. any concurrence in action; combination in bringing about a given result.

san⋅i⋅ty [san-i-tee]


1. the state of being sane; soundness of mind.

2. soundness of judgment.

If the shoe fits.....

Truth is Sane, as Sane as it gets
The CONSTITUTION is NOT going to "collapse" into pulverized dust no matter how much thermate/explosives or planes they throw at it

Interesting interview...

Do these people deserve to know how and why their loved ones were murdered? Do we deserve to know how and why 9/11 happened?

In terms of physical evidence...

In terms of physical evidence, this video by David Chandler forcing the hand of NIST to make free-fall official dogma is of profound significance.

David correctly points out that Dr. Shyam Sunder makes his point about the significance of free-fall when Dr. Sunder states that free-fall means "no structural elements" are present. This point is astounding in its implications.

Great work David and thank you.

Would also like to thank Michael at Visibility911 for conducting an excellent interview where David is allowed to make his points without interruption.

These guys are attempting to...

discredit Mr Chandler's research. It would be nice to have a real expert debunk their bullshit for a change.
Just sayin....

thanks for the link.

thanks for the link.

interesting thread.

David Chandler's contributions are solid and important. As a nonscientist, I can see clearly what he illustrates and it makes sense. I applaud David and all the scientists for their hard work.

I read the thread on DU.

Let me just say as a nonscientist what I believe.

If controlled demolition didn't have criminal implications, NIST and everyone else would have come to that conclusion quickly and unanimously. Controlled demolition was not one of the options for NIST to conclude as the cause of the collapse of WTC 7 because it would mean we have been lied to about 911. It would mean that the official story is bullshit and that someone had to rig the building for demolition long before 911.

It is akin to thousands of people seeing someone shoot and kill another person with one bullet to the head at point blank range and then getting lost in the minutia of what kind of shoes the victim was wearing, or arguing that the victim actually died of a stroke just before the bullet entered his head. Ridiculous on its face, but similar to the NIST tap dance about WTC 7. NIST is grasping at straws.

NIST has spent a great deal of time (7 years) and effort composing an elaborate alternative explanation that, if believed, exonerates the real culprits. NIST is a US government agency. They are under the Commerce Department which is under Bush/Cheney. Do they have bias? Of course they do. What would happen to Dr. Sham Sunder et al if he and his team concluded that any of the buildings were felled by controlled demolition? Face it. This was not an option for them.

I say this.

If it walks like a duck, looks like a duck and quacks like a duck, it is a duck.

Show me another building that came down like WTC 7 that wasn't a controlled demolition. My understanding is that there is no such other case.

I don't discount the scientific approach to proving the controlled demolition, but the splitting of hairs about all the "modeled" conclusions by NIST can cause some of us to lose sight of the obvious.

If it looks exactly like a classic controlled demolition, and historically there are no other similar buildings that have come down it that way that weren't controlled demolitions, then the overwhelming odds are that WTC 7 was a controlled demolition.


I agree completely with what you say. I believe all three buildings were felled by CD.
No other steel framed high rise has ever collapsed completely from any mechanism before that I'm aware of. Except in the case of CD. And certainly they looked like three CD's.
But many are influenced and persuaded by bullshit like posted in the DU thread I linked. A few members there constantly push the official bullshit story and team up on any members offering any dissent or questioning. That site gets a lot of traffic I think and it's a good place to spread and demand truth. Nothing will ever change and we'll never get the truth is my fear without teamwork and enlightening the public. I hate to be so pessimistic but I think our great grandchildren will still be wondering what the truth regarding 9/11 is just like with the JFK assassination.
Thank you for responding.

"reinvestigate911" is on a spree...

man, he can really dish out the truth!
wow... just wow.

What is so funny to me is....

that anti-truther he's arguing with actually stated in a thread a while back that the collapses of the towers was like a sledge hammer impacting "stubin glass! I rolled in the floor after reading that one. Yet he claims to completely understand NIST's data. Yeah right!

I agree WildBill

You are correct sir.