Russia Today covers NYC CAN, interviews Daniel Sunjata - 10/6/09

“Government explanations of 9/11 make no sense"

American actor and 9/11 activist Daniel Sunjata says that he supports an independent 9/11 investigation because there are too many disturbing questions that remain unanswered.

“I can point out one thing in particular – the 9/11 Commission. Not one word in the 9/11 Commission report on the collapse of Building Seven,” he said. ”That is just one particular item.”

“Seventy per cent of the questions proposed by the victims’ family members during the 9/11 Commission were completely ignored. That fact alone backs for a real investigation into the matter,” Sunjata added.


Daniel Sunjata... who is that good looking guy in the blue shirt? :)

Good job Daniel.

Do these people deserve to know how and why their loved ones were murdered? Do we deserve to know how and why 9/11 happened?

All I know is that...

... Marina is hot.

Don't forget to comment on RT and thank them.


........... THANK YOU!

In my dreams

Daniel would run for office...(Gov. of NY?)....He is well informed and articulate...not to mention GORGEOUS...(which unfortunately seems to matter in our shallow brain dead culture). His challenge would be the media giving him exposure (other than negative) and staying alive,


more than thank you. You define what an American should be. For what it's worth i am very proud of you.
America needs more people like you!
I just finished watching this clip. Damn! You have done you're homework, and i can't describe how happy i am to know that a person of your notoriety is so outspoken.
You are a man of honor.

Wow! Daniel Sunjata, you're brilliant.

What an interview! Thanks, Daniel, for being so well-versed on the subject matter. Your extemporaneous speaking abilities are amazing. I wouldn't change a thing.

An eloquent spokesman

Daniel you are an inspiration brother. If only more public people would speak out. We live in strange times that so many know the truth yet so few have the courage to speak up. Keep it up, we need your intelligent voice to never shut up. Can you get some more of your TV and movie cronies to join your fight? No offense but sadly Americans seem to pay rapt attention to celebrity. Surely there are more among your ranks than just you, Charlie Sheen and Rosie O?

By the way, what are we to make of this delay in a ruling? I'm curious how others are interpreting the court's silence so far.

Stay tuned...

Can you get some more of your TV and movie cronies to join your fight?

Things are happening, 2009's not over yet... ;-)
I make a point of reading all the down voted comments because I find many of them to be the best comments. - Atomicbomb

Thanks Daniel

This is another excellent interview by Russia TV. Who can argue with these requests considering 60% of the 911 commissioners themselves raise doubt about the legitimacy of the investigation. Daniel, you do a great job of explaining the big picture of 911 while pinpointing the most obvious anomalies of that day.
By the way, I loved your narration of Loose Change: An American Coup.

Fantastic Hard Hitting Interview! Both barrels shot with Truth.

Excellent hard hitting impacting interview!


Damn, Daniel, you surely do have the facts of 9/11 on the tip of your tongue. You speak beautifully and make all the right connections, presenting a compelling case for those who are as yet uninformed.
We in the Truth Movement and indeed all Americans are very fortunate to have you speaking so eloquently for the great cause.
Someday, when the facts of 9/11 are universally recognized; when the perpetrators of these crimes are swinging from ropes; when media tools like Geraldo, Doocey and Gutfeld are demonized for the complicit cowards they are, I hope to shake your hand and thank you personally for your brave and selfless efforts.
Until then, Godspeed to us all.

Way To Go Daniel

Thanks for getting the truth out there. You made some good points.

That's a breakthrough for us, relativity minor, but a breakthrough nonetheless.

You can't help but feel at the same time though how sad and disturbing it is that the only significant media coverage we can get on this crucial issue is from a news agency of a country whose relations with us range from difficult to hostile.

Still, we keep pushing regardless. Like that line out of Eye of the Tiger:

"They stack the odds, still we take to the streets..."

Great interview, Daniel!

Very well-spoken. Glad to have someone like you to articulate the most serious, damning arguments of the 911 Truth Movement.

I wish Russia Today would do a piece on ProjectCensored,org's 2009 list of most-censored subjects. I mean, RT were to ask prominent media people in the US why certain stories (Nanothermite in the dust, Sibel Edmonds, etc.) are completely and obviously ignored, what sort of response would they get? I'm trying to imagine how a Pat Buchanan would answer questions about media censorship. His American Conservative magazine did a piece on Sibel but he won't say word one about her on MSNBC where he is asked to comment on nearly everything.

It's so odd to see a news organization named "Russia Today" exposing stories that the news media in the "free-est nation on Earth" won't touch.

As an actor, you must have an agent who is sensitive to media criticism; who must have some inside knowledge about how the media spins various stories or shuts them down. What would your agent say about the who, what and why of stings-pulling behind the scenes of news media coverage in the US?

The "Active Thermitic Material..." paper is one of the 25 most-censored topics for 2009-10. Can you contact any of the people at Russia Today to ask them about doing story?


"Active Thermitic Material..." is NOT listed in lists for 2009 or 2010. Where did I get this idea?

There was a post here on 911blogger a while back claiming that ProjectCensored had included the paper in its current list. But it is not there! No one at 911blogger updated the post about it.

However, # 24, "Japan Questions 9/11 and the Global War on Terror", IS listed for 2009. However, no mention of nanothermite in the dust there either.

You got it from here:

Project Censored Covers Active Thermitic Material, WTC7 and AE911Truth

Turns out they used it to sell books. A bait and switch.

We Are Change Colorado Interview with Daniel Sunjata

We Are Change Colorado Interview with Daniel Sunjata Posted to YouTube Sept 19th

Here is RTs Sunjata Interview on YouTube

Easier to spread around.

Great, but also . . .

99% of it is great, but unfortunate that he brings up (start of Part 2) --

"Whether you're talking about the questions surrounding 'what hit the Pentagon', was it Flight 77? Was it a missile? . . . if it wasn't Flight 77, what happened to the people on Flight 77? . . ."

He does point out that the most damning evidence for him is the thermitic residues, but why give any credence at all to the missile claim? It suggests he hasn't looked much into the Pentagon issue, but is trying to represent a viewpoint that people appear to have.

This is why it's so important to critique stuff that is weak, false or mistaken, and correct it.

Pentagon Attack Errors

There are numerous pieces of evidence that point to the attack on the Pentagon being an inside job. These include:

* The location of the attack: The portion of the Pentagon that was struck was nearly empty due to a renovation program.
* The aircraft approach maneuver: The attack plane executed an extreme spiral dive maneuver to strike said portion of the building from the southwest, opposite the direction from which it approached the capital.
* The incompetence of the alleged pilot: Flight 77 was supposedly piloted by Hani Hanjour, about whom a flight instructor said: "He couldn't fly at all".
* Signs of a cover-up: Numerous actions by officials indicate an ongoing cover-up of the facts concerning the attack.

These and other undisputed facts, constituting highly incriminating evidence of involvement of officials in the attack and coverup, have been largely eclipsed by an ongoing controversy over whether the Pentagon was hit by a jetliner at all. From early 2002, some skeptics of the official story have maintained that the Pentagon was attacked, not by a jetliner, but one of or a combination of a truck bomb, a missile or cruise missile, an attack drone aircraft or commuter jet, a flyover by a 757, and internal demolition charges. 9-11 Research provides a history of Pentagon strike theories.

Jon, next time you see him at an event, maybe you could give him Frank Legge's paper?

I've already...

Talked to Daniel about it... We can't control what people say unfortunately. If Daniel thinks the Gon is questionable, then the only thing we can do is show him the "other side" of the story, and hope he comes around. If not... I take nothing away from Daniel Sunjata. Nothing at all. I KNOW he cares about this issue.

Do these people deserve to know how and why their loved ones were murdered? Do we deserve to know how and why 9/11 happened?

Yes, clearly he does care, I

Yes, clearly he does care, I wouldn't question that. I think critiquing his position on the Pentagon isn't taking anything away from him, but working to protect him against easy debunkings.

The Pentagon problem exists for the very reasons that Legge points out eloquently in his paper and almost no one can come into the movement and not trip up on it. Daniel would probably be interested to read Frank's paper, given that Frank is one of the co-authors of the nanothermite paper that he is supportive of. It's not long, either. Please print it out and give it to him when you next see him . . . I'm 3000 miles away, otherwise I would do it, you can be sure.

He saw your comments...

And asked me for my advice.

Do these people deserve to know how and why their loved ones were murdered? Do we deserve to know how and why 9/11 happened?

Maybe we should mention that

Maybe we should mention that there was a time that you would have advised him away from CD at WTC. I hope he keeps an open mind.

If the Pentagon is too much to tackle then it may be best to just stay away from it. The official explanation of the Pentagon has never been proven so many of us will not just agree with it, not when we have new information. We know the path was a lie. What else was a lie.

Please do...

But if you do, please show him this as well.


Do these people deserve to know how and why their loved ones were murdered? Do we deserve to know how and why 9/11 happened?


We are talking about asking questions and you ask a couple of good questions about the Pentagon. Don't let anybody sway you away from that eyeopener.

Here is an in-depth look at the Pentagon 'attack':

With you in the struggle,
WeAreChangeLA -


Smart. Articulate. Informed. Irrefutable.

That was very well done!

Two suggestions:
When talking about building 7, ask to show the footage!
Only part of the wtc 7 collapse was free fall. Enough to proove the point though!

I understand...

That the judge made a ruling yesterday evening. I don't know what the ruling was. An announcement should be out some time today.

Do these people deserve to know how and why their loved ones were murdered? Do we deserve to know how and why 9/11 happened?