We will soon translate this article into English to help our English readers understand it. For now, you can use the automatic translation service by Google.

Montreal Journal Métro article

Click the images for full sizes.

Our reaction

We always welcome a good 9/11 debate. As we have mentioned during the interview with this paper's journalist, critics supporting the official story, including most media, use the old and well-known "name-calling" propaganda technique to shift the debate away from the real information. It is sad to see the collapse of World Trade Center Building 7, the 47-story skyscraper that collapsed in 6.5 seconds on 9/11, has not been mentioned once in this article, but that we have been called impostors and liars amongst many other names...

We are currently writing an article to answer the critics that were interviewed in this paper. We will certainly invite them to elevate the debate higher than name-calling, kindergarten style.

Our reply will be available later today or tomorrow.

But it is very important for us to point out that Richard Gage, AIA, contrary to a part of this article, has never mentioned that "he strongly insists that the Bush administration was behind 9/11". Gage has never made such claims and we invite the Journal to publicly correct this misleading assertion.

Here's Richard Gage own response to this accusation:

You are incorrect in your portrayal of me that "Richard Gage insists that the Bush Administration is responsible for the Sept 11th attacks". We are more than 1,000 architects and engineers who quite carefully point out and stick to the scientific forensic evidence and eye witness testimony that irrefutably supports the hypothesis of explosive demolition in all three WTC skyscrapers.

We have no theories or speculation as to who may have been responsible for the attacks. In order to determine the answers to this critical question we must have a real investigation that examines ALL of the evidence and uses the scientific method. Will you join us in calling for such an investigation? Or will you just stand on the sidelines of history and continue to mischaracterize the statements of what will very soon become 2,000 Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth?

Please visit AE911Truth.org again and think it over carefully.