Confronting Michael Moore with 9/11 Truth P2

About three years ago Michael Moore announced he would make a second 9/11 Documentary.
Since then, it was never brought up.

I'm guessing he was dissuaded by the PTB.

http://www.michaelmoore.com/words/mike-in-the-news/moore-fahrenheit-911-...
May 16th, 2008 4:39 PM
Moore: `Fahrenheit 9/11' follow-up is not a sequel

By David Germain / Associated Press

CANNES, France — With his follow-up to "Fahrenheit 9/11," Michael Moore wants to examine America as an empire, study its standing since the Sept. 11 attacks and present revelations to surprise audiences as much as the first film did.

But he doesn't want to make a sequel.

"To just say it's a sequel is so wrong," Moore told The Associated Press on Friday at the Cannes Film Festival, where he met with potential international distributors for the film, due out in 2009.

The documentary announced this week at Cannes will be a broader chronicle than "Fahrenheit 9/11," which took President Bush to task over the terrorist attacks and the Iraq war.

"It would be easier and safer to make a sequel, if that's all it was, but this isn't about Bush. We all know this. Regardless of who the president is come November, we have a big mess, a big, big mess to be cleaned up, and I don't know whether it can be cleaned up," Moore said. "The toxicity of the spill may be so great that there's nothing we can do about it. If that's the case, where are we now as America and as Americans?"

"Fahrenheit 9/11" won the top prize at Cannes in 2004 and went on to top $100 million at the domestic box office, the only documentary to hit that mark.

Moore plans to keep details of the film to himself, saying he regretted talking too early about his health-care documentary "Sicko." Health insurers were able to mobilize against him, which "made it impossible for me to get in anywhere" for interviews, he said.

The new film, which doesn't yet have a title, is being financed by Overture Films, which is handling the U.S. release, and Paramount Vantage, which is overseeing international distribution....

MORE: http://www.michaelmoore.com/words/mike-in-the-news/moore-fahrenheit-911-...

'Can anyone think of any reason he woul be against exposing the information from the truthers?'

I can. He's a typical liberal coward. He's birds of a feather with the typical Huffington Post/ Daily Kos/ Common Dreams /Alternet crowd. He can handle being attacked by Republicans and Fox News. But when it comes to the risk of alienating and being ostracized by his usual friends and associates--that's a different matter.

One thing I would venture is so about all 9/11 truthers is that we are all people who have been wiling to take the risk of alienating not just people we never had much use for anyway, but also some of the very people we'd been closest to--family, friends, political or other groups we may have been active in. I don't think Moore is that kind of person.

(And I say this while appreciating a lot of what he puts in his movies. There was a lot of good stuff in 'Capitalism, A Love Story,'--but then he had to go all swooning over Obama when he got to the '08 elections--who brought back Timothy Geithner to the Treasury department, who had much to do with the very same deregulation that was passed in 2000 that was at the root of so much of the crooked dealing outlined in the rest of the film.)