Support 911Blogger


Change is Happening!

The efforts of the 9/11 truth community to get the attention of "official" media are having the desired effect. I know this because recently our local paper, the St. Louis Post Dispatch, published a series of letters to the editor (with associated comments in their on-line forums) that gave real voice to the questions frequently raised here.

They have published letters to the editor about 9/11 issues a time or two before, but this time they published a series of three related letters over the course of about a week where—in my opinion—the arguments for questioning 9/11 spoke much louder than the opposing view. This kind of quiet attention from a local editorial staff seems to clearly signal an awakening to the core 9/11 questions, particularly since the last word went to a fellow questioner of the official story of 9/11. Further, the on-line comments were overwhelmingly from people who were largely well informed about the holes in the government's theories of what happened on that day.

Following are links to the article that started the exchange and to the letters that followed:

April 2nd - Original Editorial that inspired 9/11 letter

http://www.stltoday.com/news/opinion/columns/the-platform/editorial-reining-in-the-nsa-s-snooping-at-least-at/article_d5ee...

April 5th – First Letter-to-the-Editor Raising What-Happened-on-9/11 as a Issue

http://www.stltoday.com/news/opinion/mailbag/letters-to-the-editor/challenge-the-story-which-is-basis-of-our-fear-of/artic...

April 8th - Letter Defending 9/11 Commission Report

http://www.stltoday.com/news/opinion/mailbag/letters-to-the-editor/studies-find-no-evidence-for-conspiracy-theories/articl...

April 14th – Letter Critiquing Defense of 9/11 Commission Findings

http://www.stltoday.com/news/opinion/mailbag/letters-to-the-editor/jet-fuel-fire-could-not-have-melted-steel-in-collapses/...

To read the on-line comments follow the link at the bottom of each web page.

The years of efforts by the activists who write and/or are reported on here are bringing the question of what really happened on 9/11 to the public's attention. Thank you! It's working. Keep it up!

Very encouraging

Very encouraging, PR, thanks for the post.

The truth will out.

More news...

By Frances T. Shure: Why Do Good People Become Silent—or Worse—about 9/11? - Part 6: Conformity

Chicago, IL - AE911Truth Relentless on the American Institute of Architects

This Summer, AE911Truth heads into the Windy City for the 2014 National Convention of the American Institute of Architects, the fifth AIA convention that AE911Truth has attended since 2008. It takes place June 26-28, and will be held at Chicago's McCormick Place on South Lake Shore Drive.

Expected to draw nearly 800 exhibitors and over 20,000 building professionals, the event promises to be yet another good opportunity for AE911Truth to sound its wake-up call to thousands of architects and others who remain unaware of the alternatives to the impossible claims of the official story of 9/11.

David Chandler: Why I Am Convinced 9/11 Was an Inside Job

Question fo any architect or structural engineer....

Excellent news.This should be a very good event!

A quick thought - the architects' community must be highly aware of building codes and regulations - after all, these are a fundamental factor in the design of buildings. In the case of 9/11, we all witnessed the first (and last) time in history that steel and concrete framed high rise buildings failed *completely*, *symmetrically*, *rapidly* and *spectacularly*, as a result of local fires, or so we were told. If this was indeed the case, then one of the very first things we would have logically expected would be a complete revamp of building codes to make sure that buildings, both in design and under construction would not suffer the same fate in the event of fire. Furthermore, we would logically expect that existing high-rises in all US cities would have to be retrofitted to conform with the new regulations brought about by the events of 9/11. After all, if WTC7, which was not hit by a plane, failed on account of local fires - then ANY high rise would be at risk from the same.

Perhaps architects who are not familiar with 9/11 Truth could be asked, in a carefully framed question (preferably on camera) - but asked in casual fashion about "the new regulations", what are they, and how do they affect the design of new structures... I would be most curious as to what kind of responses the interviewer would get!

Comments

The comments at these articles are also very encouraging.