Do The American People Still Care About 9/11 Truth?

Do The American People Still Care About 9/11 Truth?
By Derrick Broze July 28, 2016
…the (28 PAGES) documents show clear ties to Saudi Arabia. Still, many in the 9/11 Truth movement are cautious of the 28 pages, with some calling the whole fiasco a psychological operation being conducted on the American people. What is the purpose of the PsyOp? The idea would be that “the powers that wish they were” allow a controlled release of the low hanging fruit (28 pages) and focus attention on Saudi Arabia rather than possible connections to the U.S. government, Pakistan, or Israel.

This allows the public (and some 9/11 researchers) to feel like there has been a victory and now we can all go back to normal life. Also, this keeps the conversation on the 28 pages and not on the other anomalies which occurred on September 11, 2001. There is also the fact that it has been public record for many years that the majority of the alleged hijackers had ties to Saudi Arabia.

The fact that these pages would be released at all should be celebrated, but it should not cause the 9/11 Truth Movement to rest for a single moment. With the 15th anniversary approaching in less than 2 months this a grand opportunity to have conversations about the many, many questions surrounding the attacks. After all, even if the Saudis were involved, it does not explain how the buildings could fall at near free-fall speed or how or why World Trade Center 7 fell despite not being hit by a plane.

Regardless of whether or not you believe the 28 pages are the end of the 9/11 Truth search or just another distraction, the American people are tired of being lied to by their government. There is a growing discontent in the nation right now and many of the crimes perpetuated by the government against the people have been allowed in the name of keeping people safe from terror attacks. Simply put, exposing 9/11 destroys the whole Police and Surveillance State.

For 15 years architects, engineers, actors, scientists, pilots, firefighters, activists, and family members of the victims have raised a wide range of questions related to the funding of the attacks, the physics of the buildings’ collapse, the possibility of controlled demolition or other exotic weapon used to bring the buildings down, and much, much more.

For the 15th anniversary, the collective “9/11 Truth” movement will….


"Why Saudi Ties To 9/11 Mean US Ties to 9/11"

Great post, TomT.

From the Washingtonsblog link...

16.The Saudi government was sued by thousands of 9/11 victim’s family members due to the suspicion that Saudi Arabia helped to finance Al Qaeda.
The Saudis hired the law firm of Bush Administration insider James Baker to defend them in that lawsuit.

NEWSWEEK - April 2003

...members of the Saudi royal family and the country's wealthiest businessmen--many of whom are defendants in the case--have offered up seven-figure retainers to some of the toniest and most politically connected law firms in the country.

Baker Botts, Sultan's law firm, for example, still boasts former secretary of State James Baker as one of its senior partners. Its recent alumni include Robert Jordan, the former personal lawyer for President Bush who is now U.S. ambassador to Saudi Arabia.

An internal list of other law firms retained in the case, reviewed by NEWSWEEK , reads like a veritable "who's who" of the U.S. legal community. Among those firms and their Saudi clients are: Wilmer, Cutler & Pickering (Prince Mohammed al Faisal); Kellog, Huber, Hansen, Todd & Evans (Prince Turki al Faisal); Jones, Day (the Binladin Group); Ropes & Grey (Khaled bin Mahfouz); White & Case,(the Al-Rajhi Banking Group); King & Spalding (the Arab Bank and Youssef Nada); Akin Gump (Mohammed Hussein Al-Almoudi); and Fulbright & Jaworski (Nimir Petroleum.)

But legal sources say some high-priced firms and their senior partners have been wary of the Saudi overtures--despite offers of retainers that, in some cases, have ranged as high as $5 million....

Actually, more and more people care

The nearly 7.5 million views for this video suggest people are interested in 9/11:

As for the 28 pages, the lack of interest among the populace is obviously a function of downplaying by the media. That said, the pages, important as they are, are a diversion--whether intentionally or not--from questions such as "Who blew up the towers (WTC 1, 2, 7, and perhaps 6)?"

It's not that the pages aren't important. Page 14 alone, about al-Bayoumi, *should* be enough to open an entire new investigation.

Some excellent comments about the pages are made by Kevin Ryan, both in RLM's link above and at

A nice definition of, and a whole page about, the "limited hangout" is at 'A "limited hangout" is the deliberate revelation of some information (i.e. about malfeasance) to try to prevent discovery of other information.'

The 28 pages, as portrayed by the media, are what I would call a risky limited hangout, one I hope backfires and leads more people to take interest in 9/11.

Among my friends, the subject of the 28 pages has allowed me to start new conversations about 9/11. They have become more open to the idea that 9/11 was indeed a horrible conspiracy involving the US, Israel, and, ironically, to a perhaps lesser extent Saudi Arabia. They see these pages have been classified for more than a decade, and they listen to such statements as "You know, there's also classified information about Israel and 80,000 more pages about Saudis."

RE: 7.5M

Unsurprising that it's littered with the standard variations of no-planes disinformation.

DisInfo -- This is a tough nut to crack.

DisInfo -- This is a tough nut to crack. We have all probably fallen prey to disinformational aspects or to altered relative importances. I have been duped many times. The irony is that "being duped" can be a tough thing to self-recognize, just like one's own faults, quirks and aberrations.

What I am certain about...
~ I am certain that telling others about the 9/11 Cover-up is emphatically and extremely important.
~ And I am certain that "Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth" is one of the best tools to use in the dissemination of the 9/11 Cover-up.

William F Pepper tells it well... AND TAKE NOTE OF THE VERY LAST SECONDS OF THE VIDEO (grin)

I have no problem with civil discourse and discussions on any topic, especially within the choir.
However, when it comes to a new person being exposed to information which could shake the stability of their world view, there are sane appropriate ways to do this.
The following scenario damages our cause... The individual who tells a new person often inappropriate hard-to-digest overwhelming information about 9/11 and false flags.

My speculation - A Conspiracy Theory to destroy 9/11 Activism

This is only my speculation.

Besides disinformation (or along with it), I feel that part of the operation to destroy the 9/11 Truth movement is to THWART actions of ACTIVISM, to hinder the outreach towards waking up new people.
One of the myriad of ways they do this is to entice the choir to sing to itself in a closed room.
There are thousands of "Truther" type blogs, YouTube Channels, alternative news websites and radio programs, pundits, online commenters, etc.
For the most part these places are choir to choir formats. The target audience is not new people.
And for topping on the cake, daily we are hit with lots of new controversial terrorist activites or corrupt government-corporate news stories which the alternative "truther" media bites into.
So, in essence at the end of the day, the choir sings about all the frauds to the choir.

I am not saying that choir to choir news or discussion is a bad thing.

But ask this question:
Where are all the alternative "truther" media reports about the activists on the ground actually trying to inform others or better conditions?
Where are the stories about ordinary people who get out there and try to make a difference?


Perhaps, even the alternative media has been duped by a Covert Operation designed to just keep the choir in a state of rage complaining to choir members about the fraud of it all.
We end up with...
Just keyboarders with no effective action.
Just sofa sitters being intellectually glib thinking airy-fairie thoughts.
Or "Administrators & Planners" saying "Here is an action that someone else should do".

What about the people who actually get their hands dirty, who are actively trying to get the word out to new people?
I rarely hear about the people who are in the field plowing the dirt and planting the seeds on virgin minds.

There is an absence of encouragement towards real world activism within the alternative truther media. It is rarely mentioned.
I think this is by design.
I think that the Powers That Be do not want activists highlighted in any type of media unless it serves an agenda.
Even mainstream media will not report on certain large protest gatherings.

But we also have an alternative media that does not highlight grassroots activism.

In one respect, the alternative "truther" media (news, radio, bloggers, commenters, etc.) are culpable for the lack of visible 9/11 Activism.

Agreed, TomT

Encourage activism. Encourage participation. The people's ears are open.

Are there any folks at North Texans for 911 Truth, who might be willing to start up an active website on 911 with potential large-scale participation? I would gladly nominate you and Joe to monitor it, due to your dedication.

PS Just so you'll know, I certainly do not advocate for "no planes". The main point I was making for the "CIA Insider" vid linked to above was its large viewership, not its flawlessness. It refers at one point to plane swapping, not "no planes." Also, Susan Lindauer speaks of thermonuclear weaponry at the vid's beginning. She has made it clear elsewhere that she is not claiming nukes were actually used for 911. She is of course just reporting what she had been warned to watch out for. She later deferred to AE911Truth and accepted that thermitic material and possibly other explosives were used to bring down the towers.


"large viewership, not its flawlessness" I definitely didn't mean to imply you did.

You are welcome.


Satyakaama, I track with you man!

I track with everything you said.
I like you and always enjoy your comments. (but I can't pronounce your name. ha!)
(It is a shame that some great points are made in videos / articles, but the videos/articles also contain tidbits which don't fit appropriately for a standard of credibility when viewed by raw public. I understand. It can be tricky and I have definitely had my share of reprimands. I still stumble. I see the value of maintaining a standard otherwise credibility becomes marginalized. Not everyone will agree on where that line for the standard should be, but so what? We better dang well have a standard.)

ha!...I am worn out. It is tough just to keep up with all the stuff our group has going on. I can't take on anymore.
The same is probably true with Joe.
Our group does more than only 9/11 issues (such as VAXXED or Fluoride or health) and so we stay very busy. We are fortunate in that some members of our group are real Activists. Gina runs circles around me as far as making things happen. The VAXXED movie showing last night that she put together was a packed AMC theatre. Doctors and people's testimonies at the beginning. Info-bags for everyone. Another theatre showing in a couple weeks. Wednesday (10th) Gina has speakers slated before the Dallas Mayor and City Council. Joe will speak Wed.

Thank You

It's appreciated. Keep fighting the good fight.

Speaking of videos

that show maintained interest in 9/11, this one is less than 300 views short of 2 million. It should surpass 2 million today, as it is climbing at more than 1 thousand views per day, even after being on YouTube nearly two years.

I would like to see the lawsuit lead to "disovery".


n. the entire efforts of a party to a lawsuit and his/her/its attorneys to obtain information before trial through demands for production of documents, depositions of parties and potential witnesses, written interrogatories (questions and answers written under oath), written requests for admissions of fact, examination of the scene and the petitions and motions employed to enforce discovery rights. The theory of broad rights of discovery is that all parties will go to trial with as much knowledge as possible and that neither party should be able to keep secrets from the other (except for constitutional protection against self-incrimination). Often much of the fight between the two sides in a suit takes place during the discovery period.