There are basically 4 historians people site to claim Jesus existed. 1) Tacitus 2)Pliny 3) Josephus 4) Suetonius,
-All poor, interpretive sources, while Josephus was proven a forgery.

The info denoted by these writers is obscure, ambiguous and FAR from any proof that the great "Jesus" existed in
all his fantastic, miracle ridden glory. I would say about 5 PARAGRAPHS exists outside of the bible which have any semblance of
this "Jesus" character... all interpretive. Not to mention you would think a guy who rose from the dead and all the other silly sci-fi crap,
would have made into into thousands of volumes of the historians... not a few paragraphs of dribble. Its pathetic.

911 was an inside job and Christianity is a fraud. It's time to wake up.

Zeit-man, you have done a fabulous thing here. I will be burning a lot of these DVDs and passing them out as soon as you make it available - any plans for that?

I have not yet watched part 1 - the following comments are only in response to other comments on this forum including your own.

The historical record of Jesus is not restricted to the (4) sources that you mention. Jesus did not die on the cross, he survived it (having only been on the cross 3-4 hours) and made his way with one or more "disciples" to India. There are many books about the evidence of this and one particular source that is unimpeachable. Jesus lived a full life in India and was buried in what is now Kashmir.

Your otherwise fabulous video is self-denigrated by your prejudice and presumed knowledge of that which you cannot know - whether Jesus was a real or mythiical character. I can get behind all the denigration of religion and the way that religion is used by "the controllers" that anybody wants to put out there, but I cannot get behind speculation about Jesus' not having existed based solely on the limited sources that you mention. (And, I'm not a Christian in case you're wondering about prejudice on my part.)

As others have stated, your speculative statements about the existence of the historical figure we call Jesus constitute a serious flaw in what otherwise is a fabulous piece of work. Truth.

The work is an analysis of information coming out of the Bible. I'm not talking about other people's ideas, such as "the jesus who went to india", as that isn't in the Gospels.
The Jesus OF THE BIBLE however, if ones take the time to research it fully, is nowhere to be found in the historical record, while nearly all aspects of this "character" are attributed to other pre-christian gods. The logic of the evolution of the jesus character in a "solar/steller" cult myths becomes very obvious.
Please watch part one.
I find it odd for you to criticize a part of the work ..........you haven't even seen!

"while nearly all aspects of this "character" are attributed to other pre-christian gods. " is repeated often in new age circles but isn't really true. Most of the aspects of the character is related specifically to the Torah and the psalms of the old testemant. The 'solar/stellar' generalization (Horus! Mithras!) comes from people who don't take the time to research the connections of the new testament to the old testament.

News editor at The Watchman Report, www.watchmanreport.com, delivering 9/11 truth to the Christian community

The Pre-Christan gods are a reality. It's there for all to see.... if one chooses to see.
Go ahead and dismiss them.... they won't go away.
The truth will never go away.

are realities, and so is the Torah and the books of prophets and other writings that make up the Tanakh, or in Christian terminology, old testament books. Your response just shows you haven't done the research, sorry. There is at least a realistic argument that a jewish sect made up many or all of the stories in the gospels to fit their leader into satisfying hundreds of verses specific to the faith given in the Tanakh.

The Horus/Mithras stuff is just intellecual laziness and dishonesty, "Ooh, another story with a virgin birth!" "Another story with someone dying and coming back to life! Wow! That's incredible! I'm just going to disregard that just about every word supposedly stated by and every action supposdly taken by Jesus is specifically related to a section of the Tanakh."

News editor at The Watchman Report, www.watchmanreport.com, delivering 9/11 truth to the Christian community

over 34 years worth in fact and what Zeitgeist is saying is absolutely correct.
Notice how you are doing exactly what those that refuse to accept the cold hard facts of 9/11 truth do, just flat out denial of what is right in front of your face.
The Bible is without any question just an Astrological Drama, even they way it was written in verses & parables, homilies etc are like old Pagan Passion plays which were acted out on a stage.
The NT follows a 1 year ministry of the SUN, first the SUN meets whom? well the first constellation of course which is Aquarius the water bearer (John the baptist).
Whom does the SUN meet second on his 1 year trip? The 2 Fishermen (Pisces). and so on all through the bible.

How is it that the SUN manages to ride BOTH an "ass, and on a colt, the foal of an ass" into Jerusalem in August? Well maybe it just could be that Cancer is rising that month and the SUN passes through both of the stars that make up the claws of the constellation Cancer and guess what the names of those stars were in Chaldean star charts... Yep "The ASS & THE FOAL....DOH!
Today they are more commonly known as "Asellus Borealis and Asellus Australis" (The Northern and Southern Donkey/Ass).

I think Part one is a good precursor to 9/11 truth because it shows exactly how ignorant myths become fact in the minds of the delusional.
Millions have been fooled into believing the myth of Christianity, so too have millions been fooled into believing the utter BS of the Official Government Conspiracy Theory.

"which pagan tradition are you referring to here? Because it isn't true."

This proves your ignorance of the subject as you don't even know about pagan passion plays which were extremely popular for many centuries, the orators were literally the rock stars of their day.

The gospels are passion plays designed to be read or acted out in front of an audience. Passion plays were a common feature of pagan religion. Looking at the Gospels themselves one finds a chopply written, scene by scene, display of the life of the God man. Only the important aspects of his life are described. The minor events and influences of the life of Jesus are not recorded, which leaves one to think that the Gospels are indeed a play.
One in particular that comes to mind is the "Yusirian Drama", which was the enveloping of a priest in a shroud by two other priests, disguised as wolves. These two wolflike characters – portraying the divine guides of the dead – conducted the shrouded one to a temple of Auset/Isis outside the city where they left him. They would later return and lead the shrouded priest, who enacted the role of King Rhampsinitus, back into the city. On his return, the shrouded priest brought with him a napkin, supposedly given to him by Auset. Parts of this ceremony became the narrative in the Gospel of John where we read of visitors to Jesus’ tomb beholding a napkin and a shroud and two angels.
Another is the Drama of Bel

The bible is written as a stage play, verses, acts, etc this is obvious to anyone not brain dead.

I have spoken to MANY scholars of ancient religions, have also read many diaries of several archaeologist , I also have about 85 volumes in my library concerning this subject.

You have no clue what you are talking about, all you are doing is grasping at straws out of desperation to defend your belief in your sun god.

http://www.africawithin.com/studies/egyptian_great_year.htm

http://www.litjournal.com/docs/fea_pagan2.html