http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070429/ap_on_re_us/highway_collapse

Hmmmmmmm...

In any case, this will certainly serve as timely rebuttal-ammo whenever the implausibility of the WTC collapse is pointed out. Could it be...?
I'm not saying anything yet. They cite the temperature: 2,750 degrees. Does gasoline burn that much hotter than jet fuel?

Some further information on this topic to consider:

BBC Reports the collapse of Building 7 while it is still clearly standing in the background:
http://www.911podcasts.com/display.php?vid=200

911 Mysteries:
http://www.911podcasts.com/display.php?vid=183

911 Press For Truth:
http://www.911podcasts.com/display.php?vid=165

Terrorstorm:
http://www.911podcasts.com/display.php?vid=151

For its October 16 issue, the New Yorker’s Nicholas Lemann has penned what I would call a soft-hit-piece on 9/11 Truth, entitled: “Paranoid Style---How conspiracy theories become news.” The article does a kind of meta-handwaving-dismissal, not by poo-pooing the Truth Movement directly, but instead by pish-poshing the coverage (in the news and documentary film) of Truth research. The implication here is that the coverage is just an inevitable by-product to some doubly inconsequential fringe cult, so never you mind anything else you may see in print or on screen.
The method is duly served by the New Yorker’s characterization of Richard Hofstadter, the ideological father behind conspiracy-theory-derision, as having been “one of the country’s leading intellectuals,” and then going on to treat his superficial, supercilious bull-shill as exhaustive explanation for the unfortunate “phenomenon” of conspiracy theoretics. Case in point? What else? Loose Change. About that, the writer, with the smug distraction characteristic of all the New Yorker’s most deliciously insubstantial pontifications, opines: “To engage in huffy denunciation of the journalistic shortcomings of ‘Loose Change’ would probably not change the minds of many of its fans.” Of course we know it’s not worth your time kind sir, but you favor us with examples yet! “Commercial flights did not hit the World Trade Center and Pentagon…United Flight 93 was diverted to Cleveland and its passengers taken to an empty NASA research facility…two AA flights that crashed that morning had not been scheduled to fly…” etc. [Editor’s note: LC guys, what was that part about the NASA warehouse all about, anyway?]

Calling all New York Truth advocates and agitators:
Pace University will be hosting televised "town hall"-style meetings this week to mark the much-heralded Five-Year-Anniversary:

http://www.ny1.com/ny1/content/index.jsp?stid=1&aid=62136

One needs to RSVP, which I imagine will be enforced due to the televised nature of the event.
This looks like a great opportunity for advocates and researchers to sow some seeds of skepticism and suspicion.
Just remember that a search for the Truth does not "insult the victims." We are all victims of the trauma and the deception.