Molten Steel

9/11 Free Fall 10/10/13: Gery Warner

Gery Warner is one of the experts featured in "9/11 Explosive Evidence, Experts Speak Out." He spent two formative years as a Project Engineer for Alcan (The Aluminum Company of Canada) in the casting plant, where he dealt with molten aluminum. In this episode he talks about the controlled demolition evidence and shares the interesting story of his own waking up process.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e4r3VYA-52w

An Open Letter to The Economist Magazine

By Stephen Demetriou: The significance of molten metal in the basements of three completely separate, distinct collapse events...?

FEMA report confirms molten steel found at WTC 7

FEMA confirms that molten steel was found at the WTC7 site.

Here is the Link: http://www.fema.gov/pdf/library/fema403_apc.pdf

"It is much more difficult to tell if melting has occured in the grain boundary regions in this steel as was observed in the A36 steel in the WTC 7."

Under the "Suggestions for Future Research" you find this...

"The severe corrosion and subsequent erosion of Samples 1 and 2 are a very unusual event. No clear explanation for the source of the sulfur has been identified. The rate of corrosion is also unknown. It is possible that this is the result of long-term heating in the ground following the collapse of the buildings. It is also possible that the phenomenon started prior to collapse and accelerated the weakening of the steel structure."

Thermite and thermate will give the result found under the rubble. It keeps on eroding and giving off heat for a very long time. Plus, needs no oxygen to do that.

9/11 an Inside Job, by H. Titan, Ph.D.

This is submitted for Review and Critique.

Pls refer to http://bogusstory.com/911_inside_job.html
and http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/archives/cat_911.html for more details.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

9/11 an Inside Job, by H. Titan, Ph.D.

In the wake of revelations of murderous deception in the Iraq War, carried out by the Bush Administration, more and more Americans are asking questions regarding the basis for the US "War on Terror".

Half of New Yorkers believe US leaders had foreknowledge of impending 9-11 attacks and consciously failed to act; 66% call for new probe of unanswered questions by congress or New York's Attorney General, see Zogby, and thousands of Americans have signed a petition for a new probe.

A poll shows 89% of CNN Internet users feel this way and over 63% of Canadians feel similarly. On the 3 year anniversary of the 9/11 attacks 80% Al-Arabia satellite TV viewers thought others, besides Bin Ladin, were behind 9/11.

Journal of 9/11 Studies Letter: Molten What?

Journal of 9/11 Studies Letter
http://www.journalof911studies.com/letters/MoltenWhat2.pdf

Molten What?
Jerry Lobdill
29 March 2007

There is much misunderstanding about the meaning of the colors we see when we look at pictures of the WTC towers before they fell. 9/11 literature is full of faulty assumptions, assertions, and conclusions. In this short paper I will present a case for how the pictures should be interpreted regarding the colors of thermal emissions we see in them. The case is based on the physics of black body radiation and gravity flow of liquids.

[...]

Dr. Jones demonstrated by experiment that organic material floats on the liquid aluminum and burns up (oxidizes). Further, the liquid aluminum in this experiment was never heated to the point where it no longer appeared silvery. This experiment gave the expected result. Organic material would not change the color vs temperature behavior of aluminum.

The conclusion of this analysis is inescapable. The liquid metal was molten iron.

Note: This article is related to the discussion found in this letter

Glowing Aluminum Disinformation (Feb 8, 2007)

New letter at Journal of 9/11 Studies

My letter titled "Molten What?" has just been published at http://www.journalof911studies.com/letters.html.

Gas-Fire Melts a Freeway! What Exactly is Going on Here?

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070429/ap_on_re_us/highway_collapse

Hmmmmmmm...

In any case, this will certainly serve as timely rebuttal-ammo whenever the implausibility of the WTC collapse is pointed out. Could it be...?
I'm not saying anything yet. They cite the temperature: 2,750 degrees. Does gasoline burn that much hotter than jet fuel?

Some further information on this topic to consider:

BBC Reports the collapse of Building 7 while it is still clearly standing in the background:
http://www.911podcasts.com/display.php?vid=200

911 Mysteries:
http://www.911podcasts.com/display.php?vid=183

911 Press For Truth:
http://www.911podcasts.com/display.php?vid=165

Terrorstorm:
http://www.911podcasts.com/display.php?vid=151

6 weeks at 1500 degrees

Only the use of thermite could = 6 weeks at 1500 degrees- why so hot Rudy?

My latest on "Molten Metal", for the german speaking-part

Geschmolzenes Metall am Ground Zero!

Eine deutsche Zusammenfassung
über die Berichterstattung zu diesem Thema

Dirk Gerhardt aka Sitting-Bull, 15.02.2007

16.09.2001: Data collected by NASA
finds dozens of “hot spots” at Ground Zero
(some over 1300 degrees C)

“The temperature of the fire at the WTC was not unusual, and it was most definitely not capable of melting steel.”

Die Temperatur des Feuers in den WTC-Türmen war nicht ungewöhnlich [hoch], und es war ganz bestimmt nicht in der Lage, Stahl zu schmelzen.

(Prof. Eagar, MIT, 2001)

“Your gut reaction would be the jet fuel is what made the fire so very intense, a lot of people figured that's what melted the [WTC] steel. Indeed it did not, the steel did not melt.”

Ihre erste Reaktion wäre abzunehmen, dass Flugzeugbenzin die Feuer so heiß werden ließ, viele Leute hielten das für die Ursache des geschmolzenen Stahls. Aber so war es nicht, der Stahl schmolz nicht.

(Dr. Gayle, NIST, 2005)

Heiße Infernos