Venezuela's Chavez says Bush planned 9/11 attacks - Video

Video: Venezuela's Chavez says Bush planned 9/11 attacks -

HUGO CHAVEZ, VENEZUELAN PRES. (through translator): The hypothesis that is gaining strength, which was said on television last night, and which could soon blow up, was that it was the same U.S. imperial power that planned and carried out this terrible terrorist attack, or act, against its own people and against citizens all over the world. Why? To justify the aggression that was immediately unleashed on Afghanistan, on Iraq and the threats against all of us, against Venezuela, too.

Thanks Gold for the heads up!

This is rather not good news

... much politcal influence never did any good to any case...

how is this not good news?

how is this not good news? because daddy government says Chavez is a communist? come on, this is great news. not all americans fall for the bullshit propaganda. i have been feeling much better about the american people lately, only another false flag could stop our momentum.

Whistleblower video and book

I think that we should thank Chavez for stepping forward. He's in a very dangerous position, and he knows it; but I don't know how many U.S. residents know it. Perhaps we should be educating them about that as well as the 9/11 cover-up.

The author stated that he finally wrote the book when he saw what happened on 9/11. He doesn't say that he thinks that 9/11 was an inside job, but he does say that he thinks it was revenge for what the U.S. multinational corporations have been doing to people like Chavez all over the world - from South America, Central America, Indonesia, Saudia Arabia, Iran, etc. to Iraq.

This writer admits that the CIA was behind more than just Chile's Salvadore Allende's assassination.

Everyone should see the following site and perhaps consider purchasing the following book: Just as the main media won't diffuse too much information about the 9/11 truth movement, they won't interview him to discuss his book.

"Confessions of an Economic Hit Man"

How the U.S. Uses Globalization to Cheat Poor Countries Out of Trillions

We speak with John Perkins, a former respected member of the international banking community. In his book Confessions of an Economic Hit Man he describes how as a highly paid professional, he helped the U.S. cheat poor countries around the globe out of trillions of dollars by lending them more money than they could possibly repay and then take over their economies.

Perkins writes, "The book was to be dedicated to the presidents of two countries, men who had been his clients whom I respected and thought of as kindred spirits - Jaime Roldós, president of Ecuador, and Omar Torrijos, president of Panama. Both had just died in fiery crashes. Their deaths were not accidental. They were assassinated because they opposed that fraternity of corporate, government, and banking heads whose goal is global empire. We Economic Hit Men failed to bring Roldós and Torrijos around, and the other type of hit men, the CIA-sanctioned jackals who were always right behind us, stepped in."

To see the video and read the transcript:


critique of "Confessions of an Economic Hit Man" and more

Someone else posted this very important information, and I wanted to make sure everyone had an opportunity to read it. It's a real eye-opener.



Meditations on 9/11 Truth


Maybe not, but I don't see

Maybe not, but I don't see any trails and Chavez is a very respected man in the latin community, a growing portion of the American Populace.

good and bad

It will have a positive effect outside the U.S I think. For many people in South America it will be the first time the idea of an inside job crossed their mind. This could lead to some great new research not effected by typical U.S filters.

On the downside within the US Hugo Chavez is one of the only foreign leaders John Q Public can name and most associate him as an enemy.

Chavez is only an enemy to the TFM

Chavez is only an enemy to the TFM 's that buy the crap the MSM feeds them hook line and sinker.

The enemy of my enemy is my

The enemy of my enemy is my friend.

Besides, Venezuela has helped the poor of the NE by offering heating oil at a reduced cost.   

Re: South America

Tonight at my local 9/11 meeting, we were comparing stories from our contacts in other countries. A guy with a good buddy in Argentina says EVERYONE there knows 9/11 was an inside job.

on 9/11+5

I was descended on by a tour group comprised of about 25 Argentinians, Italians, and Spaniards. They took all my remaining DVDs, jotted down my website ( and thanked me as they left. The Spaniards were especially interested because they have growing doubts about M-11, the Madrid train bombing. Previously, a brazilian defended me before a group of critics by telling them that in Brazil everyone knows the truth and that the world is laughing at Americans for being so gullible. Global awareness is important because Americans will soon realize that if they encounter well-informed internationals they are going to look like idiots if they don't get with the program. Globalization rightly has its discontents but one aspect that is undeniably good is the growing pressure to prove ourselves to people from different backgrounds and with different perspectives. Granted, 9/11 was propaganda aimed at the global community, but obviously internationals are going to be a lot more skeptical of the USG. Given how skeptical Americans themselves are, I think what we will see with the recent explosion in interest on the subject is the world community waking up faster than Americans, who will nonetheless follow, a bit more slowly, but surely in the direction of full disclosure and the truth.

As I've said before--we can't be stopped, not even by another false flag attack. As long as we continue to move forward, slowly, confidently, peacefully and with positivity we will change the world forever and history will be re-written.

"Among the 'spider-man' skeptics are those who claim that no human can shoot web and stick to walls... They conveniently ignore the fact that he was bitten by a radioactive spider."

Daily Bugle editorial debunking the claims of spider-man deniers

the mainstream media loves

the mainstream media loves to jump on stories where Arabs, Muslims, or political enemies say such things.. they won't cover the polls showing a large support of this same view by Americans, but I wouldn't be surprised if they covered this to make Venezuela a more 'acceptable' target.

That's very true about the

That's very true about the US media and the corrupt establishment, and also true of a few brainwashed idiots. But nuff real people do dig Chavez despite all that, and so I think things like this will make people like Chomsky and blowback supporters take note. So it is positive.

Raw Story kicking some ass today.

Video: Chavez touts theories that Bush planned 9/11


Dem effort to limit surveillance bill blocked
Raw acquires NSA wiretap talking points...
Verizon denies taps; Exec. was former AG for Bush Sr.


Video: CNN, Zahn cover Internet 9/11 conspiracy movie

I Don't See the Point

Although I'm glad the world is paying attention, as you can see from Drudge coverage, calling attention to Chavez' comments is not very helpful. This is akin to the president of Iran saying the same thing. Even mainstream doubters will dismiss his comments as anti American.

I'm much more impressed when an American serviceman or woman makes such statements, or a CIA veteran.

Just yesterday..

Chavez was saying..."may"...or..."plausible". Why the sudden shift?

This is great..I think?

Hey guys, I'm back, what did

Hey guys, I'm back, what did I miss?

Looks like I got some podcasting to do... 

Dude you back from the NY

Dude you back from the NY City protests or holiday? Cus trust me man, if your back from holiday you've got some AMAZING SH!T to catch up on!! Check Jon's movie dude, you'll see what I mean, I so wish I was there.

No thanks, Hugo

I'm also uncomfortable with Chavez getting on board. This drives a larger wedge between Left and Right on 9/11, which will die a horrible death if it is politicized.

i couldnt disagree more.

i couldnt disagree more.

I'll second that.

I'll second that.

Chavez is awesome! "The

Chavez is awesome! "The Revolution Won't be Televised" google it and watch it if you haven't already.

I wish I was getting back

I wish I was getting back from GZ or somewhere exciting, I've been buried at work and haven't been able to pay attention to the movement.  I haven't heard any stories about the protests or anything, guess I'll get caught up when I set up all the podcasts that I've missed.

 What about Rick Siegel's protest?  Anyone hear anything about that?

Check it

way off topic, but does

way off topic, but does anyone know if its normal for my face to still be totally numb after ive been out of the dentist for a good 5 hours now? this is freaking me out.......

LOL yea course that shit's

LOL yea course that shit's normal, hahaha., not normal.

I remember the same thing happened to my friend "Buck", and he wound up with lock jaw or something nasty like that. The doctor said even if he'd had his tetanus shot, still wouldn't matter because of the things these dentists are using these days.

You'll be fine ;)

It’s just anaesthetic

It’s just anaesthetic dude, that shit wears of eventually. Is the drink pouring out the side of your mouth man LOL?

hahaha, it sure is. but 5

hahaha, it sure is. but 5 and a half hours is normal? the last time i got this done it wore off after just 2 or so hours. Medias got me freaked out with that lockjaw comment.......

you are joking right?

you are joking right? because seriously, im freaked out. its going on 6 hours and my face is still fully numb. tell me your joking. computers dont show sarcasm very well.

It's normal, just don't....

stab the inside of your mouth with a fork just because you can't feel it at the moment.

Believe me, you'll feel it later!

"There's a shadow on the faces of the men who send the guns to the wars that are fought in places where their business interest runs."

Trust man it'll wear off,

Trust man it'll wear off, "lockjaw" LOL that shit Tetanus come on media stop trying to make folks Hypochondriacs here hahaha.

you should have seen me

you should have seen me pacing around work here asking everyone if this is normal. i must have looked like a friggin hypochondriac. i was seriously freaked out though. luckily it seems to be finally wearing off.

Yeah Chris..

I was just having fun with 'ya. Seriously. :)

you son of a bitch. hahaha,

you son of a bitch. hahaha, you had me going man, i must have looked like a psycho running around here asking people if im gonna get lock jaw or nerve damage or some shit. im not a very smart guy, you gotta be careful when making statements like that to me, hahaha.

Dentist: off topic

My dentist gave me a tiny amount of "something new." a couple of weeks ago. I usually never use novacaine since I hate the feeling and don't need it. This time she had to put a clamp really tight and the last time the filling failed since she was too afraid to get the clamp exactly right with me without novacaine. So she had to do it.

Anyway, I said, "Is this normal. This feels much stronger than I remember novacaine?" It's been 10 years at least so I couldn't be sure. Maybe it was me? She finally got around to admitting: no, that it was new stuff and she gave me only an teensy amount.

Well, the whole side of my face was numb, including the inside of my nose. It really sucked. I think your dentist got carried away with whatever new stuff is being touted.

I'd draw the line with the dentist and just tell him/her that this is not acceptable. PERIOD. Regular novacaine is cheaper for the dentist. Call the dentist and say you're having a bad side effect.


"When you eliminate the impossible, whatever remains - however improbable - must be the truth!" - Doyle

it actually finally wore off

it actually finally wore off around 9:30 that night. i had the shots around 1:30. i did have her shoot me with an extra shot though because i was still feeling pain when she was drilling. i just never expected it to last that long,haha. the first time i had the same stuff it wore off in just 2 or 3 hours. the thing about it though, it didnt even wear off at all, it just pretty much stopped all of a sudden. up until around 9:30 it was as numb as when i first got shot with it. i still have at least 3 visits to go with 2 wisdom teeth to be pulled : (

Regardless whether US media

Regardless whether US media covers this or not...Its covered by international media. And frankly, the way Bush is viewed internationaly I dont see many of them rising to his defence. Thats 2 leaders that have called
foul on the Bush administration
The first was in a long letter from Iran that the president "refused to read" Now this? This really needs to be an international investigation in my opinion.
Do the laws of physics change in differant countrys?
NO. When they draw the same conclusions that bring most of us here do you think they can cover that up too?
I dont...I hope

Help needed -- having a discussion..

with an individual who finally began asking real questions after seeing the Danny Jowenko video:

He asked the following regarding WTC7:

"Also, why bother with the explosives in the buildings? And why bother with WTC-7? If the supposed goal was to stir up a fervor in support of a war in the Middle East, why bother with any of that? How many Americans would have been less upset by 9-11 if WTC-7 didn't collapse? Did anyone even know what WTC-7 was before 9-11? Was it worth the added risk of placing explosives in the buildings?"

Any suggestions on the best way to tackle this question regarding the motivation for building 7 on its own?


Some suggest that WTC 7 was the command center from which 9/11 was launched; and thus, had to be destroyed to cover the "scene of the crime" so to speak.

Tell your friend to research

Tell your friend to research the occupants of that building . And the amount of information regarding criminal conduct of same major oil and energy companies which pretty much ended the investigation.

Once the plan was known within the oligarchy..

There were several opportunities to use the events to "ged rid of problems", and/or "profit enormously" from.

WTC7 conveniently vanished with all the SEC records of highly scandalous cases...among other possible motives.

WTC1&2 Made the lease holders billions and eliminated a liablility for the NY Port Authority.

Insider trading on the airlines and other companies made many rich...well, those of at leach of which had the cajones to cash in.

Very true

someone should call on the SEC to explain why they had NO backup whatsoever of several thousands of extremely high-level fraud cases, I think.

Or is it somehow SOP not to do any backups? Any administrative/bureaucratic types here with experience on that?

Boycott Anglo-American oil, go Citgo!

It's a small thing you can do to starve the Empire and support anti-Imperialist truth-tellers like Hugo Chavez. Buy your gas from Citgo, a subsidiary of the Venezuelan national oil company. Your nearest 7-11 also sells Citgo gasoline. This sure beats throwing more money at war-backers/profiteers Exxon,BP,Shell, etc.

Visit my blog, America, the Bushieful!

Agreed. I have been

Agreed. I have been enjoying Citgo sweet crude (refined of course) exclusively for at least a year now.

But be cautious of purchasing at 7-11's. They recently partnered with Citibank for all of their ATM's and they bought out White Hen. Ask before pumping to ensure Venezuelan gas powers your ride.


Excellent new review of 9/11 PRESS FOR TRUTH

Just noticed one of the first truly mainstream reviews of 9/11 PRESS FOR TRUTH, c/o the DVD Savant site at the popular DVD Talk page. The reviewer, Glenn Erickson, is highly respected and has run the popular DVD Savant column for several years, along with recording commentaries for Warner Home Video on some recent film noir DVD's and writing for various magazines. His site is frequented by a lot of key industry insiders and his extremely positive review of the movie is a very good thing.

9/11 PRESS FOR TRUTH review

by Glenn Erickson at DVD Savant

I pause on this September 11 to note that while feel-good emotional dramatizations of the 2001 attacks are starting to proliferate in the media, reliable basic information about our world is becoming ever more scarce, especially on television news. The difference between news, opinion and reassuring entertainment has disappeared, and viewers who want to find facts and full reportage are at a total loss. The airwaves are clogged with voices screaming that the media is overwhelmed by political bias. Any questioning of the version of events reported by the government is held up to instant ridicule.

9/11 Press for Truth is two documentaries in one. Its first part chronicles the experience of four women who lost husbands or sons at the World Trade Center. As the "Jersey Girls" they briefly became a media focus, insisting that the Bush administration was being too secretive and asking for explanations for inconsistencies in official announcements. Most of the supposedly liberal-biased media coverage I heard concentrated on two things -- the personal tragedies of the individual women, and the uselessness of their questions. "Why did their loved ones die?" they asked, and editorial after editorial repeated: "Because our country was attacked, dummies." What more was there to say?

Dorothy Rabinowitz in the Wall Street Journal opinion page from April 2004 uses the above argument while ignoring the Jersey Girls' message. She characterizes their complaints as media grandstanding, saying that our times are "...quick to confer both celebrity and authority on those who have suffered." The implication is that because the plaintiffs are "emotional women", their opinions and concerns have no weight.

The docu presents a reasoned overview of the Jersey Girls' story. The widows and survivors got together initially because no investigation was planned for exactly what happened before and after 9/11. There was a lot of confusing information to be sorted out, such as the fact that no jets were scrambled when the airliners were known to be hijacked, although doing so was standing operating procedure for even minor aerial misadventures, like an off-course jet over Florida. Contradicting administration statements, older news bulletins on the web revealed that the government knew for months that Al Caida operatives were in the country and that their plans for violence specifically mentioned hijacking planes and crashing them into buildings. The survivors also noted that many high-ranking Pentagon officials cancelled travel plans for September 11 because of 'security concerns.' Why that particular morning, and why just them? Finally, when President Bush was staying in Florida, anti-aircraft missile batteries were installed atop his residence -- an extraordinary precaution, we are told.

The survivors, now called the "Family Steering Committee" wanted an impartial investigation like the one that followed the Kennedy Assassination, if only to defuse crazy ideas of high level conspiracies. They found that media outlets and government representatives became interested in their case only when they dramatized their plight as grieving widows. They appeared on TV as concerned housewives (often filmed in their kitchens!) asking why they were being ignored. Only then was a 9/11 Commission set up. After an initial period of sympathy, the media turned hostile. The Jersey Girls, we were told, were using 'the grief card' as a political wedge.

The administration stonewalled the Commission, which eventually held hearings that did not press for answers to the initial questions. In one widow's estimation, 70- 80% of their questions were not addressed at all. Condoleeza Rice appeared before the Commission, gave testimony -- some of which contradicted established pre- 9/11 facts -- and was dismissed. President Bush 'cooperated' with the Commission by meeting in closed session, and not alone. The Commission was granted access to only a tiny bit of requested documentation. The budget to investigate the causes of the 9/11 attack was but a small fraction of the amount granted to investigate President Clinton's sex life during the Lewinsky flap.

The Commission part of the story ends bitterly. Two members of the Commission turned out to be Administration insiders, and coincidentally were the two members designated to decide who is interviewed and which path the Commission would take. In this telling of events, it looks as if the "Family Steering Committee" was duped, along with the rest of the country.

At this point the docu segues into the fact-finding work of Paul Thompson, who assembled an online document called the Complete 911 Timeline. The Timeline simply organizes and correlates documented news reportage on events before and after the attack, comparing what is known to have happened with what spokesmen for the Bush administration later say happened. This Website provides a two-page summary of some of the highlights of Thompson's work. It's all documented - with links to the major newspaper articles used as sources.

Thompson's Timelines become the focus of the rest of the documentary, covering the run-up period to the 9/11 attack and moving forward to the War in Afghanistan. We're surprised to learn that in July of 2001 Bin Laden received Kidney treatment in a U.S. hospital in Dubai, and while there was visited by two CIA agents. This isn't hooey, as the information comes from reports in the Sydney Morning Herald, The London Times and UPI.

Even more alarmingly, the Afghanistan part of the documentary focuses on documented facts that refute President Bush's televised oath to capture Bin Laden, crush Al Caida and to deal equally harshly with any government that harbored them. Apparently trapped in Afghanistan, with full aerial surveillance covering any conventional escape route, Bin Laden was allowed to cross the country in a thousand-vehicle convoy, and then fly to Pakistan. His routes in both cases were (so the docu implies) purposely left unguarded. The docu also offers proof that money for the 9/11 terrorists came from within the Pakistani secret police. The implication -- or conclusion -- is that Pakistan harbors Al Caida and Bin Laden. The U.S. instead decided to attack Iraq. It doesn't add up.

It's easy to fly off into conspiratorial avenues of thought, and perhaps harder to consider the idea that the careful culling of ten thousand pieces of information can easily be made to yield conflicting data. Connecting the dots can produce different pictures, depending on who is choosing the dots. In this case, the sources cited and the facts established are more than credible.

9/11 Press for Truth leads us to some pretty grim ideas about what is really going on in the so-called "War on Terror." We listen to key administration officials ignoring fair questions with evasions, condescending non-answers and repeated fairy-tales about Terrorism and The Enemies of Freedom, and we don't know what to think. Are we being protected from a Truth we cannot handle? Or has a power elite simply hijacked the nation?

The most disturbing thing is that just asking questions is now considered suspicious activity. We've reached the stage where any dissent, questioning of authority or petitioning for answers is treated with ridicule and contempt, as with the "Jersey Girls" of the Family Steering Committee. How dare they expect their government to be accountable!

9/11 Press for Truth is not a shock-doc or a flamboyant Michael Moore type of show. We see the President receiving the news of the attacks, and there are no snide comments about what children's book he is reading. When President Bush fumbles tongue-twisted through simple public statements, he now looks as though he's struggling to avoid talking off the top of his head, to avoid saying anything "off the script." 9/11 Press for Truth doesn't rely on ironic "zingers" to keep up interest. It goes from fact to fact and reminds us that they're all from the public record. It shows very convincingly that we're being routinely lied to on the details, and allows us to decide for ourselves what the truth of the big picture might be. More of these responsible documentaries are being produced and shown. This is one of the most thought provoking I've seen.

Disinformation's DVD of 9/11 Press for Truth looks great in an anamorphic 1:78 presentation. Some talking heads from TV coverage are composed low because the editors had to mask off the constant network, corporate and product-placement banding across the bottom of the frame. The disc has thirty minutes of uncut Commission testimony as an extra.

It can be purchased online at Amazon or at This URL.

This never happened before with a review disc: The entire film is viewable on-line at This URL. You can watch it, or sample it, right now. It doesn't look anywhere near as sharp as the DVD, but the message is undiluted. The blanket availability also proves that the docu is not primarily a money making endeavor.

Paul Thompson's 911 Timeline has been published by HarperCollins and is called The Terror Timeline: Year by Year, Day by Day, Minute by Minute: A Comprehensive Chronicle of the Road to 9/11--and America's Response.

On a scale of Excellent, Good, Fair, and Poor, 9/11 Press for Truth rates:

Movie: Excellent
Video: Excellent
Sound: Excellent
Supplements: 30 minutes of extra uncut testimony
Packaging: Keep case
Reviewed: September 11, 2006

Chavez and Hense

I noticed that Hense had a lot in that film on Chavez.

In the second part where he shows the 911 commission is a bunch of lies. That is very inovative. Another Review of Press for Truth

The best part was where Chavez says that the government may have killed it's own people. No such thing comes from the friends of Soro's Mr. Hense.

Actually, only joking, cant figure out how this got on the page for a Chavez video except for maybe Kyle has paid some people well to post this junk everywhere over anything.

Did this video say anything?

Hugo Chavez is smarter than George W. Bush

Chavez is no dummy. Pay attention to the alliance he is forming with Cuba, China, North Vietnam and Iran. Bush has made America more vulnerable than at anytime in the history of this country.

How? We have lost the moral high ground. Not only have we attacked our own citizens, but we've used that attack to launch wars of aggression against muslim nations.

I would not be so quick to dismiss Chavez. He's no two bit third world dictator. I also understand that he is a master chess player. George Bush can barely play checkers.

Economic Hitman

If you want to understand the rage that is out there towards the Eagle Empire, read John Perkin's book "I was an economic hit man".

Chavez' comment is just another 5lb weight being stacked on the right side of the canoe.

And then, or instead, be

I would not be so quick to

I would not be so quick to dismiss Chavez....George Bush can barely play checkers

Too funny. Lol.

sorry if this is old.




Email Archives
Print © Reprint
Feeds Newsletters

September 12, 2006 -- ON Feb. 7, 2005, I became a member of the Bush/Halliburton/Zionist/CIA/New World Order/Illuminati conspiracy for world domination. That day, Popular Mechanics, the magazine I edit, hit newsstands with a story debunking 9/11 conspiracy theories. Within hours, the online community of 9/11 conspiracy buffs - which calls itself the "9/11 Truth Movement" - was aflame with wild fantasies about me, my staff and the article we had published. Conspiracy Web sites labeled Popular Mechanics a "CIA front organization" and compared us to Nazis and war criminals.

Popular Mechanics crank

Popular Mechanics crank can't admit defeat

The Truth Will Set You Free | September 13 2006

What a loser.

Rather than admit that he's wrong and we're right, the man who thinks he 'debunked' the Truth, with his empty commentary in Popular Mechanics last year, wails and whines about being compared to a Nazi.


Alex Jones' Ground Zero Report Part 3

Prison | September 13 2006

We have made available the MP3 of the entire Alex Jones Show today because of the importance of the broadcast.

Alex is back in the studio to discuss his role in the 9/11 anniversary protests, and isjoined by several truth activists who were there with him including Jason Bermas from the Loose Change crew.

Also featured is a short interview with BBC reporter Greg Palast, who is being criminally charged with unauthorized filming of a "critical national security structure" in Louisiana.

Go to to to download the MP3 and please spread it around as this was an extremely busy and noteworthy show.