Glenn Beck on Bill Maher protest: “9/11 Truth = Timothy McVeigh”!

Glenn Back: “This is the kind of group that ‘a Timothy McVeigh’ would come from.”

This is where Beck, or his producer, got the idea from;

Conspiracy Fanatics Invade Bill Maher
By Dave Nalle

"What they don't seem to get is that being obnoxious doesn't make people respect them, it makes those they want to influence and the audience they want to reach take them even less seriously. If you have a controversial cause and behave like a whacko, then people conclude that your cause is silly even before they have a chance to consider the evidence. "Stupid is as stupid does" is the operating principle under which they seem to be eager to be judged.

As they marginalize themselves more and more with their ridiculous claims and increasingly outrageous behavior, I'm afraid we can expect to see more and more desperate and extreme attention-seeking behavior. That's the pattern of the kind of narcissistic mindset which drives conspiracy fanatics. It's even believable that in the ultimate irony, as they retreat into a world of paranoia and frustration, the 9/11 conspiracy fanatics might themselves turn to violent terrorism to get the attention they so desperately crave. It's easy to laugh at the conspiracists, but it's a grim truth that someone protesting Bill Maher this week might be the next Timothy MacVeigh or Ted Kasinski a few frustrated and ignored years down the road."

Show "Getting behind a protest" by Dem Bruce Lee Styles


(maybe he never left the military)

McVeigh Video Destroys OKC Bombing Official Story

Shows McVeigh was in military receiving instruction in "explosives and demolition" over a year after official story says he was discharged, whistleblower harassed for years while unknowingly in possession of bombshell tape

and . . . . .

'Killology' Founder Is Source of US School Terror Reports?

What do CNN’s hyperactive Glenn Beck and National Geographic TV programs have in common when talking about the possibility of “Muslim Terrorists” shooting school-age children? They are both seemingly using, as their source, a man who invented the word “killology” and helped in the prosecution of Timothy McVeigh – a prosecution that is recognized as increasingly dubious by the US judicial system. Other proponents of the “School terror” plot are apparently affiliated with US Homeland Security.

The "Bill Bean" that presented his revelation on AJ's show...

Anyone know if he's the same "Bill Bean" as below...

His website :


If they are the same guy, then personally I would not regard this as a reliable source, just take a look at the links on the above website, UFOs, alien seekers etc)


Would be interesting to know if they're the same "Bill Bean"

Best wishes

Dem Bruce Lee You Are Way Off Base

Do you realize that Steven Jones and others have been attempting your suggestion of tea & crumpets w/ bill Orielly for years.

What happens every single time?

The same exact thing happens as what happened with this Glenn Beck lunatic.

You are wrong in your suggestions that this shows us in a bad light. Maybe the problem is that you are wiating for acceptance by people like Glenn Beck and Bill Oreilly?

Do we really need that? Nope.

I say :

NO!!!! To pandering to these main stream nut jobs. Glenn Beck? We know what this loony has on his show. He's a lunatic. He addresses the issue in an irrational way. Instead of looking at the facts about building 7 he does a show on the mental stability of 911 Truthers.

Well, if Bill Maher says 911 Truthers need it REALLY THAT CRAZY that activists would show up to confront him?

Your approach is akin to the red-coats of the revolutionary war. are asking 911 Truth to line up in the open fields to face an enemy that is far superior in weaponry and numbers.

Tea And Crumpets won't work.

You seem to be siding with Bill Maher and Glenn Beck that the people who did this are literally mentally stupid and need paxel.

Is that what you are saying?

Can't Stop 9/11 Fever

We don't need "tea &

We don't need "tea & crumpets" and neither do we need to shoot ourselves in the foot by giving shills like Beck the ammo they crave to smear us as "fanatics" and "McVeigh types".

Why not just use our brains a little and not come off as what could be perceived as "crazy"? I don't think the guys who protested are crazy, I completely sympathise with them, but they didn't seem to plan much for what they were about to do beyond shouting things at Maher.

People like you Jpass are all caught up in the hype of this protest, you’re not seeing how bad this makes us look. The media is capitalizing on this opportunity to make us all look "out of control" and "nuts", it's very transparent but you and others can't see that because it seems like people are still in "HOORA STICK IT TO MAHER!!" mode.

I’m still optimistic and hope something good does come out of this, but to say “any publicity is good publicity” is false, if something makes us look bad it’s going to be used to try and damage us - and that is what we are seeing with the meida coverage.

"Why not just use our brains

"Why not just use our brains a little and not come off as what could be perceived as "crazy"?"

That is exactly what they did. Their action has reverberated from one side of the media landscape to the other and back. Glenn Beck was spewing his hatred far before this event and will continue to do so.

In retrospect, this question applies to every single situation...every second that passes....anywhere...anytime.

Why didn't we do it better? It's easy to be a Monday Morning Quarter Back because we can always do better.

According to the majority of 911 Truthers and non-911 Truthers that I've questioned....the protesters didn't come off as crazy. They come off as brave.

You and Glenn Beck are the only ones I know of who thinks they came off ass 'crazy'.

"people like you" ?

No need to bring in the politics of division. Let's agree to disagree on this topic but don't make this into an issue of camps jockeying for position. There are no 'people like me' and 'people like you' as you've put it.

Anyway, if there really were 'people like me' vs. 'people like you'' looks like WE got the numbers...if that matters.

Can't Stop 9/11 Fever

I could not possibly agree with

Jpass more, he is absolutely correct.
If you are waiting to be accepted in anyway whatsoever by whom we know for a FACT are complicit in the crimes and cover up of 9/11 and the election fraud then you are seriously delusional.
There is no such thing as being accepted by these freaks, best we can hope for is EXACTLY what these activist achieved in spades by invading Mahers little private Idaho.
We are getting exposure which is what we need LOTS of it, we can march around like idiots with 300-400-500,000+ of us protesting and completely ignored by this MSM which basically serves no purpose.
OR we can start attacking the G-D hell out of every live TV show until they realize we are NOT going away EVER.

Headline News Covers Bill Maher Hecklers/ Building 7

Did anyone else see this?? CNN's Headline News just covered a segment on Bill Maher's hecklers and his vulgar response to them. It showed the first two hecklers and then Bill's lashing out. I was sure this would be it with no mention of Building 7... however much to my surprise they then brought up Building 7 and showed clips of its demise! They mentioned how the protesters are saying it was an "implosion" as they showed the footage. Then they showed the mock up clip by truthers giving Bill the bird and saying that 2 planes can't cause THREE buildings to self-destruct, etc. CNN showed this clip! Then they even showed the webpage very closely for 6 or 7 seconds while saying that the 9/11 Truth Movement is calling 9/11 an inside job. Wow.

This was the finest news coverage I have seen to date and proves without question that the LA Wearechange action was VERY worthwhile! We need to do more.

We have clearly struck a nerve with the mainstream media. We now have a track to run on: "Building 7" and
We need to do everything in our power now to promote these two winners. Let's hit the streets with banners, posters and signs for Googling "9/11 Truth" and "World Trade Center 7."

Here it is..also in BLOGS. Its GREAT

Great Job Joe!

You're the man, Joe. I'm not a tech guy and can't do posts very well, but I knew someone would put this up. It should be posted as a blog-- O.K. you did already!

It deserves to be on the front page.

Beck's 911 Poll just flipped out

The numbers miraculously went fro 78% Truth... to 56% Against to 44% Truth

You knew they would not let the real numbers stand.

Lying Con Men.


Credit Goes To GREENBACK!

Thanks man, that was a

Thanks man, that was a really good piece by CNN all things considered.

If that's true, which I'm

If that's true, which I'm sure it is, then that's very good news.

CIA Chief Micheal Scheuer On Israel Bill Maher reaction WOW

There is good a reason Bill Maher is on TV. It is not just because of he is funny , I think that he is hilarious.

It is that he thinks good family loving Americans should die for his homeland of Israel.

Micheal Scheuer Says" Israel is not Worth American Life or Dollar". Look and study the reaction of Bill Maher when he objects.

Show "That is an anti-semitic attitude and commentary" by doughnut

i cant stand Scheuer, hes

i cant stand Scheuer, hes obviously very good at lying considering he was the head of the "Bin Laden Unit", but you're joking when you say hes anti-semitic right? he seemed dead on in my opinion. im sick of giving money and arms to Saudi Arabia, Israel and any other corrupt regimes. and Garafolo is right about Maher's Israel bias. it doesnt surprise me at all that a guy like Bill Maher who shills for Israel in all circumstances would be completely against the idea that crazy muslim religious fanatics didnt do 9/11. this is how simplistic BIll thinks-Israel=good,religion=bad. that shapes his views on 9/11, make no mistake.

EDIT:wow! it only took like 2 days for this comment to appear. im being moderated because of a harmless joke i made to doughnut about Arabesque. ive since seen people here accuse others of being disinfo, saying they are criminal, and even worse things yet they still seem to be here. hmmmm......

"The Central Intelligence Agency owns everyone of any significance in the major media." ~ William Colby, Former Director, CIA


WOW!! doughtnut I am an anti Semite for for pointing out Bill Maher views on Israel and using a CIA chiefs words and statements on Israel.
If you keep throwing around anti Semitic like candy it will not be effective.

Well, that wouldn't be too bad.

"If you keep throwing around anti Semitic like candy it will not be effective."

Perhaps, you Americans could muster up some courage? As it is now, all one has to do is to call you an anti-semite and you start shaking like a leaf and keep your mouth shut. While you die in wars for Israel and pay with your taxpayers money for their wars.

It is pretty dumb to be a coward, isn't it?

criticism of israel is so rare

JG hit the nail on the head- israel and the usa are led by murderous right wing factions that dont reflect values of life liberty, truth.or lawful conduct.
both nations are led by fascists who spread terror and disinformastion about terror more than any other political or insurgency entitiy on our troubled planet.
,we are all screwed until law returns and war crimes are seriously considered by the hague or another tribunal body , the nwo and their servants in many nations are in a position to prevent international justice and further other false flag mass murder events

resist by specific challenge to specific crimes tell other americans what you know ,and why it is evident to you. spread truth and spread knowlege about the fascist agenda attacking the free nations of the earth . fight the architects of the 911 false flag mass murder event. truth is a non -alterable condition of reality
lies can hide but never change what is so , and truth is on our side.

Why do you keep

insisting that 911 truth should stay "Mr nice guy"?

Hasn't 6 years experience with the mainstream massmedia blocking showed that it doesn't work???

NO more Mr nice guy.

Not journaism

Any high school journalism student would know to do a news story you have to get opinions from both subjects of the story. This is not journalism.
This is pure propaganda - and it's simple to see through it.
The advertisers of this show should be boycotted.
And judging from this guy's poling a few clicks back - nearly 70 per cent of those canvassed disagree with these clowns.

"This is pure propaganda -

"This is pure propaganda - and it's simple to see through it."

Yup. It's desperation and we should all be taking notes.

You can't get arrested for being loud and holding up sings at a live television show. Well, maybe I'm wrong but who cares. I'll take that misdemeanor if it agitates GLenn Beck into ridiculous things like this interview.


Can't Stop 9/11 Fever

Bounty Paper Towels

I just saw the clip on the CNN feed.
I guess I won't be buying any Bounty Papers towels in the near future !
( I don't really care how bloody absorbent they are)

A friendly reminder:

If you're going to boycott Bounty Paper Towels, it'll only have a chance of having an effect if you communicate to Bounty that fact and why you're doing it. Otherwise you might as well forget about it.

No Worries

I'll spend my money where I want.
It's not my problem.

Beck Show October 23 2007

Watching this show for the first time.
These are some of the sponsors of propaganda that brushes of the murder of thousands.
Edward Jones - making sense of Investing.
Country Inns and Suites
Blue-Sky from American Express
CVS Pharmacy (Robert Shapero) (William Shatner)
The Villages (Florida)
Fox - (what a surprise)
1-800 Dentist.
Ford Fusion
SurfPro ?
Shaw - (Canada feed)
Major League Baseball - Fox (Maybe get a new media placement agency - stay away from reality comedy)
CORT - Warren Buffet
Flight (Canada feed)
Global (Canada Feed)
CSX - How tomorrow moves
Farmers Help Point
Some crap 1800- MESO

No comment on his 9/11 poll.

Anyone interested in the truth movement should realize these companies support blatant propaganda that happily brushes off the murder of thousands of people.
Perhaps consider where you put your business.

Show "You think people can see through a solid wall?" by White Rows

So long as it remains non-violent, it can't hurt overall

Those non-urban Midwesterners you concern yourself with: Do you really think they'll suddenly begin to sympathize with us if we remain polite little boys and girls?

Non-violent protest, passive resistence -- they worked for Gandhi, for the civil rights movement, for the anti-Vietnam war movement. When the powers-that-be are blocking you out, you've got to find ways of getting their attention.

(No violence though, which really would be extremely counterproductive.

(Indeed, it wouldn't be surprising that, when the 9/11 truth movement becomes popular enough, agents of the perpetrators will start to stage faux 9/11 truth movement acts of violence. Something like what already seems to have happened with the OKC bombing, which was apparently orchestrated by the Clinton administration to neutralize the unpopularity of the Waco massacre and to discredit the then-growing militia movement.)

You can't buy advertising like this

You do not understand what is happening and why and why it's such a good thing.

"9/11 Truth" wouldn't even BE in the mainstream media right now if it wasn't for this event. This will inform millions of people about what it going on.

Sure, some will be dismissive, and such, but they more likely than not would be just as dismissive in any other situation, even "calm, reasoned debate and discussion". (and maybe even more so with the latter, since passion does affect people emotionally)

There is a reason why Civil Disobedience is used by pretty much ALL "movements", and that is to get the ideas and concepts into the papers and TV news and magazines and anywhere else they can.

Because, THEN, reasonable, intelligent, compassionate, empathetic, and similar attributed people will learn about what the people in the movement are trying to do and the information they have.

Or you can sit back on your ass and do "nothing", or take years and years trying to calmly and quietly inform people and make them aware, while you get basically no mention in the mainstream media, and your movement dies, and you achieve nothing.

This event has GREATLY played out to our advantage, and it is still doing so several days later, and for many more days to come.

You can't buy advertising like this.

Senior 9/11 Bureau Chief, Analyst, Correspondent, Principle Investigator, Forensic 9/11ologist

To sin by silence when they should protest makes cowards of men. — Abraham Lincoln

Secrecy is the beginning of tyranny. — Robert Heinlein

These guys are pitiful.....

Again they resort to ad hominem attacks, straw men and lies.

Ad hominem by Beck and not worth a response.
"Anybody who thinks that 9/11 was carried out by the gov't isn't a truther, they're Idiots."

"Can you actually imagine that our government was capable of successfully pulling off 9/11 and then keeping it off of the front page of the NY Times?"

I say, can you imagine 19 guys led by a dialysis patient in a cave with a laptop can fool the most sophisticated air defenses in the world? I can imagine that a small group of people associated with our government distracted the military with numerous war games and TRIED to successfully pull off 9/11. BUT... they made many mistakes, the biggest one being WTC 7. Is he saying that a large group of people in our government didn't keep the Manhattan project and the wars in the Philippines a secret? And let's not forget William Colby, Former Director, CIA when he said: "The Central Intelligence Agency owns everyone of any significance in the major media."

Another ad hominem by Beck. What DID he say about Building 7? Was his teleprompter too fast for him?
"12% of Americans are just dumb enough to believe that is exactly what happened - with the US gov't taking down the World Trade Center least (lease?) number 7."

"These truthers are exactly the kind of people that want to rock this nation's foundation and tear us apart and plant seeds of dissatisfaction with all of us."

Yea, that sounds just like you Glen!

Clearly Shermer has not read "Debunking 9/11 Debunking by David Ray Griffin:

"We lined up all of their claims in our special issue and knocked them down one by one, as did Popular Mechanics."

The worst type of ad hominem from Beck: claiming 9/11 truthers are exactly what they are fighting against!

"I think they do believe it - which is why I believe these guys are dangerous. I believe these guys are anarchists that are looking to tear us apart. This is the kind of group that a Timothy McVeigh would come from."

A straw man by Meigs.... no one has said that scientists at Columbia said there were bombs in the buildings. Their data is available and it debunks the official theory!

"One of the ones that comes up a lot is the idea that there were bombs in the buildings and that seismographs at Columbia Univ. picked those up. We called the scientists and Columbia and they said our report says no such thin. that it was totally taken out of context."

Does Shermer know how to fact check his own statement? He says:

"They claim that the World Trade Center Buildings fell exactly like buildings fall that are intentionally demolished. .... None of [ taped controlled demolition buildings] fall like the World Trade Center. They all fall from the bottom up and the World Trade Center Buildings fell from the top down - basically right where the planes hit - where they collapsed initially. That was easy to refute, but once [their theories] get out on the Internet, nobody fact checks."

Excuse me? Just because MOST buildings that fall due to controlled demolition are done from the bottom up, doesn't mean it cannot be done from the top down. Just look at the top down CD video recently brought to light by Richard Gage in his 911: Blueprint for Truth video ! And here's a lie if I ever heard one: " the World Trade Center Buildings fell from the top down" Are we conveniently forgetting about Building 7?


How did CNN and BBC have foreknowledge of the WTC7 collapse, yet six years later, the government cannot explain it?

Loser Glenn Beck is Losing His Own 9/11 Poll

"Where am I Wrong?"

"But truthfully, I don't really know. We've had trouble getting a handle on Building No. 7."
~~ Dr. Shyam Sunder - Acting Director Building and Fire Research Laboratory (NIST)
"We are unable to provide a full explanation of the total collapse."(NIS)

It's up to 76% No


Hold on, wait, now it's --


I know I'm easily amused, but still -- LOLOL!!!

Senior 9/11 Bureau Chief, Analyst, Correspondent, Principle Investigator, Forensic 9/11ologist

To sin by silence when they should protest makes cowards of men. — Abraham Lincoln

Secrecy is the beginning of tyranny. — Robert Heinlein

We Are Tearing The Country Apart?!

No - it's the corporate media who peddle the phony left vs. right culture war who have successfully divided the country.

One Battle At A Time

To those who hold the opinion that this is 'bad' for 911 truth...

By asking people to adhere to standards that would be acceptable by the likes of Glenn Beck and Bill Maher you are asking people to play in a fixed game.

Would you sit down at a poker table you knew was rigged?

What major activist victory has EVER been achieved by 'playing by the rules'?

Every time this is a topic on shows like Glenn's another 911 Truth vicotory.

Some here would have us believe that the majority of Amercian's are NOT intelligent, smart, thinking people. They are though. Just like most of the 911 Truthers I chat with.

Most that see this video can easily notice the tactics used. In many cases, Glenn Beck is actually pushing people towards 911 Truth by making these outrageous claims correlating 911 Truth activist with Tim McVeigh style terrorists.

To those infuriated by Glenn Beck's statements in this interview....

Don't sweat it. This is a victory. When 911 Truth agitates Glenn Beck into saying 911 Truth = Tim McVeigh that is a major win.

I laugh when Glenn Beck and Bill Maher are forced into saying ridiculous things like "911 Truth needs Paxei" and "911 Truth = Tim McVeigh"

Most people won't believe this nut case Glenn Beck. I used to live in Philly. The guy is a quack and just because he's on CNN doesn't mean people hang and believe on every word he spews. A large majority of people can still think.

This is 911 Truth raising a flag at CNN Headquarters without even being in the studio.

On a precautionary note we should, as 911 Truthers, have a single signed statement and declaration of support for NON VIOLENT ACTIONS. Something like a treaty that everyone can sign and post on the front page of their web site. This way when these nuts start tieing 911 Truth to things like school shootings and Nazis we can easily show our badge & pledge for non-violence only.

Bill Maher and Glenn Beck come off far more 'crazy' and in need of medication then the activists that had the sack to confront him after his horrible comments about paxil.

Can't Stop 9/11 Fever

Show "No I'm not saying that, I'm" by Dem Bruce Lee Styles

"f*ck giving them what they

"f*ck giving them what they want, i.e. something that they can spin as "crazy"."

The entire point of spinning something is to make it appear as if it is something it's not.

There is nothing you can do that will cause Glenn Beck NOT TO SPIN 911 Truth issues on his show. Trying to do so, IMO, is practicing self censorship in an effort to appease Glenn Beck and the countless other nut jobs like him.

Can't Stop 9/11 Fever

Easily they could spin the

Easily they could spin the Podhoretz as crazy.

Come know as I do that all you have to do is talk about building 7 to be considered 'crazy' by Glenn Beck. It's not the action it's the thought crime that is being prosecuted here. It's been the same for ever issue since 911 that involves people who disagree with Glenn Beck and US foreign policy.

Besides, no one knows who Podhoretz is and there is no shock value for Glenn Beck to exploit. His show is a shock and awe scare down info-bullshit hour.

Glenn Beck covering a book review? hahahah

Can't Stop 9/11 Fever

"Lets see Beck and the rest

"Lets see Beck and the rest of the media report on the Podhoretz confrontation! But they won't BECAUSE WE COME OFF QUITE WELL IN THAT ONE! WE DON'T IN THIS!"

Perhaps this observation is exactly what's being argued here. We likely *won't* see the Podhoretz confrontation on TV, and thus it never happened. The only people that will see it, for the most part, are the Internets crowd who already know the official 9/11 narrative is a lie. What good does that do for the effort?

But I would agree that maintaining a calmer demeanor during these confrontations would be a good thing (the lady in the 'better' Podhoretz confrontation was an embarrassment, even if she does have personal reasons for being emotionally distraught).

I don't see any real

I don't see any real difference between Real Time and the Podhoretz appearance. People were shouting out things and demading to be heard. When you are closed off from the mainstream, you have to get pissed and stop taking it. When did this type of citizen action become ineffective and appear crazy - when we did it? When people have had enough and representatives of the power structure won't listen, they show up and demand attention. Code Pink did it at the Gonzales hearings. Did we say they were hurting their cause? No. Those who don't agree with them think they're annoying, but they were heard. The objects of their protest were made to listen, and America got to hear it to.

Not Spamming...

I'm sorry for posting so many comments but I had this one last thing I wanted to throw out there on this thread...

What if Dem Bruce Lee is wrong about 'giving them ammo'...

Consider the opposite...

What if Glenn Beck and Bill Maher were giving 911 Truth the ammo?

I am in the planning stages of a video dedicated to the study of the media's reaction to 911 Truth. Not so much a piece on theories of what happend as much as a study showing the many many examples of these whack jobs equating 911 Truth activists with Tim McVeigh, Paxel, Nuts, Crazies....

I have been thinking about this project for the last 3 days and I woke up this morning to this GEM!

Over and out.

Can't Stop 9/11 Fever


Who says it has to be Bottom-up or "controlled" to demolish a structure? Look at this concrete structure from Hiroshima ( a one min. walk from Ground Zero)-tough stuff. Conventional bomb runs are top-down and they do their work well enough.

No- I'm not implying nukes were used, or that the Hiroshima concrete (see link) even compares to the light-weight concrete at the WTC. I am saying that this "sceptic" uses limp logic ("CD is always bottom-up" (WTC 7? duh) as his best example to condemn our movement. Pathetic


Be cautious as the question is worded to formulate a yes response. The current poll shows 74% whom concur with the truth movement. I would wonder if Mr. Beck will have the guts to show the poll results on his show tonight.
If he does, he will probably dismiss it as a small group of crazies voting constantly and "stacking the results".
My bet is that he ignores the results completely.
Peace Out.

Who is more "dangerous", a

Who is more "dangerous", a brainwashed brownshirt or a brave, nonviolent man using only his voice and a sign? "Dangerous" to whom?

As for the desperate "McVeigh" smear--violence is what THEY do:
"...he was taken to the ground roughly. He was handcuffed. Someone put a knee in his back to hold him down. He said they twisted him like a pretzel."

“On the altar of God, I swear eternal hostility against all forms of tyranny over the mind of man."--Thomas Jefferson

Good to have 9/11 back in the mainstream

media. Don't worry, Glenn Beck is a total tool and anyone who can see this will side with the truthers. Beck fans will never come out of their fantasy land of propaganda & lies.

Anyone else READY for Loose Change Final Cut?

Ron Paul + 9/11 Truth = FREEDOM!

I Agree

It's been a while that haven't heard anything from Bill O'Reilly regarding 9/11 truth. It would be nice if we could make him attack us every once in a while too... . Amazingly, they don't know how much they help us by doing that.

Show "The notion of controlled" by haverman

What a shame we don't abandon our strongest argument

governWhen Richard Gage gives his Power Point presentations, at the end he always asks for a show of hands as to who still disagrees that controlled demolition took down the WTC. And then he asks -- if there are any, bearing in mind that there are usually many engineers and architects in the room -- what it is in the evidence that he's already painstakingly presented that they find unpersuasive. He then proceeds to address those concerns, until nobody is any longer prepared to argue the point.

You post here regularly to tell us to give up on controlled demolition, which, aside from controlled demolition being self-evidently true once one has some basic background facts, is the fastest and clearest way to begin to demolish for the benefit of novices the government's 9/11 claims.

What, pray tell, is it in the controlled demolition thesis that you find unpersuasive?

REPLY to McFrandy # 1 My

REPLY to McFrandy # 1

My objections to the CD of 1 and 2 theory arise in two areas.

First, I object to the interpretation of the visual evidence of the collapses of the towers.
I believe people just aren’t looking right or that in some cases they just aren’t looking period.
I remember a reply I got earlier from someone whose name has been mentioned enough now : “ are you telling us we’re not seeing what we’re seeing ? ‘ “ I replied :” I’m saying that what you are perceiving is not what’s really happening “.

The list of characteristics that came about via Hoffman, Griffin and now Cage has been a
‘ how to interpret what you see ‘ guide for many 911 truthers. The supreme irony to me is that DRG points to the unique way in which the towers came down, listing a number of observable characteristics, as evidence that CD was at play, but that at the same time, there is no evidence available of any building that ever came down in that way before or since. In other words, they can only compare the collapses to footage of buildings that came down by CD, in ways that are completely different ! ( Again : I’m not talking about WTC 7 here. )
I can, for now at least, only conclude that the unique, top down destruction of the towers looks like it had everything to do with the strike / fire damage. That’s what I see. I don’t see beams being violently ejected sideways. I don’t believe ( parts of ) the towers could ever topple or fall over sideways whilst maintaining their structural integrity. They were never built to do that. I don’t see the towers coming down at freefall speed, and they simply do not.
In fact, the freefall idea is pivotal to the CD hypothesis, because it would prove there is no resistance below, etc. To me the huge plumes of debris , combined with simple time measurements, can lead to only one conclusion : there was resistance.
Otherwise the huge noise produced by the collapses would be caused mostly by explosives.
Is that what that sound is ? I don’t think so.


The second kind of objection I have concerns the scenario of CD, in terms of who planned what, how and why ; a strikingly unpopular topic among the people here, by the way. Not meaning to be cynical or disrespectful to anyone, I feel someone in the 911 truth group should have done more work on this. My suspicion is that that no one has, because when you reason along on it, it’s hard to keep it probable, or even possible.
On a gut reaction level, I find the whole idea itself unbelievable. I realize that’s hardly scientific, so, suspending my disbelief as much as possible, I try to think through the scenario as it could have occurred, and I have trouble making it plausible.

How could the scenario go ? You may disagree with me, of course, and I would welcome your views.

Scenario-wise, I would have to imagine that in addition to ‘ the hijackers ‘ ( either really Muslim fundamentalist terrorists or some kind of US black ops agents, or some hybrid form of the two ), there is a Group X , made up of some alliance of black ops / renegade government faction and ‘ Larry Silverstein ‘ -type interests. What drives this motley crew together ? Why would they help each other ? Why would they need each other ? Their plan would be to either use a terrorist attack that they know will be happening as a cover for their real agenda, which is the destruction of the towers for the purposes of....solving an expensive asbestos problem ? Scamming the insurance ?
All while killing thousands of innocent men and women in the process ? How greedy can a person get ? Effectively triggering a 4 year recession ? Doing severe harm to the economy ? ...Hhhmmmm...

Or was the downing of the towers about completing the illusion of shock and horror, because, somehow, just the sight of the plane impacts and fires and poor people jumping to their deaths and others being burned alive and suffocating wasn’t effective enough ? If the attacks were a false flag operation, the total destruction of the Twin Towers would not have been necessary to create a scare effect on the US people of unprecedented proportions. So to me, that rules CD out as a motive for the so-called ‘ renegade CIA / NSA /false flag faction ‘

So who in ‘ Group X ‘ would need the collapses so bad ?
In the hope that the towers would be hit by the planes, they’d have to wire two of the largest buildings in the world with a huge number of explosives / incendiaries, with the people still inside, so that the buildings would be brought down fully, not just hit by planes. However, and this cannot be overstated, this complicated CD process must be carried out so as to make sure it didn’t look like controlled demolition, because the idea is to make it appear that the terrorist attack caused the collapses. Why ? If they wanted to blame terrorists for what they wanted to do, namely bring down the towers, why not do a repeat of 1993, ( this time successful ) and bring them down at night with minimal casualties ? Seems to me it would be possible to set up a ‘ terrorist ‘ patsy for that.

If the terrorists didn’t need the buildings to come fully down to achieve their goals, then by the same token, neither would the false flag / black ops people. So the only group with a vested interest in full demolition is....who ? Larry Silverstein ? N Y Port Authority ?
Would these people kill thousands to make more money ? Does anyone else share my sense of disbelief here ?

Please note I don’t rule out the possibility that 9 / 11 was a false flag operation just because I don’t believe in CD. It’s still possible that Atta and cronies were handled in such a way that in reality, their actions were used by others with a secret agenda to achieve very different goals. Also, I remain very puzzled by WTC 7, by the molten metal under the rubble, to name but a few things that I feel need to be answered. .

Thanks for the detailed reply

But I'm afraid this could generally be summed up as unsound a priori bias.

Unfortunately, your text is so long that I'd need a couple of uninterrupted hours to answer it point by point. I don't have that time right now, and by the time I do this blog thread will be so old that practically nobody reading at this website would be reading it anyway, so it wouldn't be worth my taking all the trouble.

Does anybody else reading here have the time to critique this stuff now? The record might as well be set straight.

Reply to McFrandy # 2

I believe not enough attention is paid to the way in which the towers were designed and built.
It determines how they stood for many years and also how they were destroyed in 2001.
Everyone here is familiar with the list of characteristics DRG mentions that are meant to indicate that the towers’ collapse is such that only CD could have caused it. I believe Jim Hoffman and DRG and recently others like Cage, are interpreting the video and photo evidence incorrectly. This I feel is caused by their failure to take into account the way in which the towers were constructed, and as a consequence, the way in which they came down. What happened for me, as I looked again and again at the familiar collapse footage and stills taken from many different angles, with the list in hand so to speak, is that I began to realise that what is clearly visible in that material in fact does not fit the list very well at all.

The list, now heavily back in use by the architects, illustrates clearly how the collapses are perceived by DRG, Cage et. al.. The wording reflects a certain way of thinking about the towers as structures that leaves some crucial factors out. I will come to those.
In general, the towers are always referred to as ‘ steel frame buildings ‘, inferring that they posessed great internal strength. That’s why they speak of the towers or parts of the towers ‘ toppling over ‘ under certain conditions. The example Steven Jones cites of the top section falling straight to the ground vs. the top section falling through the remaining bottom section, is another illustration of that thinking : the bottom part would provide massive resistance, so it would not be possible for the top to fall through at such ‘ near freefall ‘ speeds. Something must be making that resistance go away instantly, and that something would have to be explosive charges, set off in sequence etc etc.

The reasoning here is : the freefall speed proves there is no resistance below, therefore explosives must be destroying the tower floor by floor very rapidly and in sequence. The masses of falling material and dust clouds are also explained by explosives, because what else could be causing them when there is no resistance ? In other words : Freefall proves no resistance proves CD.
I look at it quite differently : freefall does not occur precisely because there is ( dust-generating ) resistance. It takes around 18 seconds for the last piece of WTC 1 to hit the ground, ( not counting the 55 storey-high piece of central core that survives temporarily,tellingly ). Only falling perimeter columns make it to freefall speed : they hit the ground while the standing bottom part is still many storeys high.

I understand the perspective and the disbelief of Hoffman, DRG, Jones and Cage, because I see what is lacking from their understanding of the towers as structures. What is lacking is a good concept of the interplay between the three main elements of which the towers were made : the core columns, the perimeter columns and the floors. The main point is, although made of steel, these elements and the way the were connected to form the towers, was nothing like a steel frame or steel grid found in many other highrise buildings.

The three elements all had very different functions and are used in very different ways.
They were implemented in the way they were to achieve maximum height ( equals max number of floors ) plus maximum open, column-less floor space. To achieve that, the more classic steel grid design was for the first time abandoned in favour of a revolutionary shift of the columns, usually evenly spaced for optimal load bearing, towards both the centre of the building and the outside perimeter, leaving large uninterrupted open office space. The central core was most solidly and ruggedly constructed, like a steel grid building in fact, but supporting an actual building with a footprint much larger than its own. The perimeter columns were assembled in stacks of three ( or thereabouts ) , with spandrels providing cross support. They provided additional vertical support and load bearing, plus torsioned resistance to lateral wind forces. ( This is a very much simplified version of the function and construction of the columns, but for the purposes of this argument, please bear with me ).

Now comes element number three : the floors. Large pans of steel, supported at their underside by steel trusses, filled with a 4 inch layer of concrete. The floors were designed and assembled to perform , among other things , two functions : bear the load of the tenants and their office equipment etc. plus, and this is the important part : enable the perimeter and core columns to do their work by fixing them in place relative to each other. The columns are strong enough to support their own weight plus the floors, but don’t fall down only if they are fixed in place one directly above the other, following a straight vertical line. A 1400 ft tall column made up of 110 sections will have no hope of lasting unless relative lateral forces are kept to a strict minimum. That was the all-important function of the floors, without which the columns simply could not stand, inspite of their often referred-to massive strength. The floors themselves had no real structural role in keeping the building up other than to handle the relatively small lateral force of fixing the central columns to the perimeter columns, floor by floor. That’s why the connections of the floors to the columns were designed to perform that function. The floors hung on both sides on brackets strong enough to bear their own static ( non-moving ) load plus office equipment and people, and strong enough to help keep the columns in their vertical alignment, so the columns could do the job they were designed to, i.e. hold up each other and 110 floors with open office space. Obviously, there were redundancies built in, though none prepared the buildings for what happenened on 9 11 2001.

( This is another area that merits very careful description so here I hope to be accurate enough for the purposes of this reply ).
Proponents of the CD hypothesis always speak of ‘ how the towers / buildings fell ‘.
It is important to note here that these two towers came down in a way unlike anything ever seen in the world, then and now. Never before or since have you seen a building, large or small, end up in pieces on the ground in that way. The towers failed at the plane impact area and the ‘ top part ‘ , above the impact, fell down on the intact ‘ lower part ‘ . That’s the simplest way you can put it. Strangely, the towers remained firmly standing until the very last floor fell. They were being destroyed from the top down, floor by floor, down from the impact zone to the ground. So the towers didn’t ‘ fall ‘ in any way any tower has ever fallen.
I think that is the case because of the unique way these buldings were damaged, and because of the unique way in which they were designed and constructed. .

Once the destruction begins,( yes I’m not explaining initiation ) I see the tops falling onto / through the intact parts somewhere at the impact zone. But instead of pushing down the entire structure floor by floor, I notice in the billowing smoke, columns surviving the initial ‘ demolition wave ‘ rushing by. These all appear to be ( sections of ) perimeter columns, that can be seen to slowly fall outward, pivoting on what must be parts of the perimeter still standing directly below. The taller these falling stacks of column are, the further away from the footprint they land. They are not violently blown sideways by some explosive force : they fall slowly outward like long poles, some then breaking up as they tumble down, trailing dust in their wake.
Nowhere do I see pieces of floor still attached to the columns. They are all sheared clean off.
Where are the floors ? They are all far below, collapsing onto eachother at high downward speed, while the columns buckle and fall without the floors there fixing them to the central core. The central core is a steel grid structure itself, so survives longer than the perimeter columns, but ultimately falls.

Meanwhile the central core exhibits the same shearing off of the floors. WTC 2 had a massive amount of core columns still standing after the floors and perimeter columns had fallen away. There is video and photo evidence that shows it clearly : not a trace of the floors is visible, only central core columns. WTC 1’s central core partially survives the massive forces of destruction, because as with WTC 2, the floors moved downward with great speed, ripping off the floors below instantly. The floors are gone from view. They are never visible anywhere during the collapses. They are collapsing inside, before the columns fall away and down, seconds later. They end up slamming into the basement, compressed in layers ( see photo of ‘ meteorites ‘ ) compacted by huge downward pressure. Nowhere is there any part of floor still attached to a column.
This is supported by the video from below just as the collapse starts.
You can see the result of the floors falling ( dusty air being blown out, windows breaking simultaneously per floor ) while the perimeter columns are still intact 5 or 6 storeys up : the downward velocity is high enough for the floors to be ripped clean off their brackets / clips and be pushed down, hitting each new floor with a short sharp blow many, many times beyond their design limits.

What you can see falling down in the widening plume of dust is not the floors, but only columns, mostly perimeter. The central core columns are falling in or close to the footprint. Strikingly, both towers have sections of perimeter at ground level still standing ! The highest parts of those also reveal no part of any floor ( truss ) still attached. They are all sheared off, and some photos show the bent clips.

The towers came down in a way that is consistent with the way they were built and with the specific functions each one of their three constituent structural elements had. Each element fell in its own way, and consistent with the way it functioned in the structural interplay of elements.
The floors fell on top of each other, while the columns still maintained their vertical position.. The clips / brackets holding the floors in place break off while the columns, central core as well as perimeter, remain standing until the tremendous vibrations and shocks of the destruction below produce just enough lateral movement for however many are still standing, to fall.

From my point of view, the symmetry of the collapse is now logical, and not strange as DRG claims. The socalled totality of destruction is equally logical once you see how the collapses occur consistent with the way the towers were built and what structural elements they contained.
As for explosiveness, I see nothing being blown forcefully sideways, as Hoffman and DRG claim.
I have explained why some perimeter columns ended up far away from the original footprint.
Nothing to do with explosives.

The fact that both towers were destroyed in the same way is to me a strong indication not that they were both wired with explosives and blown up, but that they were both designed and built in uniquely similar ways, failed in their own uniquely similar ways after both being damaged in uniquely similar ways.

When trying to contruct a plausible scenario for the CD hypothesis, involving the hijackers and
‘ Group X ‘ ,who are blowing the buildings up in such a way that it doesn’t look like CD but really is, I have serious trouble twisting any kind of believeble scenario around that storyline. I notice by the way that this is an area all proponents of CD avoid. I believe that is because it quickly becomes highly improbable. I notice, in all this time, none of the movements brightest minds have dared tread in that mire. Coincidence ?

Finally : all of this doesn’t mean I can explain exactly when the collapses started or
I can’t even say for sure that no thermate or explosives were used to initiate collapse, although I can argue a strong case purely on logical grounds. In addition, the stream of metal falling from the South Tower is in the wrong corner to initiate collapse. The thermate evidence seems circumstantial.
Where was even a trace of demolition equipment ( of which it is claimed there was a lot ) in the pile ?
( I am still however mystified by the molten metal under the buildings, and the extreme heat.
I have yet to see a good link between that heat , especially weeks afterwards, and CD. )

The videos and photos of the collapse simply do not show CD at work. All the ‘ telltale ‘ signs of CD supposedly visible in the videos are for me adequately explained by the reasoning outlined above.
I wonder who would agree with me ?


Whom pays you

and how much to spew this utter bullshit here?
You are dead wrong on all counts as always and I find it very hard to believe that anyone can be this ignorant.

Melodrama and cluelessness does not behoove you

Get informed and increase your awareness. Check out

Senior 9/11 Bureau Chief, Analyst, Correspondent, Principle Investigator, Forensic 9/11ologist

To sin by silence when they should protest makes cowards of men. — Abraham Lincoln

Secrecy is the beginning of tyranny. — Robert Heinlein

I've never heard of Beck: Who broadcasts him?

"[M]arginalize themselves more and more with their ridiculous claims and increasingly outrageous behavior"? There's a thigh-slapper: As though the 9/11 truth movement could do more to marginalize itself than the gatekeeping MSM, which is thoroughly, conscientiously monopolized by anti-truthers.

Indeed, Beck makes this point graphic by having as his only guests two other MSM gatekeepers, there to back up Beck's own gatekeeping. Of course, if the major 9/11 truth claims really were "ridiculous," Beck should be delighted to have an outstanding representative or two exposed by confrontations with Meigs and/or Shermer.

No such luck, though. The viewer is just supposed to take those two (both of whose magazines are CIA-funded, by the way) and their straw man debunkings at their word.

By the way, what's the deal with Chris Matthews's loud nervous laughter (in the Bill Maher clip)? He sounds like he's scared to death. (As well he should be, knowing what monstrous crimes he helps keep covered up.)

Vote here on Glenn Beck Site

Vote here on Glenn Beck's Site

Vote here on Glenn Beck's Site

Glen Beck is insulting 911 truthers.He should be accountable NOW

Herblay FRANCE


Glenn Beck is actually pushing people towards 911 Truth by making these outrageous claims correlating 911 Truth activist with Tim McVeigh style terrorists. He is insulting the 911 truthers like Bill Maher. He should be accountable for his words like Bill Maher and explain in publique his alignment to the Bush government's lies !

This is just the beginning of the end for the neocons propagandists ! They are going to kick your ass into the Milky Waaay but like Ghandi with the Amritsar Massacre of 379 civilians by British and Indian troops, we know now what we are up against and like Ghandi we will win by peacefull means !

We will remain pacifist and respectiful but we will continue to ask for answers to our rightfull 911 questions to the people who pretend to defend our freedom of speech !

In France we have not yet started the "We are change" but it would be interesting to do such interviews with Nicolas Sarkozy, the french president, who is not so clean with the Human Bomb episode !

Yours John

Keep the pressure on.

I can't agree with "Dem" Bruce Lee about this protest.

The interruption was justified, and Maher practically begged for it when he accused us of needing Paxil. In his ugly face, I say.

He has a smug latte liberal gaggle of fans that were hostile to us BEFORE this ever happened. He is a mejor gatekeeper, and he should be challenged.

You people underestimate the power of these gatekeepers. Fuck the Glen Becks of the world. It's the Chomsky's, Cockburns and Mahers we need to expose as not who they appear to be.

Beck is a neo-nazi.

These other people pretend they are the opposition.

If they are allowed to "lead" the opposition to state power in the US, then there will BE NO OPPOSITION (as is painfully obvious).

I don't know if you put the "Dem" in your name because you want us to blindly support Democrats. But, they are indeed half the problem, and half the cover up. They also are chomping at the bit to start World War 3 on behalf of Israel by nuking Iran.

I'll keep my independence, and my independent voice. And I'll use that voice, even if I happen to be in the audience of some brownshirt boot licking "personality."

Polite emails have accomplished nothing in 6 mother fucking god damned years. Does that not tell you anything?

The "Dem" means "Them", it's

The "Dem" means "Them", it's got nothing to do with f*cking Democrats that's kind of paranoid to be honest.

"He has a smug latte liberal gaggle of fans that were hostile to us BEFORE this ever happened. He is a mejor gatekeeper, and he should be challenged."

I'm not saying he should not be confronted, I THINK HE TOTALLY SHOULD BE CONFRONTED! But these guys said a bunch of inaudible incoherent stuff that was pretty confusing even if you could hear it "WTC7 fell faster than the sands in NJ"? What? This type of action when done right is excellent and I commend the spirit of these guys but it was a mess, and because it does not make us look good, period, the media is running with it.

The reason why they are attacking "us" SO strongly

Is NOT because of what happened. It is because of what the effect of what happened will be (in the positive sense), and also because they know their Rush Limbo-like viewership will goose-step into line and orgiastically salivate over their "reporting".

Plus "someone" told them to make the report they made.

And the two interviewees stupidly set themselves up to look bad by allowing themselves to be used.

Senior 9/11 Bureau Chief, Analyst, Correspondent, Principle Investigator, Forensic 9/11ologist

To sin by silence when they should protest makes cowards of men. — Abraham Lincoln

Secrecy is the beginning of tyranny. — Robert Heinlein

The law of attraction

Dictates that the more you fear something or try to attack something, the more resistance you get from the target. 9/11 Truthers came to make some noise and Media took the bait. The more Corporate Media tries to stifle dissent, the more attention they bring. Trotting out Shermer and "skeptic society" Gurus with their ridiculous Straw Men will create the REAL skeptics to dig deeper into what they have been told about 9/11, and you'll have millions more questioning that day. This stuff gets people talking, as obviously observed in the past week. They're showing their fear by attacking, and they hope that the world doesn't notice. But they will, people are becoming exponentially more aware something is not right. So I say let them attack.

All this stuff about a more "acceptable" version of civil disobedience/protest makes no sense. What are you going to do, wrap 9/11 into a a package with a flashy bow before it can be discussed? As if the very act of questioning Government isn't "kooky" in the first place to the majority of the HIVE(America)?

People are going to point and giggle regardless. It could have been P.E.T.A. activists at the Bill Maher show and someone would have created some sarcastic commentary over it. The media WANT you to feel embarrassed at second guess yourself. They WANT you to retreat and think of a better "approach" that will be more palatable to the masses. 80% of all original thought and inner dialog in your brain is "FRINGE" to someone. But as soon as the Corporate Media whores start talking about it on prime time television, it's not so much "FRINGE" anymore, now is it?
The more you resist, the more you attract. It's a basic rule of the Universe and the Media hasn't gotten the memo yet.

The more I see the coverage, the more I think that this action at Bill Maher's show was "good". It's definitely bringing the conversation to the front and in more homes. Isn't that part of the whole premise, to spark debate? Let them pull out their little "Tim Mcveigh" slanders. The country and the world will see what's going on. People get more hip to Corporate Media every passing day and realize that they have a vested interest in the "official Line"....of any subject. And people know Glenn Beck is a hack. He's a fucking pizza delivery boy with a camera and a microphone. No worries.

International press / tv transcripts

Check out,,2197015,00.html

The whole thing was also reported on CNN, Fox News, MSNBC.
Copyright 2007 Voxant, Inc.
All Rights Reserved.
Copyright 2007 MSNBC
All Rights Reserved.


October 22, 2007 Monday

TRANSCRIPT: 102201cb.471


LENGTH: 7312 words


BYLINE: Dan Abrams, Tucker Carlson, David Bienick

GUESTS: Rachel Maddow, Robert Raben, Kozak the Magician, the Amazing Jonathan, Brian Russell, Mickey Sherman, Susan Filan


A look ahead to the election of 2008.


DAN ABRAMS, HOST: But first, at last night`s Republican debate, all of the leading candidates seem prepared to selectively ignore any past statements that might expose their hypocrisy and instead focus on trying to convince dubious right wing voters that I am your man.

ABRAMS: (....) Plus caught on tape, Bill Maher flips out on a protester, kicks him out of his HBO studio, saying it`s the only time he`s defended George bush. That`s up next on Beat the Press.
ABRAMS: It`s time for tonight`s "Beat the Press." First up: Fox`s Bill O`Reilly, had radical Conservative commentator, Ann Coulter on his show and did not press her about the comments she made that Jews, quote, need to be perfected. We weren`t the only ones to notice in a rare moment of candor, on that taped program. What of his usually, psychopathic guest, Barry Goldberg took O`Reilly to task. And listen to O`Reilly`s ludicrous explanation.
ABRAMS: Right. The right wing loons are primarily entertainers. He`s not going to name them. When it comes to the people and organizations he referred to left wing loons, he`s happy to name. The Daily Kos, George Soros,, Tim Robbins and the other reporter who crosses O`Reilly, fair and balanced. Finally, to someone who actually is a tough interviewer, Bill Maher, he had some 9/11 conspiracy theorists infiltrate his live studio audience Friday night and dealt with them.


BILL MAHER: Hey, do we have some (bleep) security in this building? Or do I have to come over and kick this guy`s (bleep)?

Is it that hard to throw somebody out of a building?



MAHER: I`ll kick your (bleep) out of here, too. Get out. This isn`t the Iowa caucus. OK? It`s not a debate.


ABRAMS: He actually then went and helped remove them. Nice job, Bill. Bill will be on the show next week.

Copyright 2007 Fox News Network, LLC.
Fox News Network


October 22, 2007 Monday

TRANSCRIPT: 102202cb.256


LENGTH: 599 words


BYLINE: Bill O'Reilly


O'REILLY: "Impact" segment tonight, as we have been reporting, the far left in America is growing bolder by the week. It now believes it can interrupt church services, political gatherings, and even television programs.

This sacrilege last week by gay militants in San Francisco went unpunished, as city officials refused to condemn it. And the Catholic church has not filed charges.

A few weeks ago, I chastised the Democratic presidential candidates for attending a meeting sponsored by a far left Internet smear site. There's no way any politician should have honored that group with an appearance. And the fact that the next president of the United States feels that crazy left-wing loons should be recognized is beyond disturbing.

Now comes another incident, this one an interruption of the Bill Maher HBO program by crazy people who feel 9/11 was an inside job that America attacked itself. Take a look.


BILL MAHER: This is part of the Democrats...

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: Building 7 fell (INAUDIBLE) than the Sands in New Jersey.

MAHER: I'm from New Jersey.

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: Don't tase me bro! Don't tase me bro!

MAHER: Boy, sometimes here at CBS, I wish the sound wasn't working. I do not know what that (BLEEP) is saying. But you know, see, this is the problem sometimes with...

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: Chris Matthews, you said, 'I promise not to...

MAHER: Hey do we have some (BLEEP) security in this building? Or do I have to come over and kick this guy -- out?

Hey, hey, hey. Out, out, out, out. Get out.

You know, is it that hard to throw somebody out of the building?

UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: What about building 7, Bill? That was cowardice! Attacking a man for asking a question!

MAHER: I'll kick your (BLEEP) out of here, too. Get her out of here. Hey, this isn't the Iowa Caucus. OK? It's not a debate. It's a debate between us. You're in the audience. Audience comes from the Latin, to listen. What's going on here?

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: Tell us what happened in building 7, Bill.

MAHER: That was not mine.

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: This is about 9/11, about misrepresentation -- this government! GOP lied to you...

MAHER: Yes, this is the problem with live television. I guess it gets around that if you're on live, then the nut cases -- yes, and you are a nut case, building 7. You know what that's all about? Of all the things I've said, and believe, me, I've said a lot of things as you all know that could get my head on a block, the one that they protest about out here is the people who think that the World Trade Center was a controlled explosion.

You see, in that instance, I'm actually defending President Bush. I don't think President Bush brought down the World Trade Center.


MAHER: And cows disagree with me.


MAHER: How come I don't fire my audience department is really the question that's running through my mind? Yes, don't be gentle with them. (BLEEP) kicking is what's called for.


If this was a microcosm of America, I'd vote for Rudy Giuliani at this point.


O'REILLY: Now let me make a prediction here. Driven by crazy websites, the far left in this country is so out-of-control that somebody's going to get hurt. No American has a right to intrude on church services, television programs, or any other private gathering. If authorities don't wise up fast, bad things are going to happen. Wait and see.

Directly ahead, are people who believe in intelligent design being persecuted?

And later, Rosie O'Donnell refusing to promote her new book, even though she would pay millions. We'll tell you why, upcoming.

LOAD-DATE: October 23, 2007

Copyright 2007 Associated Press
All Rights Reserved
Associated Press Worldstream

October 20, 2007 Saturday 1:19 PM GMT


LENGTH: 376 words

HEADLINE: Bill Maher helps security guards kick rowdy protesters out of live audience



Bill Maher can add "security guard" to his job description alongside comedian and political commentator.

Maher on Friday night helped security remove a rowdy protester from the studio during his weekly HBO cable television show "Real Time with Bill Maher," and it was all captured on live television.

Maher was talking science during one of his weekly panel discussions when a protester in his audience stood up, held up a smuggled-in sign reading "9/11 is a cover up fraud" and shouted comments to the same effect.

The host tried to shout down the audience member, who only became more agitated.

"Do we have some (expletive) security in this building," Maher yelled, "or do I have to come down there and kick his (expletive)?"

When security reached the man's aisle and the man resisted leaving, Maher ran into the seats and helped them push him out the door, shouting "Out! Out! Out!"

Several other protesters, sprinkled throughout the audience, then stood up and shouted.

"This isn't the Iowa caucus, OK, we're not here to debate," Maher shouted with most of his audience cheering him on. "This is the problem with live television."

In the Iowa caucuses, a key early test in the presidential nominating process, voters meet publicly at sites across the Midwest state to discuss their party's presidential candidates and begin choosing delegates to the national nominating convention.

The incident was shown live on the East Coast, and the network appeared to show the entire affair unedited for the taped-delayed West Coast version.

After the instigators were ejected, Maher told his panelists MSNBC's Chris Matthews, Los Angeles Times columnist Joel Stein and Congresswoman Sheila Jackson that they often linger outside his studio to share 9/11 conspiracy theories with him and try to get into the show.

"It's the only time I defend Bush," he said.

"I'm thinking about firing my audience department," he added.

Regular audience members found the ruckus thrilling.

"We picked a very exciting night to be here," Eliot Stein, a 54-year-old high school teacher, said via cell phone. "There's few live TV shows anymore, and here you got to see, it was like a movie. it was great."

Phone and e-mail messages left with HBO officials late Friday were not immediately returned.

LOAD-DATE: October 21, 2007

O'REILLY: Now let me make a

O'REILLY: Now let me make a prediction here. Driven by crazy websites, the far left in this country is so out-of-control that somebody's going to get hurt. No American has a right to intrude on church services, television programs, or any other private gathering. If authorities don't wise up fast, bad things are going to happen. Wait and see.

^ That really bothers me.

More MSNBC + CNN transcripts

Copyright 2007 Voxant, Inc.
All Rights Reserved.
Copyright 2007 MSNBC
All Rights Reserved.


October 22, 2007 Monday

TRANSCRIPT: 102201cb.478


LENGTH: 7898 words

HEADLINE: TUCKER for October 22, 2007

BYLINE: Tucker Carlson, Chris Chan, Chris Jansing, Bill Wolff

GUESTS: Liz Cheney, Eugene Robinson, Bob Franken, David Adams
CARLSON: (...) Bill Maher kicks a protester out of his studio audience, but not just any protester. A 9/11 conspiracy theorist, one of many in this country.

We`ll tell you how many in just a minute.
Be right back.



BILL MAHER, COMEDIAN: See this is the problem --


MAHER: Hey, do we have some security in this building? Or do I have to come over and kick this guy`s out of here?


MAHER: Out, out, out.


CARLSON: That was the scene in Bill Maher`s studio Friday night when a member of a very vocal 9/11 conspiracy theorist group erupted into the studio. Maher ordered security guards to remove the hecklers, and his remaining audience cheered the move, deriding the conspiracy theorists as lunatics. However, a poll in 2006 suggested that more than one-third of the entire American population suspects the federal government either assisted in the 9/11 terror attacks or took no action to stop them so the country could go to war in the Middle East.

What explains the persistence of these conspiracy theories. Here to tell us, we welcome back "The Washington Post`s" Eugene Robinson and online columnist Bob Franken. Gene, it`s almost unbelievable, if you think about one-third of the population believes the federal government -- presumably thousands or many hundreds of people in the government colluded somehow to kill American -- innocent American citizens for some abstract reason?

ROBINSON: Yes, you know, it`s a reflection I think at this point primarily of the unpopularity of the war. I mean I get these e-mails. I get e-mails from people all the time.

CARLSON: No one ever talks about the in the mainstream press.

ROBINSON: And why is the mainstream media hiding the fact that this and that. Goes on to cite --

CARLSON: We are hiding. Here is what we`re hiding; we`re hiding the fact that hundreds of thousands of -- many millions of people apparently believe this.

ROBINSON: Yes, I mean, I actually do wonder what that number means. Is it that millions of people are willing to entertain this notion, millions of people have some sort of questions, think there`s some unanswered questions about 9/11. I don`t know. I wish I had a factual explanation for this. Because on its face it`s absurd.

CARLSON: If you`re willing to even entertain the notion, think about what that means. You are willing to believe that the president or the Congress or somebody, them, in the federal, people in charge, would kill more than 3,000 people who didn`t do anything wrong because it helped them pass the Patriot Act or invade Iraq. That`s so evil, how could you still live in this country if you believed that?

FRANKEN: Well, I think that nobody takes it to that next step. I think we have a combination of things going. Number one, I think that there is an overall cynicism, probably warranted cynicism, about not just government, but this whole amorphous society that we live and all the institutions. who people feel are not treating them fairly, number one. Number two, you have people who take advantage of the -- talk radio hosts, people who blog, who are under no requirement to say anything that has any sanity it to. They can say whatever they want. Somebody`s going to believe them.

You put all those things together, and I think that you have a society right now that`s willing to believe or, more probably, not disbelieve anything. So there you are.

ROBINSON: One thing you have to add is that could anyone believe that the government of the United States would, you know, would cherry pick flimsy intelligence in order to justify an invasion say of Iraq in order to satisfy this grand dream of --

CARLSON: I think people -- I`ve never bought -- it would be so self defeating, without re-litigating this -- but it would be so self defeating for the administration to make up evidence they know would be revealed as false. It`s kind of impossible to believe that.

ROBINSON: It`s more subtle than that.

CARLSON: If I believe that people are stupid, yes, totally.

ROBINSON: To believe what they want to believe, to not believe evidence that perhaps one should give equal weight to, but that doesn`t support the case for war.

CARLSON: Are you kidding, I do that all the time in my personal life.

ROBINSON: You`re not president.

CARLSON: I`m not defending it. I`m merely saying, it`s a long way from there to flying planes full of innocents into office buildings. That`s completely insane.

FRANKEN: I don`t think it`s a long way. I think it`s a short way. I think what you if is this very short distance between people, as the movie once said, who are mad as hell and don`t want to take it any more, and ready to believe just about anything.

CARLSON: That`s frightening. If you have a population that stupid and reckless and they`re in charge of the government, maybe it is time to leave the country.

FRANKEN: Or maybe that fed up.

CARLSON: What does that mean? I`m fed up with a million things and I don`t believe things that have no basis in fact.

ROBINSON: You don`t think they believe this in France?

CARLSON: I don`t know. Maybe in Burkino Faso there is a little island of sanity. I`m just saying, that`s frightening. Considering that the population is in control, I don`t even want to think it through any more. This is why we never do this topic on the show, because it upsets me too much. I don`t want to know these kind of facts about America.

Speaking of facts that are not widely known, the "New York Times," Jim Rutenberg, this morning, sort of blew the cover on how the media industry works by outing our news director, Matt Drudge, on the front page. He basically let everybody know that Matt Drudge picks our stories for us, which he does. But he also revealed that the Hillary Clinton campaign, which has been attacked by Drudge over the years in some pretty duty ways, is now sucking up to Drudge and using him -- or attempting to. That`s unbelievable.

FRANKEN: Which just goes to show that collectively the Hillary Clinton momma did not raise no fool. The truth of the matter is that the bloggers now, particularly somebody like Matt Drudge, they are the ones who set the agenda. When I was starting out in television news, the joke used to be, to find out what I`d be working on, they`d say read the "New York Times" and the "Washington Post." Now, to find out what is going to be in the "Washington Post," you find out what`s being said on Matt Drudge. No offense to you.

ROBINSON: None taken. The "Washington Post" website is the second most trafficked newspaper site in the country. The biggest single driver of traffic to our website is "The Drudge Report." It really is.

CARLSON: You got to wonder if people out in the rest of the country know that, but here we`ve said it. It`s on page one of the "New York Times." Now you know our secret. I feel like the magician -- the lady is not really sawed in half. I guess that`s what people are finding out. There`s an amazing poll from the Value Voters summit, which we talked about last week. It took place here in Washington. All the candidates came and made their pitches. Giuliani made his pitch. They didn`t agree with anything he said, almost by definition.

Yet here are the results of the poll taken of people who attended afterward. The winner was Mitt Romney, kind of amazing, considering these are mostly evangelicals and he`s Mormon. They don`t seem to mind. He got 27. Mike Huckabee also 27, Ron Paul 15, Fred Thompson 10, Rudy Giuliani negative -- less than 2 percent, John McCain less than 1.5 percent. John McCain pro life voting record his whole career, since 1986. What is this?

FRANKEN: First of all, I think we should point out there were two straw polls. One was of the participants there. The second one was of the online poll. The skeptic, lord knows I`m not a skeptic, but the skeptic might wonder if Mitt Romney did the same thing did he in the straw poll in Iowa. That is to say, see to it that those online voters were, how shall I say it, friends of Mitt.

ROBINSON: These are activists. This is not a scientific poll. Scientific polls of that voting population seem to indicate there are a lot of at least evangelical voters who have a real problem with Mitt Romney and his Mormon faith, and fewer who have problems on those issues with John McCain. I`m not sure I --

CARLSON: I don`t know, I bet -- it would be interesting to see a reliable poll of sentiment among evangelicals. I bet you Mitt Romney would beat John McCain. There`s just something stylistically.

FRANKEN: But the real question is, in the straw poll who do think they was responsible for 9/11?

CARLSON: That`s it. Again, I don`t even want to know. That`s the last time we`re going to talk about that on this show. It gives me the creeps too much.

Copyright 2007 Cable News Network
All Rights Reserved.



October 22, 2007 Monday



LENGTH: 7659 words

WOLF BLITZER, CNN ANCHOR: Thanks very much, Lou. (...)
And if you're ever attempted to heckle someone make sure it isn't the comedian Bill Maher. Was his outburst justified or politically incorrect?
And how to handle hecklers. The comedian Bill Maher has a different approach. We're going to show you what it is right here in THE SITUATION ROOM.
Heckle at your own risk, at least when it comes to "Real Times of Bill Maher." We're going to show you how he challenges the challenger.

Stay with us. You're in THE SITUATION ROOM."

BLITZER: Here is a look at some of the Hot Shots coming in now.
Some of this hour's Hot Shots.

Hecklers might want to think twice before they take on HBO's Bill Maher.

CNN's Jeanne Moos takes a look at this most unusual story.


JEANNE MOOS, CNN CORRESPONDENT: It was almost as if they heckled Dr. Jekyll and he turned into Mr. Hyde.

BILL MAHER, TV SHOW HOST: Hey, do we have some [bleep] security in this building? Or do I have to come over and kick this guy's [bleep] out of here? Would you get the [bleep] out of my building? Hey, hey, hey, out, out, out!

MOOS: Sure some public speakers preferred trying to calm hecklers with kindness.

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: I don't mind listening. You can talk.

MOOS: Yes. Well Bill Maher minded when a second heckler piped up.

MAHER: I'll kick your [bleep] out of here, too. This isn't the Iowa caucus. You're in the audience. Audience comes from the Latin, to listen.

MOOS: How do you say this in Latin?

MAHER: Yes, and you are a nut case, building seven.

MOOS: The hecklers believed the way world trade center building seven collapsed on 9/11 suggests it was rigged to implode, that the U.S. government is hiding the truth. They mocked Bill Maher for mocking them, circulating a parity of one of his show segments called "New Rules."

UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: New rules, two airplanes can't slam into two buildings and knock down three. What about building seven? MAHER: Ass kicking is what's called for.

MOOS: Hey, Bill could have been worse. He could have tasered them. Remember the guy who wouldn't stop questioning John Kerry?

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: Don't tase me, bro. Don't tase me, I said don't tase me!

MOOS: "Don't tase me bro" went on to become a catch phrase with remixes on the web. Emblazoned on t-shirts "Don't tase me bro" was even reduced to shorthand, DTMB, on doggie wear, on thongs.

So far we haven't seen Bill's rant plastered anywhere except on You Tube. Bill Maher's anti-heckling technique reminds us another pro of the putdown. But at least we didn't have to bleep Ronald Reagan. Talk about the great communicator.


MOOS: As for Bill Maher's hecklers claiming 9/11 was an inside job ...

MAHER: I don't think President Bush brought down the world trade center.


MAHER: And cows disagree with me.

MOOS: Bill put them out to pasture.

Jeanne Moos, CNN, New York.

BLITZER: Thank you Jeanne.
Copyright 2007 Cable News Network
All Rights Reserved.



October 20, 2007 Saturday


SECTION: NEWS; International

LENGTH: 7145 words

HEADLINE: Miracle Baby Survives Tornado; Georgia is in a State of Emergency Due to Severe Drought; Iona College MRSA Outbreak; Cold Medicines Unsafe for Small Children

FREDRICKA WHITFIELD, CNN ANCHOR: Hello, I'm Fredricka Whitfield right now in the NEWSROOM.


BILL MAHER, HOST OF REAL TIME: This is the problem with government. Hey, do we have some security in this building? Do I have to come over and take this guy down?


WHITFIELD: That's a shout out. We'll show you what made comedian Bill Maher so angry on his own television show.

WHITFIELD: (...) Well, almost anything can happen on live television. That we know. Here's further proof.


BILL MAHER, COMEDIAN AND COMMENTATOR: This is part of the Democrats ...


MAHER: I am from New Jersey. Yes, like I even ... UNIDENTIFIED MALE: (INAUDIBLE)

MAHER: Boy, sometimes here at CBS, I wish the sound wasn't working.


MAHER: I don't even know what that (EXPLETIVE DELETED) is saying.

But, you know, see, this is the problem sometimes with government ...

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: Chris Matthews, you said (INAUDIBLE) ...

MAHER: Hey, do we have some (EXPLETIVE DELETED) security in this building? Or do I have to come over and take this guy (EXPLETIVE DELETED) out of here? (EXPLETIVE DELETED). Hey, hey, hey! Out, out, out, out!


WHITFIELD: Out, out, he says, and out he went. Well, the comedian and political commentator Bill Maher, large and in charge. He took security into his own hands on his own television show last night after a rowdy protester, as you just saw, held up a sign and started yelling, "9/11 is a cover up fraud" and it just kept happening and you saw that Bill Maher just kind of lost his temper and said, forget about it.

Well, several other protesters sprinkled throughout the audience tried interrupting the show, as well. And I should add Maher's show is on HBO, a company owned by Time Warner, which also owns CNN.
Copyright 2007 Cable News Network
All Rights Reserved.



October 22, 2007 Monday



LENGTH: 8287 words

ROBERTS: And good morning to you. Welcome back. Thanks very much for joining us on this Monday, the 22nd of October.

I'm John Roberts.

CHETRY: (....) Meantime, Bill Maher gets politically incorrect with a rowdy protester during his TV show. Let's take a look.



BILL MAHER, "REAL TIME WITH BILL MAHER": Hey, do we have some (EXPLETIVE DELETED) security in this building, or do I have to come over and kick this guy's (EXPLETIVE DELETED) out of here?


CHETRY: There you go. Of course, you're allowed to say those words on HBO. It was all captured on live TV.

The guy had smuggled in a 9/11 (ph) as a cover-up sign. Well, Bill Maher helped push him out the door. He also threatened to kick out another woman who called him a coward.

"I don`t want to know these kind of facts about America."

This quote from Tucker Carlson about disturbing facts of 9/11 in his show tells much:

"This is why we never do this topic on the show, because it upsets me too much. I don`t want to know these kind of facts about America."


CARLSON: I`m not defending it. I`m merely saying, it`s a long way from there to flying planes full of innocents into office buildings. That`s completely insane.

FRANKEN: I don`t think it`s a long way. I think it`s a short way. I think what you if is this very short distance between people, as the movie once said, who are mad as hell and don`t want to take it any more, and ready to believe just about anything.

CARLSON: That`s frightening. If you have a population that stupid and reckless and they`re in charge of the government, maybe it is time to leave the country.

FRANKEN: Or maybe that fed up.

CARLSON: What does that mean? I`m fed up with a million things and I don`t believe things that have no basis in fact.

ROBINSON: You don`t think they believe this in France?

CARLSON: I don`t know. Maybe in Burkino Faso there is a little island of sanity. I`m just saying, that`s frightening. Considering that the population is in control, I don`t even want to think it through any more. This is why we never do this topic on the show, because it upsets me too much. I don`t want to know these kind of facts about America.

I hate to be a bitch about

I hate to be a bitch about this, I’m just saying what I think, maybe I’m wrong, sorry.

Nothing wrong with saying what you think

I don't think you're "being a bitch" if that counts. There's nothing "bitch" about speaking your mind.

no bitch

I wasn't thinking of you as a bitch.

I think if you looked at the main stream media's reaction to other issues of contention...jfk and will see that the main stream media has and will always concoct propaganda like this to pain those who question the US GOvernment's policies and 'official explanations' as quacks, kooks, nutters, crazies, lefties, loons...and...ENEMIES!

The extreme rhetoric was inevitable.

We should really begin a campaign that will require 911 Truth sites and organizations wear a badge of allegiance to absolute non-violent activism. It should be part of the motto.

Can't Stop 9/11 Fever

"We should really begin a

"We should really begin a campaign that will require 911 Truth sites and organizations wear a badge of allegiance to absolute non-violent activism."

^ Exactly.

I don't necessarily think of you as being "wrong"

We do disagree. (on this) And that's okay.

If you aren't swayed by our arguments, and we aren't swayed by yours, then we agree to disagree and live to "fight" another day.

Senior 9/11 Bureau Chief, Analyst, Correspondent, Principle Investigator, Forensic 9/11ologist

To sin by silence when they should protest makes cowards of men. — Abraham Lincoln

Secrecy is the beginning of tyranny. — Robert Heinlein

This on Beck today at KOS

Glenn Beck's Producer Stands By Statement
by Hunter
Tue Oct 23, 2007 at 02:57:59 PM PDT

Yesterday, Glenn Beck said, on his radio program:

I think there is a handful of people who hate America. Unfortunately for them, a lot of them are losing their homes in a forest fire today.

Today, USA Today got a reaction:

A spokesman for Beck expressed surprise that bloggers are seizing on this quotation as an example of incivility. "To most rational people, unfortunately still means unfortunately," Chris Balfe, the show's producer, tells On Deadline through a spokesman.

So Glenn Beck and his entire staff don't see anything wrong with claiming that some unknown percentage of the half million Southern Californians fleeing wildfires, some of whom have already lost their homes, "hate America". They don't think that part is even in issue at all -- it would only have been a problem if he hadn't added that it was "unfortunate" that these people who "hate America" were losing their homes.

Still no reaction from CNN, but why would there be? Beck was a hateful jackass when they hired him -- of course they support his statements. This isn't like the Imus or Limbaugh cases, where eventually the company is going to show a minimal shred of class.

I'm adding this:

"What no one seemed to notice was the ever widening gap between the government and the people. And it became always wider.....the whole process of its coming into being, was above all diverting, it provided an excuse not to think....for people who did not want to think anyway gave us some dreadful, fundamental things to think about.....and kept us so busy with continuous changes and 'crises' and so the machinations of the 'national enemies,' without and within, that we had no time to think about these dreadful things that were growing, little by little, all around us.....

"Each step was so small, so inconsequential, so well explained or, on occasion, 'regretted,' that unless one understood what the whole thing was in principle, what all these 'little measures'.....must some day lead to, one no more saw it developing from day to day than a farmer in his field sees the corn growing.....Each act is worse than the last, but only a little worse. You wait for the next and the next.

"You wait for one great shocking occasion, thinking that others, when such a shock comes, will join you in resisting somehow. You don't want to act, or even talk, don't want to 'go out of your way to make trouble.' But the one great shocking occasion, when tens or hundreds or thousands will join with you, never comes.

"That's the difficulty. The forms are all there, all untouched, all reassuring, the houses, the shops, the jobs, the mealtimes, the visits, the concerts, the cinema, the holidays. But the spirit, which you never noticed because you made the lifelong mistake of identifying it with the forms, is changed. Now you live in a world of hate and fear, and the people who hate and fear do not even know it themselves, when everyone is transformed, no one is transformed.

"You have accepted things you would not have accepted five years ago, a year ago, things your father.....could never have imagined."

Milton Mayer, They Thought They Were Free, The Germans, 1938-45 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1955)

NO GLENN, WE HATE YOUR HATE MONGERING. You live in a world of hate and fear. You are the spokesperson.

Glenn Beck is not human

I have smoke in my clothes, in my bed sheets, in my friggin mouth as I type this(yes you can taste it in the air). There is an orange haze everywhere and it looks like sunset all day.One of my family members is in danger of losing their home if winds shift.

Glenn Beck is a Nazi, case closed. People like him and the rest of the Media only expose themselves by this type of talk. It may make me angry but I can only hope they do it more. Another law of the Universe....what you reap is what you sow. When, not if, people have a paradigm shift on a massive scale, people like the Glenn Becks of the world had better run. That is not a threat, that is reality. People like him had better pray for 5% of the compassion they deserve.

And you're right, they hired him for this very reason, to ignite anger. To them it's a money and ratings game, to us, it's personal. But jokers and clowns always laugh right up until the point someone SERIOUS comes along.

Neo-Nazi is the word that I use to describe him


Here is a list of upcoming

Here is a list of upcoming Beck shows:

December 1
Saturday Orlando
Hard Rock Live
6050 Universal Blvd
Orlando, FL 32819 WFLA-AM

December 3
Seagate Convention Center
401 Jefferson Avenue
Toledo, OH. 43604

December 5
Wednesday Richmond
Landmark Theatre
6 N Laurel St
Richmond, VA 23220 WRVA-AM

San Francisco
Nob Hill Masonic Center
Masonic Hall
1111 California Street
San Francisco, CA 94108

December 8
Saturday Salt Lake City
E Center
3200 South Decker Lake Drive
West Valley City, UT 84119 KNRS-AM

December 10
Heinz Hall
600 Penn Avenue
Pittsburgh, PA 15222

December 12
Wednesday Des Moines
KJJY Center
2100 NW 100th Street
Clive, IA 50325 KWQW-FM

December 14
Mabee Center
Oral Roberts University
7777 S Lewis Ave
Tulsa, OK 74171

December 15
Performing Arts Center
5001 Coliseum Drive
Charleston, SC 29418 WSCC-FM

And here is a partial list of the "McVeighs" that Beck fears:

General Wesley Clark, U.S. Army (ret) – Former Commanding General of U.S. European Command
Major General Albert Stubblebine, U.S. Army (ret) – Former Commanding General of U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command
Col. Ronald D. Ray, U.S. Marine Corps (ret) – Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense
Col. Robert Bowman, PhD, U.S. Air Force (ret) – Director of Advanced Space Programs Development
Col. George Nelson, MBA, U.S. Air Force (ret) – Former U.S. Air Force aircraft accident investigator
Col. Ann Wright, U.S. Army (ret) – Retired Army officer and former U.S. Diplomat
Col. James R. Uhl, MD, MC, U.S. Army (ret) – Retired Army physician
Lt. Col. Shelton F. Lankford, U.S. Marine Corps (ret) – Retired U.S. Marine Corps fighter pilot
Lt. Col. Karen U. Kwiatkowski, PhD, U.S. Air Force (ret) – Former Political-Military Affairs Officer in the Office of the Secretary of Defense
Lt. Col. Guy S. Razer, MS, U.S. Air Force (ret) – Retired U.S. Air Force fighter pilot
Lt. Col. Jeff Latas, U.S. Air Force (ret) – Former combat fighter pilot. Aerospace engineer
Commander Ted Muga, U.S. Navy (ret) – Naval aviator
Commander Ralph Kolstad, U.S. Navy (ret) – Retired fighter pilot
Col. Michael Harley, U.S. Air Force (ret) – Retired Chief of Standardization of a Strategic Air Command Wing
Joel M. Skousen – Former U.S. Marine Corps fighter pilot
Major Douglas Rokke, PhD, U.S. Army (ret) – Former Director U.S. Army Depleted Uranium Project
Capt. Russ Wittenberg, U.S. Air Force – Former U.S. Air Force fighter
Capt. Daniel Davis, U.S. Army – Former U.S. Army Air Defense Officer and NORAD Tac Director
Barbara Honegger, MS – Senior Military Affairs Journalist at the Naval Postgraduate School
Lt. Col. Stephen L. Butler, EdD, U.S. Air Force (ret) – Former Vice Chancellor for Student Affairs
Lt. Col. Anthony Shaffer, U.S. Army Reserved – Commander of Special Troops Battalion
Capt. Scott J. Phillpott, U.S. Navy – Commanding Officer of the USS Leyte Gulf
Major Erik Kleinsmith, U.S. Army – Former Chief of Intelligence.
James D. Smith – Former Able Danger Program Manager
Col. David Hunt, MA, U.S. Army (ret) Expert in Specieal Operations, Counter Terrorism
Major John M. Newman, PhD, U.S. Army (ret) – Former Executive Assistant to NSA
Major Scott Ritter, U.W. Marine Corps – Former Marine Corps Intelligence Officer and Chief Weapons Inspector
Capt. Gregory M. Zeigler, PhD, U.S. Army – Former U.S. Army Intelligence Officer
Capt. Eric H. May, U.S. Army (ret) – Former U.S. Army Intelligence Officer
Wayne Madsen – Former U.S. Navy Intelligence Officer
David L. Griscom, PhD – Research physicist/Naval Research Laboratory
Lon J. Waters, PhD Mathematics – staff member of U.S. Dept. of Defense
Ray McGovern – Former Chairman, National Intelligence Estimates and CIA
William Christison – Former National Intelligence Officer
Robert David Steele – U.S. Marine Corps infantry and intelligence
Melvin A. Goodman, PhD – Former Division Chief and Senior Analyst at Office of Soviet Affairs
Robert Baer – Former CIA Case Offier, Specialist in the Middle East
Michael Levine – Former Senior DEA investigator
Coleen Rowley – Former Special Agent, FBI
Robert G. Wright, Jr. – Special Agent, International Terrorism Unit, FBI
Sibel Edmonds – Former Language Translation Specialist, FBI
Bogdan Dzakovic – Counter-terrorism expert
Steve Elson – Former Special Agent with the U.S. Navy
William G. Weaver, JD, PhD – Former U.S. Army Intelligence Officer
Sgt. Chadwick Brooks – U.S. Pentagon Police
Sgt. William Lagasse – U.S. Pentagon Police
Edward J. Costello, Jr. – Former Special Agent, Counterterrorism, FBI.
John M. Cole – Former Intelligence Operations Specialist
Mark Conrad, JD – Retired Agent in Charge, Internal Affairs, U.S. Customs
Rosemary N. Dew – Former Supervisory Special Agent, Counterterrorism and Counterintelligence, FBI
David Forbes – Aviation, Logistics and Govt. security analyst, Boyd Forbes, Inc
Mark Graf – Former Security Supervisor, Department of Energy
Gilbert M. Graham – Retired Special Agent, Counterintelligence, FBI
Diane Kleiman – Former Special Agent, US Customs
Lynne A. Larkin – Former CIA Operations Officer
David MacMichael, PhD – Former Senior Estimates Officer, CIA
Theodore J. Pahle – Former Senior Intelligence Officer
Behrooz Sarshar – Retired Language Translation Specialist
Brian F. Sullivan – Retired Special Agent and Risk Management Specialist, FAA.
Commander Larry J. Tortorich, U.S. Navy (ret) – Former Deputy Program Manager for Logistics – Tomahawk Cruise Missiles
Jane A. Turner – Retired Special Agent, FBI. 24-year FBI career
John B. Vincent – Retired Special Agent, Counterterrorism, FBI
Fred Whitehurst, JD, PhD – Retired Supervisory Special Agent / Laboratory Forensic Examiner, FBI
Matthew J. Zipoli – Special Response Team (SRT) Officer, DOE
Senator Max Cleland – Former member of the 9/11 Commission
Senator Mike Gravel – Former U.S. Senator from Alaska
Senator Bob Graham – Former U.S. Senator from Florida
Senator Mark Dayton – Former U.S. Senator from Minnesota
Gov. Jesse Ventura – Former governor of Minnesota
Congressman Ron Paul, MD – Congressman from Texas
Congressman Dennis Kucinich – Congressman from Ohio
Congressman Curt Weldon – Former Congressman from Pennsylvania
Congresswoman Cynthia McKinney – Former Congresswoman from Georgia
Norm Mineta – Former U.S. Secretary of Transportation
Louis Freeh – Former Director of the FBI
Edward Peck – Former Director of the White House Task Force on Terrorism
Morton Goulder – Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Intelligence
Marcus Raskin, JD – Former special staff of the National Security Council
Joseph C. Wilson IV – Retired diplomat of the U.S. Foreign Service
Morgan Reynolds, PhD – Chief Economist, U.S. Department of Labor
Paul Craig Roberts, PhD – Assistant Secretary of the U.S. Treasury
Catherine Austin Fitts – Assistant Secretary of Housing
William Bergman, MA, MBA – Former Economist and Senior Analyst
Enver Masud – Former Chief, Strategic and Emergency Planning Branch, U.S. DOE
Joel Hirschhorn, MS Metallurgical Engineering, PhD Materials Engineering
Mary Schiavo, JD – Former Inspector General, U.S. Dept. of Transportation
J. Terrence Brunner – Former prosecutor DOJ
John Loftus – Former Federal Prosecutor
George Kenney – Former Foreign Service Officer
Fred Burks – Former State Department Interpreter for GW Bush
J. Michael Springman – Former career Foreign Service Officer
Michael Mennard, PhD – Retired career Foreign Service Officer
Daniel Ellsberg, PhD – Assistant to the Assistant Secretary of Defense
Robin Hordon – Former FAA Air Traffic Controller
Philip J. Berg, Esq. – Former Attorney General, PA

Bill Maher Incident and the next one... and the next... and...

I'm just glad Bill Maher's Show didn't go off last week without a 9/11 incident occurring. And I look forward to the next act of civil disobedience to spice things up and bring the 9/11 Truth movement even more attention!!! That's a true story.

Don't work?

I can't see how anyone is complaining about how these activists handled themselves. The movement hasn't had this kind of coverage in a very long time. No matter how it's looked at, it worked. Some truth got out and even if one person looked into building 7 because of it, it's worth it.

Keep up the great work!!

Canada Wants The Truth


I just yelled at my computer screen for three minutes. I want to punch Glenn Beck in the face. Does he have a live audience that we can infiltrate?

"I will not withdraw from this war even if Laura and Barney are the only ones supporting me." -George W. Bush

When we know in advance

When we know in advance someone like Chris Matthews will be a guest, I wonder if an action like this would be more effective if we start off by first pointing out media lies the public understands like:

Pat Tillman
Jessica Lynch
Complicity in the drumbeat to war
EPA..air quality post 911 in NY.
...then bldg 7, etc.

Or challenge them to debate..."What are you affraid off? The two hundred architects and engineers that don't have government contracts or aren't related to someone in the Bush administration?

Did Maher have Colter on after she made those horrible comments about the Jersey girls? ..As a matter of fact why doesn't he invite some of the women on who FORCED this government to have an investigation into 911 in the first place?

Off topic.


Did any of the San Diego 9/11 Truthers you know suffer from the recent fires... lose houses, etc.?

Always the same two guys

Always the same two guys knocking down 9/11. These guys must be getting paid a fortune, they're everywhere! What a pity on their part to resort to the Glenn Beck show. He's the biggest nut-job of em all. Portraying 9/11 activist as "crazies", or referring to them as a "group that Timothy MacVeigh would come from" (nice try btw) is all becoming a giant mountain of desperation to those that have tampered with pandoras box. It's a pathetic rebuttal of the TRUTH that is sweeping the nation.

The truth is incontrovertible, malice may attack it, ignorance may deride it, but in the end; there it is. - Winston Churchill

Another prop idea.

Using a printer, print up sheets of hundreds of repetitions of a website link, or links. Then cut it up like fortune cookie size. You can have thousands of these confetti like truth links to throw all over the place when they come to drag you away.

You can throw them where the crowd is going to gather, on the seats of the studio, etc. Just an idea.

Let me get this straight Beck

These 911 Truthers who want to get to the truth behind who murdered 3,000 innocent American citizens are the same type of people who would blow up buildings killing innocent civilians
Together in Truth!

What's also bizarre is that

In the movie "Who Killed John O'neil " on of the reasons that was given for the Oklahoma CIty bombing was that in the future when anyone shows dissent against their government, they would be compared to a TIM MCVEIGH. A bit prophetic now. Don't know if someone brought that up, but it's interesting if anyone remembers that part of the film.


I totally refuse to watch anything that has this rush limpballs wanna-be douchebag on it... sorry.

Glen Beck... and Tucker Carlson...

Two douches for the price of one...

As to his as usual easy to dismantle point on as to which group Tim McVeigh would come from for a $1000.

What would be Gulf War 1 Veterans.

I will take More Douche Bags for $800 Alex.....