I'm speechless...

...... With only 38% support for the war down from 46% in March . The question them BECOMES does this 38% KNOW about the Evidence we have presented here today?

And if NOT, WILL You Tell Them?

Excellent Question Daniel Sunjata.

We WILL because we HAVE to.

For the sake of the Republic and the Planet.

Getting people to ask Common Sense questions about 911 will lead to the inevitable.

Inspiring Efforts.

It's good to see that people are inspired to come out with new groups and keep the work going. I hope these all produce positive results and inspire even more people. I know a lot of people are excited about these and have done a lot of work -- congrats for the efforts!

My concern, in general, is the ongoing promotions of "no plane" or "no-Boeing" and "Flyover" at the Pentagon, via the various links in each these groups. One site even advocates CIT's Flyover claims, the owner of a site who is now banned from 911blogger, Edward Reynearson of Radio du Jour.

And FYI, the Actors and Artists site has a link to Jim Fetzer's group -- in the Journal of 9/11 Studies banner it goes to 911scholars, a hoax site. I'll email the webmaster.

I have to say I'm not surprised to find a link to Jim Fetzer's group buried in here.

Because this is what I mean about continuing to support "no-planes", swapped planes, "no-Boeing", "flyover", etc, despite papers like Frank Legge's What Hit the Pentagon? Misinformation and its Effect on the Credibility of 9/11 Truth which deflate the emotional claims which underlie these ideas. Legge writes:

The best way to avoid the development of contradictory views is to scrupulously adhere to the scientific method and to promote to the public only those concepts which are shown to be soundly based. Multiple views will cause confusion which will be apparent to the target audience, the public. Many will conclude that the case for a new investigation into the events of 9/11 is weak if proponents cannot agree on significant issues.
http://www.journalof911studies.com/volume/2009/WhatHitPentagonDrLeggeAug...

and

The minor hypothesis of the paper is that there is no scientific proof that a Boeing 757 did not hit the Pentagon. . . . I have looked for evidence that a Boeing 757 could not have hit the Pentagon and have not been able to find any that stood up to scrutiny. I further contend that this hypothesis still stands.
http://www.journalof911studies.com/volume/2009/WhatHitPentagonDrLeggeAug...

What we've seen over the years is that the no-plane/ no-Boeing ideas are typically a conduit for people like Jim Fetzer and others to plant and grow speculative claims and who then promote and protect more disruptors who advocate nonsense, or a focus on the historical role of Jewish people, or who have a seat with their name on it at FOX News (i.e., Morgan Reynolds), to use to claim that cartoons hit the WTC. On and on.

When claims which are deeply flawed are protected and not exposed, they keep everything else which is standing on increasingly strong ground -- year after year -- in a swamp.

Last night at the Grand Lake Theater in Oakland we saw even more evidence exposing NIST's claims that demolition could not have taken place as false. Did we see any new evidence for how all the people in DC who saw a commercial jet hit the building were wrong? No. None. These are two very different situations, with one moving forward with increasingly damning evidence every year, and the other being a magnet for hoax claims like "the flyover" and how a taxi-cab driver was "in on it".

I know that many are well-intentioned and are doing a lot of work, and we all are glad to see more groups and see the movement growing, which is why I offer a concern toward improving these sincere efforts, not to take them down. Let's continue to move forward with the best we have to offer.

about the actors project about 10 months ago. I contacted the staff to request a change in title to something less similar to one of my main projects of the past 2 ½ years.
Artists for 9/11 Truth

They refused. After an effort to make the best of the situation for a while and after observing the coarse of events, I again asked them for a title change a couple months ago. I have been arguing my case in private, semi-private, and public since.

I was just watching a great video of a man I met about 25 years ago Zen Master Seung Sahn. He’s very famous in Buddhist circles and in Korea. I heard him say all these things in person. It was quite an experience. So I looked again to him for guidance in this situation.

Upon watching this video I was particularly once again impressed and helped especially by these 2 parts:

Timcode 2:40
Seung Sahn - “All human beings understand too much. Too much understand, then too much have problems. little understand, little problem Complete DON’T KNOW........no problem
Timecode 9:42
Seung Sahn - “What is correct life? Correct life means very simple, somebody’s hungry, give them food......sombody thirsty give them a drink......somebody suffering only help them....That is Buddhism......not special. I hope everybody attain your true self, get enlightenment, save all beings from suffering. Thank you.”

My request to the actors staff stands. I wish everyone good health and success at this critical time.
-P