James Gourley

The Importance of The Toronto Hearings

http://ae911truth.org/en/news-section/41-articles/552-toronto-hearings.html#continue
Setting the Stage for Historic Hearings in Toronto
Written by Mike Bondi, PEng - AE911Truth.org

“The media will have to examine this,” says Adnan Zuberi. “They can’t just dismiss it.”

Click this link to watch the FULL CTV News interview
http://watch.ctv.ca/news/clip518347#clip518347

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B7hkIA1UdXM

To capitalize on the strategic importance of the 10th anniversary of 9/11, the International Center for 9/11 Studies ( http://www.ic911studies.org/ ) is sponsoring a four-day set of hearings, September 8-11, at Ryerson University in Toronto, Canada. Officially called “The International Hearings on the Events of September 11, 2001”, this historic gathering of panelists, expert witnesses, and numerous key figures in the 9/11 truth movement is being more commonly referred to as the “Toronto Hearings" ( http://torontohearings.org/ ). Focusing primarily on the scientific forensic and other evidence and eyewitness testimony, with emphasis on the destruction of the three World Trade Center high-rises, the Hearings will identify some of the best evidence regarding the events of 9/11, thus encouraging and enabling national and/or international legal agencies to pursue formal investigations.

5TB Of Declassified Data Devastates 9/11 Debunkers

http://www.wearechangenewjersey.com/?p=1261

Glenn Zarmanov
3/3/11
WeAreChangeNewJersey.COM

HELP THIS STORY BREAK INTO THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA!

Thanks to James Gourley at the International Center for 9/11 Studies, the only individual to successfully sue NIST over a FOIA request for the entirety of the footage that’s been covered up for the past 10 years, we now have overwhelming evidence that disproves the official story of nine-eleven. Of the 5 terrabytes of data released, maybe 35% has been analyzed and posted on YouTube for the world to see. Even Gourley’s organization itself has not had the time to examine and post all of the new evidence and so other 9/11 researchers have taken up the task of downloading the raw data from the “NIST Cumulus Database” and posting the converted videos to YouTube and elsewhere all over the internet. We here at WeAreChangeNewJersey.COM will continue to post this new evidence until it is fully released.

Here are some of the best channels to get started investigating the new evidence:

youtube.com/wearechangenj

WeAreChange New Jersey Releases 100 New 9/11 Videos

http://wearechangenewjersey.com/?p=939

Glenn Zarmanov
2/6/11
WeAreChangeNewJersey.COM

HELP THIS STORY BREAK INTO THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA!

RELATED STORIES:

New Evidence Uncovers 9/11 Truth
http://wearechangenewjersey.com/?p=678

2010 NIST 9/11 Footage Leaks Ignored
http://wearechangenewjersey.com/?p=751

Media Admits To Having 9/11 Foreknowledge
http://wearechangenewjersey.com/?p=770

9 Years Of Hidden Evidence Exposes Massive 9/11 Coverup
http://wearechangenewjersey.com/?p=783

911Gate – Video Releases Disprove Official Story
http://wearechangenewjersey.com/?p=792

WeAreChange New Jersey Releases 5th Cache Of New 9/11 Video Evidence
http://wearechangenewjersey.com/?p=822

911Leaks: Meet James Gourley, The Real Julian Assange
http://wearechangenewjersey.com/?p=853

911Leaks: Meet James Gourley, The Real Julian Assange

http://wearechangenewjersey.com/?p=853

Glenn Zarmanov
1/8/11
WeAreChangeNewJersey.COM

Julian Assange has condemned 911Truth, WikiLeaks has revealed nothing new and in fact has allowed for a total surveillance state takeover of the web. James Gourley, on the other hand, has sued the government for 9 years worth of censored videos, revealed bombshell evidence, smoking guns, cover-ups, and has blown wide open one of the biggest crimes ever carried out and never to have been properly investigated.

RELATED STORIES:

New Evidence Uncovers 9/11 Truth

http://wearechangenewjersey.com/?p=678

2010 NIST 9/11 Footage Leaks Ignored

http://wearechangenewjersey.com/?p=751

Media Admits To Having 9/11 Foreknowledge

http://wearechangenewjersey.com/?p=770

9 Years Of Hidden Evidence Exposes Massive 9/11 Coverup

http://wearechangenewjersey.com/?p=783

911Gate – Video Releases Disprove Official Story

http://wearechangenewjersey.com/?p=792

WeAreChange New Jersey Releases 5th Cache Of New 9/11 Video Evidence

2010 NIST 9/11 Footage Leaks Ignored

http://wearechangenewjersey.com/?p=751


Glenn Zarmanov
12/7/10
WeAreChangeNewJersey.COM

While everyone is focusing on WikiLeaks and Julian Assange, another important information dump is getting largely ignored since September 1, 2010 when James Gourley of the International Center For 9/11 Studies obtained nearly 5 terrabytes of videos and reports concerning the attacks on the WTC and Pentagon buildings.

Although some of the tapes have had some audio/video manipulation, it is clear why NIST did not want to release any of this material for the past 9 years. The 9/11 coverup demands that no evidence of explosions or bombs be included in the official story, and some of these videos have even been kept hidden simply for including the WORDS "bomb" or "explosion" in their contents.

The Canadian: New Video Helps the War Against Terrorism

link: http://www.agoracosmopolitan.com/home/Frontpage/2010/11/12/03389.html

New video helps the War against Terrorism

by Eli Rika

Over the last century, the most astounding historical discoveries of man-made artifacts have often been accomplished by well-funded, highly experienced researchers. From the excavation of King Tut’s tomb to the sighting of the sunken Titanic, stunning finds have required immense financial and human resources, as well as leadership by distinguished explorers. So, how did a mountain of never-before-seen footage used in NIST’s World Trade Center investigations get exposed to the light of day last month? Was it the work of a billionaire adventurer?

Not quite. You can thank an upstart non-profit, the International Center for 9/11 Studies, whose efforts have at last borne fruit.

The International Center for 9/11 Studies was founded in 2008 by Director James Gourley, a Texas lawyer who began questioning the events of 9/11 after watching a presentation given by David Ray Griffin on C-SPAN.

“I was just floored by what I was hearing,” Gourley explained, “and I’ve been looking into 9/11 ever since then.”

Nanotechnology: 9/11 and the Future

With the advent of the discoveries surrounding the 9/11/01 nano-thermite evidence, along with what is about to come down the pike, I decided to do a cursory layman study of “nanotechnology”.

One nanometer (nm) is one billionth, or 10-9, of a meter. It takes about 3-10 atoms to span the length of a nanometer. 1 nanometer = 1,000 microns (µm) (micrometers). A red blood cell is 7 microns in diameter. A bacterium might be 200 nanometers in length.

This 10 minute video gives an excellent overview of nanotechnology.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S4CjZ-OkGDs

Nano-aluminum is burned in this 5 minute video.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FWvhthVsVDs taken from http://www.qsinano.com/index.php

James Gourley Published in "The Journal of Engineering Mechanics"

(The following article by James Gourley reports the great news that another piece has been published in a mainstream technical Journal. This follows the publication in April, 2008 in the Bentham 'Open Civil Engineering Journal' and in August, 2008 in 'The Environmentalist'. It also recounts the extra hurdles that critics of the official WTC collapse theories have to jump along the way. -rep.)

The Journal of Engineering Mechanics has recently published a paper I authored. It can be found here, beginning on page 915: (PDF 224kb)

Normally, such a publication would be announced here at 911Blogger to let everyone know we are still making progress publishing criticisms of the official fairy tale in mainstream technical journals, in the hopes of reaching more members of the scientific and engineering community.

While I am excited this paper will be reaching new audiences, and I would like to share that fact with you, I am writing today for a different purpose.

Not much is ever written about what we go through to get these papers published. The publication of this paper is a case study in the struggles we face. I’d like to relate to you exactly what I had to go through to get this paper published, and what influences the substance of it have already had. I hesitate to reveal some of the information below, but as will become clear, the Journal of Engineering Mechanics personnel have demonstrated a complete lack of scientific ethics, and I feel like I have no choice but to publish exactly what occurred in the lead up to my paper’s publication.

Kevin R. Ryan, James R. Gourley, and Steven E. Jones - Published in "The Environmentalist"

(Another peer-reviewed paper in another scientific journal. Great job, guys!)

From Kevin Ryan;

Dear truth seekers,

My co-authors and I have a new article published today, in the Springer journal The Environmentalist. It is called 'Environmental anomalies at the WTC: evidence for energetic materials.'

http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10669-008-9182-4

Many thanks to the Bloomington 9/11 Working Group for help with the related FOIA, and to attorney Mick Harrison for his generosity in making the article freely available to all, instead of by subscription only.

In case you missed our last mainstream journal article, 'Fourteen points of agreement with official government reports...', here is a link to that paper.

http://www.bentham-open.org/pages/content.php?TOCIEJ/2008/00000002/00000001/35TOCIEJ.SGM

And if you are one of those who is not wholly dependent on the mainstream, please see the many fine peer-reviewed articles at The Journal of 9/11 Studies (www.journalof911studies.com).

My best to all,

Kevin Ryan


Environmental anomalies at the World Trade Center: evidence for energetic materials

by Kevin R. Ryan, James R. Gourley, and Steven E. Jones
© The Author(s) 2008

Received: 17 February 2008 Accepted: 14 July 2008 Published online: 4 August 2008

Abstract Investigators monitoring air quality at the World Trade Center, after the September 11th attacks, found extremely high levels of volatile organic chemicals as well as unusual species that had never been seen before in structure fires. Data collected by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency indicate striking spikes in levels of benzene, styrene, and several other products of combustion. These spikes occurred on specific dates in October and November 2001, and February 2002. Additionally, data collected by researchers at the University of California Davis showed similar spikes in the levels of sulfur and silicon compounds, and certain metals, in aerosols. To better explain these data, as well as the unusual detection of 1,3-diphenylpropane, the presence of energetic nanocomposites in the pile at Ground Zero is hypothesized.

Publication in a Peer-reviewed Civil Engineering Journal!

(EDIT: FYI, it is extremely common for Open Access Journals to charge a publication fee. This in no way reflects upon the quality of the peer review process, or the contents of the paper. -rep.)

Finally! After submitting a half-dozen papers to established peer-reviewed technical journals over a period of nearly a year, we have two papers which have passed peer-review and have been accepted for publication. One of these was published TODAY! In science, we say that we have “published in the literature,” a major step in a nascent line of scientific inquiry.

And many thanks to the editors for their courage and adherence to science in allowing us to follow the evidence and publish in their journal. (Indeed, expressions of thanks along these lines to the editors will be appreciated, as they will probably get a few letters chastising them… )

The paper is here:
http://www.bentham.org/open/index.htm (our paper is listed on top at the moment, the most recently entered paper); or go here:
http://www.bentham.org/open/tociej/openaccess2.htm
(Click on “year 2008” then scroll down to the paper and click on it.)

Visibility 9-11 Welcomes Attorney James Gourley


This week Visibility 9-11 welcomes attorney James Gourley, author of the Request for Correction petition to the National Institute for Standards and Technology (NIST). 

NIST's mandate required the issuance of a final report but also included recommendations which could affect the entire steel building industry, high rise evacuation procedures, high rise firefighting techniques and numerous other standards and code.  The Data Quality Act has been in place to insure that government reports such as the one put out by NIST on the World Trade Center towers is useful, objective, and of sound integrity.   Mr. Gourley's Request for Correction petition seeks to hold NIST accountable for the egregious errors and lies published in their report. 

Requesters on the RFC include 9-11 victim family members Bob McIlvine and Bill Doyle, Physicist Steven Jones, Architect Richard Gage, Kevin Ryan and Scholars for 9-11 Truth and Justice.

Intermission music by LABAL-S.

Download this episode here.