Jane Standley in an early report stating that another building close to the towers has collapsed.
This clip was found via a research collective that I run on paltalk. This is the direct link to the room: http://express.paltalk.com/index.html?gid=1335363438 - your help is needed. There are 2, 911 truth rooms on paltalk, mine is the one with 911 in words, not numbers. But please check out both. If you are willing to help and have any problems getting onto paltalk just email me at email@example.com and i will try to help. Get on board - we are many, they are few.
Mike Rudin 2 Jul 08, 09:00 AM
After the huge response to Richard Porter's blogs last year about 9/11 Part of the conspiracy? I was very keen to get to the bottom of what exactly happened.
For the latest Conspiracy Files programme, on 9/11 - The Third Tower (Sunday 6 July at 2100 BST on BBC Two), I've been looking in detail at allegations that there was a conspiracy to deliberately demolish a third tower at the World Trade Center.
This third skyscraper was never hit by an aeroplane. There is little photographic evidence of extensive damage. Yet seven hours after the Twin Towers collapsed, this 47-storey building collapsed in a few seconds.
Further technical problems with the BBC to New York LIVE link on 9/11...
This time there are audio problems when Jane Standley is asked about the 9/11 enigma, that is WTC7 !!!
Being that I am still receiving comments that I faked the BBC footage, in which WTC7 was pronounced collapsed at 4:57pm and is still standing behind Jane Standley at least 13 minutes prior to the actual collapse time of 5:20pm, I decided to revisit the BBC footage for further analysis and additional footage to prove authenticity (sad, but turned out well in the end).
We received an interesting e mail from a CNN archivist in Atlanta who stated their utter disbelief at the notion that BBC has lost any of their 9/11 archives.
"I'm an archivist with the CNN News Library in Atlanta, and I can tell you with absolute certainty, the mere idea that news agencies such as ours would "misplace" any airchecks from 9/11 is preposterous. CNN has these tapes locked away from all the others. People like myself, who normally would have access to any tapes in our library, must ask special permission in order to view airchecks from that day. Multiple tapes would have been recording their broadcast that day, and there are also private agencies that record all broadcasts from all channels - constantly - in the event that a news agency missed something or needs something. They don't just have one copy... they have several. It's standard procedure, and as soon as the second plane hit, they would start recording several copies on other tapes machines all day long.
The only information they need to give out is the source of the collapse claim. No one is saying the BBC is "part of the conspiracy," we're saying that someone gave that reporter the information ahead of time. The source of that information is the only thing they can reveal that would be meaningful."
digg_url = 'http://digg.com/world_news/Jim_Hoffman_article_on_BBC_9_11_Timeline_Foreknowledge_of_WTC_7_s_Collapse';
The BBC Bombshell
Archived footage of television broadcasts from 9/11/2001 shows the BBC reporting the collapse of WTC 7 about 23 minutes before it actually occurred.
BBC News correspondent Jane Standley reports that the Salomon Brothers' Building (WTC 7) has collapsed, unaware that the intact building is clearly visible behind her.
On February 22, 2007, an extensive archive of television broadcast footage covering the attack was discovered on Archive.org and publicized on a blog. The archive consists of 417 mpegs, each covering about 41 minutes of broadcast. The coverage includes the following six television stations and time spans: Continued...