edward35's blog

David Schippers says "Ho Ho Ho!"

David Schippers

David Schippers, the man who impeached Bill Clinton and who is representing the FBI agents who are suing the government for blocking their investigations into 9/11 says "Ho Ho Ho!" (not really) ;-)

... But, please listen to this great interview with Alex Jones as he discusses the above issues among others.

http://www.newsofinterest.tv/911_blocked_investigations.html#david_schippers

New Cynthia McKinney and Sibel Edmonds pages ..

Please check out these two new pages summarizing Cynthia McKinney and Sibel Edmonds..

The Cynthia McKinney Page contains the video of her confrontation with Donald Rumsfeld including a partial transcript, an amazing interview with Alex Jones, the documentary film “American Blackout” and it’s trailer, and a summarized biography.

Cynthia McKinney

http://www.newsofinterest.tv/people_cynthia_mckinney.html

 

The Sibel Edmonds page contains a short video conversation with Daniel Elisberg, a summarized bio, an audio interview with Alex Jones, information about the “National Security Whistleblowers Coalition,” and relevant references from Paul Thompson’s “Complete 911 Timeline.”

Sibel Edmonds

http://www.newsofinterest.tv/people_sibel_edmonds.html

 

Please help by linking to the website and spreading the word.. Thanks! :-)

911 Summary Article has Been Expanded

Please take a look at the recently expanded News of Interest.TV article which summarizes many 9/11 related issues such as past examples of government sponsored terrorism, prior warnings, drills before and during the attacks, the money trail, government officials questioning 9/11, and the activity of key individuals on the day of the attacks.

Much of the information in this article is a compilation of the works of individuals such as Alex Jones, Paul Thompson, and Alan Miller. This article is broken into many pages, each covering a different aspect of the issue. This project is a work in progress, new content and sections are being added almost daily.

You may view the article here:

http://www.newsofinterest.tv/911.html

Forget NP, forget CD.. It's time to start summarizing the most concrete 9/11 evidence for mainstream consumption

Recent political developments due to the midterm elections are cause for concern to the 9/11 Truth Movement, and it is a good time to rethink strategies for the manner of communicating the most relevant information. This article details the importance of effectively summarizing information for potential newcomers to the movement, as well as explaining why it is not a good idea to focus on controlled demolition and no plane theories.

Time to Summarize the Most Concrete Evidence

Following is a list of topics which could be considered to have concrete evidence of government involvement in the 9/11 attacks, relying mainly on declassified documents, mainstream media reports, as well as audio and video testimony by key individuals...

- prior examples of government sponsored terrorism
- prior stated intentions related to the attacks
- prior knowledge of the attacks
- blocked investigations before the attacks
- behavior during the attacks
- blocked investigations after the attacks
- disinformation put out about the 9/11 Truth Movement

Most, if not all of the necessary information exists in order to form an airtight case for government involvement in the 9/11 attacks, however the information is generally not being properly summarized and presented for consumption by mainstream newcomers. It is not enough to communicate only to those who are already familiar with the issue.

For example, try this.. type "summarize 9/11" into Google. Obviously some information is showing up, but where are the hundreds of different summary pages which need to exist? This is a problem!

Controlled Demolition Theories not a Guarantee

The 9/11 Truth Movement needs to be careful about putting so many of it’s eggs in the controlled demolition basket. The proof for this theory is not as solid as the many other issues related to government involvement in the 9/11 attacks.

In the case of Building 7, the debate now seems to center on the amount of damage the building received when WTC 1 collapsed, and the interpretation of how the building would behave with the varying amounts of damage it could have recieved. Exact measurements of the amount of damage are difficult to prove, as there are no reliable photographs of an important gash in the side of the building. Recollections from firefighters about that day are the best information to go on.

Here is a link which compares information that agrees with the controlled demolition theory alongside ones that disagree with that theory:

http://www.oilempire.us/demolition.html

Please check out the following recently expanded introduction and summary page which contains audio and video clips about the questions of government involvement in the 9/11 attacks, as well as Alan Miller's list of 50 millitary, intellligence, and goverment officials questioning the 9/11 attacks..

New 9/11 summary page

I would like to introduce a web page created for the purpose of introducing and summarizing 9/11 questions to newcomers who are not yet familiar with the topic.

News of Interest.TV is a human interest website which combines summaries of important political information along with helpful interesting and entertaining content.

News of Interest.TV's 9/11 page makes use of select audio and video clips relying heavily on the works of Alex Jones, along with reprints of information from such websites as www.911truth.org and Alan Miller's website www.PatriotsQuestion911.com.

You may find website here:
http://www.newsofinterest.tv/

News of Interest.TV's 9/11 page is here:
http://www.newsofinterest.tv/911.html