boom shakalaka!

Looks very impressive...

I was especially impressed with McMurty's previous presentations...

"Why the Facts of 9/11 Must Be Suppressed:
Understanding the Ruling Group Mind Behind the War Without End"

http://www.kpfa.org/archives/index.php?arch=19290
Streaming Audio from "Guns and Butter" at KPFA

See also http://johnmccarthy90066.tripod.com/id390.html

Some excerpts:

“The problem of denial runs deep into the collective psyche. The anomaly to be explained is how, in an open society of cynical market calculation, the most evident facts of ruling group gain at everyone else’s increasing expense can be so successfully suppressed. “I can’t believe that” is the sign pointing back to the block behind it. … Something deeper than regime propaganda is at work. Those who believe that the in-group running the US national security state could not possibly be involved in 9/11 are, by self-admission, no longer connected to fact and truth.”

"Political history since 9-11 deepened the mystery of the mind-lock whose wider meaning we investigate here. Despite a subsequent record of years of spectacular lying about Iraq by the Bush administration, still the mass media, foreign affairs respondents and opposition critics blinkered out the accumulating further evidence for a strategically constructed 9-11 attack – for documented example, the anonymously blocked F.B.I. investigations before 9-11, the ignored intelligence warnings from many foreign state agencies beforehand, and the immediately prior visit to Washington of the CIA-advised Pakistani intelligence (I.S.I) paymaster of one of the lead hijackers. 42 Even the fixed reference points of physical science were ignored in understanding the steering event - most evidently, the massive steel infrastructure collapses whose instant fall from plane impacts alone, or none at all, contradicts the laws of engineering physics. 43 Here more paradigmatically than the unrecognised war crime itself, a structure of denial and projection somehow decoupled elite and public consciousness from the evidence. We know Church authorities would not look through Galileo’s telescope to examine the astronomical facts, but in this case the ruling group-mind embraced entire societies, while the this-worldly evidence which it blacked out was against the interests of almost all of its community of thought. The consensual refusal to see beneath any known calculus of advantage or exchange was anomalous. Only group-mind operation provided an explanation. 44"

"The documented details will not be repeated here, but they are impressively massive in confirming, and none disconfirming, the long open pathway to the attacks and a continuing consistent stand-down of investigation since. When all of this faultless sequence of coincidence working continuously in one direction and in favour of one vast payoff matrix was followed, in turn, by a stonewalling of questions by everyone at the top on whose watch 9-11 occurred, still no public questions arose. Everything before 9-11 and after it that bridged the forbidden meaning across it was disconnected from the event. When such a chain of coinciding actions and reactions all consistent with one explanation alone is so systematically blocked out by all around and delinked at every joint, there has been a shut-down of reason that needs to be explained…."

Footnote 22: Terrorism is defined by the standard world insurance clause to exclude liability as: “an ideologically motivated act or acts including but not limited to the use or force or threat of violence or force, committed by or on behalf of any groups for the purpose of - - instilling fear in the public or a section of the public”. So far as I know, no-one has applied this definition of terrorism to the daily acts of the U.S. and Israel in countries they illegally occupy, although these actions fit the legally binding definition.

"No problem of life destruction can, in any case, register to a group-mind calculus because nothing of value exists beyond it."

"... a continuous process of adapting facts to the ruling paradigm, as opposed to adjusting the ruling paradigm to accommodate the facts."

"Clinically, psychiatry knows the disorder of narcissism well. It observes the defining propensities of autosuggestive hysteria and disconnection from reality - apt descriptors for daily television on “America at war against terrorism”. But the unifying disorder is writ within and across the group-mind so it cannot be apprehended from outside its own field of meaning. When psychopathic, the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders explains, further and more disturbing properties of mental disorder are revealed. The self lies glibly, manipulates others, is parasitic, and denies all responsibility for destructive actions. The clinical definitions of the narcissistic psychopath and the market religion of America correlate too perfectly to ignore. They are as microcosm to macrocosm, ego to group-mind, but the shadow subject is not seen. For the first rule of any group-mind is that it cannot adopt itself as an object of critical reflection. This is the distinguishing nature of its self-referential circle, and its consequent life-blindness….

Deep in the American psyche, the fear turning back to conquer the Other which is always perceived to threaten it, lies the self’s final definer in a world of dark forces waiting to attack. At bottom, it may be said to be the deciding will of the group-mind of America - “I can kill, therefore I am.” Where is this equation not the propelling determiner of America’s historic identity across races and ethnic identities, past and present, and in the 9-11 era operations across the world? The power to kill the other bridges self-assertion across image and reality, law-abiding patriots and gangsters, the good and the bad alike….

After the 9-11 attack on the U.S., the meaning of “we can kill, therefore we are” was reborn as the patriotic will. Yet even after 9-11, the heroic stature of America calls itself into question when the killing of the Other is by industrial bombs falling eyeless from the sky on poor populations and their basic means of continuing life without disease and death. Although all that may matter to this moral universe is to show “We are Number 1 in the world” and “only the free market can provide freedom and democracy” - still the saturation bombing of a defenceless and impoverished people provokes uprising beneath the group-mind regulators of meaning. The life of humanity refuses the offer that can’t be refused. Even although there is almost no popular form of American culture that does not bear the undertow meaning of the master longing – from hunting other creatures to kill them, to the mock murders of wrestle-mania and video-games of shooting others in droves, to the kill-‘em language of America’s favorite sports and the pervasive violence entertainments on living-room screens, to the government of the most populous state by a movie robo-killer - still, something snaps out of the field of group-mind submersion. It may take a generation to unfold - but the end is already written on the mind-lock that cannot tell the difference between the life and death of others.97

At bottom lies the unseen equation of U.S. armed force to America itself. If America is at war in “a war without end”, then the equation rules out its life modes of peace. No received economic metric can see this problem, let alone measure it. Market growth is the only metric of social health visible through the regulating market prism. With no social life but consuming market selves against the Enemy, “we can kill therefore we are” becomes the American collectivity which is nowhere else allowed to exist. The armed force of US is in unobserved fact the only collectivity willingly funded by taxpayers since tax-cut government began. All other pooled resources for nation-state action are “socialism” to the group-mind. In the only national collectivity supported, the esprit de corps of America becomes beneath understanding the boot-camp and the killing fields of others. “We can kill, therefore we are” joins market selves in a thousand points of light. The sky-lighting bombings are “our credibility in the world”.98

This is why the Democratic Party, otherwise unaccountably, abdicated from its responsibility to oppose once the parameters of the “war against terrorism” began - affirming with “no daylight between us” the criminal invasions of other societies, the emptying of the U.S. Treasury, the systematic abridgement of legal rights, and the waiving of environmental laws for the military.99 Society-staggering increases of public expenditure on weapons of mass destruction displaced vital life needs on every level."

CIA never authenticated the December 2001 Osama video.

Funny isn't it? The confession video isn't authenticated. The others are.

/////////////////////
911dvds@gmail.com - $1 DVDs shipped - email for info

The CIA supposedly found a video tape of Bin Laden laying claim to 9/11 but, wouldn’t that be ‘hard’ evidence if it were authentic?
I mean, the FBI has not found ANY ‘hard’ evidence that Bin Laden did 9/11.
The FBI statement alone should cast doubt on the CIA’s video tape.

'I think that this film has the potential to erase the "firewall" between the anti-war Left and 9/11 skeptics.'

Let's analyze this statement, shall we? Aren't '9/11 skeptics', i.e. disbelievers of the OCT, pretty much uniformly opposed to the administration's war agenda? That's certainly been my perception. So basically what we have is that, within anti-war circles of opinion, there's a split between, on the one hand, those who have both familiarized themselves with the evidence regarding the implausibility of the official conspiracy theory of 9/11 AND who understand that its widespread exposure as such is vital to making any headway against the current regime; and, on the other hand, those who still essentially buy the official account of 9/11, and are anxious that open skepticism towards it can only weaken the antiwar movement's chances of success by making it look 'crazy' in the eyes of the rest of the public. WE have not shunned the issue of ending the occupation of Iraq--certainly not that I can see; no one needs to explain the merits of the antiwar cause to me or any thruthers I've known. The 'firewall', if you want to call it that, was thus placed there by that part (unfortunately large, it would appear) of the antiwar crowd that is pro-OCT. So what this film has the potential to do, accordng to the statement excerpted above, is to persuade pro-OCT antiwar activists that they've been wrong in their acceptance of the official 9/11 story (and that just maybe they ought to start treating us with a little respect for a change).

Hmmmm...erasing a firewall by means of persuading the very people who erected and maintained it in the first place that they were wrong to have done so. I wish the film success in that regard. But first, there's the matter of getting such people to watch the film--since they're the ones who need it most. Then they might begin to see that at this moment in history, the fundamental dividing line isn't ultimately between anti-war and pro-war, or left and right, but rather between acceptance and rejection of the official 9/11 story.

heres another call to remove Fetzer. It doesnt matter if what he sais in *this* movie makes sense or not.
we all know where 'Fetzer in the spotlight' leads to...

>>TV fakery = error.
Holocaust revisionism = error.
Anti-semitism = error.

Actually, TV Fakery is likely an intentional disinformation campaign effort (no errors involved).

Just wondering, are there any "we don't know what hit the Pentagon" comments in this film? That's one of Fetzer's favorite areas is to insist the hole was 16' wide.

Because otherwise it looks great.