That's a good point Jon, and well put, but the KW is also a good concrete example of a situation that can be very educational for people. The damage is already being done for the anniversary -- Fetzer in NYC and Von Kleist in LA. These should be spoken out against too.

We tried pretending the hoaxes would go away. They don't, they only multiply if you aren't on top of them and then appear on FOX News for the Anniversaries. The question is what's the most effective way to take down the hoaxes efficiently, while educating the most people? How can we give people the strength to be able to reject the offensive ideas and personal attacks and instead join efforts to promote our best evidence?

Finally, people have to each follow their own interests -- some of us have genes that turn on when we see deceptions and hoaxes within, and cannot simply turn away. The challenge is to make the response as effective as possible, as broad as possible.

Hence, the best thing we can do is support those who need to respond to the hoaxes in whatever way we can -- votes, links, quoting them, etc -- and each follow our own path.

"There is a group of individuals that have tried to take control of the 9/11 Truth Movement's message from day one. They are not people that support the family members, or their call for a new investigation. They are not people that know how to ask questions and demand answers. They are not people that support the 9/11 First Responders. They are people who's sole purpose is to make sure that those of us that do the previously mentioned things, spend an inordinate amount of time fighting with them, spend an inordinate amount of time debunking their "hypotheses", and most importantly, have lost our message in the sea of static that includes, "Jews, Space Beams, Mini-Nukes, Holograms, TV Fakery, Pods, Cartoons, Missiles," and so on."

Great job on that summary.

..but some of us can walk and chew gum at the same time. We know this because we do this all the time when investigating 9/11 Truth.

We got a bone, and we're not letting it go until it's sorted to our satisfaction. Not dropping this until that happens. But don't worry--because we're clever buggers we'll be able to work on the 9/11 anniversary at the same time. ;-)
_____________________________________
Impeachment. Accountability. A better world.

I know how valuable it is to create unity and have people join our movement. I know how valuable it is to get EVERYONE, (yes, everyone) on our side. I appreciate the work of those who have accomplished much when it comes to bringing people to the movement.

When I see people attacking honest and good people like Dr. Jones, and Cindy Sheehan, it pisses me off . It pisses me off to the point where I'm going to do something about it. I'm not just going to sit here and stay quiet while the false flag 9/11 truthers attack at will.

Having said this, I understand there is a very important point to be made here. We do not need to create FALSE enemies. The entire false LEFT/RIGHT, US versus THEM (as adopted by Bush's "war on terror") paradigm will not bring an end to our nightmare. The US government is ultimately responsible for the "failures" and blatant anomalies of 9/11. They are ultimately responsible for accountability. Not me, not you, not Webster Tarpley or Jim Fetzer or anyone else.

Fighting among ourselves is not the answer, and doing this is EXACTLY what the CoIntelPro operation wants us to do. They want us to fight with FAKE enemies so that we do not focus our energy on THEM. That is what they fear most of all.

I believe however, this does not mean that we can ignore legitimate problems. We simply have to find the correct approach to dealing with them.

Take for example the SPP conference and the agent provocateurs. When certain individuals engage in destructive activity such as inciting violence (or any destructive activity) that is harmful to the cause of 9/11 justice, we must deal with it in the most appropriate manner, whatever that may be. Letting internal division or attacks (deliberate or otherwise) destroy us and hamper our effectiveness is not in our best interests for seeking justice.