he means the Israeli art students.

Kevin Bleyer Bleyer joined the writing staff of The Daily Show in 2005, where he has worked on over 1000 episodes. He is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations. Bleyer has also scripted material for Bill Maher and conservative comic Dennis Miller.

Since 2008 Bleyer has contributed to a number of U.S. President Barack Obama's speeches, including the President's 2010 address at the annual White House Correspondents Dinner.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/index.html?curid=6102233

These guys have been transparent Globalists for quite some time. They’re like the Zionists that funded Marxism, Capitalism and the Bolshevism all at the same time.

By Outside Job I assume he means Mossad?

It seems to serve agendas beyond getting ratings and selling products. Is it a reflection (mirroring) of the views of their viewers? Or is it a line in the sand that says, if you believe that 911 was a false flag psyop with elements of the operation facilitated by factions of the US government, then you are to be ridiculed and ostracized from the "rational" discussion.

I think they are both too smart to actually believe the official conspiracy theory is really what happened.

Could this be a PR influenced event? Could this be a Cass Sunstein production? Just a thought.

I guess, no mater what, the word "conspiracy" can't be taken away from our perspective, and as our beloved David Ray Griffin has pointed out, it WAS a conspiracy. There WAS conspiring going on to get this long dreamed of (by PNAC neo-cons) war into action. What we have to make VERY clear, is that there is NO theorizing. Only verifiable facts are presented. ONLY verifiable facts should be presented. THEORIZING, is the word we need to REJECT, loud and clear.

The job of 9/11 was outside the realm of possibly being done by 19 hijackers with boxcutters and a guy living in a cave.

Please note that the reponse to the 9/11 Was An Outside Job held up by Jon "Whatshisname"'s holding up of the four protest signs was...

THE LOWEST RESPONSE...by far...

Meaning...

That Jon "Whatshisname"'s audience DID NOT AGREE with this sign...

...and in fact by default...HIS OWN AUDIENCE felt the OPPOSITE...that indeed 9/11 was an INSIDE JOB!

So...

...to my fellow 9/11 knee-jerkers ...overreactionary types ...hopelessly biased combatants ...and of course all the disinfo moles on the site...the PEOPLE GET IT!

GET IT?

Besides, when I evaluated Jon "Whatshisname" for Catch A Rising Star way back in the 90s, Jon "Whatshisname" had absolutely ZERO minutes of humor that would be considered political in any way shape or form. NADA POLITICA!!!

Lizz Winstead, [whom I also know and supported heartily] the "co-creator" of The Daily Show actually IS a political comic and got that show up on its current thematic feet.

Fact is that Jon "Whatshisname" was selected to be a funny talking head on this "political" show for OBVIOUS REASONS TO ALL OF YOU NOW.

But I've been on this case for years and know that even some of his comic peers KNOW that he is a gatekeeper for Israel. But, they all have to make it through LA in order to have a successful career in the BIZ...so, mums the public word.

Anyway, regarding truthers commenting on this site...WHY...might I ask that at this time in 9/11 Truth history does anybody still get surprised by such biases shown in MSM? HUH?

How come so many are still surprised? And those who see this show as an opportunity to keep our movement exposed and in "someone's news" have their thinking caps on straight.

We need to be our own media and educators...and we are wining this battle...it just takes some time.

Jon "Whatshisname"'s audience has just PROVED THIS!

This is a HUGE indicator of how well we are doing with the general public...including the most HIP audience in the nation.

Damn good news to me...

9/11 Truth for World Peace and Justice

Robin Hordon
Kingston, WA

VIVA CI...Civil Informationing!!!!

I'll do what I usually do in Jon Stewart/Colbert threads, which is to post this excerpt regarding the role of court jesters in medieval Europe;

*It is apropos in this respect that the early court jesters were assigned the role of protecting the king against the chaotic and uncontrolled forces in the universe. The jesters were considered to be qualified for such a role because their foolish strangeness and deviance intimated they were in contact with, and could potentially influence, analogous outlandish phenomena. Paradoxically, even as the funny ones soothe and protect, they also provoke. They go out of their way to conjure up images of threatening, forbidden stuff (variously relating to sex, death, anality, and hypocrisy). But each provocation is bathed in humor and the reassurance that there is nothing to fear from the threatening theme because it is, after all, only one more example of something ridiculous and absurd.*

There is something distinctly distasteful about making jokes about mass murder and destruction when they are happening in the here and now, which is what Stewart/Colbert do on a nightly basis. Defenders will argue that if we don't laugh we cry; it's a form of catharsis. There is more "truthiness" in Stewart/Colbert than the nightly news.

Yet these programs also reassure us, subconsciously, that all is well in the world. And there are lines that they will not cross. When it comes to the interviews of *controversial* figures, ie politicians/mass murderers -- 9 times out of 10 they throw softballs, giggle together, shake hands, and proceed with the commercials.

I have no doubt that dissafected youth will flock to these rallies, but it all seems so...empty.

Snowcrash's line "meaningless, obedient and moderate nothingness" is astute. These men have the potential to create real change. Yet they insist on mediocrity and nihilism.

I look forward to this rally because it will turn out to be a bust, an embarrassment, and a barometer for the establishment's base. I also look forward to the day John Stewart is prosecuted for partaking in the cover up of mass murder and war crimes and sentenced to hang till death along with Glenn Beck and every other low life.

I look forward to this rally because it will turn out to be a bust, an embarrassment, and a barometer for the establishment's base. I also look forward to the day John Stewart is prosecuted for partaking in the cover up of mass murder and war crimes and sentenced to hang till death along with Glenn Beck and every other low life.

I saw this movie recently, and in the movie, to show support for a particular public radio figure, asking here to stay with her job, the plan to support her, was that everyone that loved her, would blow their car's horn at midnight. in that city..

Now, I am not for getting arrested (then again, maybe it's a good idea to get arrested, you decide for yourself, midnight would make for "disturbing the peace") but, what if on the 11th of every month, all of us were to, at 9:11 p.m. decided, to get the public to start taking note, we all went to a central location within our own cities or town, and laid on our horns, for at least a full 60 seconds of that 11th minute of that 9th hour? What do you think? Any one else want to take up this idea. Or 9:11 a.m. for those that don't have day jobs...?

If a court of law and a jury finds John Stewart or anyone else for that matter guilty of cover up of mass murder and war crimes they shall receive just punishment, of course I meant it. Why in the world are you comparing it to Rwanda?

That was the slogan at the end ("Take it down a notch"), and there was one 911 truther sign, which could be a good sign, depending upon how you think of it.

The opposite was on the Colbert Report to follow, which has a rally at the same time and location, Oct 30, 2010. The DC mall, at the Lincoln Memorial.

But 911 truth isn't what either is about. Stewart is about toning it down, and Colbert is about raising it up (a notch). And that one 911 sign was in the mix with many others (on Stewart), and I think (between the two) it was a nice stunt.

Cheers -
Mark

Trouble is it's not funny Jon. But thanks for bringing up the subject, I suspect that was the most you could do at this time. We're still watching you...just a bit more carefully.

I thought it was brilliant. The whole rally thing is a mockery. He added 911 because it IS an issue in front of people now. I think he diffused it a little. Every time it is mentioned, it is in our favor even as a joke.

I like the idea here to make a sign that 911 was an outsouced job.

I've seen Jon seriously ask guests (don't remember who) what they thought of 911 truth. My sense was that he was sincerely wondering about it not just trying to promote the OCT. The guests discounted it of course. Since then I've seen him do pieces highly critical of Israel, so I seriously doubt that he is an Israeli gatekeeper as someone suggested. I also think he sincerely believes the OCT, because I think he has too much integrity to be a hypocritical shill.

I support the idea that he interview David Ray Griffin, Daniel Sunjata, Richard Gage, or Niels Harrit because I think he has an enormous influence on his audience. I wonder if we could write to him en masse suggesting such a thing. Since David Ray Griffin has written many books and Jon is an avid reader, maybe some of us could send him copies of his books. If he were on our side I think he would be a formidable promoter of the truth. Until they yank his show off the air of course.

http://www.cnn.com/2010/OPINION/09/22/avlon.jon.stewart.rally/index.html...

that "they" made him an offer he could not refuse?

How else could the media blackout be so absolute?

"Jon, I have here a check for $100,000 and a gift certificate at your local mortuary for $100,000, which would you prefer?"

"They" want us to direct our anger at the pawns and away from the perpetrators.

O'Riley and Chomsky should be condemned but Goodman and Stewart, perhaps not so much.