---> "I heard this covered on alex. Am I getting this right? This guy is some kindof employee of Giuliani?"

At the very least you are not getting it the same way as I do:

The individual from the interview is someone who had to accompany the other guy (who now works for Giuliani): the "individual concerned was asked to report to building seven with a city official".

• It looks like if said "city official" may be Mike Hess (who at the time was "New York’s chief lawyer who is also a longtime friend of Mayor Rudolph Giuliani").
• It looks like the other guy is Barry Jennings ("a City Housing Authority worker").

---> "This sounds like bs to me."

Looks like Barry Jennings already in the past has tried to give his testimony to reporters as well as the 9/11 Commission (but was ignored, like many other witnesses).

Looks like Michael Hess never said anything about this and kept the "conspiracy of silence", and like he is now an assiociate lawyer of Giuliani & Co. (no longer NYC chief lawyer).

---> "They're saying that a large number of people died in seven now? They are sayng that people were in there six hours after they evacuated the building hearing the explosions pre collapse? This guy is suddenly saying something that is absolutely different than everything else I've heard. It seems like disinfo."

No, the part where Jennings is telling about the "big explosion" is already on record. Various movies show that footage already! Which footage was taken on the very morning of 9/11.....

But! Everybody up to now thought that the black guy looking like Barry Jennings was talking about WTC1 or WTC2 just confirming William Rodriguez' subsequent testimonies. NO, HE WAS TALKING ABOUT WTC7 -- at least that is what this interview seems now to bring to light....

With as much supporting info as can be made available.
_______________________
"Cogito ergo sum"

That is a seriously tough spot to be in. This guy's got guts... much respect...

"In the beginning of a change, the Patriot is a scarce man, brave, hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, however, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a patriot." - Mark Twain

While at Harvard he worked with Ernest May and Richard Neustadt on the use, and misuse, of history in policymaking. They observed, as Zelikow noted in his own words, that "contemporary" history is "defined functionally by those critical people and events that go into forming the public's presumptions about its immediate past. The idea of 'public presumption'," he explained, "is akin to William McNeill's notion of 'public myth' but without the negative implication sometimes invoked by the word 'myth.' Such presumptions are beliefs (1) thought to be true (although not necessarily known to be true with certainty), and (2) shared in common within the relevant political community."[1]"

In writing about the importance of beliefs about history, Zelikow has called attention to what he has called "'searing' or 'molding' events [that] take on 'transcendent' importance and, therefore, retain their power even as the experiencing generation passes from the scene. In the United States, beliefs about the formation of the nation and the Constitution remain powerful today, as do beliefs about slavery and the Civil War. World War II, Vietnam, and the civil rights struggle are more recent examples." He has noted that "a history’s narrative power is typically linked to how readers relate to the actions of individuals in the history; if readers cannot make a connection to their own lives, then a history may fail to engage them at all."[1]

Zelikow has also written about terrorism and national security, including a set of Harvard case studies on "Policing Northern Ireland." In the November-December 1998 issue of Foreign Affairs, he co-authored an article entitled "Catastrophic Terrorism," in which he speculated that if the 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center had succeeded, "the resulting horror and chaos would have exceeded our ability to describe it. Such an act of catastrophic terrorism would be a watershed event in American history. It could involve loss of life and property unprecedented in peacetime and undermine America’s fundamental sense of security, as did the Soviet atomic bomb test in 1949. Like Pearl Harbor, the event would divide our past and future into a before and after. The United States might respond with draconian measures scaling back civil liberties, allowing wider surveillance of citizens, detention of suspects and use of deadly force. More violence could follow, either future terrorist attacks or U.S. counterattacks. Belatedly, Americans would judge their leaders negligent for not addressing terrorism more urgently."

Philip Zelikow served on President Bush's transition team in 2000-2001. After George W. Bush took office, Zelikow was named to a position on the President’s Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board, and worked on other task forces and commissions as well.
In Rise of the Vulcans (Viking, 2004), James Mann reports that when Richard Haass, a senior aide to Secretary of State Colin Powell and the director of policy planning at the State Department, drafted for the administration an overview of America’s national security strategy following September 11, Dr. Rice, the national security advisor, "ordered that the document be completely rewritten. She thought the Bush administration needed something bolder, something that would represent a more dramatic break with the ideas of the past. Rice turned the writing over to her old colleague, University of Virginia Professor Philip Zelikow." This document, issued on September 17, 2002, is generally recognized as a watershed document in the War on Terrorism.

Because Philip Zelikow's significant involvement with the administration of George W. Bush, some questioned the propriety of his position as executive director of the 9/11 Commission, which examined the conduct of George W. Bush and Condoleezza Rice. Both the 9/11 Family Steering Committee and 9-11 Citizens Watch demanded his resignation, due to this apparent conflict of interest. The Commission co-chairs, Tom Kean and Lee Hamilton, shrugged off these criticisms, as did other 9/11 family representatives.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philip_D._Zelikow

"The Central Intelligence Agency owns everyone of any significance in the major media." ~ William Colby, Former Director, CIA

1. Got rid of a white elephant
2. Provided the psychological effect needed to mobilize the american people into supporting wars of aggression
3. Destroyed direct evidence of corporate wrongdoing and fascism
4. Insurance companies are now able to raise premiums 2000% above pre-9/11 levels
5. Top-down demolition of twin towers (IMO, poorly ) concealed the fact that planes and jet-fuel were not responsible for symmetrical near free-fall total collapses
6. Larry Silverstein, Rudy Guiliani, and the military-industrial complex proffited from the physical events of 9/11

did i miss anything

_________________________________
Morgantown 9/11 Truth
The Eleventh Day of Every Month
Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth