Support 911Blogger


911blogger.com seeks to cover a broad spectrum of news, posts in the blogs section are the responsibility of the poster, readers are encouraged to check the facts and form their own conclusions.

A Coup In Camelot: A startling new investigation of America's most infamous cold case- coming soon

A startling new investigation
of America's most infamous cold case.

TRAILER: http://vimeo.com/107215297

A Coup In Camelot is a documentary that shines a fresh light on the forensic 'fingerprints' surrounding that fateful day in November of 1963, when President Kennedy was assassinated. The film features compelling analysis by the top medical, forensic and research experts in the country.

A Coup In Camelot provides an in-depth study of how Secret Service protocols were not followed, and offers analysis of the famous Zapruder film with stunning 6k digital scans to show a clarity 10 times greater than High Definition. Modern day forensics and wound ballistic techniques are applied to determine where the fatal head shot came from. Details of a casket shell game and shocking medical alterations done to the President's body are revealed, to uncover a chilling story of conspiracy.

THIN EDGE OF A HUGE WEDGE

CALL TO ACTION!!

In his recent speech to the United Nations, UK Prime Minister David Cameron is trying to get powers to force ISPs to close down access to websites that, in his opinion only, may be showing dissent. (see at mark 4:45)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IuwOfQI8YA8 

He labels 9/11 researchers as 'non violent activists'. And says that we are as dangerous as ISIS.

He has to be stopped!

Please send a personally written email to David Cameron challenging his recent UN speech demonizing 9/11 activists.

We Were Lied To About 9/11 - Episode 7 - Dr. Nafeez Mosaddeq Ahmed


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4JXBC28p4dE

Dr. Nafeez Ahmed is an investigative journalist, bestselling author and international security scholar. He has contributed to two major terrorism investigations in the US and UK, the 9/11 Commission and the 7/7 Coroner’s Inquest, and has advised the Royal Military Academy Sandhust, British Foreign Office and US State Department, among other government agencies. His new novel, ZERO POINT, predicted a US-UK re-invasion of Iraq to put down an Islamist insurgency there. Nafeez is a regular contributor to The Guardian where he writes about the geopolitics of interconnected environmental, energy and economic crises via his Earth Insight global column. He has also written for The Independent, Sydney Morning Herald, The Age, The Scotsman, Foreign Policy, The Atlantic, Quartz, Prospect, New Statesman, Le Monde diplomatique, among many others.

Zero Point: http://www.amazon.com/Zero-Point-Nafeez-Ahmed/dp/1620075393/ref=sr_1_cc_1?s=aps&ie=UTF8&qid=1412118298&sr=1-1-catcorr&keyw...

Today We Filed Suit to Reverse the City’s Fraudulent Determination on Our Second Petition

http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2014/09/29/government-confidence-911-story-every-effort-investigate-blocked/

If the government had confidence in its 9/11 story, every effort to investigate would not be blocked
September 29, 2014 | Categories: Guest Contributions | Tags: | Print This Article Print This Article

http://highrisesafetynyc.org/ Sept. 29, 2014

Today We Filed Suit to Reverse the City’s Fraudulent Determination on Our Second Petition

Read our filing and letter to Justice Wooten.

Dear Supporters,

On September 4, 2014 the High-Rise Safety Initiative submitted a second petition containing over 33,000 signatures to override the City Council’s lack of action on our first petition. The second petition secures our place on the November 4th ballot if it contains at least 15,000 valid signatures, assuming we also win the pending lawsuit regarding the petition’s legality, where we still have not received a decision.

This past Wednesday, the City Clerk certified only 7,343 out of 33,366 signatures in the second petition as valid, leaving us 7,657 shy of the 15,000-threshold.

A Determination that Reeks of Fraud

How the U.S. Concocted a Terror Threat to Justify Syria Strikes, and the Corporate Media Went Along

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GOUU-c1Kjp4#t=15

How the U.S. Concocted a Terror Threat to Justify Syria Strikes, and the Corporate Media Went Along

Democracy Now

Published on Sep 29, 2014

http://democracynow.org - As the U.S. expands military operations in Syria, we look at the Khorasan group, the shadowy militant organization the Obama administration has invoked to help justify the strikes. One month ago, no one had heard of Khorasan, but now U.S. officials say it poses an imminent threat to the United States. As the strikes on Syria began, U.S. officials said Khorasan was "nearing the execution phase" of an attack on the United States or Europe, most likely an attempt to blow up a commercial plane in flight. We are joined by Murtaza Hussain of The Intercept, whose new article with Glenn Greenwald is "The Khorasan Group: Anatomy of a Fake Terror Threat to Justify Bombing Syria."

We Were Lied To About 9/11 - Episode 6 - Lorie Van Auken


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kG0b5Fdhb-8

Lorie Van Auken was the wife of Kenneth Van Auken, a bond broker at Cantor Fitzgerald on the 105th floor of Tower 1 who was killed on 9/11. She, along with 9/11 Family Members Kristen Breitweiser, Mindy Kleinberg, and Patty Casazza were greatly responsible for the creation of the 9/11 Commission. Together, they were famously known as the "Jersey Girls," but are also known as the "September Eleventh Advocates." Lorie was part of 12 9/11 Family Members that made up what was called the 9/11 Family Steering Committee. She, along with the others, helped to monitor the 9/11 Commission, to supply 100's of well researched questions for the 9/11 Commission to answer, she worked with staffers of the 9/11 Commission, she helped the others fight for more time and money for the 9/11 Commission, and since the time of the 9/11 Commission, she has continued to be an advocate for 9/11 Justice.

Here are links to Lorie's testimony before the 9/11 Congressional Briefing that took place on 7/22/2005 in Washington D.C.

Ben Swann: U.S. Creating Perpetual State of War, Fighting ISIS While Funding ISIS


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ndpX-IYC_bk

http://benswann.com/ben-swann-u-s-creating-perpetual-state-of-war-fighting-isis-while-funding-isis/

Ben Swann appeared on RT International, Thursday to discuss U.S. airstrikes in Syria. Among the issues discussed, why the U.S. claims it is attempting to preserve oil fields in Syria while simultaneously striking those fields.

Swann spoke about what makes this “war with ISIS” truly unique. The U.S., he says, is creating a perpetual state of war by attacking ISIS on one hand while simultaneously funding ISIS indirectly though the Free Syrian Army.

David Cameron Says Non-Violent Conspiracy Theorists Are Just As Dangerous As ISIS

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IuwOfQI8YA8

Thursday, September 25, 2014
David Cameron Says Non-Violent Conspiracy Theorists Are Just As Dangerous As ISIS

David Cameron told the U.N. that "non-violent extremism" is just as dangerous as terrorism and must be eradicated using all means at the government's disposal. He references 9/11 and 7/7 Truthers as examples of the type of extremism that must be dealt in a similar fashion to ISIS.

If you thought Obama's War is Peace speech to the U.N. was creepy, wait until you get a load of this. Cameron is officially announcing a the plan to use a full assault on dissenting views.

How I Woke Up

 

We've just passed the 13th anniversary of 9/11 and now, more than ever, individuals on all sides of the 9/11 spectrum are demanding to know more about what really happened on that day.  On one side you have the co-chairs of the 9/11 commission report, Lee Hamilton and Thomas Kean, who have called for the 28 classified pages of the 9/11 commission report to be released in the public eye.  As more and more congressmen and senators read those pages for themselves, a growing coalition on the right and left is forming behind a bill that would declassify them for all to see.  On the other side of the 9/11 spectrum you have Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth (AE911 Truth) making unprecedented ground in their cause.  AE911 Truth is a major force behind the High Rise Safety Initiative, which has collected tens of thousands of signatures from New Yorkers and is currently fighting and appealing various legal battles to ensure a ballot measure will be put to the voters that would require the NYC Department of Buildings to investigate the causes of high-rise building collapses in New York City, starting with World Trade Center 7.  AE911 Truth has also put up a video billboard in Times Square this month showing millions of New Yorkers the 6.7 second collapse of WTC 7 and challenging them to "Rethink 911".

But for the 9/11 truth movement, one of the most exciting events is a new documentary called Anatomy of a Great Deception.  It has been getting great reviews from the 9/11 truth community and Richard Gage, founder of AE911 Truth, is calling it "the best chance in years to push the 9/11 debate into the mainstream".  So what is so revolutionary about this movie? Does it have new information or new evidence? No, the hype around this documentary is not because of the evidence it presents, but the way it presents it.  It's not overloaded with ten thousand questions and puzzle pieces of evidence concerning the various reasons to doubt the official story.  Instead, it's a personal story, a story of how one man stumbled upon an innocent question that lead him to another question, and then to another, until months later he was on the brink of personal disaster.  David Hooper is a successful businessman and entrepreneur; and in this very personal film he relates how his research destroyed his world view and almost ruined his most precious relationships with his wife, family and friends.

As Hooper describes the genesis of this film, "to preserve my sanity and save my marriage, I began assembling footage to visually relay what I had found for my wife, my sister, and a couple of dear friends.  This footage turned into the documentary The Anatomy of a Great Deception."  Hooper's amateur documentary succeeded to convince his family where other documentaries failed.  As word of mouth spread, Hooper decided to raise money to take his film to the next level and professionally release it so that others in the 9/11 truth community could share it with the people in their lives.

Several years ago, for various reasons, I decided that I would not promote 9/11 truth in the same way that I unashamedly promote libertarianism and Austrian economics.  Yet, I can't honestly describe how I've come to be the person I am today and carry the beliefs that I do without going back to 9/11.  More specifically, not 9/11, but WTC 7.  Like Hooper, that building shattered my world view and set me on a course of investigation that would completely transform my belief system.  So in the same spirit that Hooper took when telling his story, I will tell mine.  My purpose is not to try to convince anyone to accept my beliefs, I've given up on that long ago.  I merely hope this will help others understand my journey.

Graeme MacQueen Reveals The Anthrax Deception - James Corbett • 09/25/2014

.
http://www.corbettreport.com/interview-944-graeme-macqueen-reveals-the-anthrax-deception/

Interview 944 – Graeme MacQueen Reveals The Anthrax Deception
Corbett • 09/25/2014

Podcast: Play in new window http://www.corbettreport.com/?powerpress_pinw=12357-podcast |

In his new book “The 2001 Anthrax Deception,” Dr. Graeme MacQueen, co-editor of the Journal of 9/11 Studies, lays out the case for a domestic conspiracy in the 2001 anthrax attacks in the US. In this conversation, James and Graeme discuss the context in which these attacks happened, the way they were portrayed by the government and the mainstream media, their ultimate effect, and the voluminous evidence that disproves the FBI’s assertion that the attacks were the work of Dr. Bruce Ivins.

Visit the book’s website: http://www.claritypress.com/MacQueen.html

The 1993 WTC Bombing Damage Myth

The 1993 WTC Bombing Damage Myth

It is often said that the 1993 WTC bombing was under the north tower and threatened to take the tower down. This is a myth.

The fact is that the bomb was in the parking garage under the Vista Hotel (WTC3) and did only superficial damage to the tower structure.

http://www.nytimes.com/1993/03/02/nyregion/crisis-twin-towers-repairs-damage-world-trade-center-called-limited.html?scp=17...

Popular Mechanics (July 1993) shows a diagram of the damage, which was outside the footprint of the North tower.

http://books.google.com/books?id=pOMDAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA40&lpg=PA40&dq=popular+mechanics+1993+world+trade&source=bl&ots=rJppu41...

As you can see, the bomb damaged the refrigeration plant on the B5 level, which was outside the perimeter wall of the North tower.

Take a look at the strength of the tower during construction. How could this small bomb affect its overall integrity?

JFK, Oklahoma City, 9/11: Nothing Ever Changes September 16, 2014 | By Dave Hodges

http://www.thesleuthjournal.com/jfk-oklahoma-city-911-nothing-ever-changes/

JFK, Oklahoma City, 9/11: Nothing Ever Changes
September 16, 2014 | By Dave Hodges | 911 Truth, False Flags, Government Corruption, US News

911-24-7-excuse-for-everything

The JFK assassination, the Oklahoma City Bombing, the Boston Marathon Bombing, the London Subway Bombings and the events of 9/11, nothing ever changes. The public is looking at either a massive series of coverups or unwarranted secrecy with regard to the evidence leading to each crime.

The ink is dry on each on of these investigations, however, the government still withholds the evidence from public scrutiny like we are a bunch of little children too emotionally fragile to handle the truth. In each case, the actions of the government, related to needless secrecy, invites conspiracy theories. Therefore, once again, I add my voice in unison with the other voices who demand transparency in order that the public can determine if they agree with the government’s findings in each one of these cases.

Refutation of Dave Thomas Critique of my North Tower Analysis

I have been reluctant to enter into mudwrestling events with debunkers and propagandists for what I see as blatant disinformation. I don't see these debates as productive. They are not about deepening the inquiry into events but rather fending off ever-morphing attacks by people who engage in deceptive argumentation. I have better uses for my time. I find that ignoring them works just as well and allows me to get on with my life.

However one hit piece by Dave Thomas has been the source of repeated questions in my in-box from people who sense something is wrong with his analysis but are not confident enough of their grasp of the physics to be sure. Rather than continuing to write individual explanations in email responses I have now posted a refutation of the attack on the http://911SpeakOut.org "Articles and Links" page here: http://911speakout.org/wp-content/uploads/Response-to-Dave-Thomas.pdf.

I hope this helps.

--David Chandler

Installation of a fiber optic network initiated in June 2001 in the WTC complex

Hello from France (sorry for my approximate English),

In June 2001, a contract was signed between the Port Authority of New York (still owner of the WTC but not for long) and the company EurekaGGN, through its subsidiary BRAM, to build a new communication network made of optical fibers in the twin towers from the basement to the 110TH floor.

The works were sufficiently rapids compared to the size of the buildings.
They were to be completed in the fall for WTC1 and on the 12/31 for the WTC2.
There is no doubt that these works were well advanced during the months of July and August 2001.

This first source announces the contract on 6/6/2001 :
http://www.thefreelibrary.com/BRAM+group+is+tabbed+to+rewire+WTC.-a076297016

EurekaGGN, a full-service integrated communications provider,

How does this end?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=utjxA3GQF5A&list=PLQ9B-p5Q-YOPndlCXf4NIjBnnuILgNGtN&index=1

Since 1980, we have militarily intervened at least 35 times in more than 27 countries. We keep bombing, we continue spending trillions of dollars, but we're no safer as a result.