911blogger.com seeks to cover a broad spectrum of news, posts in the blogs section are the responsibility of the poster, readers are encouraged to check the facts and form their own conclusions.
Neil Degrasse Tyson was an eye-witness to 9/11, he wrote a letter describing his horrifying experience.
The Horror, The Horror
September 12, 2001 in the Read section
Wednesday, September 12, 2001, 10:00 AM
First-hand account of the WTC attacks and subsequent evacuation from Lower Manhattan residence. A heavily forwarded e-mail that became the subject of an article in the Wall Street Journal a week later on the widespread use of the web to communicate the tragic news of the day.
My entire family is safe. We evacuated our lower-Manhattan residence at about noon yesterday and migrated north on foot to Grand Central Terminal (about three miles) where we took Metro North to the home of my parents in Westchester, from where I write this message.
For the Safety of All New Yorkers
High-Rise Safety Initiative High-Rise Safety Initiative·
Published on May 4, 2014
Official video of the High-Rise Safety Initiative, featuring NYC architect and engineer Don Butterfield. Visit http://HighRiseSafetyNYC.org
We Must Reach $185,000 by June 1st
Make a donation - Share the video - Spread the word!
Visit HighRiseSafetyNYC.org to donate today.
From $135,000 to $185,000 by June 1st
Our petition drive kicked off on May 1st thanks to the generosity of more than 1,000 supporters who together contributed over $135,000. Through Sunday we've gathered over 1,000 signatures.
$135,000 will fund our petition teams through the first week of June, but to complete the first round of petitioning and submit 70,000+ signatures on July 3rd we must reach $185,000 by June 1st.
Dr. Frank Legge Interview
Interview conducted March 1st, 2014
MP3 and Link to Show Notes: http://themindrenewed.com/interviews/2014/484-int-49
What was it that blew a hole in the Pentagon on 9/11? Was it really American Airlines Flight 77, a Boeing 757? Or was it a much smaller aircraft? A missile, perhaps? Or just pre-planted explosives?
Joining us to discuss these questions is Dr. Frank Legge, PhD chemist and long-standing researcher into 9/11, who shares with us from his research the many reasons why he believes it is now established beyond reasonable doubt that AA Flight 77 did in fact hit the Pentagon that day.
Insisting nevertheless that the overall evidence of 9/11 unambiguously speaks of an "inside job", Dr. Legge warns of the dangers of dogmatism within the 9/11 Truth Movement, and explains why he sees 9/11 as a transnational elitist crime aimed ultimately at authoritarian One-World Government.
Despite being informed of the facts about the recycling of WTC steel, (the part about why this eviscerates Dr. Wood's absurd theory of "Dustification") Jesse Ventura continues to use the word when explaining the complete demolition of the three WTC towers.
Now he has a new episode http://www.ora.tv/offthegrid/category/ventura-declarations/counter-conspiracy-world-trade-center-7-0_5n2nag3l8ajt dealing with WTC7, right on the heels of two segments featuring Dr. Judy Wood. (Warning--Childish Content)
Please send Jesse your comments: http://www.ora.tv/offthegrid/askjesse
On 21th of November 2011 there was a memorable discussion in the committee for interior affairs of the German parliament. The cause were open questions regarding the right wing terror cell, called "National Socialist Underground" (NSU). Two of its three members diseased on 4th of November 2011 under strange circumstances.
21 story tower block in Birmingham, England by DSM demolition
Video explaining how the tower was demolished.
Will send a video of WTC7 to DSM.
Skip to 1:03:02 for the "Bin Laden Removal" question.
The efforts of the 9/11 truth community to get the attention of "official" media are having the desired effect. I know this because recently our local paper, the St. Louis Post Dispatch, published a series of letters to the editor (with associated comments in their on-line forums) that gave real voice to the questions frequently raised here.
They have published letters to the editor about 9/11 issues a time or two before, but this time they published a series of three related letters over the course of about a week where—in my opinion—the arguments for questioning 9/11 spoke much louder than the opposing view. This kind of quiet attention from a local editorial staff seems to clearly signal an awakening to the core 9/11 questions, particularly since the last word went to a fellow questioner of the official story of 9/11. Further, the on-line comments were overwhelmingly from people who were largely well informed about the holes in the government's theories of what happened on that day.
Following are links to the article that started the exchange and to the letters that followed:
April 2nd - Original Editorial that inspired 9/11 letter
April 5th – First Letter-to-the-Editor Raising What-Happened-on-9/11 as a Issue
April 8th - Letter Defending 9/11 Commission Report
April 14th – Letter Critiquing Defense of 9/11 Commission Findings
To read the on-line comments follow the link at the bottom of each web page.
The years of efforts by the activists who write and/or are reported on here are bringing the question of what really happened on 9/11 to the public's attention. Thank you! It's working. Keep it up!
Unthinkable: An Airline Captain's Story - FEATURE
Published on Apr 22, 2014
An investigative journalist explores the "murder-suicide" of 9/11 author Marshall Philips and his two children days after Philips announced a new book to include sensational new evidence of those behind the 9/11 terrorist attacks. Based on actual events.
The Scientists For 911 Truth have posted a new article on the complaint served by Dr. William Pepper on Todd Zinser, Inspector General of the Department of Commerce.
The following article was recently published in a new
underground newspaper in Plattsburgh, NY, called
The original can be accessed at http://undercurrents.webs.com/
September 11th and the Academy
By Kurtis Hagen
According to the website
PatriotsQuestion911.com, hundreds of professors
have publicly questioned the official story
of September 11, 2001. (Disclosure: I’m on that
list.) Also, two thousand architects and engineers
have signed a petition calling for a new investigation
into the destruction of the Twin Towers and
Building 7. Further, David Ray Griffin, a very
accomplished scholar, has written ten books challenging
the official 9/11 account. His books, full
of extensive and rigorous argumentation and clear
presentation of evidence, have been endorsed by
a long list of significant people, including Howard
Zinn. In addition, Peter Dale Scott’s Road to
9/11, published by the University of California
Press, is a meticulously documented analysis of
the “deep state” aspect of 9/11. And, technical
scientific papers challenging key elements of the
official story have appeared in peer-reviewed scientific
journals. (For a list of select academic articles see:
Conspiracies Go Mainstream? - #NewWorldNextWeek
Published on Apr 17, 2014
Welcome to http://NewWorldNextWeek.com -- the video series from Corbett Report and Media Monarchy that covers some of the most important developments in open source intelligence news. This week:
Story #1: Los Angeles Law Enforcement Looking To Crowdsource Surveillance
Episode 272 -- Solutions: Sousveillance
Heartbleed Bug: Passwords, Credit Cards, Sensitive Data at Risk
NSA Knew About Heartbleed, Exploited It for Two Years
Canadian Teen Arrested for Using Heartbleed to Steal Taxpayer Information
Hackers From China Waste Little Time in Exploiting Heartbleed
Confirmed: Nasty Heartbleed Bug Exposes OpenVPN Private Keys, Too
Story #2: MSM Conspiracies: Did Putin Blow Up the Whole Polish Government in 2010? A Second Look
19 Apr 2014
Interview 864 – Dr. Meryl Nass Exposes the Anthrax Cover Up
Posted by Corbett
In this blockbuster interview, Dr. Meryl Nass of AnthraxVaccine.blogspot.com joins us to break down the FBI’s attempt to pin the blame for the 2001 anthrax attack on Dr. Bruce Ivins. We go through the FBI’s case against Ivins and dissect it point by point, looking at the inconsistencies, omissions and misconceptions that have allowed the Bureau to sweep this incident under the rug in recent years.