"Two complementary videos are combined here in the order that they were presented at the 9/11 Truth Film Festival in Oakland, CA, on Sept 10, 2015.
The first video is a preview of the witness section of a forthcoming film by Ken Jenkins titled The Pentagon Plane Puzzle.
That is followed by a PowerPoint presentation by David Chandler titled Going Beyond Speculation – A Scientific Look at the Pentagon Evidence.
In post-production, Ken Jenkins of 9/11 TV added many additional graphics to the live video footage of Chandler’s presentation.
David Chandler's presentation starts at 26:40."
Ken Jenkins has ask me to post this to 911Blogger and we hope that you will share it around with other activists.
Kind regards John
Since 2006, “North Texans for 9/11 Truth” has tenaciously worked on projects, events, actions and outreach throughout the North Texas Area and Dallas-Ft Worth Metroplex, along with supporting many national 9/11 Truth campaigns. To date, “North Texans for 9/11 Truth” has given out more than 68,000 DVDs and literally tons of literature.
This September 2015, the “North Texans for 9/11 Truth Meetup Group” (http://www.meetup.com/9-11-249/ ) again performed a variety of actions to expose the 9/11 Cover-up which included an event designed to reach new people with more than 140 people attending, a successful Sign Wave, and also a far reaching Advertising Campaign.
Today is the first day of the 3-day Architecture Boston Expo/ABX2015, with 10,000 architects in attendance, to include our 12-strong crew of AE911Truth volunteers. Reaching out to hundreds of Architects, today we secured 19 additional AIA member sponsors for a new resolution calling upon the AIA to call for a new WTC 7 investigation.
The team also secured 44 new signatories for our petition at AE911Truth.org demanding a new investigation into the destruction of all 3 World Trade Center skyscrapers on 9/11.
This Thursday, November 19 from noon-12:30pm, Richard Gage, AIA, will be presenting at ABX's Learning Stage LSC02: The Third Tower: Solving the Collapse of 47-Story WTC Building 7.
If you support a new investigation, sign our petition: http://www.ae911truth.org/signatures/ae.html
Follow the News: http://www.ae911truth.org/news.html
Columnist Alex Beam interviewed AE911Truth founder Richard Gage in the lead-up to this week's architecture industry trade show in Beantown.
Dubbed the ABX, which stands for Architecture Boston Expo, the convention ranks second in both attendance and importance to the crème de la crème event—the American Institute of Architects' annual conference.
Not surprisingly, Beam makes the usual trite digs at 9/11 "truthers," the name he insists on calling the 2,350-plus professional architects and engineers who have signed AE911Truth's petition calling for an independent investigation of the destroyed WTC towers.
But Gage holds his own, directing a few jabs back at Beam...
Learn more >> http://bit.ly/AEglobeFB
It has been a very long time since I have posted at 911Blogger, and it was this issue among others that were central to me losing interest in 911 Truth activism.
I simply don't want to be associated with people who put feelings before facts or ego investment before the scientific method.
I am hoping that the great work done here by David Chandler supported primarily by Ken Jenkins may finally start an ending to the speculation surrounding the crash of Flight 77 into the Pentagon.
In absolute support of this rational position presented by David Chandler, is the witness testimony collated in the this video by Ken Jenkins.
I would be disappointed if this material is not enough to convince activists that saying that "no plane hit the Pentagon" is not supported by the hard evidence at hand.
9/11 Family Members and founders of the Skyscraper Safety Campaign, Monica Gabrielle and Sally Regenhard, testify before the 9/11 Commission.
Their website is available here: http://skyscrapersafety.org/
This brought me to tears.
The New York Times led the propaganda behind 9/11 and the 9/11 Wars. It did so by ignoring many of the most relevant facts, by promoting false official accounts, and by belittling those who questioned the 9/11 events. The Times eventually offered a weak public apology for its uncritical support of the Bush Administration’s obviously bogus Iraq War justifications. However, it has yet to apologize for its role in selling the official account of 9/11, a story built on just as many falsehoods. Instead, the newspaper continues to propagandize about the attacks while putting down Americans who seek the truth about what happened.
The New York “newspaper of record” has published many articles that promote official explanations for the events of 9/11. These have included support for the Pancake Theory, the diesel fuel theory for WTC 7, claims based on the torture testimony of an alleged top al Qaeda leader, and accounts of NORAD notification and response to the hijackings. Since then, U.S. authorities have said that none of those explanations were true. However, the Times never expressed regret for reporting the misleading information.
Instead, the Times continued to sell every different official explanation. When a new government theory for destruction of the WTC was put forth, it was immediately promoted. The newspaper never reported any critical analysis of the official accounts, despite the fact that all of them, including the final reports for the Twin Towers and WTC 7, have been proven to be wrong.
Video exploring how atheists like Sam Harris, Christopher Hitchens, Matt Dillahunty, Bill Maher and others use faith when it comes to defending the 911 Offical story. While they claim to value evidence over faith, the atheist community has hidden from evidence that would change their worldview on 9/11. Why do they hide from 9/11 truth in favor of faith?
Enjoy. Many thanks to the different artists.
Virtual Reality simulator where players live out the horrific final moments of 9/11 terror attack victims is condemned as 'sick
Virtual Reality simulator where players live out the horrific final moments of 9/11 terror attack victims is condemned as 'sick'
9/11 simulator designed to allow players to live out final moments in tower
The trailer shows the moment workers inside feel the plane hit the towers
Some people have criticised the 'game' as 'sick' and inappropriate
By Tom Wyke for MailOnline
Published: 08:41 EST, 30 October 2015 | Updated: 18:08 EST, 30 October 2015
A highly controversial virtual reality simulator is due to be released which allows gamers to live out the horrific final moments of the devastating 9/11 terror attacks which left nearly 3,000 people dead.
Titled '8:46' after the exact time the first hijacked plane was flown into the North Tower, the shocking 'game' has been slammed by social media users as deeply inappropriate and 'sick'.
WASHINGTON -- Two of House Speaker Paul Ryan's (R-Wis.) newly empowered committee chairmen took immediate advantage Thursday of the freshly elected leader's pledge to give power back to committees -- and may have handed him a 9/11-related publicity disaster.
Rep. Bob Goodlatte (R-Va.), the chairman of the Judiciary Committee, and Rep. Fred Upton (R-Mich.), the head of the Energy and Commerce Committee, both announced measures to temporarily extend the expiring 9/11 health and compensation programs.
By Kristen Breitweiser - 9/11 widow and activist
I'm going to keep this really simple.
In response to your comment that you could personally "plead guilty" to not having imagined terrorists would use passenger aircraft as weapons→please stop lying.
As proof, I provide the "Iron Man" documents from the Asymmetrical Threats Division of Joint Forces Intelligence Command (JFIC), also known as DO5, whose task it was to track UBL from mid 1998-mid 2001.
I would first note that you were National Security Advisor to the President of the United States -- that means that you had pretty much access to anything and everything available regarding terrorist threats from groups like Al Qaeda.
Fourteen years later, everyone now knows about the summer of 2001 and the more than one dozen intelligence reports blinking red about an impending Al Qaeda terrorist attack. There was the August 6 PDB, FAA reports, CIA reports, DoD reports, and FBI reports -- all indicating and discussing terrorist cells inside the US planning attacks inside the US.
What most people don't know about is the smoking gun report from JFIC, DO5.
People sometimes wonder why is it important to investigate the alleged hijackers and others officially accused of committing the 9/11 crimes. After all, the accused 19 hijackers could not have accomplished most of what happened. The answer is that the official accounts are important because they are part of the crimes. Identifying and examining the people who created the official 9/11 myth helps to reveal the ones who were responsible overall.
The people who actually committed the crimes of September 11th didn’t intend to just hijack planes and take down the buildings—they intended to blame others. To accomplish that plan the real criminals needed to create a false account of what happened and undoubtedly that need was considered well in advance. In this light, the official reports can be seen to provide a link between the “blaming others” part of the crimes and the physical parts.
Pushing the concept of “Islamic Terrorism” was the beginning of the effort to blame others, although the exact 9/11 plan might not have been worked out at the time. This concept was largely a conversion of the existing Soviet threat, which by 1989 was rapidly losing its ability to frighten the public, into something that would serve more current policy needs. Paul Bremer and Brian Jenkins were at the forefront of this conversion of the Soviet threat into the threat of Islamic terrorism. Both Bremer and Jenkins were also intimately connected to the events at the World Trade Center.
New 9/11 Timeline Entries: Pre-9/11 Warnings about Al-Qaeda, Cheney's Military Aide on 9/11, and More
From the History Commons Groups blog:
New entries have been added to the Complete 9/11 Timeline at History Commons, which cover various events relating to the 9/11 attacks. Many of them describe warnings about the danger posed by al-Qaeda that were given in the 12 months leading up to 9/11 and some describe events from the day of September 11, 2001, itself.
Donald Rumsfeld Was Concerned about a Possible 'Modern-Day Version' of Pearl Harbor
A couple of new timeline entries deal with Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld's preoccupation, in the months before 9/11, with the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor, Hawaii, in December 1941 that led America to enter World War II. In March 2001, Rumsfeld sent members of the Joint Chiefs of Staff a copy of the foreword to a book, which discussed the US government failures that led to the attack on Pearl Harbor. And in July that year, he wrote a note to himself in which he expressed his fear of the United States experiencing a "modern-day version" of the attack on Pearl Harbor.
Other senior officials talked, in the months before 9/11, about the possibility of a Pearl Harbor-like event happening in the future. In June 2001, Army General Tommy Franks, commander in chief of the US Central Command, gave a speech in which he said the US needed to prepare for an "asymmetric" attack resembling the attack on Pearl Harbor. And on the day before 9/11, Charles Nemfakos, deputy under secretary of the Navy, said during a briefing that the US would have to suffer an attack comparable to the attack on Pearl Harbor before it would address the problems with its defense policy.
Officials Warned about the Danger Posed by Al-Qaeda