kawika's blog

NIST Replies to WTC7 Stiffeners Inquiry

I am pleased to offer the following email from Public Affairs Officer Michael Newman, dated 25 OCT 2013. The inquiry actually began in March 2012 immediately following our discovery of the stiffeners on girder A2001. Despite what the answer says, I made my inquiry on 26 JUL 2013 and followed up on 24 SEP. No reply was received so I sent a final letter on 19 OCT.

Background on this inquiry can be found here:

http://911blogger.com/news/2013-09-25/60-days-nist-refuses-reply

************************************************************************************
From: michael.newman@nist.gov

CC: wtc@nist.gov
Subject: RE: WTC7 Report Discrepancies
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2013 12:55:28 +0000

Dear Mr. Cole,

Following your e-mail of September 24 (see below), a set of responses to your questions were prepared. Unfortunately, the partial shutdown of the federal government delayed our getting these responses to you. With our apologies for tardiness, here are those responses:

A) In NCSTAR 1-9, which design drawing was used to create:

Figure 8-21?.................1091, 9114
Figure 8-23?.................1091, 3004, 9114

60 days--NIST Refuses To Reply

It has been 60 days since I asked NIST about the numerous discrepancies between Frankel Fabrication Shop Drawing #9114 and certain figures found in their WTC7 report NCSTAR 1-9.

Frankel Drawing #9114 clearly shows stiffener plates welded onto the end of the girder that NIST claims walked off its C79 seated connection on floor 13, leading to an unprecedented global progressive collapse.

Please contact NIST Director Patrick Gallagher and Public Affairs Officer Michael Newman at the following email addresses and ask for a prompt reply to these pertinent questions.

michael.newman@nist.gov
patrick.gallagher@nist.gov

You may phone them at:

Patrick Gallagher-- 301-975-2300 (Director )
Michael Newman-- 301-975-3025 (Public Affairs)

********************************************************

To: michael.newman@nist.gov; patrick.gallagher@nist.gov
Subject: WTC7 Report Discrepancies
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 23:31:55 -0400

Dear Mr. Newman and Mr. Gallagher,

It has been 60 days since I sent my inquiry regarding the figures in NCSTAR 1-9.

The Case Against NIST

The case against NIST is taking shape. Everybody agrees that the time has come to enter the courthouse.

 

Can YOU Spot The Difference?

What's the difference?  Those plates welded to the girder.  They are called stiffeners.

Why aren’t the stiffeners shown in the version above from the NIST report when they are shown in the actual WTC7 drawings? (NOTE:  I drew the stiffeners in because NIST failed to.)

Why the stiffeners are so important:
Stiffener plates are critically important.  They allow a girder to transfer loads to a wider footprint (bearing surface) and increase its ability to resist failure.

WTC7 Shear Studs and Video Expose

Please visit the Architects and Engineers For 9/11 Truth websites for two new articles about WTC7.

This article deals with the shear studs on the girder NIST claims caused the initiation of global progressive collapse:

http://www.ae911truth.org/en/news-section/41-articles/786-nists-claim-in-its-final-report-about-the-lack-of-shear-studson-...

For a more in depth look at the shear studs issue, and the numerous other NIST errors and omissions, continue to this link:

http://www.ae911truth.org/en/news-section/41-articles/789-groundbreaking-wtc7-video-expose-independent-investigators-revea...

Questions?: Email the video producers at
nineeleven247@yahoo.com

NIST Notified of Discrepancies

The following email has been sent to NIST director Patrick Gallagher and Public Affairs officer Michael Newman.

This concerns many errors/omissions in the NCSTAR 1-9 Report.

****************************************************************************

Dear Mr. Newman,

On March 16, 2012 I wrote your office with an inquiry about certain errors in the NCSTAR 1-9 report. Your reply follows:

From: michael.newman@nist.gov

Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 16:49:50 -0400
Subject: Your Inquiry on NIST NCSTAR 1-9

Dear Mr. Cole,

Joseph Main forwarded your e-mail of March 16 to me for handling. Our researchers looked into the issue you raised and found that there is indeed an error in the drawing number cited for Figure 8-16 in NIST NCSTAR 1-9, Structural Fire Response and Probable Collapse Sequence of World Trade Center Building 7. The drawing used in Figure 8-16 was “Structural Drawing S8” rather than “Erection Drawing E12/13”. Figure 8-16 is used to locate features of the floor framing, and either drawing would serve this purpose. The differences between the two drawings are minor, involving some notes that appear in one drawing but not the other. The information of interest is the same in both drawings, and the error in the drawing number referenced does not affect any observations, findings or conclusions in the NCSTAR 1-9 report.

NIST will include an erratum to the report to indicate this correction.

Thank you for catching this error.

Sincerely,
Michael Newman
NIST Public Affairs

911 MAPS

Spend 25 seconds for ACTION!

Please open your email, copy, paste and send the following to Paul Dewar. Anybody can do this, Canadian or not.

Send to: paul.dewar@parl.gc.ca

Email Subject: Petition (#5248504)

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dear Mr. Dewar,

I am writing to you to voice my support for the petition requesting a Parliamentary review of the 9/11 terrorist attacks which is currently in your office.

This petition (#5248504) has been signed by over 1400 Canadians. As foreign affairs critic for the NDP, it is clear that you have a duty to your constituents and to the people of Canada to raise this issue in parliament.

The story of this petition is now on YouTube (http://youtu.be/WBAI8_zkSoI) and has been signed by over 1400 Canadians.

Please do submit the petition to parliament with no further delay.
If you are not able to read the petition then fulfill your duty by handing it in so that the Government of Canada is required to respond.

Please write back to me and keep me informed on this request.

Respectfully,

[Your name]

Innocents Betrayed

What is the cost of gun control? Count the number of unarmed innocents murdered by their own "protectors". Governments which pass laws are the most efficient destroyers of not only liberty and property, but of life itself.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1pKasF6l3y0

What Happens When Guns Are Banned

Before you support a gun ban, consider the consequences. The loss of liberty to defend oneself can be measured in the loss of life.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=OyS3CEIbpJo

Arm all adults and see what happens. Allow everyone to become a marksman. If it doesn't work, you can always try to take them away later.

Cops are too far away to be effective. They always get there after the crime.

Shop? Go To Jail!

See this hidden video of two Canadian tourists getting a taste of the new Amerikan Police State.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-i5sDOdoFqg&feature=player_embedded

Good thing it wasn't me. My conversation would go this way:

Police: Which store are you going shopping at?

Me: I'm going to Herr Hitler's Boutique. The same place you got your shiny jack boots.

F*****ing NAZIs suck.

AMAZING EFFORT. WOW!!

Rena Patty and Pamela Senzee are bicycling across America to bring 9/11 Truth to firehouses, police departments, sheriffs and local media.

See the latest video about Rena's stop in Erie, PA.

http://www.goerie.com/crosscountry-cyclist-travels-through-erie

Please visit Pam and Rena's blogs here:

http://www.911journeyfortruth.org/index.html

WOW!

Richard Gage in NYC--9/9 & 11/2012

Architect Richard Gage will present Blueprint For Truth at the following location

Walker Stage
56 Walker Street
NY, NY 10013

Sunday SEP 9 -- 1-8 pm
Tuesday SEP 11-- 8 pm

http://www.ae911truth.org/en/events.html

More events to go to:

http://ae911truth.org/en/news-section/60-action-alerts/661-join-us-for-groundbreaking-911-anniversary-events-in-new-york-c...

1964--New Weapons For a 1970 Battlefield

Title: Unconventional Weapons for the 1970 Battlefield
Date: July 1964

http://www.governmentattic.org/6docs/UnconWeapons1970Battle_1964.pdf

See the list of References beginning on PDF page 73.

Thanks To 9/11 We Have This--Congratulations!

Don't turn away. Don't make excuses.

The 9/11 Justified War on Terror up close and personal.

Put your daughter or son into this picture. HOW DO YOU LIKE IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vlxJXfdemW8&NR=1&feature=endscreen

Any mofo who pays taxes for this obscenity has blood on their hands. SHAME ON YOU!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!