At a recent Campaign for Liberty rally, Dr. Ron Paul said:

"What I fear the most is a false flag - something happening where one of our ships goes down, or there a plane goes down, and of course it HAD to be the Iranians, you know, for sure, for certain."

www.youtube.com/watch?v=JxXy7n8CVAM 28:00 minute point

Rep. Ron Paul MD spoke at the Ron Paul Rally at the University of South Florida Sun Dome, preceding the Republican National Convention in Tampa on August 26, 2012.

"Talking about foreign policy like this, and emphasizing Blow Back, somebody rather nastily said the other day on the internet, and they said 'Oh yeah, if those Paul people had been in charge, Osama Bin Laden would still be alive.' But you know what I think the answer is? So would the 3000 people from 9/11 be alive!"

At that, the crowd cheered.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=T_-02dpyPaw C-SPAN

On August 28, 2006, Dan Eggen of the Washington Post published this article about the FBI and Bin Laden.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/08/27/AR200608...

About the lack of 9/11 being mentioned on Bin Laden's wanted poster, Prosecutor David N. Kelley said:

I'd be troubled if I were asked to put up a wanted picture where no formal charges had been filed, no matter who it was.

We would be troubled too, if we started 2 wars without formal charges.

The FBI maintains a separate "Most Wanted Terrorists" list, which includes bin Laden and 25 others who have been indicted in U.S. federal courts in connection with terror plots. But this second Bin Laden listing also makes no mention of Sept. 11.

Future indictments may be handed down as various investigations proceed in connection to other terrorist incidents, for example, the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001.

The article implies that Bin Laden organized the 9/11 attack. He praised it but never claimed to have organized it.

Deadline reports that Chandler has just signed on for the Mark Boal scripted film that follows the events leading up to the assassination of Al Queda leader Osama Bin Laden. The article states that Chandler will be playing a CIA agent in the fast-tracked factual account of the military operation but nothing has been confirmed.

The Emmy winning Actor (taking home the Best Actor Drama statue) will join an incredible ensemble that includes Jessica Chastain, Joel Edgerton, Edgar Ramirez, Jason Clarke, Mark Strong and Chris Pratt.

Chris Mohr has organized a fund raiser, which quickly reaised $1000 for equipment and expenses for Dr. James Millette to study the WTC dust. Chris reports that Dr. Millette is almost finished with the test. Here is some information about him, from www.ChrisMohr911.com/JamesMillette

James R. Millette, Ph.D., executive director of MVA Scientific Consultants, Duluth, Ga., has received the ASTM International Award of Merit from Committee D22 on Air Quality. The Award of Merit is the highest society award granted to an individual ASTM member for distinguished service and outstanding participation in committee activities.

Replication of experiments is so important for the scientific method, and for 9/11 Truthto be taken seriously by the scientific community. It has been 3 years since the Thermite study was published in the Bentham Open Journal. We cannot stand on that alone.

US News and World Report created an online poll, listing 10 GOP candidates by name, but putting Ron Paul in the "Other" category.

Who is your pick for the 2012 GOP presidential nomination?
o Mitt Romney
o Newt Gingrich
o Mike Huckabee
o Michele Bachmann
o Sarah Palin
o Tim Pawlenty
o Mitch Daniels
o Haley Barbour
o Rick Santorum
o Jon Huntsman
o Other
http://www.usnews.com/opinion/articles/2011/02/24/who-is-your-pick-for-t...

Hmm. Notice anyone missing? "Other" categories should be those choices that comprise only a few percent. But in this poll "Other" (including Ron Paul) is beating all others combined with over 67% of the votes.

Source: http://www.usnews.com/polls/who-is-your-pick-for-the-2012-gop-presidenti...

It is a good idea to reserve rooms now, in advance, for anniversary seminars to be held on 9/11/2001.

As an example, here is an ad I'm running for 4 weeks x $9 = $36. Many local libraries have a seminar room and overhead projector, to hook up to your laptop. So you can play the AE911Truth and other CDs.

9/11 Tenth Year Anniversary. Discussion of videos from scientists, architects and engineers. Question & answer. September 11, at 2 pm, Fairfield Public Library Conference Room. Refreshments will be served.

SOUTH BARRINGTON, Ill. (AP) — Two F-16 fighter jets intercepted a plane flown by a 75-year-old woman after it entered restricted airspace during President Barack Obama's recent visit to Chicago, federal officials said Thursday.

Two F16s intercept wayward plane on 8/4/2011, but couldn't on 9/11/2001?

http://news.yahoo.com/f-16s-intercept-plane-during-obamas-chicago-visit-...

9/11 Experiment: Egg Drop, Equal Collision disproves Bazant's "Pile Driver" Theory NIST cited Zdenek Bazant PhD's "Pile Driver" Theory, whereby the top 10 floors, or so, of the World Trade Centers 1 and 2, collapsed down upon the approximately 90% of the floors below, completely to the ground. We test this hypothesis with an egg falling upon eggs below. Only the falling egg and the top-most egg were cracked. The eggs below were undamaged. There was room enough in the glass for eggs to explode sideways, but they didn't.

Objects of equal construction smash each other equally, upon collision. This goes for eggs as well as WTC floors. The video may have a humorous tone, to make it easy to watch, but has a serious message. We need a New Investigation by the National Institutes of Science and Technology. The NIST report was used as a justification for two wars.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ZMcJnq6zh4

This experiment was replicated at:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q_B6Zvwo2RA

You can replicate this experiment with a video of your own. Materials: 4 eggs, tall glass.

Background: Army Specialist April Gallop, was in the wing of the Pentagon that was hit on 9/11, with her small boy, and injured in the rubble. She was instructed by her commanding officers to speak the Official Story, but bravely spoke her true observations. In 2008, she sued Cheney, Rumsfeld, and Myers for not evacuating the Pentagon, when they knew it was a potential target. Her case was dismissed on March 15, 2010, but appealed that decision.
www.CenterFor911Justice.org
http://911blogger.com/news/2011-03-25/895-germans-doubt-oct-army-spc-apr...

Status: On April 5, 2011 the appeal of the case of Gallop v. Cheney, Rumsfeld, and Myers was heard by the United States Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit at 11 a.m. at New Haven, Connecticut. But one of the 3 judges turned out to be George Walker Bush's cousin, Judge John M. Walker Jr., an obvious conflict of interest.

Update: Press Release from William Veale of the Center for 911 Justice, April 6, 2011

One way to transcend the black out about 9/11 in main stream multi-national mogul owned media, such as Murdoch News, is to take out small classified ads in your local newspaper, encouraging people to check 911Truth.org, 911Blogger.com, or a site of your choice.

This ad only costs about $5 per week and will be seen by thousands.

How many tax dollars would it take for a new 9/11 Commission?
Tax pennies, is more like it.

In 2005 there were about 100,000,000 Americans who paid taxes.

If each Tax Payer paid 15 cents, that would be $15 million,
about as much as the Zelikow-Kean-Hamilton Commission eventually got.

Initially the 9/11 Commission got $3 million, about 3 cents per tax payer, or even
zero per tax payer, if the money was "printed" by the Federal Reserve.

Amidst Growing World Doubts About 9/11, Career Army Officer Takes Bush Administration Officials to Court April 5th Represented by the Center for 9/11 Justice.

Read more: http://www.heraldonline.com/2011/03/23/2932008/amidst-growing-world-doub...

On April 5th, 2011, at 11 a.m., at the Federal Courthouse at 141 Church Street in New Haven, Connecticut, the case of Gallop v. Cheney, Rumsfeld, and Myers will be heard by the United States Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit.

Gallop's case relies on virtually all forms of evidence admissible in court, but significantly, on published scientific evidence that residues of these explosives were found in the rubble after the attacks. In its totality the proffered case establishes that the government hypothesis – that the buildings collapsed due to fire in combination with the airplane impacts – is scientifically untenable.

The stakes in this case are epic, including the possibility of an overwhelming transformation of the world's understanding of history, not to mention American citizens' relationship with their government.

UPDATE: From an email from April Gallop's attorney William Veale.

Sent: Saturday, March 26, 2011 1:51 PM
Subject: April Gallop's case on April 5th

The hearing on April 5th is the oral argument on the appeal that we filed when our case was dismissed by Judge Chin. We are a long way from trial. I haven't had time to write a thorough explanation for the web site. I appreciate your interest.

Bill Veale
http://CenterFor911Justice.org

We encourage you to write your Congressman and both Senators, to demand a new investigation of 9/11.
They do respond.

www.House.Gov/WriteRep
www.Senate.Gov

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-uAoCJCDgfU0

You can track how your representatives vote and who donates to them at www.GovTrack.US

More info at http://911Experiments.org.

This experiment is to test the hypothesis that concrete pulverizes in to dust when it falls, as claimed by the official 9/11 Commission Report about the World Trade Centers. If concrete turns to dust so easily, the world needs to find a stronger, non-exploding building material.

Blocks of concrete were purchased and dropped from a 5th floor balcony. It was found that the concrete cracked, but did not create a significant amount of concrete dust. Thus, this ground breaking study is a Myth Buster, as well as a concrete buster.

Evidently, we need a new investigation commission, with scientists not just politicians, to find out what really happened on September 11, 2001.

YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aa6pyPi386k

More info at http://911Experiments.org/FallingConcrete.

The day before 9/11/2001, Donald Rumsfeld announced that
$2.3 Trillion in transactions cannot be accounted for.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xU4GdHLUHwU

The Pentagon wing with the Accounting records was destroyed on 9/11.
How convenient. So we will never know where the money went.

How can we get a feel for how much $2.3 Trillion is?

The Moon is an average of 384,403 km from Earth.
That is 384,403,000 meters (384 million meters)
That is 384,403,000,000 millimeters (384 billion)

If the thickness of a US Dollar is about 1 millimeter,
that means you could stack 384 billion dollars to the Moon.

$2.3 trillion or $2,3000,000,000,000 would stack dollar bills
2.3 trillion / $384 billion = 6 times to the Moon

As many times as NASA landed on the moon. (Yes they did.)

A lot of murders have been done for much less money.
If 9/11 was an inside job, it wasn't done for small change.

Hani Hanjour, supposedly on Flight 77, was about 5 feet tall and the other hijackers ranged from 5.5 to 5' 7". They were of slim build.

Captain Charles Burlingame of Flight 77 was over 6 feet, a Navy Captain, weight lifter, and a boxer. The OCT says pilots like him gave up their planes to these puny weaklings with box cutters? The story makes no sense.

There are many ways the 6 foot men on the flights could have overcome them.
1. Take a seat cushion as a shield, and punch the hijackers out.
2. Pour hot tea or coffee in their face, then move in to disarm them.
3. Throw luggage at them, then move in for the tackle
4. Take a scarf or towel and snap them in the face
wrap their hand, then turn the box cutter on them.
5. Two or more passengers could overpower each one of the hijackers
6. Push the snack cart down the middle and ram the hijackers
7. Take a fire extinguisher, spray at the terrorists, then move in.

Any more ideas?

----- Original Message -----
From: CICorp
To: info@gatesfoundation.org
Sent: Monday, December 13, 2010 6:05 PM
Subject: Please support a New Investigation of 9/11/2001, AE911Truth.org (501c3 nonprofit)

This is a proposal for the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation to support a New Investigation of the events of September 11, 2001.

Bill has a scientific mind, and surely must see some suspicious things about what happened on that day.
* WTC Building 7 came down at free fall speed, as if by pre-planted explosives.
* WTC Buildings 1 and 2 also came down suspiciously fast, after have stood for nearly an hour.
* Scientists have identified military grade nano-thermite in the WTC dust (www.NielsHarrit.org)
* The Pentagon refuses to release photos of the jet, despite over 100 cameras
* The hole where the jet supposedly went in, is suspiciously small, with no wing marks.
* Eye witness testimonies vary as to the approach of the plane, its size, and type
* Senator Max Cleland, said the 9/11 Commission was a "cover up" and quit it.
* Flight 11 from Boston turned Northwest towards Griffiss AFB then sharply south

Did you ever notice anything suspicious about Flight 11 and Flight 175?

The paths and plane sites are right in plain sight.
Millions have seen this animated graphic on USA Today.
http://www.usatoday.com/graphics/news/gra/gflightpath2/images/flash.swf
Click on "See All Flights", then "Go"

Why did Flight 11 from Boston turn Northwest instead of Southwest towards NYC?
Why did Flight 11 "just happen" to cross paths "almost colliding" with Flight 175?
Could terrorists have executed such perfect timing? Coincidence?
Why would terrorists waste 1/2 hour on a detour, and risk being shot down?
Why would they fly in the directon of Griffiss, Stewart, and McGuire Air Bases?

Dr. Griscom explains in his New Hypothesis paper, linked from his new web site
www.DavidGriscom.com

He received his PhD in Physics from Brown University, worked for 33 years as a scientist at the Naval Research Laboratory, and has published 190 scientific research studies to date. He was also selected by NASA to study lunar rock samples.

This is not to defend any type of terrorism. But it is a matter of perspective, who is a freedom fighter, and who is a terrorist.

British Lt. Colonel T.E. "Lawrence of Arabia" used guerrilla (terrorist) tactics to drive the Ottoman Empire out of Arabia after World War I. He blew up trains on the Hejaz Railway and planted explosives (IEDs) to harass the Turks. These are terrorist techniques.

In the west, Lawrence of Arabia is considered a hero, with a memorial at Oxford, books and a movie about him, winning 7 Academy Awards.

Maybe this comparison of 2 men who sought independence for Arabia, will help us understand the perpective of those in the Arab world who feel Osama is a hero. We need to try peaceful methods and understanding that every man wants to defend his home land.

>Al Qaeda is a name that this group choose for themselves.

No, buddy. That is not true.
There is no reference to Bin Laden ever using the term "Al Queda" until after 9/11/2001,
when he learned that this was what the Americans were calling him and his followers.

Will those who benefit financially, and for job security, use the term "Al Queda"? Absolutely.
"Oh yes", they'll say. "And they have high tech undeground bunkers in the caves of Afghanistan!"
Will the Northern Alliance accept money to help you find these complexes in the hills? Absolutely.
Have we ever actually found more than just some natural caves?

First, let's do a simple experiment to find out what Al Queda actually means.
1. Go to the Google Translator to translate from English to Arabic.
http://translate.google.com/#en|ar|the%20base
2. Type in "the base", click "Read phonetically", then click Translate
3. You will see it literally means "al Qāʻ-dh"

Also, you could also use http://www.farsidic.com/Translate.aspx
Farsi is similar, but displays their strange alphabetic characters, which read right to left.
You'll recognize this symbol on American made documentation about Al Queda.

It is common knowledge now that the Gulf of Tonkin incident was a false flag operation to get the USA in to war with North Vietnam. Robert McNamara has come out publicly to acknowledge that the incident never happened. Over 30000 troops died in the Vietnam War. But where are the protesters now? Who is calling for a new investigation? Why isn't McNamara being charged for participating in a conspiracy that caused so many deaths? The public does not care.

There is evidence that The Maine was a false flag op to get us in to war with Spain. But there are no calls for a new investigation now. It has been so long. No one cares any more. We are not giving Puerto Rico back to Spain.

So there seems to be a time period, about 20 or 30 years, when the new generation hears about incidents in a history book or web site, and is apathethic about false flag operations. They may be interesting, but not motivating, to the public.

It has been almost 10 years since 9/11/2001, and it is harder to get people to care about what happened. It has been almost 7 since the start of a war to find weapons of mass destruction that did not exist. Where are the protesters now?

If anyone can help get a new investigation going, it is the insurance company that was forced to pay billions to Larry Silverstein. The indications of insurance fraud include Larry's bidding to become the landlord of the asbestos filled World Trade Center buildings only weeks before 9/11, and taking out the maximum possible insurance against terrorist attacks. He, his son, and daughter "just happened" to be late (by over an hour) to their usual 8:00 am meeting at the restaurant atop World Trade Center 1 on 9/11/2001. Larry is a billionaire who could hire a team of doctors to meet at his convenience, even at midnight. Yet he claimed to be missing the 8:00 meeting with his tenants to go to a dermatologist, an appointment he did not attend. On PBS television, Larry falsely claimed to have spoken with "the fire department commander" who said the smartest thing for WTC 7 was to "pull it" - a term for controlled demolition.

Here is the information to encourage Swiss Reinsurance to re-investigate 9/11.

Swiss Reinsurance America Corporation
Americas Headquarters
175 King Street
Armonk, New York 10504
United States of America

T: +1 914 828 8000
F: +1 914 828 7000

Abstract: Concrete cracked in to chunks but did not turn to dust, when dropped 50 feet.

Purpose: To test the hypothesis that concrete pulverizes in to pyroclastic clouds of dust when it falls rapidly on to concrete, as it did at three World Trade Center buildings on 9/11

Methodology: Blocks of concrete were purchased. One block was dropped from a 5th floor balcony on to another block. The experiment was video recorded.

Result: It was found that the concrete cracked in to chunks, but did not create a significant amount of concrete dust.

Conclusion: Another explanation for the pulverized dust needs to be formally investigated, such as the presence of pre-planted explosives in the World Trade Centers.

It was also found that terrorists would not be able to purchase nano-thermite easily.

http://www.YouTube.com/watch?v=aa6pyPi386k

911Experiments.org/FallingConcrete

911Experiments.org

Project for a New American Century lists their office address as 1150 17th Street, Suite 510, Washington DC on their web site front page. http://NewAmericanCentury.Org But, like their misleading advice as a "think tank" this a phony "mail drop" address.

PNAC presented a report called "Rebuilding America's Defenses" written mostly by Chicken Hawks who never joined the military. It said that "it will take a catastrophic and catalyzing event, like a new Pearl Harbor" to get the American public's support for using our military might. Like their "military leadership" the PNAC was about false appearances instead of truth. The PNAC, hiding behind a phony office "front", with a misleading web site, helped get America in to a war over false pretenses.

//www.youtube.com/watch?v=UsyWjk3sR-w