9/11 BBC WTC 7

Mainstream Media Implodes on 9/11 along with WTC 7


TV Coverage of Remarkable Building Collapse Analyzed

The shocking collapse of the 47-story World Trade Center Building 7 on 9/11 caused great alarm, not only in the architectural and engineering community (among those who have become aware of it) but with mainstream media – right from day one. While Dan Rather’s commentary on the remarkable collapse (that it looked like it was knocked down by well placed dynamite) is more often quoted, Peter Jennings also had similar thoughts as he reflected on the shocking 47-story collapse shortly after the event.

"It Fell in Silence: The Collapse of World Trade Center 7"

"It Fell in Silence: The Collapse of World Trade Center 7"

Nathan Janes

Many Americans are unaware that three buildings within the World Trade Center complex fell on Sept 11, 2001. Located just 300 feet from the North Tower,World Trade Center Building 7 (WTC 7) was a forty-seven story steel framed building, which collapsed vertically in 6.5 seconds more than 6 hours after the collapse of the Twin Towers. Although the collapse of the towers was televised hundreds of times in the days following 9/11, the collapse of WTC 7 was seldom shown or discussed. The widely publicized 9/11 Commission Report fails to mention the collapse of WTC 7 in its 568 pages. Looking beyond the limited information provided by the mass media about the fall of WTC 7, a number of questions arise.

BBC keeps digging, the hole gets bigger

Monday, July 7, 2008
Links to YouTube Video
Alex Jones and Jason Bermas break down the recent BBC hit piece which labors to explain how the BBC reported the collapse of building 7 23 minutes prior to its actual collapse on September 11, 2001

14:49 3.39MB

Infowars | The Alex Jones Show

Additional Jason Bermas Audio

BBC 9/11 Conspiracy Files Producer's New Blog Posting

Mike Rudin, the producer of "The Conspiracy Files: 9/11 - The Third Tower," has just posted the following new entry on his blog. Check out the original posting to view the comments at the end.

Controversy and conspiracies II

Mike Rudin | 27 Jun 08, 04:40 PM

In my last blog earlier this month about the London bombings of 7 July 2005 there was a lot of concern expressed by people who say that when they question such events they're told they're "mad, crazy or in a state of shock". I haven't done this and won't.

What we will do is investigate an issue. For the new series we have looked for key proponents of alternative theories.

So for the new programme about World Trade Center Building 7 ("The Conspiracy Files: 9/11 - The Third Tower" for next Sunday) we have interviewed at length the architect Richard Gage, the former professor of physics Steven Jones and the writer of Loose Change Dylan Avery.

We have then taken their questions and arguments and tested them.

We Are Change UK - Phil Hayton and WTC7

Members of We Are Change UK interview ex BBC World presenter, Phil Hayton. Enjoy!

The 6.5 Second Collapse of World Trade Center Building 7

In this short documentary-style video, I outline the mathematics and science of WTC7 as it relates to its uniform 6.5 second collapse at 5:20 pm on the evening of September 11th. I also briefly touch upon the government analyses conducted by FEMA and NIST, and I compare the collapse to known controlled demolitions and similar steel structures with fire and/or structural damage. Additional info that the viewer may find applicable is that more than half of the diesel fuel was recovered by the two largest underground storage tanks post-collapse (documented by FEMA), and that fires on the north, west, and east sides of the building did not appear to be out of control. In the intro to the vid, the BBC field reporter mysteriously digitizes out of the conversation minutes before WTC7's collapse, after having prematurely reported its collapse 20 minutes before it occured (with the building standing behind the field reporter in plain sight). Also interesting to note, if the hypothesis of NIST is true, then controlled demolition crews only have to weaken one core column in a skyscraper to perfectly implode it.

The Cock-Up

The Cock-Up

Michael D. Morrissey

March 29, 2007

May be redistributed for non-profit purposes; orig. pub. at http://www.mdmorrissey.info/cock-up

When the BBC reports the fall of Building 7
23 minutes before it happens
you know this is not a "cock-up"
but a whistle blowing loud and clear
from inside the loop.

Just ask yourself the simplest questions.
Is the BBC the National Enquirer?
Has it ever happened before?
How could it happen?
Talk about the nose on your face.
Could it be any plainer?

An inside job within an inside job,
a veritable Russian doll of inside jobs,
a symphony of whistles.
NORAD, the FBI and CIA
hamstrung and defeated
by 19 Arabs with boxcutters.
Do you really think they think
we are that stupid?

What is the message, then?
The one the Demo-rats have swallowed,
for example, and all the Congresswimps,
and the leaders of (almost) all the western countries
in their tribute to pox Americana?

Vince Salandria called it "transparency"
in reference to the JFK assassination.
I call it "let's show 'em that we've got 'em by the balls."
This is what they hope – that we will resign,