willyloman's blog

So What Are You Going to Do About It?

by Scott Creighton

"So, what do we do about it?"

This question has been repeatedly asked of me as a direct result of any number of articles I have written or threads I have "hijacked" in the name of calling attention to this growing bi-partisan tide of imminent globalization, a.k.a. the Fascist State of World Government; the New World Order.

What do we do about it, indeed.

When you think about the scope and the breadth of this globalization campaign and all it's well-funded, interwoven, interlocking ivy-league staffed Think-Tanks, it's easy to succumb to your baser "flight" instinct. After all, how could any man succeed, even in the most peripheral of engagements, against such a conglomeration as this imperial movement that stands before us, when presidents (Kennedy), congressmen (Kucinich, Paul, McKinney, Sanders), scholars (Chomsky, Zinn), and heroes (King, Nader) have all fallen short of the mark?

'Just who the hell do you think you are compared to them?"

The Questionable Timing of the Pakistan Blast

by Scott Creighton

(I wonder how long it takes to build a truck bomb.)

Let me see if I got this straight now.

Over the past 7 years we have dumped billions and billions of dollars into Pakistan to help with the Global War on Terror™. Yet, we know that former President Musharraf spent much of that money beefing up his military presence on the border of India, while another large part of that money, just went missing. Some of that money was traced to election fraud attempts. All of this, and the accepted wisdom is that the Taliban and bin Laden, are in Pakistan (of course I think he is dead, but that is beside the point).

When Musharraf lost the election, he shut down the democracy in Pakistan and arrested judges and opposition party leaders. Eventually, Pakistan shamed us by actually impeaching their president for corruption, while ours gets off Scott-Free thanks to Nancy Pelosi and a complicit congress.

Along comes a new President, President Asif Zardari, one that isn’t in the pocket of BushCo and low and behold, we start ramping up the rhetoric about needing to attack inside Pakistan “when ever we feel like it“.

The Gift of 9/11

by Scott Creighton

The events of 9/11 unfolded before us in a grand spectacle of shock, emotion, and repetitive images; collapsing burning, jumping, screaming, falling, crying, dying. And we watched, helpless as a baby lost in a world of wolves, as black clouds, 10 stories tall, glided down the streets consuming everything we had once known and cherished about ourselves. We watched people trying desperately to escape the gathering gloom. They ran, and then we ran. We ran right into the waiting arms of Big Brother. Right where we were supposed to run. Where we would be ...safe.

But we aren't safe, are we? Far, far from it.

We came to realise on that day just how far some would go to advance their ideologies. We came to see the world in a new, dangerous light; where being an "American" meant no more to these terrorists than being anything else. We knew in a flash that we were within their grasp and that our lives meant nothing in contrast to their greater scheme of things.

And thus, we became ants on 9/11. Nothing more. The delusion of democracy would soon come to an end and this "great experiment" in self-rule would wither and die. Just like the terrorists wanted.

Uniform Vigilance

by Scott Creighton (inserts from George Washington’s Farewell Address)

You want to see what blind allegiance to “Party” looks like? Would you like to guess where it leads? No nation, based on a constitutional representation of the will of the governed, of the whole of the governed, can stand for long when it’s spirit is skillfully divided and fractionated by an elite ruling class.

- “They serve to organize faction, to give it an artificial and extraordinary force; to put, in the place of the delegated will of the nation, the will of a party, often a small but artful and enterprising minority of the community;…” GW.

There must be a set of norms that we all accept that define us as a community and as a nation to bind us one to the other. These are the standards of behavior and laws that govern that make up the very belief systems that, to some degree, we must all share as a common identity. This is who we are as a people; the core principles of our communal agreement. And this is what is being systematically undermined through party manipulation by these elites who are beholden to the precepts of no party, but rather, to an oath of loyalty to each other.

How an Average Guy Became A "Truther"

There is nothing special about me.

After college, I went into construction, and worked hands on for over 15 years. I hung steel on the NB Handy Building in Lynchburg Va. I attended Mountain Productions Rigging School, I was Head Rigger for Showman Fabricators in New York City and installed the new (at that time) MSNBC Studios. I also weld a little (MIG only). Since then, I have exclusively worked in architectural design, Computer aided drafting (CAD). (JPEGS of my work available upon request) i do engineering specifications for commercial and residential new construction (I am not an engineer). A recent project put me in Atlanta (last month) for the installation of a project I designed the technical specifications for - commercial project involving massive steel structures, design weight bearing loads, and even THERMAL EXPANSION RATIOS.

That is my background.

Now, I will tell you this; those buildings, all of them, were brought down by Controlled Demolition. Of that, there is no question.

9/11, Afghanistan, Iraq, Georgia, Iran, and Pakistan; The Vulcan’s Path to The Caspian Sea Basin

by Scott Creighton

***UPDATE*** Reddit blocked this one as well.

One of the first things this administration did was meet with Dick Cheney’s Energy Task Force in early 2001. Those meetings were kept secret and they have refused to disclose who was actually there, and what was discussed. We all know that.

“The Washington Post reported on November 15, 2005 that it had obtained documents detailing how executives from major oil corporations, including Exxon-Mobil Corp., Conoco, Royal Dutch Shell Oil Corp., and the American subsidiary of British Petroleum met with Energy Task Force participants while they were developing national energy policy. ”Wiki

The Criminalization of Politics and Other Fine Talking Points

by Scott Creighton

Yesterday, during the House Judiciary Committee’s hearing ”Executive Power and it’s Constitutional Limitations“, as an argument for not opening an investigation into criminal acts by this administration, the same talking point came up time and time again; these “demented” people who call for impeachment are trying to “criminalise” political differences: the Criminalization of Politics.

Now this would normally fall into the silly smoke screen category (especially after what we KNOW happened at the Department of Justice with Carl Rove’s help) …if we hadn’t heard it before. But of course the interesting thing about this is where we have heard it before.

The other day, there was a debate on NPR’s Democracy Now, between Glenn Greenwald and Obama advisor Cass Sunstein about the need for impeachment. Sunstein made reference to a previous argument he had made at the recent NetRoots Conference about impeaching this administration seeming like criminalizing political differences.

The Missing Kucinich Article of Impeachment: Treason

A comment I posted to David Swanson of After Downing Street.

In these last few weeks I have noticed many, many sites pulling away from the pursuit of impeachment. For various stated reasons, they are resigning themselves to what must seem like an inevitable conclusion to them.

I admire how hard you are still pushing. In fact, it seems that the more of them that silence the call, the louder you become. I am glad that someone is still working toward this result. Not that you are the only one as there are still many people in the blogs out there that wish to see this happen as well.

The truth of the matter is, that other forms of dissent are also losing voices. Here in my hometown, the local 9/11 Truth leader is looking to find a replacement for her while the numbers of active people in our local movement get smaller and smaller.

Even some of the leading voices in the 9/11 Truth movement seem to be taking a bit of a vacation from the fray right now; just when we need them the most.

Tearing Apart Emperor Brooker: or Shooting Fish in a Barrel

By Scott Creighton

The following is my response to Charlie Brooker’s yellow journalism piece from the Guardian. but first, a little background:

Charlie wrote this about the 2004 election “John Wilkes Booth, Lee Harvey Oswald, John Hinckley, Jr. - where are you now that we need you?” Wiki. He admitted later it was in bad taste, after the Secret Service gave him a call, and the Guardian pulled the article and made him write an apology in which he went off on some rant about having intercourse with kids at a cocktail party (he seems to make that kind of joke quite often. I guess it’s for “shock value”).

Currently Charlie has a show on BBC 4, which is a show, about other shows, and is in it’s 4th season with the number of episodes for the coming year “TBA”. Considering the timing of his little article here, and how it correlates to the release of the deeply flawed BBC piece on building 7, it would seem that Charlie is letting someone know that he is a team player before contract renewal time (wink wink, eh Charlie?).

"Demolition Teams" on site at Ground Zero hours BEFORE WTC 7 Fell

While attempting to find out who the "special engineer" was that accurately predicted the collapse of Building 7 five hours before it fell, I ran across an article written by Brett Blanchard, Director of Field Operations for Protec Documentation Services.

The article itself is here:


... and the site for Protec is here:


Once again, the article is of the typical "whitewash the controlled demolition theory" garden variety. Not hard at all to run through line by line and debunk. Blanchard's piece is full of unsupported misinformation like "The fact is many steel structures have collapsed due to fire." which, of course stands in direct contrast to NIST's report as well as even the latest BBC hit piece which agrees with the conclusion that Building 7 and the Towers were the first steel framed buildings in history to collapse due to fire.

BBC Piece Post-Mortem: Mark Loizeaux and the Special Engineer

It is difficult for me to know where to begin peeling away the layers of misinformation the BBC peddled to their audience in last weeks exposé on the collapse of Building 7 of the World Trade Center in New York. There are so many people out there grinding away at the production, I don’t feel the need to repeat what they have already done with journeyman-like effectiveness, yet there is something that I have yet to see addressed that I feel is crucial to exposing the overall lack of trustworthiness of the piece. And there is another related aspect of it, that I feel may in fact, be almost an unintended admission, of sorts.

At issue? Mark Loizeaux’s direct misrepresentation of fact and Peter Hayden’s uncanny admission.

Meet Mike Walter: Watch Him Lie About 9/11.

Mr. Walter says in this interview that he heard the roar of the engines of the plane over head and looked up to see, quite clearly, the AA logo of American Airlines on the side of the jet.

Then he says that the plane dove and increased speed toward the Pentagon. Well, if that is the case, then he must have seen the plane a mile or so out because according to the FAA and Norad, that plane was flying low for quite a ways before it struck the Pentagon. How did he hear the “roar of the engines” so far out?

Then he adds the new story-line that he saw the wings of the plane fold back into the body of the jet when it hit.

Look at the pictures from the only release 5 frames of the actual video from the attack.

How did someone “see” the wings “fold back against the plane” in that millisecond of impact that was obscured by the fireball? He couldn’t have. It’s impossible.

But even more telling than all of this…

His original interview with CNN on the day of the attacks.

(This is a follow-up to Aidan Monaghan's blog entry)

This is about Mike Walter. Mike is a liar. He is lying about what he saw on 9/11. And here is the proof.

An Open Letter to Steven Jones... On the Subject of Detonator Cord

An Open Letter to Steven E. Jones, Jeffrey Farrer, Gregory S. Jenkins, Frank Legge, James Gourley, Kevin Ryan, Daniel Farnsworth, and Crockett Grabbe On the Subject of Detonator Cord

by Scott Creighton

I wish to first thank each and every one of you for your continuing efforts to bring the serious questions that still permeate the official 9/11 investigations to light. I hope that in time, your efforts will rank among those of Daniel Ellsberg, Bob Woodward , and Carl Bernstein.

I also wish to congratulate you on the recent publication of your peer reviewed article “Fourteen Points of Agreement with Official Government Reports on the World Trade Center Destruction“, published in The Open Civil Engineering Journal, Vol. 2 Issue 1, by Bentham Open. This is a huge step in the struggle for credibility in an atmosphere where any mention of discrepancies in the “official story” of 9/11 equates to professional suicide.

The courage it takes for you to continue your research and lectures is not lost on us and if I may be so bold as to speak for some of the 9/11 Truth seekers; thank you.

My Last Comment to David Swanson of ADS About the Taibbi Article

David, you are too good of a writer and researcher not to see the glaring problems with Taibbi's arguments.

You ever notice how people like Taibbi here can only attack "truthers" personally, and not on facts alone? There's a reason for that David; because the facts just don't add up.

Let's put it this way:

Someone kills your family (or a neighbors. whomever) and the Sheriff refuses to launch an investigation for 400+ days until the family members go to the press and get so much attention, that sheriff is forced to investigate.

But at first he puts a detective in charge who has already been accused and tried (Kissinger) of lying and manipulating evidence in other cases (Chile Sept. 11 1973) and he has business ties to one of the suspects (bin Laden family, who, by the way, the sheriff also has business ties to).

FYI: AfterDowningStreet Posts Yellow Journalism Story About "Truthers"

I like ADS and David Swanson so when I saw this "article" posted on their main site, I lit into him about it. I didn't even question why the author of it, Matt Taibbi, would write it; I focused on why, in heavens name, would ADS publish such an unresearched and laughable example of yellow journalism.

The guy attacks all "truthers" and the movement itself with completely unsubstanciated stawman arguements. It is really idiotic when you read it. So much so, he offers as his final "evidence", a made up conversation about the planning of the attacks. I shit you not.

"f there was such a conspiracy, remember, something like the following conversation would have had to have taken place:"

Look, do us all a favor, I left a, hopefully, thought provoking comment that put out there some facts for people to check on and so they can see that one side of this argument still uses "facts" rather than just insults.

Then I called into question why David Swanson, one of the biggest advocates of regime change in this country, would post this on his site.