9/11 Research Flight 93 Flyers

Top 15 [Reasons] to boycott/leaflet "United 93"

The 9/11 Conspiracy: A Skeptic's View - Democratic Underground

This essay is certain to make many readers very angry with me. But ya gotta do what ya gotta do.

Last month I was a guest on a progressive radio talk show. About half-way through the hour-long program, the conversation was going well, until I expressed some doubts about the 'controlled demolition' hypotheses of the collapse of the World Trade Center. That comment sealed the fate of the remainder of the hour, as it prompted an unvarying succession of angry rebuttals and a deluge of alleged 'facts' supporting the view that the WTC towers were brought down by pre-set demolition charges, and that the Pentagon was not struck by a Boeing 747. And so I felt obliged to take a closer look at the theories and evidence regarding the 9/11 attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon.

Martin Luther King - A Time to Break Silence - April 4th 1967
(10mb MP3)

"A time comes when silence is betrayal" - These words are just as relevant today as when Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. first spoke them 39 years ago. At first glance they might be overlooked as just a simple protest against the war in Vietnam, but the relevance of this entire speech to the modern world we live in today, particularly issues like the truth of 9/11, can be heard in almost every inspiring point made. MLK mentions how "conformist thought" can end up preventing people from challenging their government sufficiently, especially in times of war, and how those who do speak out often then find it a "vocation of agony" because the current political climate deems it controversial or unpatriotic - nevertheless he says, "We must speak".

Here is a list of action items we can all participate in to try to keep the momentum building. Maybe the Blogger Brigade would consider blasting this information out:

This petition is something that the Scholars For 9/11 Truth intend to bring to congress and they are about 2000 signatures away from reaching their goal of 10,000. If you haven't signed it yet, please do so.

http://www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/929981172?ltl=1141667399

A mini-survey of Ph.D. civil engineers - physorg.com

I finally got a day off, wherein I didn't sleep until 3 pm, and so I took the opportunity to speak to 5 civil engineers at Rutgers University today. I basically asked for a few minutes of their time, to ask them 2 questions:

1) Have you read the NISt Summary Report?
2) Are you aware of and have you read Professor Jones' paper on the collapses?
..
Apparently, 6 out of 6 Ph.D. civil engineers that I have talked to have neither read the NIST summary report, nor have they read Professor Jones' paper. Only 1 of them has definitely even heard of Professor Jones' paper. (One of the six may have read the NIST summary, and even Jones' paper, but forgotten. However, I find it far more likely that she did not read either, and this seemed to me to be the thrust of her comments.)