Real-Time Comments Return

After much trial and error, we have re-introduced real-time comments. This is due to the massive amount of feedback from site users.

However, we do have some favors to ask:

If you find a back-and-forth comment exchange extending to the full length of the page, start a new thread at the 911blogger section at . Invite the user you are trading comments with to the thread. Otherwise, I or one of the other team members will ask you to do so.

Refrain from proselytizing about specific theories that time and again, the majority of users at have rejected. This includes: TV Fakery, DEW theories and Holocaust Revisionism. For nearly two years, when these topics are raised at this site, the users who post the topics are shouted down, and voted down. The theories are attacked. Whether the users posting the topics are zealous or just curious, the reaction is the same. We can't control this. We can't force people to moderate their tone on these topics either. The internet is a big place, find a message board with a community that wants to talk about these topics rather than trying to change the community at 911blogger, because advised by our experience, this is not likely to happen. Posting about those three topics will get your real-time posting ability "pulled".

Don't attack other users. Just don't do it. If you are offended by a post, vote it down and appeal to a Team Member to moderate. You are not the 911blogger police. If you feel a need to debate a user about one of their posts, resolve it via email (users are recommended to enable the Personal Contact Form in their profiles for this purpose), or invite the user to a debate at or another message board of your choice. Again, constantly picking fights with other users will land you in the drunk tank (Moderation Queue).

Sorry this took so long.

George Washington



What's a DEW theory?


Directed Energy Weapon

On DEW and ETs

>>This includes: TV Fakery, DEW theories and Holocaust Revisionism

But is promoting an event in NYC which will feature DEW advocate Alfred Webre, along with Jim Fetzer.

How about ETs then? Are ETs okay?

"Preview of Interview with Alfred Webre"

So shouldn't DEW be okay then, since 9/ is advertising the event with Webre, Fetzer & Barrett, all DEW advocates?

Webre freaks me out -- 11/11

What is DEW? It's huge... huge my friend.

Fetzer: “Oh Really?? Oh ho ho ho ho! Oh Judy. Oh my, oh my, oh my. This is huge… this is huge Judy!!”

“We're an empire now, and when we act we create our own reality."


We'll see...

Forgive me for reserving my judgement. 911b has suffered a great loss of credibility for several weeks. It is good that the site has taken the first step towards recovery. Old Alek would like to wait for at least a month and see how the restoration of instant comments works out. Fool me once, shame on you...


Great to hear, Reprehensor. I can't even begin to imagine how much work the moderation was.

Good Deal

Good idea. I think we can put up with the shills.


Abuse the privilege. I'm addressing myself as well as everybody else.

Donate To 9/11 First Responders

Great Truthers

Jon I know there is a lot of great truthers who got banned from 911 blogger for speaking there conscience about certain subjects like the holocaust in which I learned a lot from those discussions I want to thank you for the position that you and John A took. You made it very easy for me to find the truth on that Subject and I would have never been introduced to the great jazz musician Gilad Atzmon

Say hi to John Albanese for me


You being sarcastic? Which "position" is that?

Edit: Since you aren't answering my question, I'll assume that you're being sarcastic. Since you mentioned my "position" regarding the Holocaust, and an "anti-Zionist" musician, I'm assuming you think I am a "Zionist."

That's fine. For those who think I am a "Zionist", read this.

One thing the "anti-Zionists" seem to have forgotten about is the culpability of the Bush Administration with regard to the 9/11 attacks. Everything is Israel. Well, I haven't forgotten the mountains of information that link this Administration to the attacks, and I plan to see that they are held accountable for their actions. AS WELL as anyone or any other country involved. If anyone disagrees with that, fine. You are entitled to your opinion. I, however, have an axe to grind with this Administration.

Everyone take note. It wasn't me that "started it."

Donate To 9/11 First Responders

Good call. The Eleventh


This is great news and will put many people's paranoia to rest, I'm sure. Certainly mine.

Jon Gold...relax brother. No need for ego here.

Nothing about ego...

What I said applies to me as well.

Donate To 9/11 First Responders

In that case...

okey dokie :-D Glad to have our family back together! If only we could celebrate! I'm especially happy this took place before Final Cut is released.

Hooray for 'net democracy!

This site hasn't been the same. Your new policies are fair.

Thanks, guys.


Is an internet gem.

Administrators: Thank you for all the hard work you have and continue to put in.

We are the empire now.

Jumbo Jets Can Not Demolish Skyscrapers.

Me too, thanks

Administrators: Thanks for all the hard work and good will


All right!


JFK on secrecy and the press

Thanks Alvin R

for posting the JFK speech. In my mind 11/22/63 was worse than 9/11. As Meria Heller said, "That was the day the music died." I couldn't agree more. It's been all downhill since. No 11/22/63 = no 9/11/2001.

Someone actually voted this

Someone actually voted this down!!! Oh well, can't please everybody...

"If you carry the torch of

"If you carry the torch of truth through a crowd, you are bound to singe someone's beard"
-- read it somewhere
11/11 Never Forget - Fetzer Flips
Zeitgeist Movie Torrent DVDRip (XviD)

Hey ImgStacke, I notice you

Hey ImgStacke, I notice you have Zeitgeist in your signature line. I've heard good things and bad things about that movie, haven't seen it myself, however I did notice that the new Smashing Pumpkins album is called Zeitgeist. Maybe unsuspecting people searching for information on that album will find this video and have their eyes opened....

Perhaps - when you put it in

Perhaps - when you put it in to google it is the first hit - As far as the movie goes, I think it doesn't hold any punches, we have been cradled much to long and our cradlers have since gone only to be replaced by those who seek to control us and subvert our natural instinct to understand the world around us. A need to make it all make sense.

11/11 Never Forget - Fetzer Flips
Zeitgeist Movie Torrent DVDRip (XviD)

Yes Zeitgeist is very good

I have noticed it being played at several 9/11 truth get togethers lately.
It gives a bit more than just 9/11 as it shows how easily seemingly intelligent people are fooled in mass.
I think the only thing that would make it better would be the addition of something similar to "Orwell Rolls in his Grave" to show the complicity of the MSM in all of this.

Let's remember that we are the 9/11 TRUTH movement.

NOT the 9/11 PARTIAL TRUTH movement. To that end of exposing the entire truth and all perpetrators, we must be levelheaded, mature, and respectful enough to hear and examine all views backed by evidence. Anything less does not advance this movement towards our stated goal.

"If you carry the torch of truth through a crowd, you are bound to singe someone's beard"

Good saying there, imgstacke !

Glad to see real time

Glad to see real time comments back, although I would really like to know why I am not allowed to have this video on Insider Trading posted.

I have submitted this twice now and it still has not posted to the blog page. What gives??

I submitted once at 530pm yesterday and then again overnight and still nothing.



I sent you an email. I asked a Professor of economics about this video, and here was his reply;

"I cannot recommend this piece...

It quotes by title (w/o naming the author) Radlauer's 2001 article cited in
my chapter (pp. 68-69). This is one of the articles most responsible for
the exaggerations by people such as Ruppert and Tarpley. It quotes the
supposed $15 billion gain thrown out by von Bulow which is nothing but an
unsourced wild guess which I could not even come close to..."

The Professor is Paul Zarembka, who has closely examined the insider trading situation, and offered a scholarly report about it in "The Hidden History of 9-11-2001". The book is inaccessible to many due to cost at this point, but several University Libraries stock the "Research in Political Economy" series. Perhaps you can view the article there. The book is vol. 23 in that series.

Zarembka's work is pretty thorough, and I'm relying on his judgment call on this one. I don't want want people to think 911blogger is tacitly endorsing this video when they see it here.

I didn't receive that email

I didn't receive that email as of yet. I am not that familiar with Prof. Zarembka's work but will look into it. I too had recalled Ruppert mentioning those same figures on several occasions and to date was not aware that they were in question. Thanks for the info and reply.

Always good to consult and expert

But where is the beef?

Could you please ask Professor Zarembka to publish something to that effect in the Journal of 911 studies so that it could be read and evaluated by the 911 community? There is just too much hearsay about this matter of the put options.

I would have to agree.

I would have to agree.

Zarembka again...

I had reservations about the video because it referred to an article by D.
Radlauer entitled "Black Tuesday, the world's largest insider trading scam"
which I have shown in my own chapter in HIDDEN HISTORY to be an
exaggeration. There is serious, much more credible research by A.M.
Poteshman, in the JOURNAL OF BUSINESS, 2006, "Unusual option market
activity and the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001". Using
confidential market data the rest of us do not have access, the latter
article does confirm, with high probability, insider trading on the airline

von Bulow's comment about $15 billion in potential profits that day is
unsourced. I could not come near to confirming the number. Repeating
undocumented assertions do not serve us well.

I would also recommend that alleged hijackers not be referred to as if that
part of the official story is correct. In this regard, I would point to
Jay Kolar's chapter in HIDDEN HISTORY.

In any case, the video does provide a lot of useful and correct information
which is valuable.

I am available at for further dialogue. Paul Zarembka

Zarembka ends.

The Poteshman paper is available online:

In the conclusion of his study, Poteshman says;

The option market volume ratios considered do not provide evidence of unusual option market trading in the days leading up to September 11. The volume ratios, however, are constructed out of long and short put volume and long and short call volume; simply buying puts would have been the most straightforward way for someone to have traded in the option market on foreknowledge of the attacks. A measure of abnormal long put volume was also examined and seen to be at abnormally high levels in the days leading up to the attacks. Consequently, the paper concludes that there is evidence of unusual option market activity in the days leading up to September 11 that is consistent with investors trading on advance knowledge of the attacks.

It's a good paper. There was insider trading, but the big, big numbers can't be verified.

I highly recommend the book edited by Mr. Zarembka,

it is a scholarly work and thus a valuable edition to any library on the events of 9/11/01.

Reprehensor, it was very good to meet you in Vancouver and it is great to be able to, once again, recommend 911Blogger as the best site for news, information and dialogue on the critical events of 9/11/01.

I hope that you and yours are all well.

Long live 911Blogger!

The truth shall set us free. Love is the only way forward.

Live in a Major Urban Area?

As my fake terror attack radar is currently blinking red with the screws popping out of it, I am encouraging everyone who lives in a major city to carry with them a digital camera, and have the video setting set to take at least 1.5 hour of video. Something is going to happen any day now. It is our job to record it. When you are done, remove the memory card and put it in your sock for when someone tries to seize your camera.

would be good to replace the

would be good to replace the good with a small capacity dupe
11/11 Never Forget - Fetzer Flips
Zeitgeist Movie Torrent DVDRip (XviD)

Yeah dudes!

Love those real-time comments!

"Out of these troubled times, our fifth objective — a New World Order — can emerge..." - George H.W. Bush, 9/11/91


you guys rock.

Thank you, this is my first

Thank you, this is my first post since the restrictions. +- is all one needs.

Show "911 blogger comes too its senses" by plcapeli

good ol days

Thanks for going back to the good ol days

TV fakery just is not possible with all the eye witnesess so please drop it

Show ""Popular Theories Only."" by morganstack

A suggestion

When you have concrete and verifiable evidence (with analysis) which you have written in a scholarly, peer reviewed paper that supports the theory of real time video manipulation of the plane impacts on the Twin Towers and not just conjecture based on a poor understanding of physics, please submit it for publication and return here to debate the issue.

Until then, to argue that opposition to the "tv fakery" theory is some kind of limited hangout inside of the greater truth movement is ridiculous, insulting and divisive.

I focus my energy on working to get a new and true investigation into the events of 9/11/01 as that is the only way we will ever know what really happened and who the perpetrators truly are. The most effective way of doing this is by presenting the most solid and credible case. If you are really interested in getting new investigations, I suggest you do the same.

I hope that you and yours are well.

The truth shall set us free. Love is the only way forward.



Nicely done, Rep

Does this mean we will see the return of open threads?

Morgantown 9/11 Truth on MySpace
The Eleventh Day of Every Month

Wow, I never

Wow, I never thought you guys would reverse the censorship. Thanks guys!

Guess I should change my sig now :)
The Eleventh Day of Every Month

Oh ye, of little faith...

Just twitting you, brother.

***goofy grin***

It is very nice to have the real thing back, and not a moment too soon, I hasten to add.

I hope that you and yours are well.

The truth shall set us free. Love is the only way forward.


Good to see you again, 911 Blogger!

"In the beginning of a change, the Patriot is a scarce man, brave, hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, however, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a patriot." - Mark Twain

"You are not the 911blogger police."

News to me! ;-P

So, can we have avatars? Please? Pretty please?

Impeachment. Accountability. A better world.

Oh, and thanks, guv!

We promise to be good...probably. ;-)

Impeachment. Accountability. A better world.

Fuck man!

..........Just testing!...... lololll!

Happy I am!

You can't hide a lie for long. Truth shall come out.

If you guys are going to censor theories

then why not censor the immature posters who insult and attack people for having a different idea than them?

If you forbid theories because they are an "embarrassment" to the movement, then why not do the same to the immature haters who are DEFINITELY an embarrassment to the movement?

And you know who KT is talking about ...

There is one poster who is consistently abrasive, immature, always trying to start a fight, probably has a net negative comment rating. Many of his (quite popular and polite by comparison) adversaries have been banned. Yet he lingers on. Why is this embarassing ad hominem provocateur extraordinaire protected? You can't let your rabid pit bull run loose outside your house and claim to be a responsible householder.

read the post killtown it's not the theories it's proselytizing

That will get you in the "drunk tank" O-t-N

and I agree with KT people who post nothing but ad-hominem attacks should get drunk tank posts till they sober up.

Morale Booster All Round

I'd say.

Good move.

And Thanks.

I have become curious now

as to what is encompassed by your use of the term "Holocaust Revisionism"
For example, would discussions regarding the "dancing Israelis" be considered off limits?
What about further discussions related to possible Israeli / mossad involvement in 911 and other false flag attacks?
Or is this a literal interpretation about people claiming that the holocaust victim numbers were inflated, or that Jews weren't the only victims?
I'm not sure how that would connect to 911, other than perhaps an external effort to lump them together by posting here to discredit both so now i am wondering if that's what's up.

I thinkwe can all agree

That putting israeli involvement in the area of holocaust denial research would be positively ridiculous. As there is clear verifiable evidence of at least a partial role in 911, and that's being really really really conservative.

even if the numbers are valid

regarding jews and the holocaust, to think that that traumatic event would ever justify the behavior of Israel towards Palestinians, or the behavior of some American/Israeli zionists who took part in the planning and execution of 9/11 would be an abomination. it's all in the thinking. the psychopathology would be huge, i mean, huge.

Show "You know, I ask myself if I" by u2r2h

weather mod and contrails are verifiable

They were seeding clouds in freaking vietnam DUDE, thats weather modding.

ask yourself some more

What do you make of the Roswell incident? The military first announced it had captured a downed UFO, then changed the story to a weather balloon the next day. As one watches the eyewitness testimony, one has to wonder what could these octogenarians hope to gain by lying about it? I wasn't there but personally I think the most likely explanation was that an extraterrestrial vehicle did crash near Roswell. And that's just one incident amongst hundreds by reliable witnesses, including military and police, pilots and astronauts, and sometimes dozens or more witnesses from all around the world and even throughout history. I'm not saying I am a 100% true believer in extraterrestrial visitors, but at the same time, no way I'm ruling it out or censoring people for discussing it!

the only thing worth censoring is censorship

the evidance of strange very fast craft that engage in in acceleration activity unavailable to known airships is huge and has been recorded by credible astronauts pilots for decades , clearly there is a mystery to solve , why would you want to censor that?


Finally, Rep, I formally retract and apologize for anything I said about you.



Please clarify on the "proselytizing" rule.

"Refrain from proselytizing about specific theories that time and again, the majority of users at have rejected. This includes: TV Fakery, DEW theories and Holocaust Revisionism."



1. To induce someone to convert to one's own religious faith.
2. To induce someone to join one's own political party or to espouse one's doctrine.

To convert (a person) from one belief, doctrine, cause, or faith to another.

So does it mean no positive talk about controversial theories, such as NPT, which may convert non-believers, but negative talk about these theories (i.e. debunking them) is ok? Please clarify.

So does it mean no positive

So does it mean no positive talk about controversial theories, such as NPT, which may convert non-believers, but negative talk about these theories (i.e. debunking them) is ok?
I think that covers it. Debunking Disinfo is important as it promotes the truth by eliminating lies.
11/11 Never Forget - Fetzer Flips
Zeitgeist Movie Torrent DVDRip (XviD)

Now do you have to prove something is "disinfo"

or just say it is over and over here?