This is big. Naomi is saying what most people in the Truth Movement have been saying all along, only she is choosing her words carefully. This was a clever way of saying she is suspicious without risking the fate of Rosie and Charlie Sheen. She has the credibility and drawing power to open doors.
One small step for Naomi, One giant leap for the Truth Movement.
Bravo Naomi.
We've been hoping for a celebrity to get on board with the movement. We here she is I think we should thank her and support her. She's a very brave woman.
Now we need to get the other Naomi onside.

Yikes. I loved Naomi's book, but this seems a very naive statement. Is she biased? Mis-informed? I voted for Clinton way back when but have learned a lot since then. It seems to me that this erosion of our de-mock-racy started WAY before 2001. GWB may be just a final chapter? It is hard to sort out the facts with so much to learn and so much hate and slander out there, but to say the "Clintons are just like us" sets off alarm bells and whistles for me. I am still learning and unlike most people in this country/world my mind is open....I know there are willing people here in this blog to help educate me!

Do more research on the Clintons. I believe they support tyranny NOT liberty despite what you think you know of them and their character.

http://patricksperry.wordpress.com/2007/06/30/hillary-quotes

Where is the G-damn f**king flag? I want the G-damn f**king flag up every f**king morning at f**king sunrise." (From the book "Inside The White House" by Ronald Kessler, p. 244 - Hillary to the staff at the Arkansas Governor's mansion on Labor Day, 1991)

"You sold out, you mother f**ker! You sold out!" (From the book "Inside" by Joseph Califano, p. 213 - Hillary yelling at Democrat lawyer.)

"It's been said, and I think it's accurate, that my husband was obsessed by terrorism in general and al-Qaida in particular." (Hillary telling a post-9/11 world what a 'great' commander in chief her husband was; Dateline, NBC 4/16/2004.)

"I have to admit that a good deal of what my husband and I have learned [about Islam] has come from our daughter." (TruthInMedia.org 8/8/1999 - Hillary at a White House function, proudly tells some Muslim groups she is gaining a greater appreciation of Islam because Chelsea was then taking a class on the "religion of peace")

F**k off! It's enough that I have to see you shit-kickers every day, I'm not going to talk to you too!! Just do your G*damn job and keep your mouth shut." (From the book "American Evita" by Christopher Anderson, p. 90 - Hillary to her State Trooper bodyguards after one of them greeted her with "Good morning."

"You f**king idiot." (From the book "Crossfire" p. 84 - Hillary to a State Trooper who was driving her to an event.)

"If you want to remain on this detail, get your f**king ass over here and grab those bags!" (From the book "The First Partner" p. 259 - Hillary to a Secret Service Agent who was reluctant to carry her luggage because he wanted to keep his hands free in case of an incident.)

"Get f**ked! Get the f**k out of my way!!! Get out of my face!!!"(From the book "Hillary's Scheme" p. 89 - Hillary's various comments to her Secret Service detail agents.)

"Stay the f**k back, stay the f**k away from me! Don't come within ten yards of me, or else! Just f**king do as I s ay, Okay!!!?" (From the book "Unlimited Access", by Clinton FBI Agent in Charge, Gary Aldrige, p. 139 - Hillary screaming at her Secret Service detail.)

"Many of you are well enough off that [President Bush's] tax cuts may have helped you. We're saying that for America to get back on track, we're probably going to cut that short and not give it to you. We're going to have to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." (Hillary grandstanding at a fund raising speech in San Francisco; SFGate.com 6/28/2004.)

"Why do I have to keep proving to people that I am not a liar?!"(From the book "The Survivor," by John Harris, p. 382 - Hillary in her 2000 Senate campaign)

"Where's the miserable c*ck sucker?" (From the book "The Truth About Hillary" by Edward Klein, p. 5 - Hillary shouting at a Secret Service officer)

"No matter what you think about the Iraq war, there is one thing we can all agree on for the next days - we have to salute the courage and bravery of those who are risking their lives to vote and those brave Iraqi and American soldiers fighting to protect their right to vote." (Was posted on Hillary Clinton's senate.gov web site on 1/28/05)

"Put this on the ground! I left my sunglasses in the limo. I need those sunglasses. We need to go back!" (From the book "Dereliction of Duty" p. 71-72 - Hillary to Marine One helicopter pilot to turn back while en route to Air Force One.)

A right-wing network was after his presidency…including perverting the Constitution." (To Barbara Walters about the Republicans who impeached her husband; 20/20, ABC 6/8/2003.)

"What are you doing inviting these people into my home? These people are our enemies! They are trying to destroy us!" (From the book "The Survivor" by John Harris, p. 99 - Hillary screaming to an aide, when she found out that some Republicans had been invited to the White House)

"I mean, you've got a conservative and right-wing press presence with really nothing on the other end of the political spectrum." (C-Span, 1/19/1997 - Hillary complains about the mainstream media, which are all conservatives in her opinion)

"Come on Bill, put your dick up! You can't f**k her here!!" (From the book "Inside The White House" by Ronald Kessler, p. 243 - Hillary to Gov. Clinton when she spots him talking with an attractive female at an Arkansas political rally)

"You know, I'm going to start thanking the woman who cleans the restroom in the building I work in. I'm going to start thinking of her as a human being" (From the book "The Case Against Hillary Clinton" by Peggy Noonan, p. 55)

"You show people what you're willing to fight for when you fight your friends." (From the book "The Agenda" by Bob Woodward, ch. 14)

"We are at a stage in history in which remolding society is one of the great challenges facing all of us in the West." (From the book "I've Always Been A Yankee Fan" by Thomas D. Kuiper, p 119 - During her 1993 commencement address at the University of Texas)

"The only way to make a difference is to acquire power" (From the book "I've Always Been A Yankee Fan" by Thomas D. Kuiper, p 68 - Hillary to a friend before starting law school.)

"We just can't trust the American people to make those types of choices…. Government has to make those choices for people" (From the book "I've Always Been A Yankee Fan" by Thomas D. Kuiper, p 20 - Hillary to Rep. Dennis Hastert in 1993 discussing her expensive, disastrous taxpayer-funded health care plan)

"I am a fan of the social policies that you find in Europe" (From the book "I've Always Been A Yankee Fan" by Thomas D. Kuiper, p. 76 - Hillary in 1996)

- - - - - - - - - - -

http://www.amazon.com/Hillary-Clinton-Nude-Ambition-Americas/dp/14259675...

http://www.hillary-clinton-nude.com

http://9-11.Meetup.com/322
Many hands make light work!
RRREMA=research, realize, react, educate, motivate, activate
"It's been said, and I think it's accurate, that my husband was obsessed by terrorism in general and al-Qaida in particular." (Hillary

and I have to say I've never heard two people more excited and eager to learn from each other. After listening to that show I'd say it would be next to impossible for them to not continue conversating on a regular basis, and in that context I would think Jones will school her on 9/11 if she is not already on the up and up.

I wonder if they know eachother.

I saw Naomi Klein in Portland, Or. last Friday evening when she was confronted by some somewhat boorish truthers. I knew somebody would confront her on that note, so I took a keen interest in what she had to say.
She said, (paraphrasing):
"I don't put any faith in the 9/11 commission report, and I don't put anything past these people. I have a whole lot of questions about 9/11, BUT... I only write what I can prove."
I was heartened to hear that from a journalist. Because, you know, that's just what they should do.
And, knowing that her Mother in law was raked over the coals for questioning 9/11 early on, I think what Naomi Klein has done is to go in search of the framework.. the bigger picture.
Even while she absolutely doesn't take an inside job stance, Klein does mention Kissinger's appointment to head the commission, the curious date coincidence w/ 9/11 1973, when the Chilean government was overthrown to institute globalism, and how 9/11 has been used to promote a globalist agenda that benefits primarily the disgustingly rich.
The Shock Doctrine covers and makes a strong case for manufactured crisis, as well. And, the book is so compelling, that I think it will break that cycle of psychological resistance in many intelligent people who have been clinging to the 9/11 myth.
Several times while reading the book I had the feeling that she was avoiding 9/11 to reach a wider audience and to expose the bigger pattern.
And, truly, if 9/11 *is* part of a bigger pattern, what harm is there in that? Research for the book is posted online: http://www.naomiklein.org/shock-doctrine/resources

Naomi Wolf, in this talk, looks like she's bringing 9/11 to this group unbidden. That's awesome.
It really does make me think that we've finally hit the tipping point.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
~George Orwell

There are many people out there who still find the concept of false-flag ops in the USA too far out. Naomi Wolf's contribution, whether intended or virtual, is to give those folks enough evidence of galloping fascism from the mainstream literature to shock them into thinking about the current US power structure in post-infantile terms, without touching the third-rail of "inside jobs." Both Wolf's "ten steps to fascism" and Klein's "shock-based revolutionary capitalism" do a good job of culturally and psychologically side-stepping a subject which is all taboo for too many liberals: the idea that "our own government", as misguided or even evil as it might be overseas, is just as capable of being murderous to "citizens like them" right here at home.

Keep in mind that while those coming from a conservative background have some basic ideological grounding in the concept of governments having structural biases towards bad behavior, most liberals don't have an inherent problem with activist government -- their basic bias is to look at the intentions of those in charge, and assume that all that's necessary for "good government" to happen is for the "right people" with the "right intentions" to be put in charge of the "machinery of government." And many of them do see themselves as being the people who, by some right, should be in charge of those "levers of power" to control that government machinery -- which, being just machinery, will automatically do the right things once they get a seat at the controls.

Most such liberals have spent a fair amount of time trying to figure out how to do the right thing with power, not how to limit it. And they really have a hard time coming to terms with the idea that the "machinery" they should rightfully control could be used to directly attack themselves, its rightful masters. They have a VERY hard time understanding any system powerful enough to be an effective welfare state is also capable of being a very efficient prison, even slaughterhouse.

Modern liberals have much in common with the Confucian intellectuals of Imperial China, and intellectual cadres of other imperial regimes in other cultures and eras. They simply have a very hard time seeing themselves as prey. Their entire intellectual career, since junior high school, has been to groom them for some "policy-making position." Remember the joke about newspapers? "Readers of the Washington Post think they have the power... readers of the New York Times think they ought to have the power... readers of the Wall Street Journal actually have the power." The Naomis' audiences have good hearts, are very bright... and don't read the Wall Street Journal. They have spent their whole lives mistaking their being groomed to be skilled functionaries for being groomed for power. This inherent lack of humility and blindness to their own limits not only gives them the stamina to keep at the roles they're good at (and needed for), it keeps them from realizing that this time, that barrel isn't swinging in the direction of the poor souls they are trying to shield -- it's being aimed directly at them.

Having a couple of fellow intellectuals, whose relatives were killed in Nazi extermination camps, write these books now can serve as an effective emotional softening-up campaign to realize that "it can happen here." Once readers of these books, and perhaps readers of "Confessions of an Economic Hit Man" realize that the local Empire really is an Evil Empire, and that it can treat the US mainland as a set of colonies... maybe they'll be emotionally ready to deal with the next step: that "It Already Has Happened Here", and "It Can Happen Here, Again, And Soon."

I can imagine both the Naomis, like some others, are probably both learning more as they go AND are sometimes hedging their words -- either till they reach a personal and professional level of verification, or till their typical audience is ready to hear a stronger approximation of the truth. Wolf's current message says practically everything of political significance being said in the 9-11 truth movement, without actually saying those words. And even if they never blurt out "inside job", they can lead audeinces along an evidentiary path to a point where making that leap for themselves is no longer an insurmountable task.

Please keep in mind that, at this point, practically anyone willing to deal with the evidence on its face has already been reached. These are new markets, so to speak, and the blocks to their accepting the challenge of facing the truth is not simply based on "lack of access" to the evidence. For these folks, "9-11 truth" exists in a realm somewhere between "You were born because Mommy Did It with Daddy" and "We never really went to the Moon." It's either too outlandish to be true, or too unspeakable to dwell on, and certainly not to be talked about in public.

The Naomis are playing their part in the current movement being played by the Imperial opposition's counterpart to the Might Wurlitzer... give 'em credit for that. I suspect each demographic fraction currently either still supporting the American Empire, or not opposing it, will have to find their own set of intellectual prophets who break down the specific preconceptions, assumptions, or taboos, keeping their group from
(1) considering 9-11 truth directly; (2) giving it the top priority in their intellectual and political development that it deserves, or (3) finding ways to bring their political actions and behavior in-line with the intellectual truths they now know, or dreadfully suspect.

Currently I suspect the message that needs to get out to the readers of the Wall Street Journal, another very important demographic, is to not only see the neocon venture as a failed policy that's drastically harmed the US, it has failed precisely because the neocons in every move have intentionally ignored everyone else's ideas, and have shown nothing but contempt for everyone else, even those they have depended on to carry out their ventures. And this is a structural failing inherent in THEIR ideological DNA. Perhaps a significant fraction of the "WSJ readership" will then be capable of breaking ranks and seeing things for themselves -- not so much that covert operations exist, but that all those pesky democratic procedures and values, like openness, debate, and due process, force everyone's ideas to be put to the test before those ideas can do real damage... and that all of us need that discipline of proving our most cherished ideas to unsympathetic audiences. Too many conservatives have sided with too many neocons simply because they have tired of "endless debate", which is another way of saying they have failed to prove their ideas or understand the dynamics of marketplaces for ideas. As a result of their turning a blind eye to the neocons glorification of the cult of secrecy in government, not only do we now have a government that's increasingly brutal, the lack of pointed debate means government policies are becoming increasingly downright stupid. So... well, if they won't listen to the Founding Fathers, they won't be able to ignore Darwin. Maybe the "WSJ readers" will catch on that the structured stupidity of empires reliably carry the seeds of the empire's own destruction. In that light, perhaps they will be capable of seeing the voices of those ready to declare the bankruptcy of this Empire as those ready to look for a sober reorganization plan for the (hopefully) surviving Democratic Republic.