October 2010

(For a historical archive of our old site visit http://911blogger.com/archive)

PressTV Opinion Poll: Ahmadinejad 9/11 Probe "Just Call"

link:   http://www.presstv.ir/detail/147371.html

Poll finds 9/11 probe 'just call'
Tue Oct 19, 2010 6:22PM
 
The majority of respondents to an online poll say President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's proposal to form a tribunal to probe the 9/11 attacks is "a step in the right direction."

More than 58 percent of respondents to the Press TV poll voted in favor of the Iranian president's proposal because they believe people have the right to the truth.

Over 33 percent said the probe was long overdue as it should have taken place before the US-led invasion of Afghanistan in 2001.

Only 9 percent of respondents deemed the proposal unnecessary as they considered the official September 11, 2001 scenario provided by the US government acceptable.

Did the Bush Crime Family Benefit Most From the Failed 9/11 Attacks?

link: http://upswing.newsvine.com/_news/2010/10/18/5309900-did-the-bush-crime-family-benefit-most-from-the-failed-911-attacks

Did the Bush Crime Family Benefit Most From the Failed 9/11 Attacks?
News Type: Event — Mon Oct 18, 2010 10:24 AM EDT.By upswing
advertisement
In my opinion, the 9/11 attacks failed: If they had succeeded, then the White House and Congress would also have been destroyed, and the country would have been under martial law and under the sole control of Bush/Cheney.

But that's for a different article.

Just as interesting to me are the components of 9/11 that succeeded: specifically, the complete destruction of three buildings.

There are theories abounding as to what happened on 9/11, the most "tin-foil-hat-like" of which is the ridiculous official Boxcutter Conspiracy Theory offered to explain the events of 9/11 -- you know, 15, 19 or whatever number of Arabs in a cave outsmarting and debilitating the entire US military and intelligence structure.

The truth of the matter looks like it might be coming out, albeit slowly and painfully.

Lee Hamilton: The 911 Commission is a good place to begin an investigation

link: http://upswing.newsvine.com/_news/2010/10/18/5310110-911-commission-vice-chair-says-911-commission-report-is-nothing-more-...

9/11 Commission Vice Chair Says 9/11 Commission Report Is Nothing More Than a Good Place to BEGIN an Investigation
News Type: Event

— Mon Oct 18, 2010 10:45 AM EDT.By upswing

As I type this, Lee Hamilton, Vice Chair of the 9/11 Commission is being interviewed by Diane Rheim, and he just answered a question from a listener by stating two things:

1. The 9/11 Commission was highly politicised, and

2. The 9/11 Commission is a good "Starting point" from which to investigate the events of 9/11.

Holy Sh*t!

Here is one of the guys in charge of putting together a report that many cite as the final word of the events of 9/11 stating outright that it is no such thing.

Rather, he says, it is a good place to BEGIN an investigation.

Why is the MSM ignoring the deafening call for a truly independent and scientific investigation, with subpoena power, into the events of 9/11?

GENERAL RULES: POSTING AND COMMENTING- http://911blogger.com/rules

http://911blogger.com/rules

911blogger.com is not a message board. This site is not structured for long marathon debates about the veracity of specific claims or hypotheses. If the pace of the comments area does not suit you, consider setting up an account at truthaction.org.

GENERAL RULES: POSTING AND COMMENTING

Posts and comments made on 911blogger.com are stored forever.

Be civil. There have been disagreements about what happened on 9/11 since it happened. If you feel compelled to point out factual errors in a blog entry, back up your observations with linked documentation. Calling another user a liar or a disinformation agent will not be tolerated. If you believe someone is lying post the facts and let the readers decide for themselves.

Do not make this site a rallying point for competing factions to battle and waste our bandwidth and time.

Do not post material that promotes hatred, racism, violence, terrorism or criminal actions.

Do not use the site to continue arguments with other users from thread to thread.

Do not post pornographic, gore, or otherwise non-work safe images or video.

Do not create multiple user accounts.

Alternative Media Censorship: Sponsored by CIA's Ford Foundation, and others

Here is some information that may be helpful in figuring out just why the popular alternative media sites have censored 9/11 truth information.  I have no proof, no evidence, but I think this should be considered as a possible reason for the blockout of the important and scholarly research that many in the 9/11 truth movement have presented.

link:  http://www.questionsquestions.net/gatekeepers.html

ALTERNATIVE MEDIA CENSORSHIP:
SPONSORED BY CIA's FORD FOUNDATION?

by bob feldman

The mass-circulation weekly TEMPO accused Ford of having once played, at the urging of the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency, a covert role in Indonesian political affairs by consciously supporting the work of individuals who were deemed to be sympathetic to the anti-communist aims of American foreign policy.
— Chronicle of Philanthropy, 12/13/01

NIST Video - Overturned Cars, Post-Collapse

So, looking through the newly-released NIST videos and I was struck by multiple videos shot by people at the scene of the Twin Tower collapses. What you see in these edited (by me) videos is a number of cars and trucks overturned (or completely flipped), presumably by the collapse. Now, I realize the "common sense test" is not the most stringent or scientific, but does it make sense to you that a gravitational collapse could/would generate enough force to literally flip cars? The videos in question were shot before any heavy equipment like cranes and/or construction trucks arrived; as you can see in the first clip, the second tower hasn't even come down. Explosive force, no?

Clips used: CBS-Net Dub3 25, WNBC Dub3_65, WNBC Dub10 80, and WNBC Dub10 90.

We Are Change Chicago at Anti-War Rally 10-16-10

We Are Change Chicago at Anti-War Rally 10-16-10

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eq2ZvSd-z0M

We (9/11 Truth for Peace and Justice Movement) should be attending all Anti-War Rallies.

Visibility 911: A dozen Questons about Flight 77 from Kevin Ryan

working link: https://web.archive.org/web/20101023112411/http://visibility911.com/kevinryan/2010/10/a-dozen-questions-about-flight-77-an...

original link:  http://visibility911.com/kevinryan/2010/10/a-dozen-questions-about-flight-77-and-the-pentagon-that-might-lead-to-justice/

A dozen questions about Flight 77 and the Pentagon that might lead to justice, and one that won’t

There are many questions to be answered about the events at the Pentagon on September 11, 2001.    Here are a dozen such questions that, if answered, might help to bring about justice.

  1. Exactly how was Flight 77 hijacked, considering, among other things, that the alleged hijackers were said to be identified as security risks (possibly linked to al Qaeda) when they tried to board, and were not physically imposing (all 5 and a half feet tall or less, and slender in build)?[1]
  2. How was the nation’s air defense system disabled on 9/11, and how could anything have hit the Pentagon approximately 80 minutes after the first plane was known to be hijacked?
  3. Why was Dick Cheney tracking Flight 77?[2]
  4. Why were explosive experts, who had a history of covering-up the OKC bombing and have since been accused of obstructing other investigations, hired to write the FEMA report? (Mete Sozen and Paul Mlakar).[3],[4]
  5. Why did the roof of the Pentagon collapse 30 minutes after impact, giving additional evidence for the use of explosives?   Note:  The use of explosives at the Pentagon seems to be in agreement with the use of a large plane, which would have had little penetrating power.
  6. Why was AMEC, the company that had just finished refurbishing Wedge 1 of the Pentagon, hired to lead the clean-up effort at Ground Zero?[5]
  7. Why did the NTSB not make public reports on any of the planes as is the normal procedure?[6]
  8. Why did none of the planes squawk the hijack code?
  9. Why was the official explanation for alleged phone calls made by Flight 77 passenger Barbara Olsen changed several times, and ultimately how could Ted Olsen’s story make any sense?[7]
  10. Why did high-ranking Pentagon officials cancel travel plans for the morning of September 11 “…apparently because of security concerns.”?[8]
  11. How could Hani Hanjour still have successfully piloted Flight 77 given his poor qualifications?[9]
  12. Why are those interested in The Pentagon not intently reviewing documents released by the FAA and 9/11 Commission that reveal startling questions about the aircraft and events of that day?[10]

Why are these questions NOT being pursued by independent investigators?  That’s because the attention of many potential investigators has been hijacked by the much less useful question of “What hit the Pentagon.”  This is certainly the favorite subject of intentional disruptors and official story supporters.

Pentagon braces for huge WikiLeaks dump on Iraq war

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/us_usa_iraq_leaks

Pentagon braces for huge WikiLeaks dump on Iraq war

By Phil Stewart Phil Stewart

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – The Pentagon said on Sunday it had a 120-member team prepared to review a massive leak of as many as 500,000 Iraq war documents, which are expected to be released by the WikiLeaks website sometime this month.

Jesse Ventura to feature the Pentagon in new season of Conspiracy Theory

Source Link:
http://www.infowars.com/jesse-ventura-this-is-a-country-of-fear/

In this interview with Judge Napolitano, former MN Governor Jesse Ventura says he will be covering the Pentagon attack on 9/11. Although the official website for his show does not mention the 9/11 show, Jesse mentions here in the interview.

http://www.trutv.com/shows/conspiracy_theory/episodes/index.html

IMHO:

RSS