The classroom version is now available, used with permission.

In order to download the video, please cut and paste the following into the address bar of your browser.

https://www.adrive.com/public/5d469784d5d30cd272d859af534fc1d1d2a383bbf0cc4caff5f6ae4222abe570.html

This link will allow you to download and save the video file, so you can play it.

The size is approximately 700 MB, and it will take some time to download.

Suitable for college level classroom discussion:

This is the 45 minute edited version of 9/11 Experts Speak Out, shown at the University of Tennessee presentation.

You can download the file at

https://download.adrive.com/public/view/5d469784d5d30cd272d859af534fc1d1d2a383bbf0cc4caff5f6ae4222abe570.html

We hope to have the entire video, including panel discussion up soon.

News Story from Chattanooga Times Free Press, 11/16/11.

RE: 11/15/11 seminar at University of Tennessee at Chattanooga

Questions should be asked about the science behind the falling of the World Trade Center buildings 10 years ago, panelists agreed Tuesday night.

The University of Tennessee at Chattanooga hosted the event, "The Science of 9/11," which began with a moment of silence for the families who lost loved ones.

The discussion "is an opportunity to illustrate the application of the scientific method to a real life event that most Americans remember exactly where they were," said UTC professor of anthropology Lyn Miles, one of the event's coordinators.

There are also more than 1,500 architects and engineers who have raised scientific questions over the collapse of the World Trade Center and are calling for a full investigation of 9/11, and it's worthwhile to discuss why, she added.

The school showed the documentary "Architects & Engineers 9/11 Truth," also the name of the nonprofit that says the collapse of the buildings was not caused by the impact of the planes but by explosives or controlled demolition.

Close to 300 people attended the event, many university students, who often cheered the comments made from one of the panelists, David Johnson, a University of Tennessee at Knoxville urban planning professor emeritus and urban engineering expert, who also calls for a new investigation of what happened on that day when almost 3,000 people were killed.

http://youtu.be/FyVNfMIDx_M

A decade after the 9/11 terrorist attacks, Ground Zero has been swept
clean, a memorial has been established, and new towers are rising
where the World Trade Center (WTC) buildings once stood.

Something else is rising: the voices of scientists, architects and
engineers who say the official story of the destruction of the World
Trade Center does not fit with eye witness testimony and the laws of
physics. They contend the government agency in charge of the
investigation ignored critical, explosive evidence found at the crime
scene.

A new film, The Science of September 11, encapsulates their arguments
and highlights shocking evidence that is officially unexplained.

The trailer and film are available on You Tube.

The editors say over 1500 architects and engineers are putting their
credibility on the line by confronting the National Institute of
Standards and Technology (NIST) and demanding an independent
investigation.

The documentary is a compilation of previously released videos

This version in 6 parts has well synchronized audio - video.

The film features Richard Gage AIA, Dr. Stephen E. Jones, David Chandler and members of Architects and Engineers for 911 Truth, with original music courtesy of Eva James.

The presentation proves the world trade center buildings were demolished with explosives. It shows why a new scientific investigation and judicial inquiry is needed.

This edited compilation is presented under terms of "Fair Use". The intention of this creation is for non-profit, educational and personal use. Portions of copyrighted material may be included under Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976. Allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching and research. Any other use may require that permission be obtained from the original copyright owner.

The Science of 9/11
This original compilation has a running time of 55 minutes.

If you would like a free DVD quality down link that does not have a problem with the video-audio synchronization, send an email to
911TrueStory@Gmail.com

Current download links include:

You Tube link
http://youtu.be/d8Z_CchNF8A

MP4 file
http://www.archive.org/download/Science_Of_9-11/Science_Of_9-11.mp4

QuickTime .mov file
http://www.archive.org/download/Science_Of_9-11/Science_Of_9-11.mov

This film features Richard Gage AIA, Dr. Stephen E. Jones, David Chandler and members of Architects and Engineers for 911 Truth, with original music courtesy of Eva James.

The presentation shows why a new scientific investigation and judicial inquiry is needed.

See below for the download link to save the DVD ISO file (over 3.1 GB).

https://www.adrive.com/public/ddb8f6f096e2904f6f52bb4b2cb3fb8b75f7259e837cc44d473bcbeaaeee601b.html

After it is saved on your computer or flash drive, you can burn it to a DVD using a program such as ImgBurn.
You can get this at http://ImgBurn.com

You can also download a MP4 file, using You Tube Downloader software, using this link:
http://youtu.be/zDlm3DDQ7BE

This original edit is suitable for college presentations and presentations to staff of Senate and Congressional representatives.

The Science of September 11

If you would like a free DVD quality downlink that does not have a problem with the video-audio synchronization, send an email to
911TrueStory@Gmail.com

Download links:

MP4 file
http://www.archive.org/download/Science_Of_9-11/Science_Of_9-11.mp4

QuickTime .mov file
http://www.archive.org/download/Science_Of_9-11/Science_Of_9-11.mov

You Tube
http://www.youtube.com/user/WTCDemolition?feature=mhee

This film features Richard Gage AIA, Dr. Stephen E. Jones, David Chandler and members of Architects and Engineers for 911 Truth, with original music courtesy of Eva James.

The presentation shows why a new scientific investigation and judicial inquiry is needed.

9/11 Researcher Dr. Graeme McQueen's Radio Interview on KPFA's "Guns and Butter" with Bonnie Faulkner explains how the anthrax attacks, which began one week after September 11 and were made to look like Muslims did it, were later proven to have come from U.S. Military labs.

McQueen says the delivery of this weapons-grade strain of anthrax in envelopes marked "Death to America" and "Allah Is Great," to various parties including Senators Leahy and Daschle, were crucial in perpetuating the environment of fear and getting the Patriot Act passed (audio):

(The topic begins around 11 minutes into the show.)

Listen at

http://www.kpfa.org/archive/id/71693

http://www.archive.org/details/September11ExpertsInterviewed

Suitable for download and playing on IPOD, 25 minute mp4 video.

http://www.archive.org/details/September11ExpertsInterviewed

This is my suggestion for a mp4 (mpeg4) video that can run on IPOD and go viral. It runs 25 minutes, and can be downloaded at this link.

http://www.archive.org/details/EvidenceOfWorldTradeCenterDemolition-ExpertsInterviewed

This is my suggestion for a 40 minute remix edit of 911 Explosive Evidence: Experts Speak Out.

The official pre-release version is over 2 hours long and contains redundant material.

AE911Truth plans on releasing their final, high quality DVD in October. I URGE YOU TO BUY IT WHEN IT IS RELEASED.

My edited remix includes low quality footage of Steven Jones from the San Francisco press conference, where he describes the red-gray chips. I hope the editors of the final DVD release decide to include the original footage.

Journalof911Studies.com and other sites provide broken links to peer reviewed papers.

The links that are currently provided were valid prior to a redesign of the Benthan web site.

Since the Benthan site has been changed, I have not been able to access the following articles through the Benthan site:

Fourteen Points of Agreement with Official Government Reports on the WTC Destruction

Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe

Copies of the original papers ARE STILL AVAILABLE at the following locations:

A pdf copy of the 14 Points of Agreement paper is at
http://www.911truth.org/Articles/FourteenPoints_Jonesetal.pdf

A pdf copy of the Active Thermitic Material Paper is at
http://buildingwhat.org/downloads/Full_Thermite_paper.pdf

benthan-open.org no longer seems to be a supported web site URL.

The new top level URL seems to be http://www.bentham.org/open/index.htm

It seems that bentham is only allowing free access to the CURRENT ISSUE of each of their open journals. In order to see an article from a previous issue, it looks like one must order and pay for a reprint.

http://www.archive.org/details/WorldTradeCenterDemolitionsProofOfThermite

This 13 minute video is part of the Press Conference presentation made by Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth in September 2010.

It is a reply to critics who have denied the presence of:

Vast amounts of molten iron found at the sites, formed by thermitic reaction;

Tiny microspheres of iron, indicative of heat sufficient to vaporize iron;

Nanothermite explosive chips in the World Trade Center dust.

Many people use Wikipedia to give them at least an overview of a topic.

Unfortunately, it appears the current Wikipedia entry regarding the controlled demolition theory is seriously out of date.

See

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Trade_Center_controlled_demolition_conspiracy_theories

An effort is needed regarding planning and execution, and this effort may take several months to obtain results.

The effort needs to be:
Reasonable
Thoughtful
Coordinated
Persistent

Here is my proposal:

I am NOT calling for active attempts to submit revisions to Wikipedia at this time.

Planning and discussion must occur first.

A small group of persons should be responsible for the effort.

First, corrections and omissions need to be identified within the structure of the existing Wikipedia entry.

(It is not reasonable to expect they will create a brand new entry or category.)

Second, a person or committee chair who is familiar with the Wikipedia entry edit process would begin the formal revision process.

Each attempt at revision must be documented.