(For a historical archive of our old site visit http://911blogger.com/archive)
A few minutes of your time could just reap rewards that benefit so many more of the global community. So act now please!
No matter your personal stance on the events of 9/11, the world gave its sympathy that fateful day to the victims and the grieving. The international community was behind America in the sorrow of the atrocity…..SO WHERE R THEY NOW???
The victim’s families continue to fight for closure over the events and to raise global awareness of their plight. http://www.911pressfortruth.com/timeline & http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=5589099104255077250&q=9%2F11+Press+for+Truth
All the while wars are being waged in the name of 9/11 at the expense of innocence, whilst future wars are pending for the spread of ‘freedom and democracy.’
From certain viewpoints, the very freedoms of the people of sovereign nations have become downtrodden internationally and not from the Terrorists who supposedly hate them so much but from the very policy makers of these wars, in the name of ‘security’.
9/11 VICTIMS NEED YOUR HELP
Reqesting to add digg botton to 9/11 huge smoking gun bbc forknowlege blog
I would like to request that everyone please watch this. This was one of the most emotional presentations I've ever seen. My heart goes out to all of these people. Thank you Michele Little, Bob McIlvaine, Janette MacKinlay, Luke Rudkowski, and Mrs. Wallace.
Many thanks to The Citizen's Advocate, and to bruce1337 for uploading it to Google Video.
Were Harley Guy and Jerome Hauer channeling each other on the morning of September 11, 2001?
...from the morning of September 11, 2001:
Dan Rather: Based on what you know, and I recognize we’re dealing with so few facts, is it possible that just a plane crash could have collapsed these buildings, or would it have required the, sort of, prior positioning of other explosives in the, uh, in the buildings? I mean, what do you think?
Jerome Hauer: No, I, uh, my sense is just the velocity of the plane and the fact that you have a plane filled with fuel hitting that building, uh, that burned, uh, the velocity of that plane, uh, certainly, uh, uh, had an impact on the structure itself, and then the fact that it burned and you had that intense heat, uh, probably weakened the structure as well, uh, and I think it, uh, was, uh, simply the, uh, the planes hitting the buildings, and, and causing the collapse.
Full text included in this post. However, nice formatting, links, and images here:
Hope you´ll understand me, I´m from Denmark and might misspell or use wrong terms.
I´ll start by saying I´m NOT a Bush-fan and I don´t want t affend anyone, I really feel for those who lossed their loved ones on 9/11.
Does anyone think it really was a planned demolition that made the twin-towers fall and if it was: WHY?
I guess that´s what everyone wants to know, but I can´t help but to think that tapes of "Controlled freefall"
could be tampered with also. It´s an apolling thought that anyone would do that, but knowing Bush and his wardesires
maybe it´s not such a big surprise. I know that our primeminister went into the war against terrorism on false
conditions, and I really believe that he knew about it, so it isn´t hard for me to imagine Bush as to pull such a stunt.
Afterall it is a very good reason for revenge, isn´t it? Butas a human being I´m puzzled. I don´t get the una-bomber or
Tim McVeigh either, I mean.. To take someones life! Some just doesn´t have a concience.
The evidence speaks for itself, but as seen many times before, people can be payed to say and "prove" anything.
"The official US Commission investigation into 9/11 has been widely discredited. The Commission's Executive Director Philip D. Zelikow was a Bush White House insider who had the power to direct investigations away from certain topics. Much of the evidence presented was heard in secret by Mr Zelikow and not passed on to the other Commissioners. The 9/11 Victim's Families have called for a new independent and international investigation."
Please sign the petition which can be found here:
I recently attended the showing of "Improbable Collapse" in Greensboro, NC for the NC film festival. Afterwards there was a Q & A session to discuss what we had seen in the film with the director and writers of the film. The film was really educational, and the dialogue after the film was very informative. But, I only have one complaint, and this is for the entire 9/11 truth movement. I found that most people that attended this film had very liberal ties and seemed to be searching for yet more things to bash Bush and blame his administration for. We in the truth movement have to be very cautious when meshing our political views and the tragedy of that day. I am a conservative, but I am not so blind in my faith that I can not see the forest for the trees. This administration is a corrupt administration, but it is no more corrupt than previous admins. This thing is much bigger than simple party lines. If the movement truly wants results, we can not start the conversation with Bush did this or Bush did that...keep political bias out of it, as hard as that may be. The movement should be based soley on a new investigation.
digg_url = 'http://digg.com/world_news/The_untold_story_of_9_11';
World Trade Centre janitor William Rodriguez was there when the aircraft struck the Towers and was decorated for his heroism in rescuing survivors. Ahead of an appearance in Lewes, he speaks to Angela Wintle about the experience and the disturbing questions he's been asking ever since.
The Argus is a local newspaper with a daily readership of over 80,000. This weekend it ran a suppliment that had William Rodriguez and 9/11 on the entire front page and ran the story over the centre and one more page for a full three pages.
This is not a hit piece and to my mind is totally fair and balanced. I have already thanked them for running the piece and am looking forward to seeing William tonight!
See at 15:00 time mark.
On September 11th 2001, BBC World reported at 4:57pm Eastern Time that the Salomon Brothers Building (more commonly known as WTC7 or World Trade Building 7) had collapsed.
This even made the 5pm EST headlines, what is bizarre is that the building did not actually collapse until 5:20pm EST.
9/11 was unusual enough, without BBC World being able to foretell the destiny of WTC 7.
What is even stranger, is that the women reporter is telling the world that the building had collapsed when you can see it in the background over her left shoulder.
Then at 5:15pm EST, just five minutes before the building did actually collapse, her live connection from New York to London mysteriously fails.
So the question is, on 9/11 how did the BBC learn that WTC7 collapsed 23 minutes before it actually did.
Building Seven was 47 storeys, modern in design with structural steel throughout, yet symmetrically collapsed in 6.5 seconds, was someone leaking information.
I watched 60 Minutes tonight and they ran a segment called:
Brundibar: How The Nazis Conned The World
In the story, one of the men in the Nazi camp, Paul Sandfort, made this very profound statement:
Sandfort acknowledges the Nazis did convince the world. "But they only convinced the world because the world wanted to be convinced. It's easier."
This is how the truth of 9/11 is being hidden. bush/cheney, etc learned from the masters...Hitler and the Nazi's on how to hide the truth.
They knew the vast majority in this country "can't handle the truth".
Or simply don't want to know the truth, because it's easier.
Because once they know the truth, then they'll have to do something.
And most people don't want to do something.
But we must!!