http://news.prnewswire.com/DisplayReleaseContent.aspx?ACCT=ind_focus.story&STORY=/www/story/07-14-2009/0005059621&EDATE=

9/11 Commission Reconvenes as Bipartisan Policy Center's National Security Preparedness Group

Thomas Kean and Lee Hamilton Lead Center's Newest Project

WASHINGTON, July 14 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- Building on the highly acclaimed work of the 9/11 Commission, the Bipartisan Policy Center (BPC) today announced the launch of a new project called the National Security Preparedness Group (NSPG) to further examine the changing threats to the United States. Under the leadership of 9/11 Commission Chair, Thomas H. Kean, and Vice Chair, Lee H. Hamilton, the NSPG will focus its efforts on national intelligence, terrorism, and security issues, continuing the work of the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States (9/11 Commission) and its successor, the 9/11 Public Discourse Project.

(Peter Lance took note of my Daily Kos diary entry titled "The Wreck of the Patrick Fitzgerald", and although he and I might never agree on the true nature of "al Qaeda", there is something fundamentally wrong about the way that Patrick Fitzgerald has gone after Lance and HarperCollins, threatening legal action if the trade paperback version of Triple Cross saw the light of day. It seems to me that somebody wants the information in Triple Cross suppressed. In my opinion, it is the story of Ali Mohamed, still unknown to so many Americans, and other people around the world, that is causing such a fuss. Anyhow, take a look at Lance's latest article, and decide for yourself just what is going on here. -rep.)

"Mr. Fitz, in your threat to sue for libel, please, either put up or shut up"

by Peter Lance - July 15th, 2009

Seven weeks ago Patrick Fitzgerald, the most intimidating Federal prosecutor in America, sent my publisher (HarperCollins) and me a letter threatening to sue us for libel if Triple Cross, a book I wrote, critical of his anti-terrorism track record, was published.

Yesterday marked the four week anniversary of the book's pub date and although it's been out for a month, we're still waiting for his summons and complaint.

It was the fourth threat letter that Fitzgerald had sent since October 2007 and the man who’d succeeded in getting New York Times reporter Judith Miller jailed for 85 days in the CIA leak probe, was growing impatient.

"To put it plain and simple," Fitzgerald wrote, "if in fact you publish the book this month and it defames me or casts me in a false light, HarperCollins will be sued." ...

Continued...
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2009/7/15/753730/-Peter-Lance:-Mr.-Fitz,-in-your-threat-to-sue-for-libel,-please,-either...

9/11 activist Aidan Monaghan just proposed an idea for a national direct action campaign to provide notice to Congress of the nano-thermite evidence -AND- their duty as federal officials under the US Constitution. To quote Mr. Monaghan:

"Satisfactory notice of the nano-thermite evidence upon federal figures can apparently be achieved via certified mail. The signed and returned USPS notice (green card) is deemed valid evidence of service during federal litigation for example."

"Effort Should Be Nationwide. National legislators generally only respond to their constituents. Legislators and their staff are likely highly motivated to open and read all correspondence, and it should be assumed that they do so. In light of this, confirmed receipt (signed USPS confirmation) of the nano-thermite research material and a note regarding ones duty under "CHAPTER 115-- TREASON, SEDITION, AND SUBVERSIVE ACTIVITIES-- See 2382. "Misprision of treason," may compel these federal figures to act.

And this may eventually lead to a wider federal probe."

"Reason and experiment have been indulged, and error has fled before them. It is error alone which needs the support of government. Truth can stand by itself." --Thomas Jefferson

THE BATTLE FOR BELIEF : A SOCIOLOGISTS RESEARCH IN 9/11 ARGUMENTATION — MICHAEL ARMENIA

We are at war, and one of the most critical and dangerous frontline is not in Afghanistan, Iraq or Iran. Rather, it is the battleground within the human psyche. Individual and collective minds are waging psychological warfare in what promises to be one of the most intense struggles in American history, if not all of human history. How do we communicate the truth about the events of 9/11 to those who have been deceived by the operation and its cover-up in the media? Are logic, reason, and science enough?