Coming this fall, “9/11 in the Academic Community,” a Winner of the University of Toronto Film Festival, is a unique film that documents academia's treatment of critical perspectives on 9/11 by exploring the taboo that shields the American government's narrative from scholarly examination. Through a powerful reflection on intellectual courage and the purpose of academia, the film aims at changing intellectual discourse on 9/11 and the War on Terror.
All efforts are being made to make this film available by this October. Please widely distribute the following video preview: Youtube Video Preview: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OFzVKDdCa6s
Janette Mackinlay, 1948 - 2010 was an artist, 9/11 survivor and activist for 9/11 Truth and justice. This video (in 2 parts) shows Janette's presentation at the University of California Davis on May 1, 2009.
The occasion was Prof. Steven E. Jones' first public presentation of his research on dust from the World Trade Center. Janette was the first person to give Prof. Jones a sample of dust from the World Trade Center. Prof. Jones, Prof. Niels Harrit and other scientists found red gray chips in the dust, some visible to the naked eye. Scientific examination revealed that these were unexploded pieces of nanothermite, a military grade explosive researched and developed at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratories in Livermore, California.
Disconnecting the Dots: How 9/11 Was Allowed to Happen
By Kevin Fenton
As reported here in 2010, 911Blogger and History Commons contributor Kevin Fenton has recently released his long anticipated book: Disconnecting the Dots: How 9/11 Was Allowed to Happen which is now available on amazon.com
David Chandler Talks About His New DVD “9/11 Analysis” and Rationalizes the Pentagon Debate on Visibility 9-11
Show notes and interview by: John Bursill
This timely and important Podcast is a MUST listen!
Listen here: http://visibility911.com/blog/?p=1874
David who describes himself as a “pacifist” talks in great depth about his journey on the campaign for 9/11 Truth and Justice which he is passionately dedicated. Many of you may be aware it was David who is credited with getting NIST to admit WTC Building 7 fell at a an acceleration consistent with free-fall due to gravity; which I and many others view as the single most powerful debating tool for us as 9/11 Truth advocates! David disputes he is solely responsible for this and says that Jones, Ryan and others were central to this achievement but it was his question that drew the answer in the end so it seems. David also talks about the highly political timing and nature of the NIST Building 7 report.
Hello Truthseekers & Truthtellers,
Are you aware of this statement: "No modern political ruling group has successfully controlled its constituency after failing to sustain the continuing credibility of an external threat of war." These words were taken from the "The Report From Iron Mountain" (1967). The official government account of 9/11 continues to lose its credibility thanks to the 9/11 Truth Movement. Stay positive in your pursuit of truth. If you haven't read this report consider reading it because it will give you a lot to think about when it ...comes to war and peace. I attached a link to the report. Take Care Matt
Visibility 9-11 Welcomes Jon Gold
Interview by John Bursill
This week on Visibility 9-11 we have Jon Gold, a long-time 9/11 truth activist who is currently building bridges between the 9/11 truth movement and the peace movement. Jon talks about two very important and groundbreaking events that he is participating in March. The details are below.
Treason in America: 9/11, The Wars & Our Broken Constitution Conference
Valley Forge Convention Center
March 6 & 7th
This event brings together peace activists, whistleblowers, alternative media and 9/11 truth advocates to a conference discussing the issues and problems produced by the 9/11 attacks and cover-up. Jon will be the MC at this event and the speakers include Richard Gage AIA, Cindy Sheehan, Lt. Colonel Anthony Shaffer, Bob McIlvaine, Daniel Sunjata and Luke Rudkowski just to name a few! Neither left nor right, this gathering is truly groundbreaking.
Please support this event, see details here: www.treasoninamericaconference.com
Peace of the Action
"Reason and experiment have been indulged, and error has fled before them. It is error alone which needs the support of government. Truth can stand by itself." --Thomas Jefferson
THE BATTLE FOR BELIEF : A SOCIOLOGISTS RESEARCH IN 9/11 ARGUMENTATION — MICHAEL ARMENIA
We are at war, and one of the most critical and dangerous frontline is not in Afghanistan, Iraq or Iran. Rather, it is the battleground within the human psyche. Individual and collective minds are waging psychological warfare in what promises to be one of the most intense struggles in American history, if not all of human history. How do we communicate the truth about the events of 9/11 to those who have been deceived by the operation and its cover-up in the media? Are logic, reason, and science enough?
Tuesday June 16, 2009
Dr. Yuan T. Lee is a 1986 Chemistry Nobel Laureate.
After his public lecture, we briefly explained the findings of the "Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the World Trade Center Catastrophe" peer-reviewed paper and politely asked him to review it.
- One Professor at a Time -
University of Waterloo 9/11 Research Group
Activist editors at Wikipedia have changed the name of the "World Trade Center Controlled Demolition Hypothesis" page to "World Trade Center Demolition Conspiracy Theories", are removing all links to the paper "Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe" recently published in the refereed Open Chemical Physics Journal (including from the 9/11 Truth Movement page and even Dr. Steven Jones' page), and have banned and/or restricted some users that re-add the links and question their policy.
See the discussion thread at TruthAction.org- many links to relevant pages at Wikipedia; the "Talk" page is very revealing of their bias, hypocrisy and intellectual dishonesty:
Wikipedia editors livid over new paper
The new paper has pulled the rug out from under the wikipedia front lines defending the official story and they have now suddenly changed the title of the demolition page from --
Controlled demolition hypothesis for the collapse of the World Trade Center
World Trade Center controlled demolition conspiracy theories
"This collection contains more than 5 terabytes of data gathered from 9/11/2001 to the present. The collection of archived documents was commissioned by the Library of Congress to preserve digital materials covering the events of September 11, 2001. Additional assistance has been provided by Alexa Internet, webArchivist.org and Pew Internet & American Life."
"Highlighted on the webpage are a few of the many thousands of sites represented in this Internet library." http://web.archive.org/collections/sep11.html
(My thanks to Garko for pointing out this website.)
I send this letter to both the pilots for 911truth and the ae911truth sites.
I there is anybody here from either sites or some of the other scholars for 911 truth they are cordially invited to help me on the subject.
This is the letter:
Together with my husband I ran a SFX company for 18 years.
Nothing glamorous, no big blockbusters, just a lot of hard work, long days and nasty deadlines.
We worked primarily in the advertisement world and did what is called table top SFX. We made moving models, computer animated in the real world, in preparation for the compilation of the filmed material with film editing software.
Still, we kept abreast of all the latest big screen effects and we always if only for the fun of it analyzed the sfx movies we saw.
After we stopped with our company in search of a more relaxed lifestyle, I was able to become a full time 911 researcher and I now run a blog (see signature).
I am also working on analysing what was obviously one of the most spectacular SFX productions of all times: the events of 911!
I try to put the events together from an SFX engineer's point of view.
I am planning to go to the National Archives in D.C. (actually the branch in College Park, Maryland) to look at this http://arcweb.archives.gov/arc/arch_results_detail.jsp?&pg=52&si=0&nh=65&st=b
Do you guys think it will be worth it? It ostensibly has over 1,400 images. Has anyone else gone to see if there is anything of value in terms of new photographs, especially of damage to wtc 7? I don't want to waste my time and money if anyone can convince me it won't be a fruitful search. It does talk about the photos being of the "aftermath", but I don't know if that means it has pictures from the day or not. Anyway, any recommendations would be appreciated.
A site is being designed to be the largest single collection of WTC 1 and 2 research photos available on the internet.
Please submit links to your favorite photo archive sites so I can collect all photos and links in one place for easy public reference.
Also included: Photo analysis, studies of WTC core structures, photo collection of apparent bomb damage to core column sections, mappings of possible bomb locations, analysis of North Tower "spire". The site is at
This is a work in progress. Please contribute your favorite photo links and watch the site grow.
Here is a never before-released video of the WTC attacks. This has to be the clearest and most detailed video surrounding the terrorist attack on the towers. The video is graphic in depicting the collapse of the first tower. 9/11 Was An Inside Job
What We Saw Never before-released video of the WTC attacks
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=5474006551011489413&hl=en 26 min
Loose Change: Final Cut Footage
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1375208054676470714 1 hour
I hope readers will find that this old piece of mine remains relevant as a guide today.
TEN SCENARIOS OF WHAT MAY HAVE HAPPENED ON SEPTEMBER 11th, 2001
By Nicholas Levis
(Original April 1, 2004 - revised May 2006)
Of the attempts to categorize 9/11 theories I've seen, some beg questions or unfairly characterize what people think. Most are simply vague in their terms. I have tried to do better with the following list of nine graduated options, which I believe fairly describe the differing opinions people actually have (short of those who believe in divine or extraterrestrial intervention). This remains a mental exercise, but I hope it helps sharpen our logic.
1 THE OFFICIAL STORY