Ok my stand on the 9/11 ordeal is simple. I think that the governent definitly had some involvment in it. To what extent? I'm not sure. But one thing I do know is the fact that the government is trying to cover their own ass while killing innocent bystanders in the meantime. If this doesn't sicken the percentage of the schmuck's who voted for this idiot president of ours, then I don't know what to say. Look on the news. See how many innocent children are being killed. How would you feel if you were sitting in your house, minding your own business and all the sudden
you're dead. You've done nothing to deserve this, but yet because you are in that paticular area, you should die. Honestly, it's sickening.

Four U.S. Congressional Candidates from Arizona Support a Truly Independent Reinvestigation of All 9/11 Evidence and Events - Press Release (PDF attached to this post)

Tucson, AZ, Oct. 22, 2006 - Statewide results of the 2006 Congressional Candidate 9/11 Truth Poll are in. The survey was conducted by 911Truth-Tucson by mailing questionnaires to the winners of the recent Arizona primary races for US House and Senate in all Arizona congressional districts. The surveys were provided by 911Truth.org -- a leading national 9/11 Truth group. The survey asked candidates for their opinions regarding the attacks of September 11 and the official investigations that followed.

Five candidates responded to the poll:

Richard Mack	Senate	Libertarian
Mark Yannone	CD3	Libertarian
Don Karg	CD4	Republican
Warren Severin	CD5	Libertarian
David Nolan	CD8	Libertarian

(more after the jump, be sure to download the original PDF attached)

Reprinted from Resistance Intelligencer

I think everyone can agree that the campaign to get the information out there to the people has been a resounding success thus far, the results to every poll are a testament to that.

Is it time to take the next step and start wielding some of the power this movement has accumulated? It is often said that senior citizens wield a considerable amount of political might in the United States. For the most part this is because they have numbers and they get out and vote, reliably and consistantly. While I think their power has somewhat decreased in recent years, there can be no doubt that political candidates make concessions to this power, and even at times go out of their way to mollify them, if for no other reason than through the fear that this voting bloc may come out in strength against them. I feel that the Truth Movement could rival this power and most likely excede it.

We certainly have the numbers on our side. Just look at any of the many online polls and you see the numbers... remember the Charlie Sheen poll? How about the 0wnage of the United 93 forums? Hell, check some net traffic reports or data on search terms, 9/11 Truth sites are some of the busiest out there. That's some serious numbers.

Building a Brighter Future

The Current Situation

Together, we can and will build a brighter future. Yet in order to give meaningful suggestions for this, we first
need to speak candidly about what's happening in the world at present. Based
on the abundance of reliable, verifiable information provided on the www.WantToKnow.info website, it appears that there are factions within the world's power elite which desire to exert as much control over the world as possible. Their primary means for establishing control are through promoting fear, secrecy, and polarization, and through distracting people from their deeper purpose in life. As these factions gain ever greater power and control, our freedoms and liberties are increasingly taken away, sometimes without our even realizing it.

I was in the process of making a music video in recognition of the 911 victims. I came across the vidoes about the cover up. I had seen this before and some what doubted it. Then as I was remembering what I was doing five years ago while I lay awake watching a rebroadcast of the Today Show from 9/11/01on MSNBC today. It came to me. I would hope to say that five years and counting of higher education would consider me an educated individual. There are three things that don't add up. The interview of a man in the Pentagon at the time of the "Plane Crash" basically proved the questionable facts I had gained from watching the video about a year and a half ago. To much of my surprise there has been ample amounts of facts proven in the newer versions. Either way, I still doubted it till about an hour ago. The questions I had about the Pentegon where, how does one here a crash/explosion and not evacuate the building. I don't care if it is built to withstand war time. Anyone would seek shelter in fear of other attacks, per se. He was being interviewed in his office with a co-worker, he didn't seem frightened to me. Rather, nervous his story wasn't adding up. Lastly, I was watching the rebroadcast and I thought to myself, when the Towers fall if it imploads then it was a cover up. Unfortunately, it didn't. The point where the plane hit first began to crumble appearing to bring down the other sections of the Towers outwards. I thought then see no cover up. One last fact that came to me was I remembered thinking to myself, at the point of the first tower collapsing, that it didn't seem logical or scientifically possible to me. I had class so I shrugged it off and ran off. So in answer to my question about the imploading. They had to have poorly placed the explosives in a manner that would make it seem as if it wasn't a planned demolition. One other thing that comes to mind is, I also noticed that later on in the year or perhaps the new year following 9/11 I remembered hearing about several members of Bush's administration resigning. I then thought to myself, why is every one doing this so fast after 9/11?

http://gaelicstarover.blogspot.com/2006/08/mary-maxwell-phd.html

Republican Congressional Candidate, Author and Political Scientist, Dr. Mary Maxwell has responded to my earlier post

"I doubt that Sen Gregg actually said that. No New Hampshire Republican would take such a position against the Constitution. More likely, the words were supplied by the editor of The Union Leader (also known locally as The Management Follower). I believe many quotes in newspapers are written without benefit of a telephone call to the speaker. In any case I suspect that the episode of the professor would not have made the news (after all it is not an event) but for the fact that I am running for Congress here in New Hampshire, and on Thursday another paper came out with the jaw-dropper that I had labeled 9/11 a false flag operation. I am indeed proud of the Nashua Telegraph for letting me say my piece..."

Click here for more information about Dr. Maxwell's Congressional campaign.

Connie Fogal, leader of the Canadian Action Party speaks out, topics include the North American Union and 9/11 from the perspective of a political party.

Connie Fogal - 30m, 29s - 108mb

Thanks to www.stoplying.ca for sending this in.

GOP candidate says 9/11 attacks were a hoax

From New Hampshire's Nashua Telegraph
By ALBERT McKEON, Telegraph Staff
Published: Thursday, Aug. 24, 2006

A Republican candidate for this area’s congressional seat said Wednesday that the U.S. government was complicit in the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.

In an editorial board interview with The Telegraph on Wednesday, the candidate, Mary Maxwell, said the U.S. government had a role in killing nearly 3,000 people at the World Trade Center and Pentagon, so it could make Americans hate Arabs and allow the military to bomb Muslim nations such as Iraq.

Maxwell, 59, seeks the 2nd District congressional seat. The Concord resident opposes the incumbent, Charles Bass of Peterborough, and Berlin Mayor Bob Danderson in the Republican primary Sept. 12.

Maxwell would not specify if she holds the opinion that the government stood by while terrorists hijacked four domestic airliners and used them as weapons, or if it had a larger role by sanctioning and carrying out the attacks.

But she implicated the government by saying the Sept. 11 attacks were meant “to soften us up . . . to make us more willing to have more stringent laws here, which are totally against the Bill of Rights . . . to make us particularly focus on Arabs and Muslims . . . and those strange persons who spend all their time creating little bombs,” giving Americans a reason “to hate them and fear them and, therefore, bomb them in Iraq for other reasons.”

In Oklahoma's historic 5th district congressional race, the State's largest newspaper utilized an underused adjective to describe '9/11 Truth' candidate Matthew Horton Woodson's statement 'any objective observer realizes that domestic criminal must have been involved with the horrors of 9/11' as 'malarkey'.

History was made when this very conservative newspaper in the 'home of the heartland' printed the words 'controlled demolition' of 'one of the buildings that collapsed near the Twin Towers'. The Daily Oklahoman has only printed the words "World Trade Center 7" twice in it's history. So I call this progress!

It should be noted that the Daily Oklahoman's office building was damaged in the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing, and now has it's headquarters in a modern high rise.

While Mary Fallin and Mick Cornett have tried to win Republican voters in the 5th District congressional race, an independent seeking the office has gone about advancing 9/11 conspiracy theories. Matthew Woodson sent an e-mail this week that mentioned a "controlled demolition" of one of the buildings that collapsed near the Twin Towers. "Any objective observer realizes that domestic criminals must have been involved with the horrors of 9/11." That kind of malarkey, similar to state House candidate Charles Key's fixation with the Oklahoma City bombing, costs a candidate all credibility.