Those thinking of demonstrating in DC this September 11th may want to consider the recent comments by Cindy Sheehan, there is a good chance that no 9/11 Truth will be heard. Rick Siegel is going to DC this September, however Cindy is likely to get all the press. A good alternative is the demonstration at Ground Zero.

Good write up by Dem Bruce Lee Styles, follow the hyperlink for the whole thing.

http://www.yourbbsucks.com/forum/showthread.php?p=65112#post65112

You and me both:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/

The director of a new documentary on September 11 fears that two upcoming Hollywood dramatizations of the World Trade Center attacks may eclipse her project.

"I hope the truth does not get lost amongst the fiction," Linda Ellman, a former NBC News producer, who made her film directorial debut with "On Native Soil," told Reuters.

"I don't have a problem with fictionalized stories or fictionalized efforts about 9/11, because people need to be kept aware and should never forget. I just hope the truth isn't replaced by fiction, because the truth is shocking," she said.

What's wrong with the following paragraph?

Obviously, in order to present his theories, he must have a firm grounding in many scientific disciplines as well as some knowledge of engineering in order to debunk the established theory that two 767s filled with hundreds of thousands of pounds of jet fuel plowed into two 110 story buildings at more than 500 miles per hour, igniting and burning the fuel at several thousand degrees causing support structures to weaken until the weight bearing beams holding up the top several floors gave way allowing the entire edifice to pancake down to the ground. But Mr. Barrett has so far not shown that he has any expertise in anything, much less his possessing the specialized and collective knowledge of The American Society of Civil Engineers, whose brilliant analysis of why the towers fell is generally accepted in the scientific community as the best theory available about how the disaster happened.

911Truth.org has a brief new article about the "Military Exercises" that preceeded, and took place on, 9/11. To give it some context, I'll post some links to some other, older articles, as well.

Exclusive Report: Did Military Exercises Facilitate the 9/11 Pentagon Attack? - July 2006

...We can see that Pentagon training exercises prior to 9/11 routinely involved the simulated crashing of an aircraft into the building. But might another such exercise have been scheduled for the morning of 9/11? There are various pieces of evidence indicating this may have been the case. Although the existence of such an exercise has never been stated explicitly, this might be because the exercise was declared classified....