http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nUgvgSPwPJw

Architects & Engineers For 9/11 Truth joined several other organizations and everyday citizens on Wednesday, September 11, 2013, engaging other New Yorkers and encouraging them to rethink 9/11. ReThink911 (http://www.ReThink911.org) is a global awareness campaign to bring the world's attention to 9/11 best evidence and a growing demand for a new independent investigation into the events of 9/11.

http://philadelphia.cbslocal.com/2013/09/11/group-of-engineers-believe-controlled-detonations-took-down-world-trade-center/

By Paul Kurtz
September 11, 2013

BLACKWOOD, N.J. (CBS) - There’s been a growing movement led by some architects and engineers to take a second look at the collapse of the New York City skyscrapers in the attacks on September 11th 2001.

“Architects and Engineers for 911 Truth” focuses primarily on Building 7 of the World Trade Center. Not many people know that a third building fell on 9-11. Tony Szambotti is a mechanical engineer from Blackwood, New Jersey. He says the 47 story skyscraper was not hit by a plane…yet collapsed into its own footprint at 5:20 in the afternoon.

“It’s in absolute freefall. There’s no resistance to it for the first 2.25 seconds and then it slows down a little bit,” Szambotti said. “The actual measurements are somewhere around 6.6 to 7 seconds for that 610 foot building to collapse completely to the ground.”

Szambotti and some 2,000 other of his colleagues contend that it was not scientifically possible for an office fire to be hot enough to melt steel girders and columns. Which brings these highly educated, white-collar professionals to a disturbing conclusion.

Interview 748 – James Corbett on the Psychopolitics of 9/11 12 Sep 2013

Podcast: http://www.corbettreport.com/?powerpress_pinw=7983-podcast

On this edition of Traces of Reality Radio: Guillermo is joined by the host of The Corbett Report, James Corbett. James and Guillermo discuss the 9/11 Truth Movement, pitfalls and successes—its past, present, and future.

We discuss the political, sociological and psychological effects of 9/11, to what extent these effects linger 12 years later, the importance of focusing research efforts into specific questions of “who” and “why” rather than quibbling over “how,” and the potential avenues available to take and seek real answers and accountability.

Has Questioning 9/11 become more Acceptable?

By Nile Bowie
September 11, 2013

Despite the media’s best efforts to dismiss 9/11 conspiracy theories, one in two Americans doubt the government’s narrative and skepticism is slowly seeping its way into the mainstream.

Twelve years on from the events of September 11th 2001 and a seemingly nightmarish deja vu has gripped the United States and its war-weary citizens. Again, the pubic is told that destructive weapons in far away countries pose a critical danger, and that despite wearing the clothes of humanitarianism, a military solution that will inevitably harm civilians is the only meaningful response. The main difference today is that after an abstract decade-long “War on Terror,” Washington finds itself fighting in Syria on the same side as al-Qaeda and those who are sympathetic to the alleged culprits of the 9/11 attacks.

The international relations landscape has changed dramatically over the past twelve years, and in the build-up to another US military intervention in West Asia, a handful of leaders are today more willing to ask common sense questions about the official line toed by Washington, such as: How can the Obama administration assert that Assad used chemical weapons before the UN team of experts on the ground have even published their findings?  

World leaders have cast doubt on Washington’s stories before, but that the leaders of major countries have – ever so gently – insinuated that Washington may be complicit in a ‘false flag operation’ to justify military escalation in Syria is quite significant. As the diplomatic spectacle around Syria unfolds and the anniversary of 9/11 looms, these times beg the question, “What else could they be lying about?