Video footage posted on YouTube refutes NIST's claim of no evidence for explosions in WTC7.

At the media briefing on the NIST Investigation into the Collapse of World Trade Center Building 7, August 21, 2008, lead investigator Dr Sham Sunder claimed "We did not find any evidence that explosives were used in the collapse of Building 7. We ran down detailed computer simulations of blast scenarios - what you see in the slide are the expected air pressures from the smallest possible blast capable of crippling a critical column. This size blast would have produced an incredibly large sound that was not recorded on videos of the collapse nor reported by witnesses"

3/2/2010: Miscellaneous - Updates as March 2, 2010
http://www.historycommons.org/news.jsp?oid=140393703-975
Several miscellaneous entries have been published in the 9/11 Timeline over the last couple of weeks. In the late 1990s, Air Force General Richard Myers thought NORAD’s radar system and control software inadequate, whereas Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Advanced Technology Joseph Eash was concerned about the use of a plane as a weapon over the same period.

Shortly before the attacks, a self-proclaimed intelligence agent called Susan Lindauer warned relatives of an upcoming terrorist attack in New York and a large number of shares were purchased in a WTC security company. Further, a NORAD exercise had terrorists threatening to blow up an airliner five days before 9/11 and some suspicious visitors tried to enter the control tower at Logan Airport in Boston two days later.

Finally, after the attacks had ended, FAA officials were too busy to write an after action report.

***************************************************************************************************************

http://tvnewslies.org/tvnl/index.php/radio-show/58-broadcasts/13227-firefighters-for-911-truth.html

Fire Fighters for 9/11 Truth on TVNL Radio tonite

Live Broadcast: Wednesday, March 3rd, 2010. 8:00 PM ET.

A common sense test: You’re dispatched to a house fire in a 2 story with
a basement. Upon arrival, all 3 floors are well involved. After the fire
has been extinguished, the neighbor across the street tells you he saw
flashes on all 3 floors within seconds of each other. It turns out the
owner has arson convictions on his record. You smell gasoline. Now, should
you test the debris for accelerants? No matter what the owner and his
friends tell you, wouldn’t you still test it? It’s a
“NO-Brainer”…isn’t it?

Let's hear what some firefighters have to say about the events of that
horrible day. Join our guest, Erik Lawyer from Firefighters for 9/11 Truth
(http://firefightersfor911truth.org/), to hear what a growing number of
firefighters have to say about what happened to the WTC.

http://tvnewslies.org/tvnl/index.php/radio-show/58-broadcasts/13227-firefighters-for-911-truth.html

[Submitted to 911Blogger by Reggie Abraham.]

By Elizabeth Woodworth, Professional Librarian

For 50 years the American Behavioral Scientist has been a leading source of behavioral research for the academic world. Its influence is shown by the fact that it is indexed by an extraordinary 67 major database services, causing its papers to be widely exposed on the international scene.

The publisher, Sage, is headquartered in Los Angeles, with offices in London, New Delhi, Singapore, and Washington DC.

Each issue offers comprehensive analysis of a single topic.

The six papers in the February 2010 issue are devoted to the recent concept of "State Crimes Against Democracy (SCAD's)," with emphasis on 9/11 and on how human behavior has failed to recognize its reality. [Ref. abs.sagepub.com/content/vol53/issue6 ]

Original article at http://www.ae911truth.org/info/179