official story

U.S. Court: Negligence not cause of 3rd WTC collapse

By Associated Press - Wednesday, December 4

NEW YORK — Negligence was not the cause of the collapse of a third World Trade Center tower several hours after the twin towers were destroyed in the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, a federal appeals court said Wednesday, absolving a developer and others of responsibility in the destruction of the 47-story building.

The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan said it was “simply incompatible with common sense and experience to hold that defendants were required to design and construct a building that would survive the events of September 11, 2001.”

The 2-to-1 decision upheld the rulings regarding World Trade Center 7 by U.S. District Judge Alvin Hellerstein, who had written that the claims by the Consolidated Edison Co. of New York and its insurance companies were “too farfetched and tenuous” to survive. Con Ed and the insurance companies had claimed that a company owned by developer Larry Silverstein and other defendants could be held liable. Hellerstein had dismissed various defendants in a series of rulings.

The building fell at 5:21 p.m. on Sept. 11, 2001, nearly seven hours after the other buildings collapsed. A Con Edison power station beneath Tower 7 was crushed when the building fell.

Judge Rosemary Pooler wrote in the majority decision that Con Ed’s interpretation of liability would mean that those who designed and constructed the building would presumably be liable if it “collapsed as a result of a fire triggered by a nuclear attack on lower Manhattan.”

The judge wrote that while concepts that would allow an entity to pursue a liability claim “must, by their nature, be fluid, at the end of the day they must engage with reality.”

In a dissent, Judge Richard Wesley said a trial should have been conducted to at least establish from expert testimony why Tower 7 collapsed.

ACTION ALERT: MEDINA CALL BOMB ALL WEEK > Tell Debra Medina She Cannot Slander 9/11 Truth Movement

CALL EVERY HOUR!!
We need Texans to take charge! We will not support her! She is lying and throwing 9/11 Truth under the bus.

WATCH VIDEOS

Debra Medina Campaign
3027 N. Richmond Ste 500A
Wharton, TX 77488
P: 877-WE-TEXANS (877-938-3926)
F: 979-532-5651

Email:

General questions:

contact@medinafortexas.com

Media questions:

press@medinafortexas.com

Speaking invitations:

invite@medinafortexas.com

----------------------------------------------
PLEASE RETWEET on TWITTER:

RT @Visibility911: (video) Debra Medina Throws 9/11 Truth Movement Under the Bus | http://shar.es/mmKd3 | @debMedina #911truth

AND

ACTION ALERT: MEDINA CALL BOMB ALL WEEK > Tell Debra Medina She Cannot Slander 9/11 Truth | @Visibility911 | http://bit.ly/bd30O3

----------------------------------------------

The Official Version of 9/11

I found this comment on a Telegraph article about Charlie Sheen's questions to the President, and just had to re-post it.

***************************

Charlie Sheen will be viewed by history as a very brave individual...

The Official Version of 9/11 goes something like this...

Directed by a beardy-guy from a cave in Afghanistan, nineteen hard-drinking, coke-snorting, devout Muslims enjoy lap dances before their mission to meet Allah...

Using nothing more than craft knifes, they overpower cabin crew, passengers and pilots on four planes...

And hangover or not, they manage to give the world's most sophisticated air defense system the slip...

Unphased by leaving their “How to Fly a Passenger Jet” guide in the car at the airport, they master the controls in no-time and score direct hits on two towers, causing THREE to collapse completely...

One more lie: "liberal media'

Zero-tolerance on altering articles is a good policy; however, that just stopped me from taking the @ out of the author's email to reduce his spam, which i think i've done before; exception warranted?

U.S. intelligence learned in 1998 of a plot to attack the World Trade Center with hijacked airliners and in 1999 of a plot to attack the Pentagon in the same manner. On Aug. 6, five weeks before 9/11, Bush was warned of an imminent attack on the United States. But Bush didn’t bother to put the nation’s defenses on alert, not even when he was told an airliner had hit the World Trade Center.

Nor did he order national defense to action when he was told the nation was under attack. Instead, he lied that there had been no warning and no one imagined airliners being used as bombs, lies he repeated until 2004.

No reporter asked why the mightiest nation the world has known was unable to defend itself from 19 hijackers for an hour and a half.

Oh, the shades and degrees between the OCT and "inside job"

Ron Wieck Agrees to Set Up a Debate Between Me and Mark Roberts

In the AirAmerica comments section appended to the 5/22 Richard Greene show, I offered several polite challenges to Ron Wieck and one or two critiques of his arguments. I got the usual JREFer treatment in response; avoidance or misapprehension of my pointed questions and patronizing, smart-alecky comments. (To be fair, this type of behavior is too common on all sides of this and most other disputes on the internet.)

My comments can be found here: http://airamerica.com/clout/blog/2008/may/22/clout-thursday#comments

(You can find my posts by doing a search in your browser for the name: omniadeo.)

In the course of these exchanges, I offered to debate Wieck, Mackey, Roberts or whomever. Mr. Wieck responded with an acceptance to set up a debate with Mark Roberts. His exact words were, "An unknown, anonymous internet denizen wants to debate Mark Roberts? Sure you do. What's your name? Let's set it up."

Sharon Stone: Truther?

I found this item where Stone says - careful, I'm translating from Spanish, which is in turn a translation from the Arabic here
"I've never believed the official story about the terrorist attacks on the Twin Towers in New York, and I've never believed the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq were a direct consequence of them."
The AP does cite the interview, but only her comments against the wars:

Do 9/11 Conspiracy Theories Upset You? American Chronicle Hit Piece?

http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/viewArticle.asp?articleID=38591
About the Author: Will Stape has written for newspapers,magazines & television, most notably for "Star Trek: The Next Generation" and "Deep Space Nine." He lives in the NYC area.
....................
The 9/11 attacks on the World Trade Center and Pentagon were brainstormed, arranged and executed by dark, shadow agents of the American government seeking to throw us into shock, horror and then rage. Their ultimate goal was US military action in the Middle East.

Theories like the above are all over. Not only do books, magazines and websites spout them, but home brewed films like Loose Change, seek to "uncover truth" about that Tuesday morning in September of 2001. Hollywood celebrities like Charlie Sheen and Rosie O'Donnell have even embraced 9-11 conspiracy theories.

An open letter to Project Censored

re: http://www.911blogger.com/node/9722

An open letter to Project Censored,

I am astounded by the resignation of Project Censored judges Jensen and Solomon in protest of PC's inclusion of the 9/11 research of Steven Jones on its most censored stories list. I fail to understand how Jensen and Solomon could admit that there are significant unanswered 9/11 questions, while stridently opposing research aimed at exploring those questions.

If there were even a five percent chance that the official 9/11 story is untrue, the historic importance of that possibility would dictate that any rational American devote all available time and energy to resolving those doubts, and encouraging any and all potentially relevant research.

In fact, the official story is demonstrably untrue. The FBI has stated and reiterated that Osama Bin Laden, wanted for the African embassy bombings, is "not wanted for 9/11" because there is "no hard evidence" connecting him to 9/11. (See: http://www.teamliberty.net/id267.html)

The Nation of Islam Confronts The 9/11 Myth

The War of Armageddon has begun (Part I) - finalcall.com

"What must America repent for? Her crimes against the Native Americans, for the Trans-Atlantic Slave-trade, for her theft of lands and territories, usually based on lies told by U.S. leaders, throughout the country’s history—from the Boston Tea Party, to the Mexican War, to the Spanish American War, to Vietnam, Cambodia, Grenada, Operation Dessert Storm against Iraq, to serious questions being asked about the real perpetrators of the 9/11 attacks, right up until the current Iraq war and occupation."

The War of Armageddon (Part 2) - finalcall.com

The following is the second installment of excerpts from the speech delivered by the Honorable Minister Louis Farrakhan at Mosque Maryam in Chicago, Ill. on April 8, 2007.

A sobering quote from Farrakhan's speech.

"The U.S. government doesn’t care about killing Americans, if it serves their purpose."

An Example of 9/11 Denial

In January, I visit my high school - a Jesuit college-prep school - and discuss 9/11 Truth with a few of my old teachers. Most were open and receptive. But my sophomore English teacher reacted much more defensively.

After telling her that my political interests had taken me down the 9/11 rabbit hole, I started discussing LIHOP evidence. I didn't have a chance to get to the MIHOP evidence, because as soon as I mentioned the possibility of US officials even doing as much as deliberately looking the other way, she cuts me off and says "Why are ya so paranoid?"

(And the look on her face basically said, Oh honey, you've gone off the deep end. Take some Prozac and some Lithium, and make yourself a nice hot cup of cocoa.)

Smirking Chimp publishes fair "9-11 skeptics" analysis

American Thinker says 9/11 skepticism "extremely dangerous"

 

by PositronicDave | Dec 3 2006

This just in...

AmericanThinker.com's Michael Lopez-Calderon thinks that people who don't buy the government's line about 9/11 are "extremely dangerous" because they might "undermine our democratic nation's war against the theocratic forces of radical, Jihadi-driven Islam".

Ouch.

You can read the full article here:

http://www.smirkingchimp.com/thread/3624

The Columbine-9/11 Connection

The Columbine-9/11 Connection

posted by IT Thursday, November 16, 2006

e-mail: interestingtimes ATSYMBOL xmail PERIOD net
website: http://www.xmail.net/interestingtimes/
blog: http://www.interestingtimes.blogspot.com

April 20th, 1999: The official report is that two disaffected teens, Dylan Klebold and Eric Harris, the more dominant of the two, armed with automatic weapons and pipe bombs, engaged in a massacre of their fellow classmates on school grounds after rigging the campus with improvised explosive devices. The carnage resulted in the deaths of about a dozen teachers and students, including the two shooters. Although no other assailants were involved, Klebold and Harris were members of a violent clique known as the "trench coat mafia" and had produced several dozen videos in which fantasies of such a massacre were expressed, rehearsed and caught on camera. Private gun ownership and rock musician Marilyn Manson were the primary scapegoats. Soon afterwards, a wide-reaching anti-crime bill was rammed through Congress under the pretense that more legislation will protect the public from such disastrous events.

September 11th, 2001: The official report is that nineteen disaffected Arabs led by fanatical Muslim Mohammed Atta, armed with box cutters, engaged in a massacre of a variety of professional people on American soil after hijacking four commercial airliners and flying them into the World Trade Center and Pentagon buildings. The carnage resulted in the death of about three thousand Civil liberties and Osama bin Laden were the primary scapegoats. Soon afterwards, a wide-reaching anti-terrorism bill was rammed through Congress under the pretense that more legislation will protect the public from such disastrous events.