Some footage of the steaming hot pile of rubble that remained after WTC7 imploded.

ABC, September 12, 9:36 AM

archive.org link: http://www.archive.org/details/abc200109120857-0939 (@ 39 minutes)
High quality XviD: http://www.megaupload.com/?d=ILQC26N6

NBC, September 12, 2:25 PM

I entered a post from the worldreports.org site earlier this year on the very bizarre allegations of mega scale financial corruption in the US. See http://www.911blogger.com/node/5345

The story continues to unfold on that website that is scarely reported on, even in the alternative media on the internet. I have been amazed though at the increasing influence of readers of 911blogger.com and the 9-11 Truth movement in general.

I would like to draw people’s attention again to the latest update on that site entitled:
WANTAGATE: GRANDFATHER OF CORRUPTION SCANDALS
WORST FINANCIAL CORRUPTION CRISIS IN WORLD HISTORY

In particular lower down the page to the section on the THE 'MULTIPLE ENQUIRY' OBFUSCATION TECHNIQUE.

In this the writer Christopher Story describes the technique in the European Parliament of dealing with controversies by creating a “public enquiry” which drags on for months without making conclusions, but forms another related enquiry and then another – all of which remain “under investigation” without ever concluding anything.

"I remember getting a call from the, er, fire department commander, telling me that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire, and I said, 'We've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it.' And they made that decision to pull and we watched the building collapse."

Has anyone contacted the FDNY, or Larry Silverstein to try and find out the name of that "fire commander" to try and get a statement from he/she?

Below is an excerpt from an excellent story in the Canadian.

This one is worth sharing with friends who are still sitting on the fence.

9/11 facts on the Sudden Implosion of WTC Building 7 are inconsistent with official Muslim conspiracy scenario

http://www.agoracosmopolitan.com/home/Frontpage/2007/04/03/01472.html

FACT 1: WTC Building 7 was one of the largest buildings in downtown Manhattan. It was 47 stories tall, about half the height of the Towers, and took up an entire city block. It was 300 feet from the closest Twin Tower (the North Tower, WTC 1), and was a steel-framed, concrete structure.4

[http://www.sst911.org]
Justin Martell talks with Presidential Candidate Dennis Kucinich for the third time. In this interview, Kucinich speaks directly to the 9|11 Truth Movement and talks of two key points that himself and his sub-committee will be focusing on in order to open up the investigations into 9|11. At the end of the interview, Kucinich says, "I'm talking about taking a couple small steps - but there will be steps taken.... well you have to start somewhere.... and because I can, I will." Take a look and continue fighting for the truth!

This is an archive to view recent video clips of mainstream media whores attacking Rosie O'Donnell and others for questioning the US government and the official version of 9/11.

http://www.youtube.com/WTPRN

(Thanks goes out to We The People Radio Network for uploading these videos)

A similar archive can be found at this link:

http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=LoudStudios

(Thanks to 911Blogger member StopLying for this page)

If anyone has any related videos they'd like to add to this archive, please post them here.

Joshua Holland has written a snide piece carefully bending the truth in an attempt to maintain the government myth.

Please come over and comment. The more the merrier. Everytime AlterNet runs a 9/11 piece it tops their most commented list and the comments run pro-Truth in greater numbers each time.

We are winning, brothers and sisters, day by day and one person at a time.

I love you all very much.

The truth shall set us free. Love is the only way forward.

http://www.sst911.org

On Monday April 2nd, Justin Martell and Mike Jackman from Student Scholars for 9|11 Truth had the opportunity to attend a Barack Obama campaign event at Keene State. There was opportunity to speak with Barack Obama following his speech, and the video above will speak for itself on the "main stream" candidates' viewpoint on a new investigation into the September 11th attacks.

The above image consists of two shots of WTC7 taken on 9/11. The Left photo is attributed to the NYPD, and is used by NIST as corroboration for eyewitness testimony that suggests that debris from the collapse of the towers caused a specific amount of damage to WTC7. The photo on the Right is by Aman Zafar. The discrepancy is obvious, Zafar's photo does not confirm the visual data in the NYPD photo.

Researchers should petition NIST for provenance on this photo. If the photo was taken with a digital camera as other helicopter shots from 9/11 were, then Exif data should be embedded in the file that will reveal a time-stamp. The original file should also reflect what we see in the NIST drafts, and not bear evidence of tampering in Photoshop or other image editing software. A separate inquiry to the NYPD probably wouldn't hurt. (If you have a connection there, use it.)

Vesa blogged this item yesterday and invites observations and input. truth911.net also blogged it and there is good information in the comments section below the blog entry. DanR over at the Randi Rhodes Message Board posted about this back in December of 2006, after seeing a post here, and that's where I cribbed the source files for the graphic above.

But if it wasn't for "Winston Smith", and his article, Photographic Analysis of Damage to WTC7 and Critical Errors in NIST's Estimations, posted last October, maybe nobody would have noticed this one.

http://www.canada.com/calgaryherald/news/story.html?id=2948e9ba-df6a-478...

Now that Rosie O'Donnell is trying to table it on The View, I guess we can talk about it here.

First, a news quiz: If, some time after the collapse of World Trade Center towers 1 and 2, a 47-storey office building in a major American city also came crashing to the ground, do you think you'd know about it?

Of course, you would.

These comments refer to an article in Inside Edition: http://www.insideedition.com/ourstories/inside_stories/story.aspx?storyi...

From the article:

James Meigs, editor in chief of Popular Mechanics said as much as 25% of the building was scooped out by the falling debris. He added, "There were intense fires that burned inside the building that weakend the steel frame."

OK, let's look at what Meigs is saying:

1) As much as 25% of the building was scooped out by falling debris.
--There is no photo anywhere in the public realm showing 25% damage to this building.
--Even if Meigs' statement were completely true, such damage would cause the building to topple over to the side, not collapse at free-fall speed straight down.

compare these two pictures

NIST Pic:

http://www.members.shaw.ca/truth911/truth911/swcornerdamage.jpg

Aman Zafar's pic:

http://www.members.shaw.ca/truth914/FigD_01.jpg

Comaprison:

http://i47.photobucket.com/albums/f178/myphotos1960/comparedamage1.jpg

that picture is from this guy's website... http://www.amanzafar.com/

here are his pics from 9/11.

http://www.amanzafar.com/WTC/index.shtm

From his website:

Five years since the attacks. A lot of people have visited this site and I have received a lot of E-mails from everyone thanking me for sharing the photographs. I have just got a new scanner so I decided to scan the picture at a higher resolution from the 5x7 prints that I had. The pictures below are thumbnails.

The pictures were taken from my apartment in Jersey. I did not see the two planes hit, but started to take pictures about 3-4 mins after the second one hit.

If you have any comments, please feel free to E-mail me on amanzafar@amanzafar.com

Please also note all these pictures are taken on 35mm film and are copyright of Aman Zafar (i.e. ME!!!!).

The collapse of 7 World Trade Center, video embedded:

• Video: http://www.911research.com/wtc/evidence/videos/docs/wtc7_collapse2.mpg
• More information: http://www.wtc7.net/

Rosie O'Donnell had a great rant yesterday about WTC7, and while she left herself open to criticism by suggesting that fire has never melted steel instead of truthfully pointing out that steel buildings have never collapsed as a result of fire, this was a huge breakthrough for the truth movement. However, many people still have not seen the collapse of WTC7, and unless they dig a little deeper on this site or elsewhere, they still will not see it. Thus my blog post. This video should be posted predominantly on the home page so that visitors new to the truth movement will be immediately confronted with this video.

Hopefully this embed script works, this was posted today on rosie's video blog. Im not sure how often she does this i just noticed the second one of two today, the previous one has no mention of 9/11. YOU GO ROSIE!!!

Scans of original drawings of the North Tower of the World Trade Center have been published online by a coalition of independent 9/11 researchers and journalists.

Berkeley, CA (PRWEB) March 27, 2007 -- A coalition of independent 9/11 investigators and journalists today announced the online publication of a set of original blueprints of the North Tower of the World Trade Center. The set is composed of over 200 never-before-published drawings, including plans, elevations, and details, given to physicist Dr. Steven E. Jones by an individual interested in a more complete analysis. Groups presenting the plans include Scholars for 9/11 Truth and Justice, 9-11 Research, and Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth. A multi-resolution drawing viewer for the blueprints is located at 9-11 Research (http://911research.wtc7.net/).

Richard Gage, AIA, Architect, the founder of Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, said, "We cannot truly understand what happened in these historical structural failure events when we are not allowed access to the construction documents." Gage believes that, given the profound differences in the official collapse theories, the need for more investigation is clear. "First they come up with the "pancake theory", then they changed it to the "column failure theory". We don't believe that either of those theories are supported by the available evidence."