Props to Caustic Logic, creator of The Frustrating Fraud blog for agreeing to accept my challenge to a recorded debate. He has declined to discuss the info over the phone in the past but the fact that he finally agreed does add a notch of credibility/legitimacy to his truth seeking efforts in my opinion.

I must admit it was strange to hear him verbalize his contradictory explanation for the north side evidence.

Although he is a self proclaimed LIHOPer he has stated that he believes the most likely scenario is that all of the CITGO witnesses are part of the conspiracy and are planted operatives put out to spread disinformation that proves the official story false.

The irony in this is that he has to accept this wild conspiracy theory (with no evidence) as a method to dismiss what he asserts is a wild conspiracy theory (that is supported with strong evidence).

http://www.musiciansfor911truth.org/

Musicians for 911 Truth

Welcome to www.musiciansfor911truth.org This website is still in it's initial planning stages and I am in the process of gathering musicians to sign up in support of 911 truth. This website IS a discussion outlet and a place for like minded musicians to explore and share the idea of supporting a REAL investigation into the events surrounding the 911 attack. Popular Mechanics, The 911 Commission Report, NIST and others have not answered the important questions regarding the attacks on 9/11/01. This site will contain music, links, ideas, and real discussion about 911, the war in Iraq, and the Patriot movement as a whole. Please leave your comments and suggestions below as this site gets built.

Send me an email and I will add a link to you or your band's website:

Send me an email at:

admin@musiciansfor911truth.org

Author Naomi Wolf draws parallels between nascent fascist states and the United States. This is not necessarily a 9/11 video, but the relationship should be obvious. This recent interview sums up her point of view, very interesting and informed perspective. Here's a little photo essay to go along.

Two frequent contributors to 911blogger.com have published letters in the Journal of 9/11 Studies: George Washington and Reprehensor.

"The legal principle called "burden of proof" can help 9/11 activists to be more effective in promoting 9/11 truth and in obtaining justice against all of the perpetrators of those attacks." -- found in "Burden of Proof" by Geo. Washington: http://journalof911studies.com/letters/f/BurdenofProof.pdf

A new topic has been opened in the Letters section of the Journal to encourage well-written letters to Senators and Representatives. Reprehensor's "Open Letter to Jane Harman, Re: Terrorism and the Internet" is an example of such a letter. It is found here: http://journalof911studies.com/letters/f/LettertoJaneHarmanUSCongress.pdf

The editors of the Journal of 9/11 Studies encourage submission of well-researched and written articles such as these, to commence the peer-review process. All papers are peer-reviewed, unless an exception (very rare) is granted by the editors and then a disclaimer is added to the posted paper. Information on where to submit papers is found here: http://journalof911studies.com/contact.html .