Will Jimeno, Port Authority Police officer, will be speaking about his experience of being one of the last individuals to be rescued from the WTC complex on Sept. 11th at my college on Oct. 2nd. I am interested in asking a question that relates to the ground level explosions prior to the collapse of Tower 2. Will Jimeno has made it perfectly clear that he witnessed these explosions. Here are a few sources:
"That's when we heard a humungous boom. I turned around from were we came and I could look out into the lobby of 2 and I just saw a humungous fireball I mean the size of my house."
"I looked out onto the street and saw a fireball the size of my house hit the pavement."
John McLoughlin who was also trapped with Jimeno mentioned witnessing explosions too.
"We heard a loud explosion coming from the area of Building 2 and at that point Building 2 was collapsing."
Once people on the ground found out that planes were hijacked, should there have been an attempt to coax them down? Should there have been an attempt to find out their intentions, and or demands? If there was an attempt, and I just don't know about it, where do those tapes exist? If there wasn't an attempt, and it should have been done, then why wasn't it?
I would think, if it were me, I would sharply look at Andrew Card in disbelief, and say... "WHAT DO YOU MEAN AMERICA IS UNDER ATTACK? WHAT THE HELL IS GOING ON? WHAT'S THE SITUATION?" I don't think I would care how many cameras were on me, or how many children were around. Or, I would say, "Children, I have to leave, some thing's come up", and walk out of the classroom, and THEN say, "WHAT DO YOU MEAN AMERICA IS UNDER ATTACK? WHAT THE HELL IS GOING ON? WHAT'S THE SITUATION?"
How do you think you would react? If you were the President of the United States, sitting in a classroom full of children with multiple cameras on you, and your Chief of Staff whispers in your ear “a second plane hit the second tower. America is under attack", how would you react?
I'm curious as to what people think they would do.
I know the story, but I want the absolute proof. Anyone? It's not hard to prove Cheney was "in charge" that day, however, it is hard to prove he was involved with the wargames. At least, that's what I've found the case to be.
Dick Cheney and the Secret Service
Cheney was Commander in Chief on 9/11 calling the shots via Secret Service.
- Secret Service has the legal authority to take supreme command over all agencies in the United States in time of a national emergency on U.S. soil. Even the Air Force recognizes Secret Service supremacy.
- Secret Service has the highest technological communication systems of any agency in the U.S. - as it should.
- On 9/11 Secret Service had the technology to see FAA radar screens in real time.
- Secret Service was in the decision-making loop as early as 8:15am on 9/11, no later than 8:45am.
Who are you going to trust to arrive at the truth regarding 9/11 and to prosecute the real criminals:
The government tortured a guy who was already crazy, and then used his "confession" as the basis for much of the official version of 9/11
The "official" version of events was crafted to protect the Bush administration
Bush, Cheney and other top administration officials claimed and continue to claim that Saddam was behind 9/11 (and used that as one of the main justifications for the Iraq war), even though they were informed that there was no link
The U.S. is using a 'Kangaroo court' to prosecute the men accused of a role in September 11 attacks, and will switch off their microphones if they say anything which questions the government's version of events
[Update: Are the world's largest bond insurers collapsing? Take a look for yourself.]
Preface: I am truly sorry for the suffering of those Americans who will lose their home, their job, or their life savings as a result of the economic crash. This article focuses on one potential silver lining -- an opportunity to promote truth and justice.
Will the crash wake Americans up from their comfortable slumber and make them question their government more? Stalin said that dictatorships only last so long as the dictators keep their people well-fed. Americans have been strongly motivated not to question the government because they have been led to believe that if they just follow the party line, they'll get nice jobs, make a bundle of dough, buy into "the American dream". A crash has the possibility to awaken Americans from their dangerously cozy nap.
In the 9/11 Report, in order to protect the identity of an intelligence asset, they would sometimes refer to people as simply "John", "Mary", etc... "We will call him "John". Have their identities been revealed?
The people harassing 9/11 activists also appear to be those promoting the theories that (1) directed energy weapons brought down the Twin Towers and/or (2) the videos of Boeings crashing into the Twin Towers were fake.
Many of us have emails and phone messages of threats of physical violence (direct or implied), harassment and intimidation against us. We are not whiners. In fact, we have largely held our tongues on the threats and intimidation we have received, because we did not want to make a mountain out of a molehill or distract the 9/11 movement.
But videos are now appearing on the web impliedly advocating violence or harassment against certain 9/11 activists, and listing their home addresses and phone numbers. Who made the videos? Folks promoting the theories that (1) directed energy weapons brought down the Twin Towers and/or (2) the videos of Boeings crashing into the Twin Towers were fake.
Is there any importance in the fact that those doing the intimidation happen to also be promoting the above theories?
Be a Part of HuffPost's Online-Only Presidential Candidate Mashup
What's a candidate mashup? It's a new kind of campaign forum that will put you in charge of shaping exactly what kind of viewing experience you want to have -- from the questions that are asked to the way you can pick and choose the issues you want to hear about and the candidates you want to hear from.
Here's how it will work: Charlie Rose, armed with questions you have sent in, will have a conversation with each of the candidates (more on these questions in a minute). The intimacy that Charlie always brings to his conversations is the perfect compliment to the intimacy, directness, and authenticity that were the hallmark of so many of the public's YouTube questions.
After the candidates have finished talking, the video will be coded and put at your disposal -- empowering you to create the candidate mashups of your choosing.
9-11 truth exposes the US Govt as corrupt at the highest levels, knowledge of it is frightening in it's implications. If you believe in 9-11 truth, can you trust the executive branch, congress, the judiciary? Do you tell the cops, or the army? 9-11 truth forces you in a position where you lose all familiar references. You end up on your own wits and no clear leader to follow or guide you. Some people are OK with that, they figure the truth out for themselves or the best of it that they can get and run with it. Other people however could be shutting 9-11 knowledge out of their system as a consequence. Is a leader for 9-11 truth the missing ingredient to achieve that elusive critical mass?
"Ok, now here's your chance: Put your question to the people in charge of this world, and they might just answer.
The BBC has joined the Davos Conversation, linking up with the organisers of the World Economic Forum, plus Buzzmachine, the Guardian newspaper, Huffington Post and Daylife.
Send us a video with your question - don't worry about the technology a webcam recording will do - and the Davos organisers have promised to put a selection of your questions to the presidents, prime ministers and top company bosses coming to Davos."
you know what to do peeps :-)