Aidan Monaghan of 911Blogger.com joins The Corbett Report to discuss his tireless efforts to uncover government documents about 9/11 via FOIA requests. We discuss some of the information he has uncovered and how others can follow in this fruitful area of research.

Download the mp3

I LOVED Anthony's "This is an Orange" and now, here's another fantastic piece from him.
Please forward far and wide in order to wake up more!!
And let's THANK Salem-News.com. ;O)

Email Salem-News.com:
Newsroom: newsroom@salem-news.com
http://salem-news.com/pages/Contact_Salem-News.php

Views of flight 175 Courtesy: bollyn.com

Mar-18-2010 14:21
A Little Known Fact About the 9/11 Planes
Anthony Lawson for Salem-News.com

Another seriously undeniable flaw in the 'official' 9/11 story.
http://www.salem-news.com/articles/march182010/911-planes-al.php

Anything to do with 9/11, 2001?

ATL00FA091A
HISTORY OF FLIGHT
http://www.ntsb.gov/ntsb/brief2.asp?ev_id=20001212X21903&ntsbno=ATL00FA0...

On September 11, 2000, at 1246 eastern daylight time, a PA-28-161 (Cherokee), N9208N, and a PA-23-250 (Aztec), N54235, collided on final approach to land on runway 09 at the Saint Lucie International Airport in Fort Pierce, Florida. The Cherokee was operated by Flight Safety International and the Aztec was operated by the airline transport pilot under the provisions of Title 14 CFR Part 91 with no flight plans filed. Visual weather conditions prevailed at the time of the collision. The air transport pilot onboard the Aztec, and the private pilot, a Saudi Arabian citizen, onboard the Cherokee, both received fatal injuries. Both airplanes were destroyed. The Cherokee instructional flight departed Vero Beach, Florida, on a solo training flight at approximately 1220, and the Aztec departed Okeechobee, Florida, after refueling, at approximately 1230.

OpEdNews

Original Content at http://www.opednews.com/articles/genera_rob_bals_080420_9_2f11_3a_united...

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
April 20, 2008

9/11: UNITED 93 DATA PROVIDED BY US GOVERNMENT DOES NOT SUPPORT OBSERVED EVENTS

By rob balsamo

PRESS RELEASE

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

PILOTS FOR 9/11 TRUTH
www.pilotsfor911truth.org

Contact: Robert Balsamo
e-mail: pilots@pilotsfor911truth.org

UNITED 93 DATA PROVIDED BY US GOVERNMENT DOES NOT SUPPORT OBSERVED EVENTS
Pilots for 9/11 Truth, an international organization of pilots and aviation professionals, petitioned the National Transportation and Safety Board (NTSB) via the Freedom of Information Act to obtain United Flight 93 Flight Data Recorder information, consisting of a Comma Separated Value (CSV) file and Flight Path Animation, allegedly derived from Flight 93 Flight Data Recorder (FDR). The data provided by the NTSB contradict observed events in several significant ways:

The NTSB Flight Path Animation approach path and altitude does not support observations.

Contained within a March 14, 2008 "DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME TO RESPOND TO AMENDED COMPLAINT" with the Nevada District U.S. Court, concerning a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit (Case #: 2:07-cv-01614-RCJ-GWF) to compel the production of Federal Bureau of Investigation records concerning the four aircraft involved in the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, Assistant U.S. Attorney Patrick A. Rose has indicated on behalf of the FBI, that records indicating the collection and positive identification of recovered wreckage created by these federally registered aircraft, were not located. Such wreckage includes the Flight Data Recorders (FDRs) of American Airlines flight 77 and United Airlines flight 93, for which no inventory control serial numbers were publically assigned.

Defendant's motion reads in part:

"Since being served with the Summons and Amended Complaint, Federal Defendant, with assistance of its attorneys, has analyzed Plaintiff’s request and conducted a search for responsive records. Federal Defendant has determined that there are no responsive records. The identities of the airplanes hijacked in the September 11 attacks was never in question, and, therefore, there were no records generated “revealing the process by which wreckage recovered by defendant, from aircraft used during the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, was positively identified by defendant . . . as belonging to said aircraft . . .” (Amend Compl. Inj. Relief #15 at 1.)"

[
UPDATE: THE NTSB MADE THE FILES DISAPPEAR FROM THEIR WEBSITE AFTER THIS ARTICLE WAS WRITTEN. I HAVE UPLOADED THE PDF FILES TO THE INTERNET ARCHIVE, HERE:

http://www.archive.org/details/NtsbfactualReportDocumentsFromSeptember11...
]

Hold onto your boxers.

According to the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB.GOV), Flight 175 originated not at Logan airport. No. But at the BOSTON HELIPORT, CODE 1MA3.

http://www.ntsb.gov/ntsb/GenPDF.asp?id=DCA01MA063&rpt=fa

The code for Logan is "BOS," not "1MA3." Check list:

http://creports.capnhq.gov/airfield/airportselection.asp?state=MA

I did not personally discover this info. It was posted several places including Pilots for 911 Truth. Another poster suggested that the heliport was actually closed at that time.

http://progressiveindependent.com/dc/dcboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=218&...

However, I did the obvious thing, and looked into what they said about Flight 11, also supposedly out of Boston.

...

Do you want to know?

http://www.ntsb.gov/ntsb/GenPDF.asp?id=DCA01MA060&rpt=fa

This is my "Holy Fucking Shit" moment of the week.

http://pilotsfor911truth.org

I called the NTSB yesterday regarding a general inquiry into how they produce their animations for investigation. I did not intend to ask any question with regard to Sept 11. It was a general inquiry...

This was their reply...

Subject: September 11 products
Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 15:56:44 -0400
From: "Lopatkiewicz Ted" Add to Address Book Add Mobile Alert
To: pilotsfortruth@yahoo.com
Mr. Balsamo:
I understand that you have recently contacted Mr. Doug Brazy of our staff to inquire about work done following the September 11 terrorist attacks. As you well know, we supported the Federal Bureau of Investigation's investigation into those attacks. Our work product was done on their behalf. Under the Freedom of Information Act, we have released some of that work product, and it can be found on our website. Because this work was done to support another agency, we are not commenting on it, and would refer all inquiries to the FBI. Any future contact with our agency on this matter should be conducted through established FOIA procedures. Please do not contact any NTSB employees directly on this matter.

Ted Lopatkiewicz
Director of Public Affairs
NTSB

A new video just released by Piots for 9/11 Truth documenting an interview conducted with the NTSB's Jim Ritter about the flight data recording for Flight 77 and the NTSB simulation based on it. Please watch, recommend and spread the word on this one! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YPF4Lo4wkJ4

http://z9.invisionfree.com/Pilots_For_Truth/
http://pilotsfor911truth.com/

Along with the recently released Flight 77 video, there were some documents released by the NTSB that I haven't seen before. Perhaps there are some researchers out there who haven't seen the attachments below either;

(Note: The following documents are in PDF format. You will need to download and install the free Adobe Acrobat Reader to view.)

Debris Trajectory Study--UA175 - 5.12 MB

Radar Data Impact Speed Study--AA11, UA175 - 9.14 MB

Recorded Radar Data Study--all four aircraft - 8.17 MB

Video Data Impact Speed Study--UA175 - 7.99 MB

NTSB Release August 22 2006 - 911myths.com

On the 2nd of July we submitted an FOIA request to the NTSB, asking for the document "Flight Path Study - American Airlines Flight 77", as cited in footnotes to the 9/11 Commission Report. The idea was to get a clearer idea of the final approach trajectory, and we were hopeful of success, as it seemed hard to imagine why this information could possibly be witheld any longer.

We weren’t alone, though, and a few days ago this same report (and plenty more) was released to the National Security Archive. If you’re interested in the details and haven’t grabbed their documents yet, then read those first.

It seemed our application was suddenly irrelevant, then. But maybe not. Soon afterwards a package turned up from the NTSB, and it did have more information than we’d expected.

Thanks JT for the heads up!